Comments by "NathansHVAC" (@NathansHVAC) on "laowhy86" channel.

  1. materialistic communist. that seems risky when communism has a history of not providing much material.
    1
  2. Hey, I'm not saying communism is bad. The communist countries are able to feed themselves. Food is really what is the most important in life. But, you should read article 6 of the Chinese constitution. http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Constitution/2007-11/15/content_1372963.htm It says "...the system of socialist public ownership supersedes the system of exploitation of man by man." You don't get much more communist than that.
    1
  3. unabellapalomablanka So ban all the successful private owned companies so that the inefficient government owned companies can succeed? Yes that does equalize. but, you're just bringing down the top to equal the bottom.
    1
  4. Tao Yanbao. Yes, you are 100% true and I agree. However, I have to point out the communist side of the argument. There is a large portion of all populations that have zero ambition and no desire to ever work hard. They are the ones that try to spread communism because they believe that you don't need to own anything other than a bicycle and poetry book. The only problem is that the guy with the car will get the girl and the guy with bicycle will get the fat chick. It is just human nature to want more than communism can offer.
    1