Youtube comments of John Crawford (@JohnCrawford1979).

  1. 47
  2. 38
  3. 37
  4. 34
  5. 30
  6. 25
  7. 24
  8. 23
  9. 23
  10. 23
  11. 21
  12. 21
  13. 20
  14. 18
  15. 16
  16. 14
  17. 13
  18. 12
  19. 12
  20. 12
  21. 11
  22. 11
  23. 10
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 10
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 7
  35. 7
  36. 7
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 6
  49. 6
  50. 6
  51. 6
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 5
  61. 5
  62. 5
  63. 5
  64. 5
  65. 5
  66. 5
  67. 5
  68. 5
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. Mastodon is like a book or game. It's something either published, or with a platform. So this raises a different issue. When you distribute a publication or put a voice on a platform, guess what? Not everyone is going to have the same views or hold the same values as you. A publication has every right to choose whoever they want to publish. We already have publications like the Jacobin, which takes its name from political club during the French Revolution that became identified with extreme egalitarianism and violence from mid-1793 to mid-1794 and helped play a factor in the rise of Robespierre. Christians have all sorts of publications like the Christian Science Monitor, or the National Catholic Register. And, guess what? There are Christians that may read the Jacobin, and atheists that might read the Christian publications mentioned. As a conservative Christian, I can't stop an atheist from reading a Christian publication, nor would I want to. Even a Satanist can read a Bible. Albeit I'd hope they might convert after doing so. But I can't just go over and take the Bible from the Satanist and declare it not for him, and that he and all other Satanists must be banned from reading the Bible. Maybe I'm not like the Bible thumper of old, who themselves were a form of woke, and we learned not to follow their bigotry. Ironically, the left is going the way of the old stereotypical Bible thumping, book burning, Satanic Panic fundamentalist Christian they still whine about when it comes to their narrative about that era. But apparently the left learned to be woke bigots.
    4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93.  @codahighland  - I've been roughly moving through the realms of conservative, centrist, and libertarian for most my life. I could tell you what was right wing in the 80's, somewhat in the 90's, though I'd say bipartisan neocon politics of the 90's was starting to muddy the waters. The 2000's was mostly moderate 'compassionate' conservative defined by W Bush, and what currently (since roughly 2010) is considered RINO spineless so-called Republicans that more often than not vote with Dem and show disdain for much of the conservative and libertarian right. But to say what is popular American right, in current times, I don't know what defines that. Trump is not right wing. Before he ran for president, he identified mostly as Democrat, which is partly why his presidential bid was taken as a joke by most, until he actually won. But I still wouldn't call him right wing. He's probably more or less a centrist, but he caters to people that, yes a lot are definitely on the right, but there's plenty that are not and are just fed up with how far the left has gone and has fallen into this ideological purity spiral on who can be the most authentic leftist, checking every single box they can, being loyal to every single leftist organization and activist group out there. And I can understand how some might consider that orthodoxy. but I think it's much more fundamentalist, even a weird sort of anti-matter twin to the conservative fundamentalism of the 80's and 90's who also were trying to censor video games, and held a political stronghold on the right. Yes, there's still a religious right, but it's laughable to say it has anywhere close to the power that the radical left fundamentalists have right now. Even as much as I am a Catholic, traditional conservative religiously, I really fear that we are looking at another French Revolution reign of terror from the left, where you can't just agree to disagree, since there are people being jailed for any sort of activism on the right where far worse things on the verge of rioting on the left is paid a blind eye to. Modern visions of segregation are mostly on the left, especially with how safe spaces are utilized. Bret Weinstein is an example of this sort of thing, who is a former professor of evolutionary biology, having served on the faculty of Evergreen State College from 2002 until 2017. Evergreen for the longest time had been considered the epitome of the most liberal of liberal colleges. Weinstein would traditionally have been fully well check marked into the left in years gone by. He was basically ousted for saying that this whole DEI and safe spaces might be going a bit too far and that it's discrimination to tell white students they are not allowed on campus in order to fight 'who-aight supreme pizzas'. He's among a few people on the left that appear sane enough to call out that something's really wrong with what's going on, and because they won't tow the line of modern leftists, they at best are considered right wingers, if not far right extremists. It's unfortunate we're in such sensational times as these. I hope we can find a way out of it before we see a real genocide or holocaust transpire from all the insanity.
    4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. I think the problem they hate about the losing funds is because it goes to that one dig of going woke = going broke. This has been the reality of AAA gaming since 2014, when Sargon of Akkad became Sargon of Akkad, for better or for worse. I say better because of how he was about to return to YouTube, and how the Lotus Podcast has been able to maintain success and keep Carl Benjamin relevant, and become more humanized since he doesn't have to speak behind the Sargon mask and explain his points without being seen as just an angry gamer neckbeard. I'd personally love to just be about music, how I've enjoyed composing music since the days I was writing MIDIs on mid - late 90's Twelve-Tone Cakewalk music suite I got with my first MIDI keyboard that I used on an IBM Aptiva 486 that initially ran on Win 3.11 with wavetable, which was later upgraded with SB AWE 64 with soundfont instrument banks and and capable to create your own. Basically the origin of today's modern VSTs and other virtual instruments, and the basic MIDI standards. Moving to Linux, It wasn't any hate for Win-10. which I liked, as being the successor for 7. which was the successor for XP, which I would still be on because that was the most table and long term experience Microsoft ever put out that was great. I think They even know that XP is the best they ever will have, especially if they continue the way they are with what they are doing now. Linux wasn't something I expected to be freedom from that, until I started try out distros and seeing what they have to offer. Currently, I'm between Fedora 40 and Garuda, both of which I run Hyprland on. Fedora is, next to Debian, one of the best long term distros while Garuda is a fun, current of the cutting edge of Arch. It's how I learned about Pipewire, Hyprland, and Wayland - two of which impact the actual multimedia aspects of how things like MuseScore, Ardour, Audacity, GNU, OpenShot, and other apps I need for my workflow. While I love the decentralization of much of the Linux distros, there is indeed a problem that only Bryan Lunduke is saying something about it. I don't live in Portland, But I do live in WA state, and as much as I believe it is necessary to pay attention to local government, 2020 showed that there's a problem there too. Microsoft basically owns my state, even now buying up farmland (and votes) in counties that are, or used to be red counties. There still are a lot of counties red, and fairly independent, and really, everything county that's not in the Seattle-Tacoma, Puget Sound area, heck, even a few counties in that area would love to break away because Seattle politics defines far too much of the politics of the rest of WA. There's similar parts of Oregon that would like to defect from Portland, just like Northern CA would love to be detached from Southern CA, and some of Southern CA misses when they were much more rural and conservative. TX may still be fairly red, but it's growing more purple. Titus is lucky to be living in a red state where he can be middle of the road centrist and not have to face a bloated, corrupt Dem controlled state governing juggernaut that is backed by some of the largest tech, music, and entertainment corporations in the country, if not much of the world. Talk about local? I've been local to my area for a long time, with my education being from Washington State University in Pullman, WA, That's about as far east and rural local college town WA as you can get up here in the Northwest, and heck, I went even farther with taking a few classes offered from University of Idaho in Moscow Idaho. I'm sure HRC would like to claim me as a Russian spy for that one. 