Comments by "ootmaster1" (@ootmaster1) on "5 Facts About Coups D’Etat" video.

  1. corruption, fraud, central banks, internationalists, and foreign interference are dangerous to a REPUBLIC
    16
  2.  @cthulhutheendless1587  she was shot by some coward security officer
    9
  3. "nothing to see here" gimmie a break
    6
  4.  @TheHauntedKiwi  fentanyl made his own bed, " the election was not actually stolen" NOTHING TO SEE HERE
    5
  5.  @ec6621  The spikes in penn, the USB hand off in georgia with the ballot boxes under tables and people told to go home. hundreds of singed affidavits. dominion... yet every mainstream outlet DEBOONKS everything with non answers and misdirection about what was happening
    5
  6.  @kharissmarrow  nonsense
    4
  7. ​ @babecat2000  "russia stole the 2016 election" reality? lol i guess its different now, elections are super duper secure and no fraud happened
    4
  8. it was a peaceful protest without fires
    4
  9.  @babecat2000  RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA for for years there was no proof, yet we had spent millions in investigations... 2020? nope, nothing to see here
    4
  10. nope, thats peaceful protesting
    4
  11. " white supreeeeems" laughable
    4
  12.  @babecat2000  you must be looking in a mirror
    3
  13. they had the wrong color hats on. if they were black power fists, it would be empowering, and they would take more photos, have a luncheon, give people awards, and invite obama
    3
  14.  @babecat2000  "you dont need to see our passports" "these are not the droids you are looking for" "there is nothing behind the curtain" cmon now
    3
  15. "protests are the tools of the unheard" aoc probably
    3
  16. " i want to do research" also you " spoon feed me information" this is why no one bothers
    3
  17. she lost because she is a slimy warhawk crook... she should be rotting in prison, but there is no justice in the justice system
    3
  18.  @colbywellens5587  laughable of you think this election was free clear and above board
    3
  19.  @babecat2000  If i ignore everything there is no fraud " nothing to see here" so sleepy
    3
  20.  @TheHauntedKiwi  "If we refuse to look at the evidence, it doesnt exist" cmon man
    3
  21. crazy how that works right?
    3
  22.  @babecat2000  quit watching billionaire funded news stations...
    3
  23.  @ijfdse  wow tough talk coming from a keyboard coward
    3
  24.  @gregpahren7441  lol
    3
  25. nah, stay for the comment section =D
    2
  26. imagine thinking there was no voter fraud in the 2020 election
    2
  27.  @TheHauntedKiwi  " the establishment investigated itself, and fount the establishment did nothing wrong" zzzzzzzzz
    2
  28.  @MonsieurBiga  adhom right off the bat amazing why you think this way... " lack of evidence" sure if i ignore it its not there anywmore
    2
  29.  @davishollis898  its the peoples house, and the peoples employees.
    2
  30.  @davishollis898  law and order implies the government follows it too... which it doesnt, so its really a moot point now isnt it
    2
  31.  @davishollis898  well, because it doesnt work anymore now does it
    2
  32. there will be a time when the whole world has gone mad, and the sane man will be cast out as a lunatic
    2
  33.  @babecat2000  no u
    2
  34.  @pepperoninipples1178  uhh screeching in tears in the street isnt the same as storming a government building. screaming russia stole the election ad trumps not my president for 4 years is fine right? or is that whataboutism now. what about when the lefties stormed government buildings? more whatabout ism?
    2
  35.  @cthulhutheendless1587  cool, i guess if i say dehumanizing your political opponents, is bad, youll slap me with some whataboutism eh?
    2
  36.  @jkarma3356  " you never read it" show me where im wrong. i have the entire thing sitting on my desk... its about 4 inches of paper
    2
  37.  @MonsieurBiga  well when the peoples voice is repeatedly ignored, maybe they need some face to face meetings....
    2
  38.  @jkarma3356  at least most people can agree Reagan nixon and bush sucked
    2
  39. its only going to get worse from here, dont commit wrongthink!
