General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Ember Fist
Actual Justice Warrior
comments

Comments by "Ember Fist" (@emberfist8347) on "Israel Declares War On Hamas After Attacks" video.

@chasejohnson1122 They got their chance to make a state then they elected terrorists. You can't elect terrorists then get mad when the IDF decides to fight back.
7
@soundpalette2438 Except they didn't. The Balfour Declaration meant Israelis had a right to live on the land and they did some dating back to the time when it was controlled by the Ottoman Empire. The land was given to them by a UN resolution. Part of the redrawing of borders Post-WWII OP mentioned.
7
@jay1jayf Except they weren't displaced as I outlined.
6
@anti-them4383 Except they don't. They didn't attack a music festival.
5
@shadowwhowalk Palestine is its own state with its own laws so it isn't apartheid.
5
@rrrr-xj6ll Nice strawman he didn't say that.
5
@newerest1 I also bet "unarmed" meant they were throwing rocks at them which can someone.
5
@DustinDonald-cz9ot Except it wasn't theft the land was settled by Israelis since the Ottomans ruled it.
4
@phann860 For starting a civil war in that nation. Wonder why Hamas has so few friends at the moment?
4
There was the claim with the UN Resolution in 1948 and then the Oslo Accords. Sadly Hamas keeps nullifying those claims. They even said the latter was prefidy a war crime.
4
No the reason to blame them is they didn't enforce the UN Partition plan. They had one job and they let everything go to hell.
4
@jay1jayf They didn't lose it. The UN Resolution that partitioned Palestine focused on giving the land to where the ethnic majority was. Therefore, they didn't lose their country. But they might if keep backing Hamas and other terrorist groups.
4
@jay1jayf I am just pointing out the historical facts.
4
@jay1jayf You really need to look at the UN Partition plan that was approved.
4
Egypt if they are saying that is hypocritical. They are manning one of the border stations into Gaza and aiding the blockade.
4
@samanthawhang7498 That is a complete lie.
3
@RRHandle 70s of Israel having to defend itself.
3
@samanthawhang7498 Except they weren't. There were foreigners in there too. And if they were out of uniform they weren't lawful combatants.
3
@staywhite6332 You mean that conspiracy theory that is totally bunk as they were filming and not dancing at all?
3
Except they already tried that. Then Hamas got elected so they went back in.
3
I am admittedly Pro-Israel, but I am for two reasons. First The flame wars are going to hot. Second. Some idiots will need to be corrected when they bring up the USS Liberty. Having a personal connection to that incident I know what actually happened and it wasn't Israel's fault.
3
@rrrr-xj6ll Except it isn't colonial. A colonial wouldn't sign a treaty giving Egypt the Sinai Peninsula back. Particularly since they could have a legitimate claim to that region.
3
@anthonybrown2426 It was more of a balance of power with the Christians in the more significant areas and a strong Muslim minority.
2
Stop bringing up that dead horse. They apologized they paid reparations and it was ultimately the Johnson Administration who is to blame for the attack because their bureaucratic incompetence left the ship in danger.
2
@mulletman2013 The US Flag wasn't that readily visible from the air at the time due to the wind as shown from image from the gun cameras of the IDF fighter before and after the attacks. The lifeboats claims are always one-sided with the most likely explanation being that they were either accidentally launched without any men in them, or fell due to the whaleboat explosion or torpedo strike (itself caused by one of the M2's cooking off from the whaleboat fire). And US Navy Uniforms aren't clear. They would look like ants from the pilot's perspective and would be in either Khaki or Service whites which aren't that distinctive unless you live in the US. And the one pilot arrest disobeyed a direct order that is insubordination which is a valid crime in the military.
2
@pdpgb Truth you say claiming Israel targets civilians despite giving the ample warning when they are about to strike a densely populated area.