😏 And yes, out of college, I wanted to be more centrist, and still believe that both the left and the right are problematic. Yet they are pretty much all we got to work with, considering you get the anarchist side of libertarian, regardless if they are left or right, But, yet again, Carl Benjamin is a UK Centrist, and yet the Labor party is pretty close to where the DNC is on things, and even the Tories are more or less RINOs, with maybe a few with any backbone, but most just go along to get along with Labor. That's a trend we have in much of the West, on both sides of the pond, throughout UK, Europe, Canada, and the US. South America is in its own world of hurt with both the the illegal drug cartels and corrupt politicians that make out politics seem pretty mild in comparison. But much of the West is from the world stage down to the mayor is major trouble. On every level, it's backed by the corporations that back the major parties, and may have certain channels going through less legitimate ways to make change. Sure, we have a lot of channels on TV, and the internet has held a lot of open space, but the people that control it from the world stage down to the local level are held by a handful of media moguls. These moguls are either big tech, or owned by big tech, or otherwise are influenced by big tech. Ironically, it's the left that I first learned about why not to trust big corporations, even while it's the left that currently is benefiting from big corporations, as well as big governement, who might as well be one and the same, the way things are going. Again, I'd rather be composing music, learning more about how MIDI and other aspects of AV work on Linux, and how to more effectively utilize social media to market and stream my music. Carl Benjamin just wanted to play video games, Bryan Lunduke would rather geek out on tech, and I'd like to just enjoy the geeking out between both Lunduke and Titus, especially on what distros and apps they might think are great for AV type things, and how to make the greatest laptop AV streaming studio ever. But no, the things we love are being used against us. And indeed, there is nothing more local and personal to a geek than their computer. Add to that people who are discriminating certain values, principles, religion, or politics, claiming I ought to be banned and treated as the monster they clam me to be. As a US citizen, that believes in the Constitution, there is something really wrong here. Conservatives get it, and have been warning about this sort of culture shift for a lot longer than any of us, back when it made sense to call the corporate enterprises more or less right wing capitalists. Right now, it's ridiculous to call these companies capitalists, especially after selling themselves out to China. And it shows when they show greater respect to China, and then back in the states, they keep fueling the culture war, and try to ramp it up even further, even to the point where you don't think they even care about going woke and making their company lose money and open themselves to lawsuits and boycotts, or people just tired of the BS, and grow wary of giving their money to companies that hold outright animosity and hatred for them. Again, I'd love to go back to enjoying tech and making music, etc. But, sometimes you have to say enough is enough. Otherwise, they will just plough right over you and try to bully you into submission.
    3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 2
  147. This is why I don't use Steam that much, because it is just renting. You pay how much you would to own a game to rent it. For now, you may mock Win 7 users for being frustrated for what is effectively planned obsolescence, but then, why be mad at Ubuntu and other major Linux distros when they choose not to support older versions? Valve may support and run on Linux for now, but they are not beholden to remain doing so. They don't even have to continue to use Chrome. Win 7 an XP are not unsafe, and I think there is a good case to make that, when older OSes do get put on planned obsolescence that the company that no longer supports the OS no longer has control or rights over how people may use it, and effectively make it free and open source. Plus, look at what the retro gaming community, and demo scene, that utilize old computers as far back as the Amiga and Atari ST. You can even find people that try to refurbish old Commodore PET to play some of the most ancient versions of Snake. Then there's the Atari consoles and people that make home brew games for thr 2600, 7800, even the 5200. These are console and computers that, for some, even their original company has long went out of business. Security-wise, there's few people left that even know how to program on them, let alone want to make viruses in BASIC. not to mention, with RAM based computers, you just turn them off, and the malware is killed because RAM is short term memory, which is shut off when the computer shuts off. You're selling the Win 7, and the XP argument short. It's not just about Steam, but also a mater of right to ownership and right to repair. The only thing that makes Win 7, XP, or even earlier versions of Ubuntu obsolete is that the people that once worked on it no longer do so. So why can't those that, for whatever reason, decide they want to use the OSes form communities that continue to work on support on their own? Isn't this, in a way, how Linux carries on, and part of why we have so many distros is because of older distro that are no longer around, but there is still a dedicated community that forks off of them? Why is it laughable for Win 7 and XP to now become free and open source distros of their own right? Especially when the company that used to support them abandoned them. It doesn't even matter that the company that abandoned them still exist, for then you might as well say Ubuntu shouldn't exist because Debian still exists. Or, a little closer in similarity, Fedora and other Red Hat distros shouldn't exist because Red Hat still exists, open source copyright notwithstanding. Because, legally, such copyrights don't seem to hold water anyways, since Redhat can trample over it anyway and say it's their code and they can use it however they want, regardless, and the courts seem to side with Red Hat. Anyway, and as it is, GOG wouldn't have existed, nor would Steam eventually pick up certain classic games, like Doom, if it wasn't for abandonware. It's only later, after companies that still held the licenses realized they could still profit from older games, that the older games wound up on Steam and consol stores, or repackaged in all-in-one nostalgia console cash grabs. Because otherwise, the argument would remain that people got ROMs for old abandoned games because either no one was selling them, the originals became insanely expensive collectibles that no one wanted to damage the hardware, so ROM backups were the better option to play them, or just simply the game companies no longer supported them, or no longer existed to support them - hence being called abandonware. All I'm saying is there's more to the story, and a lot more that ought to be hashed out legally, which gets into the archaic views we have of copywite, and how they work (or how abusive and dysfunctional they are) in modern contracts, licensing, etc. if anything, Linux and the abandoned OSes like Win 7 and XP are on a similar path. When it comes to rights of ownership, what it means to have community driven support for an OS, and being able to maintain these things. Steam shouldn't be beholden fo chrome. But moreover, your argument about security of an OS that has to rely on a dedicated community for support is shooting Linux in the foot. Linux is a diverse community that has people dedicated to updating and maintaining the particular distros that have built up to become a community. The difference for Win 7 and XP is they are already a built up community that has been abandoned. The probably are mad most especially at Microsoft, so the lashing out at Steam is from putting salt on an already open wound. What would you say to them if you continued having trouble with Windows native games, with Wine and Proton failing to get them to work, and they said, "Just give up and run Windows!" Oh, right, some did say that, and yet you didn't give up on Linux, despite you could have gotten on Win 10 or 11 for free. But hey, that's the banter among competition.Yet now that they have reached the time of forced obsolescence, they don't have to be enemies any more. They can help push for a more free and open world that isn't subject to the whims of big tech on whether we are made obsolete, or otherwise get locked out simply because the choose to do so.
