Comments by "John Crawford" (@JohnCrawford1979) on "'Is A Convicted Felon Illegally Possessing A Gun A Serious Offense?': Tom Cotton Grills Nominees" video.

The logic of the Marxist would be to consider felonies as a collective whole, rather than as an individual, case by case situation. That's why the present gun control laws rather than going after the individual criminals. What the judges say by their lips is true enough to how the justice system ought to work. Whether their actual actions in the records of their work on the bench reflects that remains to be seen. But if the left had their way, all gun owners would be felons collectively, simply for owning a gun. Such legislation must be opposed as unconstitutional.
2
@orangetuono38 - And yet it is the 'policing' at the federal level that creates a lot of this distopian Hell. A lot of conservatives and right wing in general have caught on to what they call glow events, or events they believe are put on by FBI operatives posing as right wing. There also is some odd connections between many shooters and supposedly retired FBI or CIA agents. The left has often talked about similar sorts of things happening in countries that the US was involved in destabilizing for political interests, according to the left, for the benefit of US corporate and neo-con interests. And the right now is basically saying similar things, except the operations to destabilize being done here in the US instead of abroad. Part of why I went libertarian for a while is Ron Paul and others were making a lot of sense, and sheding light on these things. In short, the corporations and the uniparty in the federal government are not our friends. They want to enslave us in an even worse dystopia than we've already been through.
2
How are they saying that? Would you rather that there be one collective sentencing that doesn't factor in your individual circumstances? I'm sure plenty of people facing felony charges simply for standing on the steps or the grass of the Capitol during Jan 6th would prefer to have their sentencing based on an individual basis, rather than getting the same charge as those that busted up windows and broke in. Hell, we'd love to see some accountability from those in charge of security who failed at their jobs. And certainly, any individual or group that instigated the violence ought to be prosecuted. But grandma that just happened to be standing on the lawn, not realizing she's standing on Capital grounds, do you think she should get the same sentencing as someone that shot and killed someone during the Capital incident? Do you really thing looky-loo grandma deserves potentially a life sentence, just because she happened to be there and didn't realize she was standing in a restricted area?
2
@orangetuono38 - Here's hoping for some sanity to finally come back. I remember when NCLB was the standard for teaching, and you needed a background check to prove you weren't some druggy abusive child molester, and yet now that seems to be criteria for teacher of the year. That there's parents going along with it - well, shows the mind control is working.
1
Dan Johnston - You obviously don't understand that if your intent is to shoot to kill, you don't do it with a spray of bullets. Instead, you take your time to aim at your target and take them down with one shot. That's why most thugs prefer handguns, and take out their targets up close. Only fools that don't know how to use a gun would use full or semi auto in a spray and pray manner. There's far more chance of the target they are shooting to get away.
1