    2
  40.  @ec6621  Ill copy past my last response to you " Im not going to bother doing that because you arent even looking into anything right now... "
    2
  41.  @ec6621  1. i watched the elections till 3:30 am. there was no way there was that man votes added and counted in that short of a time. you want more actual information, look it up 2. You mean the video of them pulling boxes out from under a table after telling poll watchers to go home? you mean the video that you can easily look up yourself? 3. " poll watchers told to go home, votes keep being counted" this is why this is relevant 4. Signed affidavits under oath are evidence 5. They have been found to switch votes, and can be remote hacked... all of this you can look up instead of playing 20 questions while asking top be spoon fed information
    2
  42.  @jkarma3356  if i keep ignoring evidence, it doesnt exist we usually pass the object permanence stage at age 2...
    1
  43.  @andersonteo7415  if i repeat msm talking points and ignore reality i win Lol k
    1
  44.  @davideassis87  sure, you can look up all the evidence you want. the video clips, the odd vote totals, the dead mail ins, sending poll watchers home, dominion, hundreds of signed under oath affidavits....
    1
  45.  @davideassis87  "if the establishment investigates itself and finds no wrong doing who am i to second guess the establishment" There is no justice in the justice department. You can look uo all you want. If you want to listen to the media outlets propaganda go ahead
    1
  46.  @davideassis87  you are just a dishonest person. If you werent yoh wouldnt act like you do
    1
  47.  @davideassis87  plenty of proof but not if you ignore it
    1
  48.  @davideassis87  imagine just ignoring things because the news tells you to
    1
  49.  @davideassis87  biden isnt gonna be pres you mook. Its gonna be pres harris in 8 months
    1
  50.  @davideassis87  trump didnt tell me anything. But thanks for letting me know you dont look i to anything unless your told it. Bahh bahh
    1
  51.  @davideassis87  guess we can have our 4 years of not my president and endless court hearings
    1
  52.  @davideassis87  imagine coping this hard about an entire establisments corruption.... I bet they love shmucks like you =)
    1
  53.  @BigBismark  by accident? the " guard" popped out and shot her like a coward as he hid behind stuff
    1
  54.  @babecat2000  just like how bernie lost the dem race? oh wait they cheated him then too. come back to me when this happens to someone you like in the future
    1
  55.  @cthulhutheendless1587  but we are a republic
    1
  56.  @ec6621  Im not going to bother doing that because you arent even looking into anything right now...
    1
  57.  @babecat2000  if i dont look into it, it doesnt exist snore
    1
  58.  @ec6621  The spikes in penn, the USB hand off in georgia with the ballot boxes under tables and people told to go home. hundreds of singed affidavits. dominion... yet every mainstream outlet DEBOONKS everything with non answers and misdirection about what was happening
    1
  59.  @awesomesauce5974  no its literally not, even if q anon is nonsense ( im 99% sure its bs) this has nothing to do with it
    1
  60.  @ec6621  not gonna copy paste it again
    1
  61.  @ec6621  TLDR DEBOOONKED yup nothing happened here, just the most bizarre election weve had in history. not only did biden beat first term obama, he did it in only a handful of states, while underperforming literally everywhere else. nevermind the bellweathers
    1
  62.  Sinochu  first off, the reason they exist is because they were accurate. yes they change, no thats not an excuse here...
    1
  63.  Sinochu  dismissals k
    1
  64.  @MrPuzzles  and over 30 people died in blm and other leftist riots as well as billions in damages. And only 2 deaths i know are confirmed. The protester shot by a coward and a cop who was attacked and doed later
    1
  65.  @howdydoodilly6812  " take control" sure keep up the mass delusion
    1
  66.  @howdydoodilly6812  they went there to tell these liars that they are tired of being lied to " a woman was shot to death" yeah by a guard who was a coward
    1
  67.  @howdydoodilly6812  he didnt say shit. What video were you watchi g?
