Comments by "marie parker" (@marieparker3822) on "Pentagon Funded the Wuhan Lab" video.

  1. 'The Mail on Sunday' in an April 2020 issue, reported about an article published by a Deputy Director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 'The Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity', issue of August 2019, in which he said, 'I am very worried. There are high-level labs (mentioning no names) which need Biosafety and Biosecurity experts and engineers, and which at the moment have amateurs'.
    3
  2. I was a fan of TWiV (This Week in Virology) until recently. Their recent issues 760 and 762 are - in the words of one commenter - 'cringetopia'. You can actually see and listen to P Daszak and two other shills from the WHO - if you can stand it.
    3
  3. PETER Daszak. I saw a fascinating documentary in April 2020 on U-tube made by Epoch Times and presented by Joshua Phillipp, which I can't find (I am a Luddite or has it been deleted by U-tube). One of the interesting things was that Indian virologists said early in 2020 that they had found four short sequences of bases in the 35,000-base genome of SARS-CoV-2 which they had only ever seen in HIV - NOT that anyone can get HIV from this - that is not possible. However, they said, such tweaking (if it was such) of the bat virus would make it much easier for a zoonotic virus to adapt to perform human to human transmission. This normally takes a long time and requires more than one animal intermediary. This virus transmitted between humans extremely efficiently immediately.
    2
  4. Actually, they may all be there, but you have to hunt for them. There should be four.
    2
  5. PETER Dasczak. I saw a brilliant documentary on U-tube by Epoch Times, presented by Joshua Phillipp in April 2020 (which I can't find because I am a Luddite). It was utterly fascinating. Early in 2020, Indian virologists thought they had found four short sequences of bases in the 35,000-base genome of SARS-CoV-2 which they had only ever seen in HIV - NOT that anyone can get HIV from this - that is not possible. However, such tweaking would make it much easier for the virus (a bat virus) to be transmitted from human to human. Normally it takes a long time, and more than one intermediate host, to wait for an animal virus to change enough to become easily transmissable between humans. This virus managed to do it immediately.
    1
  6. A report in 'The Mail on Sunday' in, I think, one of their April 2020 issues, mentioned an article published by a Deputy Director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the August 2019 issue of the 'Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity' where he said, 'I am very worried. There are high-level labs (naming no names) which need Biosafety and Biosecurity experts and engineers, and which at the moment have amateurs'. My best guess, as a totally amateur person, is that these viruses were being subjected to very potentially dangerous procedures - banned in most countries - and gross negligence allowed SARS 2 to escape. The Chinese obsession with 'face' meant that they had to cover this up as much as possible - fatal for China and everyone else. That is the kind explanation. The unkind explanation is, of course, that it is plain biological warfare.
    1
  7. It was notable that when the Australians said in the spring of 2020 that there had to be a fully independent and comprehensive enquiry as to how the pandemic had happened, within the minute of their saying this, the Chinese said, 'How dare you! For that, we are not buying your beef or coal, and we are putting a 200 per cent tariff on your wine'. It should also be noted that the WHO (and especially Tedros Gebreyesus) is the creature of the Chinese Emperor. The WHO took ages in 2020 to admit that the virus was highly infectious - it was saying for weeks into 2020 that it was difficult to be transmitted between humans. It took weeks to declare a pandemic.
    1
  8. The 'Mail on Sunday' in an i
    1
  9. My very interesting, informative and relevant communications to you, Carl and Callum, keep disappearing from the Comments. I have put some of them in - they are long - twice. Are they too relevant for U-tube? How can I communicate with you?
    1