Comments by "C. Galindo" (@c.galindo9639) on "Joe Rogan on Che Guevara T-Shirts "He's a Mass Murderer"" video.

  1. That’s like the 5th comment saying that. Go on someone else’s thread that agrees with you and have a conversation there
    56
  2.  @milosretig7445  not really. It’s pointing out facts son. Calm down boy
    21
  3.  @milosretig7445  you must be on some strong drugs to even believe Che Guevara stood for anything righteous. He is like a cultist more than anything. Lures gullible people in like you then when things are not what you expect it’s already too late for you. You’re a fool. He didn’t change anything significant and wasn’t even going for anything righteous. Just an image used to fool easily manipulated people like yourself into believing in his image
    17
  4.  @John.McMillan  same can be said about you. You only assume what you want to believe from him. Luckily history shows why you are misled
    8
  5. Yeah because it’s a debate
    8
  6.  @John.McMillan  yeah and you too as well as everywhere he went hasn’t changed much and people still fear being killed by their government and not only that but the people as well. Great job Che you also added people outside of government as a threat to citizens
    7
  7.  @John.McMillan  yes your statement is idiotic. Thanks for understanding
    6
  8.  @John.McMillan  end it because you know it’s true but cannot accept it. An emotional reaction from people with your type of thinking
    5
  9.  @John.McMillan  very sure
    4
  10.  @John.McMillan  you’re very backwards in your thinking as if the USA is the same as him. It’s obvious you choose his dictatorship over government that does more for the people
    4
  11. Don’t the Irish have their own guerilla fighters they idolize? Why care about Che?
    2
  12.  @jave8462  at least people are happier about dying there as people defend the way corrupt government in Cuba treats their people
    2
  13.  @demsochimbo5383  also there clearly isn’t any realistic reason in your made up claim of 38 million deaths a year. Capitalism isn’t even in every country let alone affects any of them
    2
  14.  @demsochimbo5383  yeah there isn’t 38 million killed in the USA annually. Recheck your made up statistics
    2
  15.  @saadfreakinadhia6239  Che was a hero for the oppressed by oppressing others and preserved his own self interests. He was a threat to whoever he disliked regardless of who they were even if they were on his side. Maybe you should quit glamorizing his history as if he caused world peace or something. All he did was replace an oppressive leader with a different oppressive leader. That didn’t change anything
    2
  16. @TimedGalaxy yes reading makes up for murder. A librarian can go on a killing spree and be forgiven by authorities because they give people literature
    2
  17. He knows enough about Che to know he wasn’t a good person. Did you know that Hitler wasn’t even German?
    2
  18.  @MrDenysJoke  no not really. Your comment shows that you’re trying to belittle when you probably know less
    2
  19.  @davidmiatke6758  oof
    2
  20. Well there are different variations of political people. It’s just they get thrown into one party because they may agree on something
    2
  21.  @samaten1386  everyone is garbage when put altogether. A good person is almost nonexistent when factoring every person. That’s why no country can get along or stay stable for too long
    2
  22. Mike was high when he got it
    1
  23.  @nickshale6926  yes I was. You didn’t expect that
    1
  24.  @nickshale6926  yes like everyone suddenly took pictures to prove everything. You are a funny one
    1
  25.  @nickshale6926  so life to you is all about pictures? I didn’t know I had to be a photographer to enjoy life
    1
  26.  @nickshale6926  like I said. I don’t take pictures of everything. Are you the paparazzi or something with your infatuation about pictures?
    1
  27.  @nickshale6926  30s would be around there
    1
  28. @First Name the IRA seem more righteous than Che and he is just an image. A fantasy when in reality he isn’t what people want to imagine him to be
    1
  29. @First Name well you can admire principles and such but not the person if their outcome doesn’t match what they preached. The IRA may have done what seemed to Britain as terrorism but they didn’t attempt to harm civilians only the authorities responsible and were more noble about their cause rather than destroying everything to put in place a leader who has dictatorial power
    1
  30.  Searlait Loughlin  that’s good history but doesn’t mean the Irish agree with him or admire him and their approach seems more rebellious against tyranny while Che’s is to devise and manipulate to create tyranny through other means
    1
  31.  @EK-rx2ju  yeah capitalism has nothing to do with imperialism as well as the Irish adopting a radical brainwashing glamorized terrorist really sounds like they were in over their head in understanding right from wrong. Also collateral damage isn’t the same as intentionally going out of your way to kill people. I highly doubt the majority of the IRA was influenced by Che who is more flawed in his ideology than anything else. Another thing there is nothing suggesting they were socialist either. Last I checked Ireland isn’t going the socialist route or even close to it. It sounds like the IRA could care less about socialism as you are attempting to assume and they care less for good reason
    1
  32.  @MrÓNiadh  uh you don’t know history let alone the difference between capitalism and imperialism.