    1
  68. Nope. Thats what they call whataboutism when you bring it up lol
    1
  69.  @pepperoninipples1178  well when the left sets the rules of engagement, with the backing of the establishment, why is it wrong when its a different group of people?
    1
  70.  @pepperoninipples1178  not even close... maybe if they were burning offices down and looting nearby stores, while locking police inside or hurling fireworks at them maybe, but none of that happened,
    1
  71.  @pepperoninipples1178  i mean, right off the top of my head there was the Kavanagh hearings there are countless others, but im not gonna bother looking them up because i know you wouldnt care either way, otherwise you would have looked it up yourself.
    1
  72.  @pepperoninipples1178  agree with what that the news are liars?
    1
  73.  @pepperoninipples1178  been doing that for longer than alot of us have been alive
    1
  74.  @Bayard1503  international travel hasnt stopped, what the fuck are you on about?
    1
  75. Whytee nationalism? But das racis
    1
  76. Laughable
    1
  77. MSM has a short memory
    1
  78.  @jkarma3356  where is teh evidence of muh russia? i have the mueller report on my desk
    1
  79. I mean they were and one just got busted. But keep on keepin on
    1
  80.  @noproki2838  you arw a joke. Here is your yuan for your shilling
    1
  81.  @noproki2838  paria climate accord is a joke
    1
  82.  @ec6621  I guarantee you didnt look into anything, and just read the first few results in google 1 " spike in dem votes" sure, a spike, not enough to change a 600k vote lead, and totally blows out every statistical voting year 2 "why wasnt the case heard" because it was " deboonked" by the media and the cases dismissed on process garbage " doesnt look nefarious" as they pull out boxes from under the table after they said they were done counting for the night? gtfo 3 " non zero number" this tells us nothing about people being to told to go home. again, misdirection of what the claim is to " deboonk" it 4 " they are evidence but thats not good enough" yeah sure it isnt 5 " thats quite a substantial claim" and its real, and happened, and you can look this up, but you arent for SOME REASON "deboonked" yeah im so tired of this game
    1
  83.  @ec6621  1. no its never happened before. 2. "cutters" what? thats now what i saw also yes, they were told to leave, it was even reported on the news 3. many did leave? why would they lie? 4. well if you had 32 affidavits that say she was graped, im going to assume safely that she was graped 5" i know you believe it but why" because it is, and it happened, and im tired of being gaslit
    1
  84.  @ec6621  Obvs i never got a notification 1. total number of votes isnt the anomaly, its literally everything else. 2. I know what a cutter is, thats not what i saw on the video 3. yeah nothing of substance said 4. except it isnt he said she said, its " i saw this happening" and there was zero investigation and most of everything was tossed out of court for various reasons. 5. "So I’m asking you, repeatedly, what convinces you of this? What is the evidence? Or are you essentially saying “I believe because I believe”, as if belief on its own is evidence?" I already answered, you dismiss evidence, and then ask for more evidence. kinda done with this
    1
  85.  @ec6621  im sure you do... 1. You are dismissing all the statsitical anomalies by saying well it coulda happend... Doesnt really change anything. "Its not impossible for a 600k lead to dissapear overnight" you beleive this crap? 2."cutters leaving" has never been what i claimed and is not what the story was told at the time it happened. Your entire argument here is "they said it was legit so who are we to question" 3. "Arguing semantics" so because the individual himself was not specifically he himself is to leave. Everything else is false or misunderstanding? Even of thats the case it doesnt change the outcome of them leaving.... 4. "You need to specifically call upon affidavits to prove they are legit" yeah or we could not dismiss them. If the cases never went anywhere they were dismissed before everuthing was heard. Of course im not going to onow what happens in an investigation that never took place. Unless you have copies of all the affidavits. In which case id like to read them. But im pretty sure you dont 5. Dismissed yes. You telling me it isn't evidence is just dismissing it..." You claim vote machines switched votes thats an allagation not evidence" Except the times where this was found out and they call it " an error" yeah sure. "So where is this grand evidence" No where because its impossible to find fraud in mail after they have been opened. You cant have proof if no one bothers investigating it... You dismiss everythimg and give me pre approved establishment talking points. We investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong... There will be no scrutiny because they dismissed it. There will be no investigations.