2
TL:DR, Hamas is currently in the minority when it comes to their genocidal views of Israel. I normally don't subscribe to the Not all Muslims claim but is certainly true in this case. Hamas doesn't represent all of Palestine, All of the Middle East, or all of Islam. Israel has managed to remain on peaceful terms with their other neighbors for a while starting with the Camp David Accords in 1974. Hamas is running low on Allies which is why it is getting claim their main source of support is Iran since the moderate Sunni Muslims who live on most other Arab nations like Saudi-Arabia, Bahrain and the UAE are in an official alliance with Israel and they have good terms with their neighbors. Egypt is even helping Israel control the border at the Gaza Strip.
2
No it failed because Hamas admitted they weren't going to obey the conditions. Egypt hasn't gone to war with Israel since they signed the Camp David Accords in 70s. Their other neighbors are obeying the peace terms they signed. It is Hamas.
2
@Watchmyplaylist You clearly know nothing about that incident. The truth is Washington screwed up and left the ship in a dangerous situation and the blame for the attack is on them.
2
@fsociety6983 An enemy ship. They specifically maintained they thought it was an Egyptian ship which makes sense from the information they had on hand. The jets sent out to find the ship behind the alleged bombardment of (it is known by the IDF to have been a magazine explosion) found a warship off the Sinai Peninsula that wouldn't normally be a neutral ship since they UAR gave warnings to keep neutral ships away from the region due to the war and the US Navy had order the entire Sixth Fleet to move the hell away from there too and didn't send any support to the ship that failed to get that order because they were afraid how Brezhnev would see it.
2
@Her_Sisko Keep bringing up that BS ignoring the actual events. I know what really happened.
2
@themurderhornet180 And now both have peace treaties with them.
2
@rrrr-xj6ll The Oslo Accords means that Palestine is legally recognized as a state by Israel. And it is currently holding an observer status by the UN. And I am not justifying oppression just pointing out the facts.
2
I took a course on the History of the Modern Middle East so I know quite well the reasons this war is happening. Britain had one job and they couldn't do it at all.
2
@FBI-ju5no I always figured that is what happened when @shadowwhowalk brought it up. Sean got me to take any mention of the phrase "unarmed" with a large salt shaker.
2
@rrrr-xj6ll No they gave land as part of a deal because were willing to seek a resolution with Egypt. And you don't think they have a claim Mount Sinai is one of the most important locations Judaism.
2
@rrrr-xj6ll Except Carter was a notorious anti-authoritarian which wouldn't make sense he backed Egypt Nasser and Sadat both fit that bill.
2
@rrrr-xj6ll He isn't nice strawman but stop spamming this comment.
1
@rrrr-xj6ll It is not a fact at all.
1
@rrrr-xj6ll So you because you have no real argument.
1
Honestly maybe you PM should sent in people to fix things. I don't normally advocate that type of foreign intervention, but the reason the nation of Israel is stuck in endless wars is because the UK failed to enforce the UN partition of the Mandate. It is best for the Parliament to fix the problem they created.
1
@meimou1754 Except there isn't anyone saying that. People on the Pro-Israel side single out Hamas, the PLO, i.e. the actual terrorist groups. It is the anti-Israel side that calls the entire nation including the civilians terrorists.
1
@03stmlax Targeting civlians does.
1
@pdpgb You are clearly talking nonsense.
1
@pdpgb Citation needed.
1
@pdpgb "I am making this all up and too lazy to cite anything."
1
@pdpgb You still haven’t given me a source despite your words being it isn’t that hard to find.
1
@fsociety6983 You forget why the blockade not an occupation is a thing. Because as I said they elected terrorists.
1
@charissa6648 He is confusing a blockade partially enforced by Egypt btw for an occupation.
1
@swampfaye India got their country back after years of non-violent resistance.
1
@ImperienCypher The USA says hello.
1
@swampfaye The UK was ruled by King George VI by the the time it became independent.
1
@swampfaye Nope King George II reigned from 1936 to 1952. He was the last monarch to hold the title Emperor of India as the position was abolished in 1947 when India got its independence effective 1948.