    2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. Bernie seemed authentic until twice bowing down to the DNC establishment. Plus, after he made some money after shilling his book, he didn't seem to go after the millionaires as loudly. Then, if you consider he has three houses, where the average American is barely able to pay their rent or mortgage, it makes you wonder how authentic he is about being in it for the little guy, rather than doing Karl Marx and just happens to be a self-loathing grifter that gets by due to the people he cons into supporting him or the cause he claims to be a part of. But, then again, as much as the DNC wants to hold power by giving lip service to popular socialism of the idiocracy, maybe that's why he falls back lock step with the establishment left, because he's not a 'true believer' of the cause. After all, if you have property and prosperity, why would you want to seriously take up a cause against it? Socialism is a con made up by a burgeoise grifter that played into the burgeoise conscience about the poor, and worked to rouse up the rabble in the proletariate that felt disenfranchised by the burgeoise. But the equity that socialism calls for ultimately leaves everybody poor and divided, save for the con artists that caused all the discord, who take power, and often bleed countries dry of both economic success and horde all the natural resources. In other words, modern Venesuella, and what you see in Seattle with a city council that actually does have a Communist on the council and a statue of Lennon in one of its parks. Their 'democratic socialism' is going about as well as it is in other democrat/socialist run cities in America, such as San Francisco, Chicago, and is partially what we get with Biden and the popular socialism in DNC establishment policies.
    2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. ​ @AllLogarithmsEqual - No, it's not a reasonable concern, but having that concern can hint to someone's bias or view. I don't see how Lunduke can be said to be any more or less honest just for consolidating his content. It seems more that he's conceding to how you can't be apolitical any more. I get it, to a point, being that, in the 80's and 90's, video games and computer magazines were about as apolitical as you can get. They weren't without their biases. Magazines that were published by, say Nintendo, Sega, Atari, and Sony, they obviously were going to write exclusively about the consoles and the games on the consoles of their parent companies. But, regardless if they were exclusive to a company, or included any and all things related to video games, it was the common expectation that they would just keep to writing game reviews, talk on the tech and peripherals of the current or up and coming consoles, as well as events, like the E3 expo. About the only time there was anything political talked about in the magazines was when politicians were talking about censoring or banning games, and how games shouldn't be taken so seriously, that it was more a problem with bad parenting. Nowadays, you have game journos that are more like the censorship advocates in the 90's Or, for whatever reason, they have to inject some random rant about how they hate Trump or JK Rowling that has nothing to do with gaming whatsoever. That Lunduke doesn't go out of his way to bash Biden as the worst president ever, or talk about how Stephen King should stick to writing horror novels because, even as bad as he is at writing those, his politics suck worse, isn't to me hiding his politics, or somehow being dishonest. As it is, I don't even know what his views on Biden and Stephen King are. But I'm just saying that you don't have to go out of your way to be overtly political to prove what your politics are, nor even have to state them. Yet you can't get away from reporting about the politics in tech that leads to things like the Hyperland - Freedesktop controversy, and I think it a fair assessment to say that certain voices in the opensource and Linux movement can be quite extreme left, especially when they are calling for people who hold views different from them to be barred from Opensource and using Linux. Might as well just say Linux and Opensource are free and open to everyone, except if you are right wing. At least someone is reporting on the bias, because many of us are leaving the corporate world because of similar toxic polarization. For it seems you can't love tech, games, a lot of things, if you don't follow the leftist cult, because they demand allegiance to them, or else.
    2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229.  @sayaneechan5799  - I don't even know if my reply got to you, because apparently the algorithm either doesn't like me talking about being a conservative, or voting for the previous US president, or otherwise presuming saying it's OK to have a certain skin color was a no-no phrase. Or bringing up w-0-ke. Who knows what YouTube is so sensitive about? Anyways, since I can't have grown up conversations on YouTube without childish YouTube censors deleting things, all I'm going to say is, American history and culture has been, and always will be a mix of cultures and people with skin colors. We talk about culture in color because we have a lot of color in our people. White makes sense to us since that's the color of our skin. Our culture is remotely European - especially if our lineage goes back to the Mayflower. I'm Sotts-Irish from my Dad's side, but it's been about three or four generations that we had a relative that actually lived in Ireland or Scotland. On my Dad's mother's side come the closest ties as I believe my great-grandmother, my grandma's mom, had come with her parents from Germany to the US. But again, my great-grandma moved here as a child at the turn of the 20th century, so I have little to no direct connection to Germany save memories of a sweet old lady that smiled at everything and everyone, but likely didn't know everyone nor what was going on since Alzheimer's kicked in. She died some time when I was in grade school in the early to mid 80's. So why call it European culture when most of us have little connection to Europe? For a while, this culture was called WASP, as in White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. I suppose that works fine for some, but Italian Americans are generally Catholic. And what about Jewish Americans? So it's easier to lump it all together as 'white'. That should be simple enough to understand, right? Unfortunately, a lot of baggage gets lumped into the term, which, fair enough, it is part of our history, and something we have to learn from. But we don't have to become self-loathing over it either. Nor do I believe that we forever pay a debt for the wrongs done by white people in the past. Eventually after repenting of something, there needs to be forgiveness and to move on with life. I don't own a slave, and no one in my family has that I have any recollection of. If they did, it's their sin, not mine. I have nothing to feel sorry about, and I have no reason to hate my skin color, especially if color of one's skin shouldn't mean anything about who one is as a person. Yet it is still tied to a history and a culture in the US. It shouldn't be used as a club against us, but it also shouldn't be something absolutely hated or vilified either. White people were involved in freeing the slaves, and white people helped fight for civil rights. History isn't black and white, it's full of color with many stories to be told and lessons to be learned.
