Comments by "NathansHVAC" (@NathansHVAC) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. I'm actually most pissed that the only vaccine that is good is not getting FDA approval because it doesn't have the political connections. This vaccine was the first to market. It was invented by a woman. It has half of the side effects and double the efficacy of Pfizer. It is 4x better than Johnson. And, it is the new startup company. I know it will never get approval until well after the pandemic is over. It is Moderna.
    1
  2.  @lkmlkm1993  It is in the constitution that only the individual states have authority for vaccine mandates. I bet you didn't know that? State mandates. Not federal mandates imposed on states. That has never been to court because that has never happened once.
    1
  3.  @christina9725  What I have been saying all along is that democrats are the party of discrimination. That is it. Republicans would never fire first responders for profits. Republicans value the individual over the group. Democrats value the group over the individual. Federal vaccine mandates that require 500 pages of legal ease are the perfect example of democrat discrimination. It is not the same as testing for employees taking drugs. Democrats want to force employees to take drugs. And you are discriminating out of fear that the unvaxed will hurt the vaxed. It certainly isn't compassion or empathy destroying people careers.
    1
  4.  @lkmlkm1993  Your court cases are all upholding state law. Federal mandates never happened. You do know one of your cases upheld forced sterilization of non-whites? Another democrat beauty. I could say that the same people that won that case run planned parent hood today. But, that would make me Q.
    1
  5.  @christina9725  Energy prices just went up this evening with the everything but infrastructure bill. Who pays that? Hopefully our best days are ahead of us. I think we can agree on that.
    1
  6.  @gattaca5911  reversed racism = anti white racism. Be honest. As for science. You have to prove that all those people awarded monetary compensation in courts for flu vaccines are making it up. You have to prove that the reason we are not seeing FDA labels is because the suppliers really did run out of FDA labels for all the rona vaccines and not because EUA stops the moment FDA is on the label.
    1
  7.  @gattaca5911  My assertion from the very beginning of this thread is that democrats are the party of prejudice and discrimination. You fear of rona causes you to destroy the lives of thousands of nurses and first responders. You yourself bring up reverse racism which is anti white racism. You call me names. As for the Pfizer fda approved Comirnaty: The only evidence that it is actually available is from USA today that shows an email from Pfizer. That is not much evidence. No suppliers. No hospitals. No drug stores can show any stock? I have a question? How do you know when your side is lying to you? Or do you just accept all the lies from your side? Do you ever get tired of the lies. I get my news from ground dot news. It shows who is paying for every news article. By the way. My other evidence is the vaers reporting system. It has exploded with people reporting side effects this year. You don't question any of that? In your mind, if the cure kills 10,000 healthy americans is that a price worth paying?
    1
  8. More like rodney dangerfield back to school.
    1
  9. Look up the word wise. You will never find a socialist there.
    1
  10. So was Steve Jobs.
    1
  11. Open your eyes. The government is part of the resistance. Didn't you read the NYT op-ed? Obama gave us Trump. So, I am grateful.
    1
  12. Trump has two books on his business deals. He run circles around New York sharks all the time. Funny, how fake news ignores those books full of $billions of successful deal making. I would say making $10 billion and documenting them proves Trump know business. Bernie has a secretary. That must mean he is better at business than Trump.
    1
  13. Who is giving everything to him now? Oh, i forgot. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  14. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  15. But, he does get things done. Even obama said getting manufacturing back was impossible. Tarrifs are making the jobs come back to avoid paying them.
    1
  16. NPC. orange man bad!
    1
  17. Yep. They go atheist and think they are smarter than the last 100,000 years evolution of religion and the evolution of the memes.
    1
  18. Orange man bad! Orange man bad!
    1
  19. he is a 70 year old coke head who ran 400 companies. all coke heads to that. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  20. no bias on wiiiikipeddddia. lol
    1
  21. Democrats are the party of mobs.
    1
  22. Funny how quick our friends laugh when we stop paying them.
    1
  23. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  24. Wait, you lefties are waiting for the next stalin. red man bad! red man bad!
    1
  25. orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  26. There is smart and wise. I'm sure you don't know the difference. Let me explain: Smart means you know books. But, you don't have any skills people will actually pay for. So sad. Wise means you have knowledge that is valuable in the REAL WORLD instead of unicorn land. Nobody pays money in unicorn land because money doens't exist there.
    1
  27. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  28. A wise brain.
    1
  29. orange man bad! orange man bad!
