Comments by "ShitSkinsIndian" (@ShitSkinsIndian) on "Living in China" channel.

  1. Indians claimed that the 1967 conflict between China and India was a "war" but couldn't provide the dates which the "war" occurred. All historians said that there was no war between China and India in 1967 but only Indian historians. A 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La) is the actual fact. War lasts for months or years. Skirmish lasted merely days. An English dictionary may help them🥱
    1
  2. Q1) How do Indians cope with 1962? Indians created an imaginary "war" in 1967 and claim victory. Q2) How do Indians cope with their 1000+ year of Muslim rule (eg. Muslim Mughals)? The Indian historians say that they Muslim Mughals do not exist in their history textbooks.
    1
  3. General Bakshi of |ndia, 3rd highest ranking military officer of |ndia, said " We had 800 years of subjugation".. 🤭
    1
  4. India has far better culture? Indeed. 😁 Indian source: Times of India Title of article/research/report: Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open. What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open Title of article/research/report: Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update Global Source: UNICEF What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
    1
  5. Indian historians lied and Indian bots have no shame spreading lies. There was no war in 1967 but only a 3-day battle/skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), but Indian historians got to lie to salvage their Indian ego after losing the 1962 war in the most humiliating and embarrassing fashion when .... 1) China was having a massive famine (Great Chinese Famine from 1958 to 1962) 2) Sino-Soviet split from 1960 to 1962 meaning China had no weapon assistance from Soviets or the West. 3) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis".
    1
  6. India invaded China in 1962 through Nehru's forward policy when China was having a massive famine from 1958 to 1962 and during the Sino-Soviet split from 1960 to 1962. It was a once in a lifetime opportunity that India would never miss to grab more land from a weakened China. When India gets beaten up and lost the war that they had started despite all these advantages, not to mentioned military supplies from Israel and USA (Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis"), she cried to the entire world and plays the victim. Till now, India never dares to disclose the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report on the 1962 war" even after 60+ years. And when the report was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement. You have to got to wonder why🤔🤥😏🥱A nation without integrity and honesty and a spawning ground for all the scam callers has no credibility on the Global Stage😏.
    1
  7. China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
    1
  8. Why do all historians except for Indian historians, said that there was no war between China and India in 1967 but only a 3-day skirmish (Nathu La) from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967? Pajeetstan lied? 😅🤣😂🤥🥱😭
    1
  9. India can't beat China in any real-life war (1962) or in any economic war, thus, they could only do it online as keyboard warriors in a propaganda war knowing that China banned YouTube or Google. 🤭🤣😅😂I know what you are going to say, Indian bots, but 1967 is not a war but only a 3-day battle/skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La). Your historians lied that there was a 1967 "war" between China and India and later claimed victory, a coping mechanism as a result of losing the 1962 war in the most embarrassing fashion in history. If they dare to lie and distort historical facts right in front of the entire world, what else would they not lie?
    1
  10. Why do all military rankings rank China above India? 🤣🤭😂1962 war? Wait, didn't the Indians claimed that they had won in the 1967 "war"? The score should be even like China: 1 and India:1 on paper? Oh wait again, all historians said there is no war between China and India in 1967 but only a small 3 day skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 😅🤣😂Read article "How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)". I guess that is the reason why China > India. 🤭😂
    1
  11. Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice. 1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself. 2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis". 3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine). 4) Despite all these advantages, India lost. 5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
    1
  12. "Abhijit Chavda: China's century of humiliation; India's millennium of humiliation".
    1
  13. Remember the German cartoonist, Der Spiegel, who made a drawing comparing China's superior and sophisticated train versus India's train on April 2023? Indians were outraged calling them racists and demanded an apology from Germany? 2 months later, Odisha train crash 2nd June 2023 involving 300+ death toll 🤭🤣😂India, the only country with a proven track record of making 3 or 4 more trains crashing against each other (Odisha train crash 2nd June 2023) in the history of mankind that is worthy of the prestigious Guinness World Records😅🤣😂Truth is not racism. 🤭🤣😂If you do not know how to search for this video on youtube by their video title, do not blame me. Blame yourself ➡ odisha train tragedy: aerial view captures devastation in bahanaga ⬅ What is even more funny is that |ndian media went totally quiet on Der Spiegel after the Odish train crashed. Why? Because German cartoonist, Der Spiegel, is right after all.
    1
  14. In year 1998, Indians and India wrote a book and proclaimed to the entire world that India will be a superpower/developed country by year 2020 or earlier (Know Your Meme: India superpower by 2020). However in year 2020 or earlier, after seeing India's GDP per capita is less than 3k and their proclaimations were nowhere close to their targets, India/Indians made another proclaimation again, and this time, India will be a superpower/developed country by year 2047😅😆😅🤣🤗🤭😏. India/Indians is/are very creative: Year 1998: India will be superpower/developed by year 2020 or earlier. Year 2020: India will be a superpower/developed country by year 2047 or earlier .🤭
    1
  15. Firstly, learn some honesty. What he said is "India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border." Removing the word "culturally" from the sentence changes the entire meaning. A diplomat is trained or programmed to be diplomatic and say things which are pleasing to the ears. It does not matter if it is true or untrue. You see, culture is a very vague and subjective thing. Not using toilets and practicing open defecation in 597 millions is also a culture. 🤭 Indian source: Times of India Title of article/research/report: Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open. What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open Title of article/research/report: Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update Global Source: UNICEF What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
    1
  16. India versus China 1962 98k Indian prisoners of war surrendered. Aksai China taken India fully colonize by British India, China was never colonized.
    1
  17.  @abhishekcharan6203  My nationality = NOT an Indian. That's all you need to know. Nice attempt at a topic change, but it does not change the fact that you lied. Removing one word, "culturally", changes the entire meaning of the sentence. If India is so powerful, they wouldn't have been invaded and colonized for 1000+ years.
    1
  18.  @abhishekcharan6203  Source = Indian? 🤭🤥
    1
  19.  @abhishekcharan6203  Indian source: Times of India Title of article/research/report: Global shame: 597 million Indians still defecate in the open. What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million) defecating in the open Title of article/research/report: Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update Global Source: UNICEF What article said specifically: India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).
    1
  20.  @abhishekcharan6203  Indian can fight? 1962 remember and 98k Indian prisoners of war?
    1
  21.  @abhishekcharan6203  "Abhijit Chavda: China's century of humiliation; India's millennium of humiliation". Surrendering is |ndia's nature. Millennium for your information, is 10 centuries. . 🤭
    1
  22.  @abhishekcharan6203  General Bakshi of |ndia, 3rd highest ranking military officer of |ndia, said " We had 800 years of subjugation".. 🤭
    1
  23.  @abhishekcharan6203  China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
    1
  24.  @abhishekcharan6203  Indian historians said that the Mughals did not exist. Makes you wonder what else they wouldn't lie.🤥 News headlines: "Why is Modi so scared of history textbooks?" "Why is India trying to erase Mughal history from Indian school books?" "India history debate after chapter on Mughals dropped"
    1