    2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. Liberal has been a 'bad word' for decades because of it being intertwined with what we call today 'woke'. Consider how you have so many conservatives agreeing with what you talk about. It is by no means that they, nor are you some racist 'yahtzee' bigot -istophobe. They've been using this tactic even back when they smeared McCarthy for pointing out the communist infiltration, which is becoming less able to deny when we see how it has finally latched on with the rise of woke. At the time, it was seen as fear mongering, and now we're the ones subject to blacklisting because of warning about this infiltration, and we tried to stop it at its inception before it grew out of hand. Now, decades after the year 1984, the warnings of the book are starting to look more and more like the reality we had hoped would not happen after the Berlin wall came down and the USSR collapsed. Yet it took a somewhat 'Brave New World' turn, as was realized the best way to enslave people is through pleasure and vice, and even a false promise of eternal youth. Sure a death cult may keep the population youthful, but by killing off the old, as is done with legalizing, and government advising on euthanasia. But will cutting life off at both the beginning and end of life ever satisfy this Malthusian social Marxist death cult? Probably not. The French Revolution showed us how proto communism will kill off its enemies, then eat its own in a purity spiral infighting that will kill off any one they feel has betrayed them or hasn't been fully loyal and on board with the cult regime. Yet as bad as the left can get, it cannot be noted the other problem when conservatives fail to do anything but preserve the revolution, or in our current year - preserve the decay and corruption caused by the current leftist death cult. I wish conservatives would finally step up to the plate and truly defend Western civilization from the hive mind, death cult virus, but they worry about social etiquette that has long since been thrown out, and that the left tramples over. For you can't be 'nice' to these people. Regardless how much you cater to them, they will continue to spit on you, insult you, call you the literal Nazi, and wish for your death - until they can make it legitimate in their eyes to go out and kill us. The conservative areas are called by them flyover states, and that's only because they haven't found a way to fully infiltrate and destroy the conservative states. But the can control them to some degree by was of weak conservative Republican leadership that still thinks bipartisanship was a good thing, and that it is a viable option still. Yet what did that get us besides Obamacare and 8 years for the left to build and grow strong enough to take the strangle ho.d they have over our society today? And that's still only hitting at the surface of the iceberg. I wish we had conservative with the spine and fortitude to actually stand up to the left. Maybe if they did that decades before we wouldn't have needed Trump to be the bulldozer to attempt to dismantle the swamp. Maybe if they stood strong and unified, we would have been able to have gotten to the truth of a certain date and the certain fraud that sparked it. But no, for some reason the GOP can't or won't stand up to the left, and act more like controlled opposition, rather than any real contender against the left. Until conservatives, or some new party rises that actually could stand against the left comes about, we will continue to be screwed over by leftist tyranny.
    2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. So it's a conflict of physical v. virtual. But let's not hide the fact that many of these sites with ads also offer a premium membership that can be purchased. The thing is, the internet is not just a server admin utility any more. It is becoming something similar to what Lunduke speaks of. In fact, this concept of a virtual shop can go back to around 2006, when Second Life was growing a virtual economy around user generated content. Most content creators on SL are going to have a more Lunduke oriented concept because they have built virtual shops that you could visit as your virtual avatar. You can buy virtual clothing and other ×ahem× 'components' to make your avatar more representative of the gender, and species you want your avatar to be. So yes, you could be a trans furry Charizard if you want to be, and buy all the parts you need to make it. The point is this 3D virtual world blends the lines of virtual world with the physical world. They've also had to deal with age verification, especially to crack down on age players and people misrepresenting their age, both as under aged wanting to go on the main grid and old people pretending to be younger to be creepers on the now defunct teen grid. Eventually both were merged, an adult only island created, and under age users were restricted to private G-rated sims (this is cotroversial among SL users to this day). So, really, there's no point to joining SL until 18. At any rate, there are virtual shops. The virtual goods they sell have a certain value to the shop owners, and a certain value to those that visit the shop and choose to purchase said purchased product. While there may be an agreement of value, there may not be an agreement on what one has a right to do with the product. SL manages this with metadata within the object called object rights. In this, the creator of the object can give the next owner permission to copy, modify, or transfer to another avatar. Linden Labs is a company based in San Fransisco, and they base their ToS around California law. Thus they do see it as their responsibility to regulate adult material, and especially no age play, even though they allow child avatars, but in very limited capacity. Even places that are not intended to be adult shops, be they clubs or some other themed hang out, beach, whatever, ban child avatars because they don't want to deal with the legal side of things, not to mention losing their virtual land, or having their account banned from Second Life. This is a company from CA that's pretty much to the left, and much of SL is pretty well left of center. Pride month is in full swing, and most stores have some type of pride product year round. They have lesbian women only islands, gay bear men only islands, LGBTQ+ allied and friendly islands. But still, dealing with adult stuff and protecting one's business and islands, many places have their own rules, and sexual age play is both not allowed, it's illegal, meaning ban from second life altogether, and possibly of law enforcement involvement. Places on SL will ban you from their land if caught with an avatar that looks underage. So, regardless what you want to believe the internet should be, the fact is it is being treated more like a public utility, and thus a public space. It's had a marketplace feel since Amazon and the (dot)com boom. Virtual worlds will keep pushing the boundaries and bring with it more of an attitude towards virtual goods and services as Lunduke has, which has less to do with being left or right as it does the changing customs on how to do business in a virtual world. Like it or not, these changes have been made, and more of similar nature are coming.