    1
  30. It is called supply side economics. The left labeled it trickle down. It is not supposed to stimulate the economy, it is only supposed to increase revenues to the treasury. And, it did for the last 5 times it was tried. Even JFK did "trickle down" in 1963 when he took top end taxes from 90% to 70%. But, wait. Before you call JFK evil, think about it for just one minute. Suppose you are a supplier yourself. (hence the word supply side). Not an employee who has no control over his income. Now, suppose you have the ability to hire lawyers and take advantage of tax shelters. You are the supply, so you make the company do whatever your little heart desires. Now, you have 2 choices: 1) Give 90% of the money to the IRS. 2) Or, give 50% of the money to lawyers and keep the other 50%. Hmmm. Does that make you a greedy bastard? You didn't create the tax shelters. Maybe the money was made in China or Europe. The fact that it was never made here is a tax shelter in itself. OK. Now, here is what happens in reality when that tax rate goes from 90% to 35%. You fire the lawyer and keep his 50%, than you give the 35% to the IRS. So, in reality, supply side convinced the supplier that paying 35% to the IRS is cheaper than paying 50% to the lawyer. The net gain is the IRS getting 35% instead of zero. It is not hard to under stand. The lefties have just been lying about supply side for 100 years. This was done in the 1920, twice in the 80s and once in the 2000s. And, $$$ to the IRS went up every time. But, this only works on the upper tax bracket who control the companies. You will find this time $$$ goes up too. But it will be buried on the back page somewhere at the end of the year. There are mathematics that explain the reality of this economic principle. Here is the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqLjyA0hL1s&t=7s
    1
  31. Ex Animus typical lefty argument. Everything is emotion. That is why the women mostly vote left. I should have known you wouldn't accept math from a jew. I'll link the black economist who pointed this out to me. But you probably won't accept that either because your only argument is emotion. That is fine. The tricle down argument is perfectly acceptable. People with lawyers never use them to save taxes and they blindly pay the high rates. Any elementary school person would belive that one, because the rich are stupid and daddy gives them all their money. I get it.
    1
  32. Here is another video saying the same thing. Please don't tell me that Sowell is a evil white person trapped in a black body. I have watched hours of his videos and he is not an evil white man like I am. Also, I probably won't be posting here because I actually have a job and I don't have time for this kind of thing. I made my point. You shot it down on emotion. That is fine. You can just call me a capitalist shill and dismiss any evidence that I show. But, if you want to find evidence yourself on the internet just search Supply Side economics does not increase revenues. Then search supply side does increase revenues and see watch argument actually uses graphs and economic data. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZPDpk8NA-g
    1
  33. Here is the 1987 fairy tale you talk about. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2012/10/15/do-tax-cuts-increase-government-revenue/#22a4902e4bf2
    1
  34. Here is corporate tax revenues going up. Again, you said it was impossible. Well, now you have to re-write history (which is already happening with the marxist professors). https://www.mercatus.org/publication/tax-rates-vs-tax-revenues
    1
  35. Supply side just applies to the rich. I saw alot of fake graphs saying that the poor are supposed to pay more revenues when the rich have reasonable tax rates. That is another lefty lie. Only rich tax revenues go up, because the rates are only applied to them. I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make him drink. You will never have a moral argument for marxism. One does not exist. If it did, the person able to make the argument that socialism is the moral equivalence of capitalism would get the nobel prize in economics. Please post a lefty graph debunking what I am saying about supply side. I would love to see it. You will be the first to find one.
    1
  36. One more thing. LIberalism is always a prediction of what will happen. Conservatism points out what actually happens. But, lets just stick to supply side. You are predicting what you are told to predict. Please try to back up your claim that upper tax bracket revenues will go down. I'm eager to hear.
    1
  37. Here is what you said: "the MAJORITY of americans will have less to spend so will BUY less" Please tell me why? I am just a dumb shit like you said. I admit that. I majored in physics in college and worked 10 years as an electrical engineer. But, I am no Einstein. My guess is that you will say because the upper bracket people steal all the money? Please tell me how lowing taxes on suppliers gives people who are not suppliers less to spend? Oh. I think I answered the question myself. I am pretty sure you are trying to say that there will be less welfare money for the non-suppliers, because the suppliers won't be paying their fair share. That must be your answer. But, please confirm.
    1
  38. Here is another one of your quotes: " in fact it will be worse considering the massive cuts and the burden beingg shifted onto those that can least afford it." I showed you the charts that revenues actually go up. You said I cherry picked them. I guess you don't believe Forbes. That is fine. Please show me your data that says revenues will go down on the upper brackets receiving the cuts. Do you even know what an upper bracket tax rate is? Just saying History is your evidence isn't actually evidence at all. I could say that history show America was strongest before it became a welfare sate. But, that isn't actual evidence. Just using the word history doesn't make it true.
