General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Gonken88
Patrick Cc:
comments
Comments by "Gonken88" (@Gonken88) on "Patrick Cc:" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Lol, he should do this today. Now it's "minor attracted" not "pedophile". At least according to the lgbtqlso+ movement.
3
Yeah, it's pretty obvious he didn't mean any harm, and he wasn't a "predator". All the evidence points at this just being more normal in the 80s as society was just more innocent at that time, with no internet pron sites etc. This kissing and hugging routine was probably seen as a way of educating kids in that they shouldn't feel embarrassed about physical acts of love and that they should develop an interest in the opposite sex, reproduce and be productive. Same goes for the (very tame) sexual references in the questions. Some of the sexual liberation of the 70s was clearly still kicking and screaming there though 😂. As even shown in this vid, all the actual evidence points towards this being completely innocent, and that people have been fooled by that short compilation we all love to cringe from 👍. The truly disgusting thing here is slandering Olvers name even further by putting some dark music to it and imply all kinds of shit.
1
@bigman5876 Reread my comment and then read your reply. It should become obvious.
1
@magallanesagustin4952 I think it's your personal associations and perversions that makes it creepier than it actually is. But you don't like to look at yourself in that light 😉
1
@magallanesagustin4952 Not at all, it's absolutely relevant and true. You literally used your own personal disgust as some form of argument, and then you get pissy when called out for it. Get over yourself eh?
1
@magallanesagustin4952 Yes, basic psychology and the so called Rorschach test that shows that our personal associations may cause us to see for example either a dolphin or a couple having intercourse within the same image. Do you have any evidence for what you say?
1
@magallanesagustin4952 Guess not 😂
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d Point one: You can't our modern values on historical events and expect to get anywhere. Also slavery was abolished in the 1980s 😂. Point two: Don't like your own comments. Especially not right after you wrote them. 👍
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d I was unaware that you're living in a country where slavery is still legal, but in the US, where this is filmed, they abolished slavery in 1886. I'm just saying it's quite embarrassing to be liking your own comments like that. Especially when they're nonsensical.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d How is that nonsensical? What countries would that be? How many countries can you even name without using Google? I'll help you out by telling you that slavery is prohibited under the UN bill of human rights as of today, and only 19 countries in the world practice it, which means 90% don't. This makes your whole thesis and arguments quite ridiculous 🙂.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d The term was "nonsensical", meaning what I said didn't make sense. I was looking at a video/situation that took place 40 years ago and judging it by the standards of that time. You're also looking at a video/situation that took place 40 years ago and judging it by today's standards. One of those two makes sense, the other doesn't. Your logic is like saying people were stupid in ancient times for thinking the Earth is flat, when in fact they just had no way of knowing any better. Also you were the one who brought up slavery as some kind of analogy. It's quite irrelevant though as slavery was abolished by the UN already in 1949, and this all happened in the 80s, so again, the fact that around 10% of the world's nations havent gone along with that is, also, a quite nonsensical argument as 90% of the world have abolished it since the 50s. But hey, you're still liking your own comments. Openly...
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d I'm not comparing those two things, I'm comparing your way of thinking by applying it to different situations. It's to demonstrate your flawed way of thinking, it's got nothing to do with the chosen situations, that's how an analogy works 🙂. You're again just referring to the present day by talking about not repeating "the same mistakes" while ignoring that the events didn't at all have the same implications back then as they do now. We're doing all new and worse mistakes today that could be worried about instead of going bananas about something that was normal in the 80s and would never happen today (and before you claim that it is happening, please cite the gameshow where hosts kiss kids). We do it with ww2, ww1? That's funny because I could swear a lot of experts claim we're headed for ww3 right now? So what have we actually learned from those historic events as you claim? Common sense is good, but you have to have some knowledge as well to back it up with. Glad you dropped the slavery nonsense at least 👍. Edit: And you didn't like your own comment! Goody! 👍👍
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d Ww3 was a 2022 topic? You're not just thinking about the war in Ukraine? That was a 2022 topic. Ww3 talk is everywhere now, I don't know if you're in denial or what. Sweden just joined NATO after 100s of years of neutrality, and so did Finland. I just watched a vid on the topic by General MacArthur 4 days ago. So yeah, it wasn't really that terrible, eh? No, I don't expect humans to be perfect, but you're the one bashing people for behaving in a certain way 40 years ago? 🤷 Sense? Awareness about what? What happened in the video isn't socially acceptable anymore. 2nd reply: Look up Fergie Oliver and you'll find nothing bad about the man. It was definitely socially acceptable and as you can clearly see in the vids, the audience didn't have any problems. Dang, shouldn't have commended you for not liking your comments. Now you're at it again 🤦.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d Yeah the war in Ukraine started the ww3 topic indeed, but it's not like it's died down nor has the conflict ended. On the contrary more have started and new countries have joined NATO, so it's hardly irrelevant just because they don't talk about it in your local newspaper anymore. So that's just, again, nonsensical. Of course you can bash anything you like, but it doesn't have to make sense. We know that what happens in the video isnt socially acceptable anymore but the point wasn't what's socially acceptable today, but back then. You're coming back to the same refuted argument. What you're referring to as "acceptable" 80 years ago wasn't acceptable back then either and it spurred a whole world war. But judging by what you just said about that I don't think you know the half of it, just saying 🙂. But you're basically just confirming my point; what might have been acceptable historically is not acceptable now, and vice versa, and we're not really ones to judge in our current state. 2. Yes very weird with today's eyes. Almost as weird as liking your own comments 😉.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d Yeah, I don't think global politics is a direction that you should be heading down as of now 😅 that's a liiiittle bit over simplified, but yes of course it would be bad for everybody. The thing here you see is that you're putting a modern day perception on a situation that played out in a completely different society, where things like this wasn't exualized. There was no sinister agenda in what happened here. You're using the ghosts of today to interpret a situation from the 80s thinking you're learning something. You're just angry with something because of the associations modern day society has given you. On the contrary we'd like to go back to more innocent times.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d And what caused the invasion? 🙂
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d No it wasn't, it was prepubescent kids and it's your own associations that makes it sexual, as made obvious by what you just said. It's like the old ink spot test psychiatrists use; some see a lamp post, some see something dirty. You obviously just have a mind that sees those things 🤷. Ah so you're a minor. That explains a lot, thanks 👍.
1
@user-fc4dl1pi7d As you've just demonstrated, it's your own associations that make this not innocent - exactly my point. You see what you want to see, but there's nothing surrounding this in that era that suggests that you're right. As for your age, that explains a lot, thanks 👍.
1
It's so funny when you try to write a comment explaining how utterly in denial you are about the 2012 conspiracy "theories", the auto-censorship algorithm deletes it after 20 seconds 😄. Yeah mate, she was bonkers and you're not in denial, saying shit that is happening right now as we speak (all of them) ain't happening. Wake up ffs..
1
Compulsive lying doesn't align with jewish beliefs? Uuuuhhm. I guess that depends on who they're lying to...
1
She put her own little crazy spin on it but yeah all of those things are happening. Depop, economy, and the brewing nato-russia conflict. This guy is just another 🐑 in denial, it's fucking scary how people can talk about these things as they aren't happening right now.
1
The uploader? Yeah, he's got his head up his behind.
1
😄 referring to fair use? Gone already in the EU and soon in America too. Guaranteed.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All