    1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. Check out Dave Rubin and how he presents the Republican candidates on one of his recent live videos titled: Unexpected 2024 Announcement Just Shook Up the Race. To cut to the short, with politics, you have to get past the theatre of it. For now, Trump is in the lead. There's still a question of if DeSantis will even run, but he would be the second in line if he did. And yes, the way he's playing things is working. For everyone knows that whoever runs against Trump is going to get hit pieces on them, and the more you're the target, the bigger the threat you are, because you're the most plausible alternative to Trump. DeSantis is definitely that. But there are others running. Dave Rubin goes through a couple of them and explains how he sees them running as a good thing, even if it's obvious they likely aren't going to be in the top tier of potentially electable as Trump and DeSantis. For one, they can present a national messaging that is good, and appealing conservative principles, ideas, and the like that can, and ought to be adopted by the top tier, especially once the dust has cleared and either Trump or DeSantis winds up the GOP nominee. The other candidates right now speak on various voices among Republicans and conservatives regarding what's important, such as America first, the land of opportunity ideal, importance of the Constitution, free speech, gun rights, etc. Listening to them does not mean you're voting for them, and moreso, it can show you're not just a candidate cultists that's either Trump or DeSantis only, or I'm nor voting. You have to realize what an insane position that is, to be such a cult worshiper of any candidate. But, anyways, just trying to give some perspective. Don't let the theatre politics get to you. It's not that much different than celebrity theatre, save you got crazies like Biden, who wants to bring back Obama's weaponizing the government against Democrat enemies, or the Clintons and their ever growing list of people that suddenly are no longer with us for having criminally damning information that could leas to their arrest, or anything else that would make their being in charge the next 4 to 8 years a hot mess. 😏👍
    1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376.  @gruntaxeman3740  - Sure, in Debian based distros, if you want to package something in a .deb package, you have to learn how to compile what you want to package into it. Or, you have to figure out for apt. Likewise, Fedora/RHEL distros have RPM and dnf. Arch based distros have pacman and yay. Add to that Snaps and appimages. I would mainly argue that it is less about the code changing as much as it is how to package the code. Yes, applications may need dependencies. But these themselves are code used to help the main code function on the distro it has been installed on. Therefore, the distro is the platform that you want to deliver the package to, and the dependencies are the additional things needed to ensure what is unpacked from the package will run on the distro it's been installed on. So, I'm not sure what the problem is, since there are so many tools available to help assemble, compile, and build the application as needed to run on any given distro. I suppose it can be tedious work to make sure everything is put together correctly, and troubleshoot where issues might conflict among dependencies, but that's just part of the whole of putting it all together. I appreciate the people that have made doing these things easier, and those helpful at troubleshooting where the automation may have gone wrong. It would be awesome If I could get to that point of building my own LFS, but I'm happy with certain favorite distros that already exist and just work on getting familiar with the terminal and how to configure and tweak things.
    1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. Platforms are not publishers. That's part of the problem there, besides the fact that social media was never meant to be an arbiter of truth, but a platform of free speech. This is where I disagree. If he can say Mein Kampf can be read, and people will find out why it's crazy for themselves, then why can't social media platforms be that free market of ideas wherein people come to their own conclusions? Yes, flat earth is a theory that we can prove today with visual evidence as wrong, but for thousands of years, it was the norm, even considered 'the science', much like Fauci proclaimed himself 'the science' despite so many times he's flip flopped, not to mention stole credit for things he barely had any involvement in. I'm sure you prance around the subject to make sure you can stay on YouTube, but I can say it - Fauci has done a horrible job, both in how he confused and divided people with regards to AIDS in the 80's and with COVID now. You guys talk of the evil and propaganda of the Nazis and can't see this similar sort of evil being tossed in our faces with vaccines, where they are using them to try and control people. They blind us with saying we ought not have borders or voter ID, but we better have our COVID papers in order just to go to a restaurant, go to a store, or get a job. Plus, while you talk of the millions killed by the propaganda of tobacco, yet speak favora ly about the 'healthcare' of abortion which there is evidence that they always put Planned Parenthood facilities in poor ethnic communities, and Margaret Sanger's ideology gives plenty of reason why. Sanger was back in the day of Segregation, and her ideology influenced Hitler as well. So yes, it is interesting what things you omit from the topic, the ideas that fade, right?
    1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412.  @mmstick  - You're the one who doesn't know what you're talking about. All you are doing is talking around the point that small businesses and individuals are minimal at best the problem. I'm not trying to defend 'memory unsafe', I am simply stating small businesses are not the problem. You are trying to push your BS agenda in here when the programming language has nothing to do with how businesses decide what software to use. They are told they need to work with this bank or financial entity to do their payment processing through, and use whatever software these companies tell them are the standards to use, and work with whatever carrier for internet/wireless that is deemed the best in the area to work with. Nobody talks to them about whether it's best to use rust or C for programming code, it's not even on their radar. Again, all that matters to them is that their payments are processed and they can pay the bills and they're workers their wages. You are making it more complex, when the point is that small businesses are not at fault when all they are doing is following the standards of business. The big corporations and banks that make the standards, and time and time again, are the ones that have these periodic data breaches, are the problem. The government doesn't do much to change it, and have little incentive to do so when the major corporations and banks line their pockets. Add to that, we had a case over the COVID years that our state government was so mismanaged that it was found out they got scammed thousands of taxpayer dollars because some bureaucratic idiot was giving money to one of those Ugandan prince email hoaxes. But sure, you can trust the almighty gov if you want. Don't blame me for warning how heavily mismanaged they are.
    1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422.  @goodlookinouthomie1757  - ok... I am a Christian, and I believe in an eternal soul, so not sure what your target for 'you' is. But sure, it's a nice, artsy saying, which itself has been mass produced and mindlessly consumed as well. But I think you miss the point that they do care, which is why they use the algorithms and AI to try and learn what people are interested in, and purposefully use that information to use what we consume in a manner that keeps us addicted and coming back for more. They study all this, and they study us, looking for all the common traits they can, and how to maximize the habits formed by those traits to make music that's 'safe'. That is to say, music that they believe will push the right buttons and make us move in the direction they want us to. Thus, whenever the left claim that to speak with opposing views is 'unsafe', they effectively mean that these are views they don't want because they challenge the status quo of the programming. They don't want the other side to be heard, or at least they don't want to be the one that introduces views contrary to the programming lest the people programmed start to think for themselves, or otherwise are swayed against the programming. I won't say that the right is without its own aspects of programming. It's almost impossible for anyone to not have programming. It's part of some aspect of our cognitive learning, particularly by rote. To this day, so many people know the nursery rhyme 'Ring Around the Rosey'. Until a certain age, we may not even realize the context of the rhyme. Yet somehow we learn these things by rote, even before we understand the meaning. In a sense, sing-song and subliminal messages are cousins to this sort of programming. That's part of the issue with pop entertainment, is what are the messages they are trying to ingrain in our minds? Is it historical, like the nursery rhyme, or is it trying to push messaging in order to shape the way we think or believe that may go against what we currently do think or believe. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, but if you're a Christian, and your child begins listening to rock or rap music, starts using slang and slurs, emulating the musicians or rappers, and decides he's no longer Christian, and practically chants the chorus of the rock stars about how they don't believe they can be they can be saved, or that it's easy to imagine a world with no God or heaven, and how some day they too will be a rock star and be more famous than Jesus, well you might wonder if the music had any influence. It would appear there is some type of programing and a particular messaging against Christianity and God. Thus the messaging does matter, because you can become what you consume.