1
@swampfaye King George VI. As I previously said genius.
1
@swampfaye He lived from 1896 to 1952. Not that long of a time. Someone clearly doesn’t anything about the monarchs.
1
@swampfaye No the Indians had a revolution but it was a non-violent one.
1
@swampfaye The Velvet Revolution shoots down your claims of no such thing as a non-violent Revolution.
1
@mushyroom9569 Hamas seems to be the invaders here.
1
@snuffeldjuret Don't he is repeating a conspiracy theory.
1
@odinsire3879 Bringing that anti-semetic conspiracy theory up again I see.
1
If we get technical you are advocating genocide. The act of forced relocation meets many definitions of genocide such as the Armenian Genocide or the Trial of Tears due to how many people end up dying along the way due to how poor their living conditions are. Hell before they came up with the Holocaust, the Nazi plan for getting rid of the Jews to force them into a inhospitable region of the world expecting they would either die along the way or die out from their lack of resources and hostile environment (Nisko in occupied Poland was Plan A, Madagascar was Plan B, The Holocaust was Plan C).
1
@katiek.8808 These are Europeans. Also the founders were supporters of European powers the debate was which nation to support.
1
@fsociety6983 But when Hamas does war crimes they are saying those dirty tricks are allows so don’t blame Israel for that.
1
@Watchmyplaylist No I went to the funeral of my grandfather who was on the ship. His fellow survivors specifically it wasn't an attack by the state of Israel.
1
@Joe-pc3hs Does that mean they will change their name to Nasserstan soon?
1
@fsociety6983 Except neither of those things are true. Gaza is just a place with a secure border like a most nations.
1
 @comentedonakeyboard Damn it is all happening in Germany. First Synagogues are burned how long until the people get burned too?
1
Americans were killed in the attacks.
1
Like the USS Liberty. I have read both the reports, I have read the contemporary interviews. I had a relative who was on that ship. It was a disaster caused by US bureaucratic incompetence.
1
@Good_Emperor That is my point. The music festival was terrorism and the claims they were attacking military only is BS.
1
@kev3d Egypt has no interest in a weak Israel. The issue is Hamas wants their human shields.
1
@yoyo_ma7677 That control part of the border with Gaza.
1
@عمرحليله-خ7ع Is the fact Hamas took hostages not enough evidence for you?
1
@عمرحليله-خ7ع No Egypt blockaded Israel that is an act of war by definition. And Syria attacked Israel first. And they don’t even have the Sinai anymore so don’t complain about that it is in the past.
1
@johns1625 No the problem is Hamas and Pan-Arabism. Egypt, Jordan, Syria and all of Israel's other neighbors honored the peace treaties they signed.
1
@silent1826 You are ignorant and don't know the first thing about me or 9/11.
1
@h_3_x_ As I said I have a personal connection. There was a relative of mine on the USS Liberty. The truth is the Government was idiotic the C&C of the navy sucked so it was a disaster waiting to happen.
1
@shadowwhowalk Not until the Oslo Accords due to the fact they were part of other nations prior that.
1
@shadowwhowalk I am specifically referring to the territory of the state which wasn't recognized as being its own state until the Oslo Accords.
1
@shadowwhowalk And Israel was to no longer occupy their territories which they did until they elected Hamas.
1
@shadowwhowalk And Palestine is still run by Hamas a known terrorist group.
1
@rrrr-xj6ll I mean they literally voted for it. They voted for Hamas don't be surprised when Israel doesn't like it when you vote for terrorists.
1
@rrrr-xj6ll I didn’t authoritarianism negated any claim just that Sadat and Nasser were authoritarian. I stand corrected about Carter but now I can add some hypocrisy to the list of reasons he was a bad president.
1
@automatic5 And morally repugnant. The side to be on is the side of peace. Some conflicts are more morally messy than others with no side that is really better than the other but siding the end of conflict and suffering is a always morally right.
1