    1
  86.  @ec6621  "so called evidence" Such dishonesty
    1
  87.  @ec6621  " i keep asking for evidence" every time i bring something up you toss it aside dismiss it or tell me its not real...
    1
  88.  @ec6621  you sound a bit defeated. Yeah, because you dismissed everything out of hand, and you default position is that im wrong and have no proof. then when you ask for proof, you dont actually care, so you just dismiss it or give me the party line explaining we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong. I genuinely wanted to know what has you so convinced that Trump won. I know people who don't think, they know , that Trump won. And I chat with them like I've been chatting with you. Unfortunately, they get a bit defensive over over my probing so I can't always continue the conversation with them. So I'd like to thank you for engaging with me this long. Its not probing if you just dismiss everything and feed me establishment propaganda... I genuinely don't think I'm dismissing what you bring up. Except the part where you did repeatedly, then occasionally move the goalpost to be " well that was not large enough to change anything" For example, you said "hundreds of affidavits", after my insisting on details you came around to narrowing it down to "I saw this happening" affidavit(s). So its not that they exist, its that you just dismiss them as heresy without looking at anything at all, and arent even humoring the idea that this was a massive fraud... That's not dismissing your point, that's wanting to verify the evidence. No, thats just dismissing them. You ask for evidence, i point to it, you tell me thats not good enough... I don't expect to be able to hold the actual affidavit in my hands (that's not the level of evidence I'm expecting you to produce), but if Guilliani or other private citizens filed the lawsuit and presented this affidavit, I'd love to read about it. Sure so would i, but we arent going to get anything Same with the "statistically impossible" figure; I'd love to review the statisticians methodology. You can literally look into anything involving the bellwether states, previous years votes, but you would know about it if you bothered to look into any of it, instead of your default position being theres no fraud... Same with the Dominion switching votes claim; I'd love to know why you think "vote switching" happened as opposed to the explanation of "human error" and the verification of accurate machine tallying via audits. Because it literally happened? and thats just the times we caught it? again, you are dismissive of everything i said under the guise of neutrality
    1
  89.  @ec6621  First off, im gonna let you know that making 5 separate short comments is actually really annoying me now. cut it out "What is your default position?" That the news is filled with liars, the government is filled with liars, the judicial is filled with liars, every alphabet agency is filled with lairs... "Except that I haven’t’ dismissed your points, I’ve asked for more details. And you don’t provide them" No thats exactly what you did, you explained them away with nonsense from the very people who have been lying to the entire country for decades, but now they are totally not lying this time "establishment= untrustworthy. Is this so? " 99.99% of the time yes. ". It seems you and I have a different understanding of the word “dismiss”. To me, it means to: send away; treat as unworthy or unserious; cease to think about, or to refuse to hear." But thats entirely what you have been doing "I literally just linked an affidavit" No you didnt. if you did, its been shadowbanned/deleted. which is also why i hate having these " wheres proof" discussions because youtube arbitrarily will hide any and all links to a discussion "I HAVE “looked into any of it”" Then you should have learned about all the statistical anomalies. if you say they arent there, i say you havent seen them, or more importantly havent been spoon fed the appropriate information "Because it literally happened? and thats just the times we caught it? again, you are dismissive of everything i said under the guise of neutrality” If I told you: “voting machines switched votes from Biden to Trump. It literally happened. And that’s just the times we caught it”. Wouldn’t you ask me for evidence? Wouldn’t you expect evidence of the “times we caught it”? You mean the times its been reported on the news? or the other times it gets reported on the news? or did you not catch the project veritas release where they busted a san Antonio woman for fraud.... but i guess youll just tell me " but veritas is fake" or " that isnt widespread enough" or other such nonsense
    1
  90. shhhhh that was peaceful protesting because partisian reasons, dont let big brother catch you thinking otherwise!
    1