    1
  423. 1
  424. The average American can find Ukraine on the map. It's even easier this day for anyone to look up Ukraine on the map just by searching it online. It's that it's on the other side of the world, and no one really knows what we are doing spending trillions of dollars on a war we have little to no business in it other than Biden via his son Hunter has certain ties and involvement in Ukraine. Regardless if there is a 'pure' reason for us to support the war is at best tainted. Granted, roughly half the US understands this, or at least are aligned to believe those that point out Burisma and Hunter Biden somehow being involved with it and the real quid quo pro that was going on with it. The other half of the country has political blinders and wishful thinking, wanting Trump to be the one to be impeached over it, despite the phone call was one asking about investigations into what was going on with Burisma. Was it quid quo pro? Honestly, I don't know with that phone call, but close to half the country believes that, despite they don't believe, or have refused to believe the quid quo pro regarding Biden and Burisma has as much, if not more evidence, as there is a video out there of Biden when he was VP bragging about holding funds to Ukraine hostage if the Ukranian president at the time wouldn't fire the person investigating Burisma. Interesting enough that Trump asking about that investigation was what got Trump impeached for quid quo pro, but Biden's involvement in getting the investigation quashed by threatening to stop our foreign aid to Ukraine if they do not is overlooked and not even questioned. Thus why I can agree that it's more about what people believe is more important in their own mind. Thus the media, who has been believing for quite a while that they are the people in charge of what to tell people to believe is supposed to be important to them, have been filtering to one side or the other, which had decidedly been to the left. Most in the media are leftists. They were educated that way, and many had been brought up that way, or, they grew up in a right of center family and had been more influenced by things considered more left of center, and kept going down the rabbit's hole on the left until they fully believed most, if not all the talking points, or at least saw that they could have a certain amount of power or influence to hold to what the left was saying is true, or how to make 'your truth' a reality, or at least something that can bend reality to your will. I'm not saying that it doesn't happen on the right. Rght-left dichotomy isn't something that holds to a firm boundary. We talk about RINOs on the right, and that's our term for those Republicans that claim to have conservative values in some way - usually claiming 'fiscal' conservatism, but are 'compassionate' on moral and social issues. This is similar to the 'left' in Christianity that claim 'all are welcome', save if you hold to conservative/traditional Christian values - the 10 Commandments seeming to be watered down as the 10 suggestions, the miracle of being able to feed the masses being a miracle of being able to get people to work as a community and share what they have, or otherwise taking a more social/socialist interpretation on things. We call them RINOs politically because it's obvious they are more aligned with the left, but pretend to be on the right by claiming they will not raise taxes (and yet they wind up doing so anyways), but are just 'moderate'. I can't say that you are 'outside the optics', but you are more open to questioning both the left and right spectrum that we all have grown up with in the US. It can be very difficult for many of us that have lived in this duality that is, not just American politics, but a sort of bi-polar mindset of our country as a whole. There are really few that are all in on the right, or all in on the left. Which is why you can have people like Caitlyn Jenner, who many people knew for decades as Bruce Jenner before that was made a dead name, who are for the rights of transgenders to be recognized as individual people of merit and worth. Yet, despite being for the most commonly held human rights concept of trans rights, Caitlyn is considered 'far right' for believing it is wrong for tans women to participate in women's only sports because of the physical advantages their natural biology can have over biologically born women athletes. Our politics and identity as Americans is rooted in a lot of things that have, compared to Europe, a fairly short history. We have conflicts, like the one you mentioned with Native Americans v. those of us that came in as pilgrims/immigrants, which also ties into our issues regarding legal and 'undocumented' immigration. Yet, we also have those that migrated here not of their own will, which also ties into the issues of migration, and slavery. To say our roots are rather twisted and mixed up is to state the obvious, but, outside of the longer roots that Native Americans have had in the land, they are not as long as those of Europe, and thus why were are also called here the New World. Does the average American know all this? Maybe not. Some people choose not to be grounded in the roots, Even the Enlightenment ideals that make up core components of the United States as a Constitutional Republic, which refused to be run by a monarch or tyrant, that is decidedly locked into the concept of 'We The People' - particularly in the importance of voting as a civic right and duty to decide the direction of our country, and the grounding of laws in the US Constitution as the bedrock of our laws, even with all this, there is still a portion of the US that does not follow even the basics of these things and some choose to be subversive to them. I'm not saying the US Constitution is perfect, but it is the law of the land. It's what expresses our rights and what is to be protected and upheld by the law of the land. From my conservative Christian, and traditionalist Catholic perspective, it is far from perfect, and I can name the many ways it doesn't align with my religious and political views. But the point for the US Constitution is not to be a religious document, nor necessarily even to appease the secularist nor the dogmas of the political factions. There was supposed to be something of objectivity in the Constitution that not only denied single rule under monarchy, but also was not going to go along with every whim and will of the mob of a democracy. Certainly, it was never going to appease the anarchist, nor anyone that wants to be nomadic to any form of law and order. But it was meant to preserve the rights of all, regardless of any one's agreements or disagreements with how Constitutional rights are protected and preserved. To me, I can be ok with that, as long as it is understood that human rights are God-given rights, and not things that the government can give or take away. So this is the difficulty that law and justice faces in our country, is to hold to a certain level of objectivity that recognizes the difference between protecting and preserving our rights over controlling and being the arbitrator of them. It can be too easy to say that the Constitution needs to change or be absolved to fit what any one individual, group, or community would rather have, but as long as 'We The People' see the need to protect and preserve them, the Constitution will remain the law of the land. Thus, Benjamin Franklin's response to Elizabeth Willing Powel's question: "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" His answer remains true today, "A republic, if you can keep it.” The newer question, which we all as Americans in the United States ought to ask is, "Do we want to keep it?" For in this question, if we seriously ask it in consideration to what we believe, and what we strive for, will be the response that manifests going forward. For me, while it may not be fully perfect to the core of my beliefs, politics, etc., I can still concede that our Constitution is at least “near to perfection,” at least to what can be expected in an imperfect world. On the positive, despite all the divisions in the US today, which can give as much question to whether we have come to a point where we might see the the loss of the union, I can also agree with Benjamin Franklin, who was unsure during the conventions to ratify the Constitution, but said, "I have often and often, in the course of the session, and the vicissitudes of my hopes and fears as to its issue, looked at that behind the President, without being able to tell whether it was rising or setting: but now at length, I have the happiness to know, that it is a rising and not a setting sun."
