Comments by "John Crawford" (@JohnCrawford1979) on "Are Fetal Heartbeat Laws Constitutional? (and the History of Roe v. Wade) -- Real Law Review" video.

  1. What can be said that the Jane Roe in Roe v. Wade became pro life? https://youtu.be/MYNyaNNq8Xg
    1
  2. The flip side of deregulated abortion clinics is that they often have lower standards than most medical clinics. It's interesting those for gun control are all for regulations similar how you explain the regulations of abortion clinics, in that major retailers choose not to sell guns any more because of all the regulatory red tape. But yet, liberals practically want to give a free for all on abortions to the point that it's not even a joke to say they want post birth abortions to be legal. The lax standards for abortion clinics can make them no better than a back alley abortion. Or have you already forgotten about Gosnell? Not to mention there are more current cases of abuses by abortion clinics that get covered up because abortion is the sacred cow on the left, so they get a blind eye paid to them by liberal law makers, judges, and lawyers.
    1
  3. Also important to note about various similar laws, especially in as much as one can compare humans with the rest of the animal kingdom. 1. You can be fined and/or jailed for disturbing a sea turtle nest. (https://tapeunit.com/sea-turtle-101-what-are-the-penalties-for-disturbing-the-sea-turtles/). 2. Even though it has been delisted under the Endangered Species Act, the bald eagle is still protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, meaning one is prohibited from taking, possessing, selling, purchasing, bartering, offering to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit, can lead to a first offense fine of $5,000 or one year imprisonment with $10,000 or not more than two years in prison for a second conviction. Felony convictions carry a maximum fine of $250,000 or two years of imprisonment. The fine doubles for an organization. (https://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html) Yet, when it comes to human life, our laws should be more lenient than these laws regarding animals? Comstock followed essentially the same sort of legal framework as these for protecting animals, as did the regulations regarding abortion clinics. But apparently we can say it's a 'right' when it comes to killing unborn humans, but perfectly fine to impose when it comes to the rest of the animal kingdom. Thus, it would be better to be born as a bald eagle or a sea turtle if you want your right to life from the moment of conception to be protected.
    1