    1
  33.  @Kitiwake  through dictatorship
    1
  34.  @MrÓNiadh  uh yeah. Capitalism wasn’t founded by Europeans as they were mostly monarchs who gave people the idea of having the right to land and such but would extort their prowess by collecting and even extorting citizens to keep them at a lower class and vulnerable to keep being taken advantage of. Capitalism mainly boomed from industrialization in the US and really it made a big difference by making a regular citizen beyond political power by being pushed into a higher class of wealth and such. However laws have been put in place to control free capitalism so as to make it more suitable for foreign trade and even political gain. It’s really all a big mess. It’s funny because capitalism wasn’t made into existence until the time I stated. All before that even if you owned a business or such you weren’t safe from being owned by the state, country, or royal. Then comes in the middle class but that’s another discussion that changed things to where capitalism had to be implemented lest the masses become aggravated by their handlers
    1
  35.  @MrÓNiadh  also no Europeans own any of the Americas. Tried but failed. Sure they brought in their beliefs and such but mo country in Europe owns anything in the Americas. Spain conquered natives but no South American country gives anything to Spain let alone worships them. Canada has Queen Elizabeth to respect but isn’t owned by England. It is more of a respectable ally to the crown and not the country itself but they’re also mixed with the French but they’re almost like Switzerland in the Americas
    1
  36.  @MrÓNiadh  uh yeah. Capitalism did start in the USA then England copied it and in England theirs wasn’t as successful let alone having to do with capitalism but being competitive to a nation that became more powerful than them and was relatively new. Writing about the colonial period capitalism wasn’t relevant but the political system in place then made it more easily accessible to become a capitalist nation. Also we were talking about imperialism being different than capitalism. Nothing about colonialism. You’re lost. Also the notion that England gave rise to capitalism by making people think they owned land is laughable. No one owned land as they were all owned by the state which was controlled by the crown. Basically like the banks today where they can take your house even if you bought it. It is all an illusion of ownershi. The people owned taxes or it was “acquired” by the crown. The beginning of the USA was more free than the damned land of England. That’s why England lost so much power because people became wise of their bs for awhile. Maybe you should read and learn more as your thinking is like the people who believe socialism is the best political system to have when it’s a total failure and the only closest lands to socialism were/are communist countries
    1
  37.  @EK-rx2ju  the IRA for the most part weren’t intentionally going after civilians but extremists exist then stuff falls apart so its sects are to blame and the IRA has different stances and isn’t one linear entity like Che who intentionally goes for communism which enslaves people right away when it is implemented
    1
  38.  @EK-rx2ju  capitalism didn’t become a thing until businesses began having political power which was in the 1800s. Capitalism is when businesses are not controlled by government overreach. Britain also used ruses like that to gain public trust to then not fall through with its promises. That is more in line with communism. If it is a free market then the businesses freely trade without government interference which wasn’t the case in the example you gave
    1
  39. Because he thinks he is cool even though he knows he’s a monster. Same as why people like Al Capone for some reason or Charles Manson or some other notorious criminal
    1
  40.  @dio2776  so speaking pretty words makes up for actually being a mass murderer rather than what people imagine him as? How does that make any sense at all?
    1
  41.  @larrywheeler9917  no not really. Che wanting to control others like any other corrupt leader doesn’t make him a saint and any slight disagreement with him had you openly murdered before him. Yeah every saint has people killed in front of them over a slight disagreement.