    1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. Don't worry so much. You didn't force me to unsub from Tim Pool. This is about the 3rd time I've un-subbed from him in the past 10 years for being a javkass. He sometimes needs his ego burst. You had nothing to do with Crowder and the DW, other than help spotlight an issue with entertainment business contracts that will always be there for as long as the industry does its business in the way it does. EB did herself in, and we need to expose grifters that manipulate social media, regardless politics.PV sounds like it was a time bomb waiting to go off, just by the personalities and technicalities that have been aired. There is certainly tension right now, especially with DeSantis v Trump. But maybe we do need a shake up. The left gave up a lot of their soul to unify under Biden, despite for decades of knowing his corruption. Our battles on the right are with bad principles on the left and right. We know there are RINOs out there who will sell our country to China for a larger stock portfolio, that want the Ukraine war to go on to keep money flowing for the military industrial complex, regardless what's good for America, or even the world. We see it on how they refuse to take the Ohio disaster seriously. So we need James out there to uncover the corruption without fear that his board of directors will shove him under the bus for fear of the political whales mad that he's getting too close to the source. Also neither should we keep from exposing the cons and grifts. It isn't the same as a purity spiral, because the principles and standards do not move to the whims and will of the politics or agenda. That's why we can't galvanize or unite just for the sake of uniting. If there's a legitimate issue, we need to cover it and resolve it as best we can. We can forgive, but not put issues under the rug. It's part of the checks and balances that help us speak truth to power.
    1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452.  @trembledust6819  - By the fact that it is common is the very reason it went viral. Anyone that's been fired can empathize with her. The poor performance is a cop out, considering she hasn't worked there that long, which is why HR would have been better off saying that the woman was right, it was because of downsizing and needing to do layoffs. It sucks, but it would have been a much more understandable thing to say, and wouldn't have led to all the rest of the drama. For anyone in her position would want to defend themselves, whether they actually do or not. Thus, HR screwed up what should have been a simple answer of yes, you were laid off, and we are sorry we had to let you go. At that point, they might add about trying back in 6 months. That would have been much more proper. The point is, by stating poor performance, it's as if to say 'with cause', and if there is a cause, she is entitled to know what that cause is. Generally, this is going to be the meeting where they ask the employee about a situation, and listen to their side of the story first - and yes, this is often written down by HR, and, if applicable, a union rep is present. Some may decide to lawyer up. And these are rights you have if a company tries to fire you with cause. You have every right to defend yourself with regards to allegations. And it can come about that they can't fire you, or otherwise the employee can sue for wrongful termination. And no, I'm not going to get into case details. We all have Google and search engines to find that info. Plus, this is a YouTube comments section, not some legitimate debate forum. So debate rules don't apply. Good luck googling what you want to know.
    1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. What we're seeing with woke was the reaction/rebellion against religious evangelical Christian conservatism that was at its peak in the 80's under president Ronald Reagan. However, we ought to remember that evangelical conservativism was something that was in both the Democrat and Republican party. People forget that, Jim Jones of the Jonestown infamy, from which we get the phrase 'don't drink the kool-aid' due to the tragic mass 'exit' event, while he was a fundamentalist of the Pentecostal denomination, as he grew into cult leader, he rejected traditional Christianity and began promoting a form of anti-capitalism he called "Apostolic Socialism." Of course, like many cultists do, he started laying claims to his own divinity. When you look into the various woke organizations, you will find them riddled with communist, Marxist, and anti-capitolism groups, and even a few that claim some form of socialist Christianity or Christian liberation theology. All of it points back to wanting to radically revolutionize, or otherwise destroy 'imperial America' to create a more Marxist/communist sort of America. Democrats often scoff at this and pretend this aspect of the radical left does not exist. Yet, in 2020 alone, the radical left's so-called 'peaceful protests' resulted in the ransacking 200 American cities, up to $2 billion in property damage and at least 25 deaths. Yet, for all this domestic terrorism, companies and corporations pledged or contributed $82.9 billion to BLM movement and other extreme leftist movements. To put this into perspective, in 2022, the Ford Motor Company's profits were $23 billion. For being so anti-capitalist, they sure are getting a lot of capital.
    1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. From a more traditionalist standpoint, the aspect here is more politically charged. In earlier times, things were more about the actions in the scandals that, in earlier terms would be considered 'buggery' or 'sodomy'. These would be things one would expect a priest to get defrocked, but, instead they did like the secular world did with problematic teachers, or how domestic disputes were handled by covering up, paying a blind eye, shuffling them off for another community to deal with, etc. Still kind of happens today, though politics are different,so the reasons for playing the same shuffle game are different, such as the case where a highs chool student identifying as female went into the hischool female bathroom and did things against the will of a biological female student. That student who identified as female was tossed off to another school where the same sort of incident as before happened to another biologically female student. Politics aside, most people would say if a person did such things against the will of another person, the person that did such actions should be charged and tried appropriately under criminal law. But, because of the politics, people don't want to touch it, lest they be labeled some sort of 'istaphobe'. In prior times, it was keeping things as private, domestic matters. But now, with things out in the open, people cover more for their politics. Even among traditionalists, we've had bad leaders and priests that got cover because people couldn't believe said person would so such things because, what was seen in public was them doing God's work, or otherwise showing as a face of a holy person. The scandal with Church Militant is a major example of it, and it's still hard to believe a person that went so hard in the fight against priests and Bishops doing bad things would himself be doing similar bad things behind the scenes. It may have been something taken out of proportion, but it could just be trying to look for a benefit of the doubt where there's none to give, which then becomes hopeful, wishful thinking. But that's just taking it from the angle of actual actions of abuse, and a general consideration for the way things were and still wind up being done, and a few reasons why. Between the public and private matters of any community or group of people, there are certainly many twists and turns that make it impossible to simply explain or define, as much as people may want a 'simple truth', which is practically an oxymoron in and of itself. On the other aspect of priesthood, the barring based on sexuality is relatively recent, and reactionary to the priest abuse of the 1950's - 1970's among the Church in the US. At least that's part of it. However, there were scandals throughout the world, and while young boys were commonly preyed upon, there were