Comments by "ootmaster1" (@ootmaster1) on "Elizabeth Warren Calls for Literal Open Borders" video.

@Betta66 ok. Dont care. Your fleeing violence line is just emotional manipulation. There are plenty of other countries to choose from, but they all dont have generous benefits and massive state wide pandering. How is this not defacto open borders? What is to stop them of we cant jail them for border hopping? You expect this country to take care of the entire 3rd world??
7
@Betta66 no. I dont care.... 600k a year??? And you think that this would be sustainable?? Are you kidding me? Turn them around and send them home...
6
@Betta66 HAH AHAHA where cite it, i have the entire fucking report in my lap printed out in its entirety.... wanna talk about crowdstrike? or facebook pagesand twitter bots.....
5
@Betta66 Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is the latest2020 Democrat to be in favor of decriminalizing border crossing as the field of candidates continue to move left on immigration.
4
@Betta66 dont break the law and you wont be treated like a criminal
4
@Betta66 "if you let your enemies beat you, you win"
4
@Betta66 wow nice strawman but no, in all seriousness i dont watch fox news for the same reason i dont watch cnn... Yes, the country is in danger. 20+ million illegals already in the country, could be more, we dont actually know. in 2 years 1 million more were at least encountered by border patrol... If you dont think that is alarming i dont know what to tell you... This isnt even touching on issues of crime, drugs, etc etc etc... this is about national identity and not having a porous border with another country. What do you think will happen to the rest of the country? at what point is it a problem for you?
4
@Betta66 Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., is the latest2020 Democrat to be in favor of decriminalizing border crossing as the field of candidates continue to move left on immigration. What is this? What about the part where they want to streamline undocumented immigrants in through the system.....
4
@Betta66 those are also only the ones who were in custody of border control... So yeah totally representative of the illegal border crossing problem.....
3
@Betta66 because different studies look at different things... and of course you arent going to get an accurate number, but that isnt even the point...
3
@Betta66 "You know for a fact that everyone who isn't in custody of Border Control is traveling with a kid who isn't actually theirs?" why would you ask an impossible question based off of something i never said? could i be you are a dishonest shill? or a brain dead moron who is letting people exploit your sympathy
2
@Betta66 And you think a border wall would stop that? yes
2
@Betta66 the plan isnt 100% foolproof, better do nothing wow, big brain power here
2
@Betta66 and there are LITERAL MILES of un walled un border fenced sections of the border that arent the things you described.... why are you so painfully ignorant of the issues you keep talking about?
2
Norman Anderson w h e w laddie if you arent a glowie, youve gotten too close and you emit residual glow
2
COOCHIE-PUNCH 5000 siiiiiiiip yup, those were the days
2
@Betta66 When the country is in danger, and the people pointing this out are the ones living here, maybe there is a problem... Nope not to you
2
@Betta66 " but most people crossing the border these days are Central Americans, not Mexicans." and africians, and middle easterners, etc etc etc...
2
@Betta66 dude, i read the page, you spoke out of your fucking ass. Please illustrate how the FBI had a thorough investigation of the " hacking" if they were never given access to the server, and the only information the FBI has is from Crowdstrike, a private security firm paid for by the DNC... the " social media influence" campaign was a few thousand twitter bots, and a few thousand dollars spend on pro trump AND pro Hillary ads. If you honestly want to discuss these things, by all means.... but if you are gonna keep being disingenuous.....
2
@Betta66 "more than 600,000 people encountered by immigration officials at the US border this year" i direct fucking quote from you... i never said money or dollar amounts to dishonest twat... " sending them back is a bad idea" i dont care! its NOT MY PROBLEM... Maybe they should go somewhere else? oh wait, they wont because we KEEP GIVING THEM SHIT
1
@Betta66 wait so in 2 years that a million people and thats not a problem? "The implication being you know for a fact that the numbers aren't representative of the true scope of immigration" No its understanding that there is more iceberg than you can see from above water... If its a million people getting caught trying to enter every couple years, what does that mean about the people who dont get caught? What about the estimated 20+ million illegals already in the country? those are just the ones we know about.... why are you sitting there with the " out of sight out of mind" mentality while at the same time being so anti solution...
1
@Betta66 It doesnt matter. they dont need to be violent acts to be acts that undermine and hurt my country... and the best solution is a nice wall/border... good fences make good neighbors
1
No. Why should they
1
@rusticoaf right but when one side can import voters, how will that matter?
1
@Betta66 what is the end result of not jailing and criminalizing border hoppers? De facto open borders...
1
@Betta66 maybe we should just lock the doors and throw them out instead
1
@Betta66 we could i dunno. Build a fucking wall and lock the fucking doors..... Why do we have to keep capitulating to the poor of the world? You do understand the reason why life boats have a carrying capacity right? Same thing
1
@Betta66 a wall will not have the benefits you think it will well we can ask isreal about their border, or maybe hungary... I dont understand why you would be opposed to a wall in the first place. secondly, obviously the gun laws didnt work in NZ because laws arent going to stop things like that. thats what the pro gun people keep trying to articulate, but it falls on deaf ears
1
@Betta66 its not that walls work its that things work with the wall sort of the point i was making. how would you be able to stop them if there isnt a physical barrier in place? or are you just going to ignore that they work
1
@Betta66 and you havent even bothered to SHOW how it WONT work... all you say is its not 100% effective so dont bother
1
@Betta66 If the tunnel concern is still an issue, then how does that make the wall a good idea? yes... are you being paid to be this stupid?
1
@Betta66 Before the walls, migrants traveled in groups, with or without the help of smugglers wow so walls stopped them from just walking over? holy fuck imagine my shock, walls work! * Now, paying a smuggler is the only way to avoid border guards and pass barriers* Hmm seems like fixing laws and cleaning house of corruption is the next solution. i cant help but imagine the EUs " diversity workplace" is in ANY WAY a helping the situation... why are you such a disingenuous liar?
1
Free speech isnt progressive
1
@Betta66 *He didnt evidence for his claim" i printed it so i could read it and use it for quick reference... so do you want to talk about crowdstrike or not?
1
@Betta66 you didnt cite anything from the report to back up your claim we dont need to let ANY of them in....
1
@Betta66 you just said in a quote, about 600k a year... and that is just the opnes accounted for... that isnt even a fraction of the total that want to come, and thats already far too many people... there are other options than letting millions and millions of poor third worlders to flood into the country killing wage growth in time for mass automation, inflating goods commodities and housing prices, and finally leaching off of the public services that they have never paid for, and long term use more than they pay in... page 12? you mean page 4.. the social media campaign? where they bought ads for hillary AND trump? or are we talking about the twitter bot farms? Or are we talking about the gru attack? the one where the FBI never had access to the servers, and the only official information is from Crowdstrike? a private security firm paid for by the DNC itself? Really though, which part was the russians influencing the election?
1
@Betta66 fuck you you dishonest fuckhead just because you count the front cover and the indexes as pages doesnt mean the page you quote is page fucking 12 of the report.. like, look at the fucking bottom of the page and find the little 4...
1
@Betta66 how do you justify being so wrong?
1