Comments by "John Crawford" (@JohnCrawford1979) on "Impeached for THAT? (Comparing the Trump Articles of Impeachment - Real Law Review)" video.

  1. It's pretty obvious why they didn't include bribery, since it would directly relate to Biden and his abuse of powers that Trump was wanting to investigate with Biden's dealings with Ukraine as VP. That really should raise a red flag for why this impeachment by the House is a sham and will be squashed by the Senate. Does anyone in their right mind even think that, if the impeachment hearing happens to convict and remove Trump that it would get the 67 votes needed to do so? This is merely a political victory for the House Democrats, which may backfire as impeachment wasn't nearly as popular as they had hoped. The far, and maybe a few moderate left are happy, but a lot of people are walking away from the DNC, and with 2020 being a presidential election year, there's going to be a lot more people voting that generally do not during a non-presidential election year. If the public are fed up with the DNC's political shenanigans come next November, you can expect a huge red tidal wave across the US and a new Republican led House and Senate exonerating Trump. https://www.thoughtco.com/impeachment-the-unthinkable-process-3322171
    1