General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Gonken88
The New York Times
comments
Comments by "Gonken88" (@Gonken88) on "The New York Times" channel.
As things have turned out, more and more people have become sympathetic to his cause. Maybe time to wake up now?
2
It's kept crime rates low for decades. Sure it's being destroyed now by migration, but that's essentially what Breivik wanted to stop.
2
Do you really have to put your ignorance on display like this?
1
And how did that work out for ya 😊? So many useful idiots promoting this pointless war without understanding the first thing about it. Now you've got a new one, but it's not so popular to pick side this time around 😂.
1
Best JFK doc https://youtu.be/Uy_DUHLEt2o
1
@JBliehall Well he does provide evidence for more or less everything he says so if you're persuaded by such things as evidence you tend to buy it. I mean there's photos, videos, testemonies etc supporting just about every claim he makes so it's hardly constructed out of thin air. I'd say a person would have to be pretty brainwashed into having the world view he/she is having to not even considering it the way you're doing.
1
@JBliehall Yes please go on, because he actually does provide evidence for everything he says throughout the doc except for a few things where there reasonably can't be any evidence though the surrounding events give support enough. I don't know if the dinner the night before was meant to be taken literally, but LBJ's ex wife makes an appearence confirming that there was a meeting and that LBJ was upset. There is a photo of a man looking very much like Bush standing outside the TSBD and there was a reference to some expert in body composure that pointed out certain things that matched like the cocking of the wrist in the pocket. The storm drain shooter is named and shamed and it's possible to look up the event further, it's not just "a guy". There weren't eight cuban shooters, only a few of them were cubam and all of them are presented with name and there are interviews with other assassins who were offered the job. What you're doing is not critical thinking, it's rathet trying your damndest to refute what's basically a theory (we'll never come close to anything else) that makes sense and where all the holes that can't be filled unless you were actually a part of the plot are filled with reasonable explainations for reasons that are your own. Maybe you're scared by the whole nwo aspect that's playing out right before our eyes as of now and resort to denial whenever you can, or maybe you don't believe in "conspiracy theories". I have watched the CIA funded 9 part doc that was mentioned in the movie and a bunch of other docs on the subject, and there's absolutely none other to this date that connects the dots in a better way and puts the whole deed into the greater perspective than this doc. You're of course free to think what you want based on your preferences, but I'll always recommend this doc, not so much for the sake of JFK but rather to expose people of the corruption that runs through this world.
1
@JBliehall Where did I say anything about an ex-wife? Are you implying that it's impossible to have a mistress while you're married? Are we becoming that far fetched in our pursuit of "debunking" this doc now?
1
Norway was beginning to open up to the nwo agenda in the early 10s and he attacked the nation's leading party as well as posting a manifest online to raise awareness. After all the censorship was done though, all we were left with was a madman and a mass shooting. Everything he said has turned out to be true.
1
Jesus, you're a sensitive little guy.
1