Comments by "ootmaster1" (@ootmaster1) on "Refuting Bidens Superstitious Paranoia About Fossil Fuel" video.

  1.  @DHTHORNE  the green energy stuff has always been government market manipuation and ways to pay certian people off. Wastes of money.
    2
  2. Yeah internal combustion hasnt changed much in 100 years.... 80s hondas were getting 45 mpgs
    2
  3. Repeat ad nauseam for 50 years
    2
  4. What? So green evergy pushes and government plans are big oils fault?
    1
  5. Lol what
    1
  6.  @cedricrust9953  explain to me how fossil fuels are a more pressing issue than global governmental corruption infecting everything on the planet molding into a one world government
    1
  7.  @cedricrust9953  "could you elaborate about what you mean by "one world government"? What would you like me to elaborate? What part of a one world government needs elaborating? This is the path of globalism... "Rising temperatures and climatic change are already causing draughts and other problems, in the next decades densely populated coastal areas around the world will be flooded." Ahh yes the same stories ive had screamed in my ear for over 20 years now... SPOILER WARNING we arent changing the earths climate as much as you think we are... also, C02 isnt exactly poison... And destroying energy infrastructure and enforcing carbon tax credits isnt going to do anything but enable corruption and consolidation of power globally... "If you thought there was a refugee crisis over the last couple years, wait till tens of millions of prople in South Asia flee their homes, and I don't think that Bangladesh, for instance, can just resettle them elsewhere in their already crowded country" And you seem to think its my obligation to let them in? fuck off and fuck no. calling mass migrations of people ' climate refugees" is the biggest load of trash ive heard since H-dawg was running for president.. Without any human interaction the climate would still change and there is nothing we can do about it. This is just more nonsense doomsday predictions. like no more polar bears, or the oceans will rise 20 feet and eat up florida... same bullshit for decades and its all about government power and money
    1
  8.  @cedricrust9953  yes, I need you to shownme what institutions exactly consitute this "one world government". I suppose you mean the UN, which is funny because whenever it votes against the US, the US just ignores it anyway or uses its veto power. Yeah im talking about unofficial institutions. Like the Bilderberg group or the council on foreign relations, or the trilateral commission Also, those aren't things "I think", they are conclusions drawn by scientists and can be looked up in the scientific literature. What specifically? If you really think scientists are all corrupt because they want research funds from the government (which are pretry competitive) while they could make fortunes spewing corporate propaganda for various oil companies to protect their short-term profites... yeah, not very convincing. Yeah imagine thinking unlimited government money isnt more enticing than finite corporate money. Also ignoring the clear issue in the higher institutions of studies and research being unable to be replicated, and the infestation of marxism into higher learning "Also, as I said, even if you don't care about people elsewhere, it will have an effect on the US anyway. The east coast has plenty of land that'd be under water eventually. If other countries suffer, this will also affect the world economy. " Yeah and 40 years ago florida was supposed to be under water and the icecaps would be gone and polar bears would be all dead. yet nothing happened and the same climate alarmist that gets pumped out decade after decade to fuel government run programs with tax dollars is just another brick in the wall Not to.mention that transitioning to green energies coupled with infrasctructure spending (hello there public traffic), which Trump has promised to do but didn't, would be stimulating the job market Green energy is a joke.... also infrastructure*
    1
  9.  Rxslinger  yes
    1
  10. Lol never gonna happen
    1
  11.  @testicularoxide5055  because its relative. relative to the arbitrary emissions standards implemented in automobile manufacturing as well as relative to the emissions of competitors cars or others in wide use. im sure we could get more efficiency if we werent so focuses on the emissions end as well as being in bed with government agencies anyway
    1
  12. Solar shingles? bahahahaha
    1