    1
  39. Ex Animus: You did do good shooting down +SquirrelHill1971 examples of Libs using tax shelters. You are correct that the "but they did it TOOO" argument doesn't mean tax shelters are good. Nice job on that one. You did shut him up using reason.
    1
  40. Here is the liberal version of supply side. "Liberals Believe In Supply Side Economics When The Fed Does The Supplying" Obama spent $7 Trillion. Thanks Obama for spending $70K for each family in America. I guess you will say Forbes is a shill. I'm looking for GAO data now. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2016/06/23/liberals-believe-in-supply-side-economics-when-the-fed-does-the-supplying/#e4d5446d28a7
    1
  41. Ex Animus: I'll help out your argument. Here is a fed report from 1981 that says supply might work and increase revenues if the taxes were high enough. But, it is somewhat skeptical. This is before the double supply side cuts in the late 1980s. I'll get some more recent government reports to make my point. https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-data/publications/business-review/1981/br81mjap.pdf?la=en
    1
  42. Raising taxes on the middle class is not supply side economics. Here is the title of this thread "Tax cuts for the rich are the only thing you can depend on republicans for" Let's please not muddy the waters with raising taxes on the poor or the middle class. Actually, the bottom 50% pay zero federal income taxes. The 2018 tax plan uses the money from the revenue windfall from supply side to lower taxes on the middle class. Otherwise it would not be able to pass as revenue neutral. But, I don't want to argue that. My buddy is reading all 200 pages of the new IRS code now and I will know exactly what happens to the middle class. I am too stupid to actually understand IRS code. My buddy is a tax accountant. So, lets just stick to the upper tax bracket OK?
    1
  43. Here is a 1994 congress report that the Reagon tax cuts significantly increased revenues from the upper 1% and upper 10%. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/9576a929-37b4-497c-9b06-4bf3481f9f0a/the-reagan-tax-cuts-lessons-for-tax-reform-april-1996.pdf
    1
  44. Here is a 1982 congressional report showing that the Kennedy tax cuts on the upper bracket increased revenues to the IRS from that bracket. https://www.jec.senate.gov/reports/97th%20Congress/The%20Mellon%20and%20Kennedy%20Tax%20Cuts%20-%20A%20Review%20and%20Analysis%20(1122).pdf
    1
  45. The Washington Times says the Trump Tax plan is going to increase revenues. Isn't this a swamp news paper? https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/11/treasury-report-tax-cut-plan-add-300b-revenue/
    1
  46. My evidence that revenues increase is backed up. Your evidence that revenues will go down is ??? (drum roll please) Your honorable unemotional word. I have to ask. Are you a woman? I don't want to mis-gender you by mistake.
    1
  47. Ex Animus. We do have a miscommunication. I'm trying my best here. What I have been saying all along is that IRS revenues (ie money) that the top brackets pay TO THE GOVERNMENT go up when the taxes become fair. In the Corporate world, when it is cheaper to do business in American than Ireland for example. I never mentioned anything about corporate profits or how much stuff corporations sell. Supply side only increases money that the government (ie IRS) gets from the top bracket. The lefties invented all the other garbage such as Lefty Lie #1) lower brackets get tax relief. Lefty Lie #2) lower brackets pay more taxes. Lefty Lie #3) Supply Side creates growth and jobs. Lefty Lie #4) Supply Side makes corporations more profitable. I hope we can agree that Corporations don't need America to make money. They can move to any non-communist country. I'm not debating any of the Lefty Lies 1-4 here. But, I would be glad to debate you on all of them if you can use more colorful adjectives to describe me personally. Some of them are actually funny.
    1
  48. Ex Animus. To Sum up. The rich and corporations pay more dollars to the US Treasury when their taxes become lower. That is all I have been saying and proving all along.
    1
  49. Having said that, since the rich will be paying more taxes in 2018, the middle class will get tax reductions to keep the tax plan revenue neutral. My taxes are going down $6K according to my tax accounted friend who read the entire tax rules. And, I make just enough money to live as a family supported by one income.
    1
  50. Personally, I would have preferred that the middle class didn't get the tax cut to pay down the debt and that the extra money be used for that purpose. But, in reality, congress would just spend that money on free stuff anyway. So, I'm not complaining.
    1