    1
  42.  @user-iu1ru1qz7u  I like your comments. They seem more educated than most people here
    1
  43. There are like 50 different countries to divide each other in South America
    1
  44.  Dustin Stich  yet they couldn’t even become well developed
    1
  45.  @卂爪卂几-g5w  I never said that but really if people actually want to make a discussion about this parroted comment it could have been stated a few times rather than over a dozen times
    1
  46.  @demsochimbo5383  as are you
    1
  47.  @demsochimbo5383  you said capitalism which the US is
    1
  48.  @demsochimbo5383  yeah you stated capitalism which the USA mainly is so you cannot say capitalism caused all of that. That’s ignorance at its fullest
    1
  49.  @demsochimbo5383  actually it is as many adopt it into helping them function. Most other countries are a mix of different types of political systems to help them function. The USA is actually the closest to pure capitalism as people can own what they create more so than anywhere else. Also state all the countries that you think are capitalist and how you came up with how capitalism affected them
    1
  50.  @demsochimbo5383  yeah you are just throwing a number with no evidence. Facts don’t care about your feelings
    1
  51.  @castrocuba4937  uh yeah no. Their main intentions were to win over the people to put a communist rule over the people in Cuba. The main theme of establishing communism is to win the people over at the same time having complete control over them yet they are ok with rule over them as long as a small need is met. That isn’t actual freedom and I doubt you know what fascism is as they used a fascist way of taking over Cuba to takeover. Yeah education and healthcare can seem a lot better when it had none to begin with but it isn’t like it is the best and also the education is to have them look up to Castro kind of like Kim Jong Un had when he was alive. You really are the kind of fool to have a violent dictator rule over you and be ok with it as long as something minimal satisfies your needs of a “livelihood”
    1
  52.  @castrocuba4937  uh yeah no. Do you even have a brain? As far as programs for helping people the US has the most out of any other country in the world and is literally the most charitable as most countries are given aid by US citizens that actually travel and do humanitarian aid for certain impoverished parts of the world. You literally have zero knowledge about what runs the Country and you are very low in intelligence
    1
  53.  @daftpunk5656  not even close but believe what you will
    1
  54.  @daftpunk5656  yeah no. If you paid attention to politics the reason why the US got involved is because Iraq was going after other countries for control of oil and would have thrown an instability not only in that region but for countries that use that area for distribution of oil. Then you will have masses complaining about the situation in the Middle East as well as why oil is being affected then other nations would have to get involved either way. So there is no appeasing the masses who think they know the affairs of the world
    1
  55.  @daftpunk5656  uh yeah. Your assumptions based on conspiracy theories shows your level of intelligence. Yeah so you ignore how harsh the governments were in that area to their people but as long as they’re getting wealthy it’s ok. Honestly you are the reason why corrupt governments can easily manipulate and massacre their own people. Such ignorance is baffling beyond belief
    1
  56.  @daftpunk5656  uh yeah. Did the US massacre an estimated 50 million people within a short span of time? No that belongs to communism starting in China. Deaths from the Iraq war would barely be above 1 million if even that probably less most likely. Also you do realize many nations in the Middle East relied on oil for their well being. Iraq wanted to control and destabilize that region to keep all the wealth for itself and was going to take over as much of those areas as possible for the dominant rule over oil which is also where chemical testing on civilians came in before invading other nations. I already told you what the main concern of the oil was about. Yes the US fought for oil but they weren’t looking to own it and the US still doesn’t own any oil in that region. You must be dense. The nations that had control of oil in that region still do and they sell to every nation interested in that oil. The US, Russia, China, England, and whoever else. What are you even trying to prove with your nonsense? Basically the US got involved to stabilize the region in order for everyone to not be threatened by a tyrant polititically and financially. As I said before if Saddam did take over most of the Middle East to control the oil then the public would have immediate outcry to stabilize the region and also stop with the destabilization of oil price fluctuation from the warring state of the Middle East.
