Comments by "marie parker" (@marieparker3822) on "Lotuseaters Dot Com"
channel.
-
97
-
68
-
58
-
48
-
39
-
31
-
28
-
28
-
26
-
24
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
14
-
13
-
10
-
Godfrey Bloom, in his Heretics interview with Ed Dutton, put forward the hypothesis that Farage's change in behaviour dates from 2010 and his light-plane air crash. Bloom said that before this time, Farage was approachable, flexible and open to other people's ideas. After that he became quite different.
This reminds me of David Starkey's hypothesis about Henry VIII, who had a serious jousting accident where he was knocked off his horse, seriously injured and was unconscious for a long time afterwards. Before the accident, Henry VIII was an artistic, athletic, likeable and approachable man. Afterwards he became an intolerant, cruel tyrant who instantly beheaded anyone who disagreed with him.
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Interesting thesis, and I wouldn't put it past 'them' - Lockheed SkunkWorks, NASA, the Pentagon et al.
BUT, sightings only/mainly in USA?
What about Rendlesham Forest (Suffolk, England), Verghena (Brazil) - I've probably got the spelling of the town wrong - Ruha (Zimbabwe), Melbourne (Australia), Chapelcross (Solway Firth, Scotland), Pentyrch, near Llantrisant (Wales)?
And, also the Phoenix Lights . . .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Who are Reform-UK's Shadow Cabinet?
Who is Deputy Leader, Education Spokesperson, Health Spokesperson, Shadow Chancellor, Shadow Foreign Secretary, Shadow Home Secretary, etc? It seems to me that they have all been sacked (from UKIP, Brexit, and now Reform-UK). They are not a political Party, only a Limited Company, jointly owned by Nigel Farage and Mohammad Ziauddin Yussef.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Use of the term 'gender' puts us in danger of falling into essentialism and therefore sexism. 'Men would tend to the cows.' Connor, have you ever heard of milkmaids or shepherdesses?
Some Victorians: 'Girls who read "difficult" books will render themselves sterile'.
Men are physically stronger than women - more muscle, less fat, greater heart-lung capacity, denser bones, longer legs, greater upper-body strength. This is the result of testosterone throughout male puberty.
Medieval times: women in farming, milking cows, making butter and cheese, making beer, helping to bring in the harvest (no tractors, far less combine harvesters), oh, and raising poultry, collecting the eggs, and killing and plucking the birds to sell or eat. Cooking, and cleaning and laundry, before housework was mechanised. Result: probably death at 35.
Industrial Revolution: women (and children, until Lord Shaftesbury) in factories, in cotton mills, in coal-mines, pulling coal wagons when they were pregnant.
Btw, I know there are some cultures which sequester menstruating women, who are regarded as unclean, but in our culture to my knowledge no difference is made between menstruating and not - you don't get a day off from the cotton mill because you have the first day of menstruation. You should certainly not now be taking any time off from the office, classroom or lab. My point? Complaints are made about 'women working' when the work they start to do is non-manual, interesting, well paid or influential. Fun facts: the first computer programmer was called Ada. She lived in the middle of the 19th century; the only person to have received a Nobel Prize for physics and another for chemistry was called Marie. They both had children, btw.
It is the epitome of sexism to suggest that a woman who exhibits political acumen (Queen Elizabeth Tudor of England), or has the charismatic inspiration to guide an army to victory (Joan of Arc) must really have been a man, as some gender idealogues have maintained.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We don't know that we are the first technologically advanced civilisation. There could well be civilisations a million years ahead of us in scientific knowledge.
The Milky Way is quite a large Galaxy - not as large as our neighbour Andromeda. Our Galaxy is 100,000 light years in diameter. It contains hundreds of billions of stars. There are billions of Galaxies.
Carl, see the Phoenix Lights, the Virginia, Brazil incident, the Ruha, Zimbabwe incident. Listen to the flyers of the American Navy Air Arm. These people do not wear tinfoil on their heads. (See, for example, Lex Fridman's interview with Ryan Graves.) They are trained observers.
Why would intelligent aliens even use radio waves - they are probably telepathic.
In order to get to the stage of development that can move at 30 Mach without a sonic boom and then stop dead, you would have to survive for a long time. That means you would have to be highly developed and mature politically and psychologically. I would guess that such aliens would find us too interesting from an anthropology point of view to exterminate us. In any case, if they wanted to, they could do it in a heartbeat. So stop denying and atop worrying.😄
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1