    1
  57.  @daftpunk5656  uh yeah. That is total nonsense. Printing dollars doesn’t mean anything and Iraq set itself up for being warred against as it was growing tensions from its interests to control oil in the Middle East. You do know Euros are worth more than dollars and can be used to buy oil? It isn’t like they have to have dollars to buy oil. Are you on drugs? Venezuela wanted to not trade with the USA and were doing well for themselves until their own politics got greedy and their government became tyrannic to where no one would help them. Yeah that was all on their own. They didn’t need anyone to mess that up for them. Maybe in your own delirious mind the USA is affecting everything which it doesn’t. You are on something else besides conspiracy theories
    1
  58. Seeing as government and people in South America do worse. The US involvement fit in well there
    1
  59.  @chideraalexanderdex9876  did you ever think it’s because people there don’t want anything better? You can give someone tools and such to have what you have but if they fail miserably then it’s obvious they can’t or don’t want what somebody else has. They love taking but don’t like making it on their own
    1
  60.  @chideraalexanderdex9876  like I said. Government OR THE PEOPLE do not want what they’re given to help them advance. Yeah if there are people that make things more difficult to give what is given then of course it will go bad. It’s like trying to put a cat and dog together and expect them to become friends. It works sometimes but sometimes you get a dog too aggressive and will attack the cat no matter how friendly and harmless it is
    1
  61.  @chideraalexanderdex9876  you obviously know nothing about me or about reality. Did I say everyone is bad? No I didn’t but a high majority of people are bad. A few good cannot outweigh that reality. If that were true then you disregard the facts of drug trade, human trafficking, and other such things that are wrong with everything in the world. You only see the good because you focus and choose to see just that. I see everything as it is and don’t sugarcoat the good or the bad. Grow up and open your eyes. The world isn’t at all good or bad but is mostly bad
    1
  62. He isn’t the Bee Gees
    1
  63.  @kf9952  some people call it a problem they call it a gift
    1
  64.  Dustin Stich  that’s funny how people use small irrelevant things like that to prove a point or dismiss something. It’s like saying he didn’t even know he prefers caramel over chocolate
    1
  65. Same can be said about every other nation. The difference is the USA doesn’t do it to its own people
    1
  66.  @anonimo8103  they’re called people who give a damn about others freedoms
    1
  67.  @kevindube7096  so the USA is bad? It didn’t do much for the world except help in advancements such as industry, oil, transit, automobiles, airplanes, electricity, technology, rights to other races, women’s rights, worker’s rights, and more including modern technology and such. Yeah the USA is bad in advancing the world possibly centuries ahead of its natural progression. Damn the USA in making the world better in advancements. It makes me mad. I would have loved to live without what we have today and struggle like my grandparents did in their lives growing up
    1
  68.  @squilliamfancyson1080  don’t use logic. It hurts people’s feelings these days
    1
  69. @Steven Andrade Che was a false image. He only wanted the progression of communism as he was a pawn. If he truly was what you say he would openly go against the actions of Castro and want a reform in his actions, but he didn’t. It showed he was using his words as a front and his “journal” was most likely made up so to make him appear in a good eye to make a legacy of himself. He was something else and his actions speak louder than words. He was a pawn in something bigger than himself
    1
  70.  @warcriment7298  yeah many dictators didn’t personally execute anyone yet they made it happen. By your logic all leaders that ordered such heinous actions against humanity should be given and their accused crimes null and void to what happened
    1
  71.  @warcriment7298  yeah he fought for a dictatorship. I know he wasn’t the dictator but established them into power as well wanted more of the same in other countries. I may not know them personally but I know enough to know that they’re not even close to being saints or a good image to look up to. Also the USA started getting involved as what other countries were bringing into the USA. You really aren’t much into history or what realistically happened much
    1
  72.  @Mutterschwein  he means leftists have different views than liberals and funny thing is liberals go against their own views with their actions (that is they think they’re liberals). The same can be said about the right or conservatives as well.
    1
  73.  @Mutterschwein  he was getting to that and if you already knew, maybe you didn’t and just said so to make the conversation end, then you should have already knew what the aim was to. Now do you actually have anything to add or are going to stay open ended?
    1
  74.  @Mutterschwein  I wouldn’t go that far as that is something only they would know if anything
    1
  75. Communists actually care about propaganda so he would be flattered by it
    1
  76.  @webtheweb  Che wouldn’t give a rat’s ass. Only if it fed his image he would
    1
  77.  @samaten1386  and he failed and made it worse
    1
  78.  @samaten1386  yeah so you want people who murder their own citizens with their power but one sounds nicer so you agree with them more. That’s not very logical
    1
  79. Yeah what is up with the Che Guevara rising in popularity? Ok he had righteous views and intentions but how he realistically approached it all shows that he was none of that
    1
  80. Do I Kruschev?
    1
  81. @Steven Andrade it’s only wrong if you’re not in power. If I didn’t believe people should have rights and not be oppressed I would love to be a communist as long as I am in the upper class of it
    1
  82.  Dustin Stich  which is why he saw communism killing people as ok because it’s for the better good
    1