cases the other way. But there is also the matter of the wording of the matter, and the implied meaning conveyed. It's like how conservatives opposed to a certain 'procedure' call themselves pro-life, and those at least wanting the 'procedure' to be legal in what they claim to be 'reproductive rights', or the 'right to choose', regardless the human developing in the womb neither did anything wrong, nor gets any choice in the matter of whether to live or die. People have this uncanny ability to define things, especially what is unsettling, in ways that can justify just about anything, regardless if it's justifiable or not. When it goes beyond an individual's private creed, and becomes that of a group or community, that creed becomes something like a cult and makes those beliefs more unshakeable because of having others around that believe similar, that share in the same creed. The secular equivalent is a shared ideology, which is what we get with politics. This is what we're up against with the sexuality issue in the Church, and even despite the attemp to keep people with deep seeded view of themselves attached to their sexuality, and thus the desires and actions thereof out of the priesthood, the creed of these alternate sexualities still entered the Church, and are adopted into the mix of political ideologies of the liberal, or leftist Catholics. Pope Francis belongs to that camp in a unique fashion that in Argentine politics is called Peronist. It's essentially the use of double speak, which can leave one confused as to what the Pope really stands for. In this, the actions speak louder than words, but yet the words effectively distract from the actions. Thus why traditionalists commonly believe by tossing out this leak of his naughty word and kind of weak apology, serves to distract from the supposed agenda to allow priests of alternate sexuaity to join the priesthood - the more liberal, the merrier. Otherwise, if it wasn't for politics, I would agree that simply having a certain orientation should not bar someone from the priesthood. But with that comes with all things that makes a Catholic priest a priest. That boils dow to the role of alter Christi, being 'another Christ' by way of leading the congregation in the formal prayer of the Mass, presenting one's congregational community with the Sacraments, and all and all giving one's life fully to God to help serve His people, His Body, the Church Militant along this path of struggle to keep to the things holy of God in a world that constantly mocks it and tries to tempt the faithful away from the faith. The priest is there to help lead us to Heaven, bring us closer to God, and help us to become holy saints in our own right, regardless if we become canonized as one of the greats, or unsung heroes that made it to the Beatific Vision. It's a tall order, but being a priest isn't just another job, it's a lifetime service and calling of God. Because of the politics, that vision of what a priest is supposed to be is blurred, and diminished greatly by those who push their politics over their calling from God.
    1
  497. The outfit stuff is kind of cat-ish drama. As far as I can tell, the worst thing she did was try to get other v-tubers to exclusively work with her. Even there, people are still playing games on Nintendo game consoles and giving Nintendo their money despite how they tried to make exclusivity agreements under the seal of quality era, which pretty much made it difficult, if not impossible for competition, since every third party was locked in with Nintendo. People still watch the WWE despite that they killed off the majority of other promos, and despite Vince McMahon's issues. Granted, Vince McMahon no longer runs or has ownership of the WWE, but the point is, brands and people can live on after the drama, especially dumb stuff over 'copying' outfits. It reminds me of on IMVU when there were cat-ish dev fights when they would DMCA each other even over the use of a color, as if you can copyright a color and claim exclusive rights to use that one color. It's some of the ridiculousness that comes up in business competition. Cheating with boyfriend aside, it really boils down to the usual business as usual garbage, because some people and companies just don't like competition and will do everything they can to get rid of competition. It's shrewd and ruthless, but is it really unexpected when money becomes the end-all, be-all of a person's existence? This is really the problem with 'business as usual' and how corporations exist only to maximize profits, even despite that a lot of times they wind up destroying their products and brands in the process of trying to squeeze that extra bit of profit. Maybe the reality is thee is something wrong with how we've come to do business and what has become the corporate business model and way of thinking.
    1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501.  @mrconroy4672  - It's hard to say. Things aren't like they were in the bit war era, where each generation of consoles had demonstrably better graphics, sound, etc. The last graphics gimmick I remember being pushed was ray tracing. Granted, Second Life is making a big deal out of physically based rendering (PBR), which I think may also have to do with making 'real', albeit virtual mirrors, but by mimicking the real life physics that creates reflections. However it be, it's just additional layers that push graphics cards, or the integrated graphics of a processor. Most of it isn't necessary for a game, and tweaking all these things is part of why games take longer to make. Games have gone from extreme limitations in everything, to the extremes of virtually no limitations. Sure, you could make an 'Ultra-Crysis' game, needing 1 Tb of memory, 128 Gb of RAM, requiring the top of the line graphics card as minimum requirements to run it. But why? Games can run on far less specs and still look decent, and, most importantly, can be played by a larger audience than the few die hard gamers that can afford a $20,000+ gaming beast of a machine. In this economy, I don't even know how people can afford a game console costing more than $200. At the going price, migh as well shell out for a low to mid end laptop or desktop. They have just enough power for most games, even if not all the bells and whistles on newer games. Add on to that, you can even learn how to make games. Long story short, I don't see why Nintendo would want to make too huge a leap in a game console. The console itself doesn't make money. The games are what sell the system and make the money. Seeing how modern games are doing, it's probably best to hold off on producing a new console until the dust settles in the gaming industry and the economy rebounds.
    1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514.  @marsovac  - As for if Beethoven could have made good techno music, all you have to do is take any of his music and remix it, such as what Will Borders did with Beethoven's 5th Symphony. The Rad Man proves that Beethoven would have been awesome at Trance, as well with his remix of Beethoven Symphony No 7 in A major Opus 92 (2nd movement). We consider him good because he was, in many ways, truly the rock star of his age, and the influence of rock stars to come in future ages. John Lennon was nspired by Beethoven’s “Moonlight Sonata”, so much so that the song “Because” (1969) with Yoko Ono, used the piano chords from the sonata. Billy Joel paid tribute to Beethoven in his song “Piano Man” (1984) from his album “An Innocent Man”. Joel has mentioned playing Beethoven’s music before his own compositions. The Beatles version of Chuck Berry’s “Roll Over Beethoven” (1964) showcases their appreciation for classical music and Beethoven’s influence on rock and roll. Chuck Berry referenced Beethoven’s music with the desire for rhythm and blues to be respected as classical music.The Electric Light Orchestra's music often incorporated classical elements, including Beethoven’s symphonies, into their rock sound. The list can go on and on, and so can the remixes in all sorts of genres. Also, I have much respect for Larnell Lewis on Drumeo, who learns how to play the drums to Metallica's "Enter Sandman" after hearing it for the first time. He's mostly a jazz musician, and in the video states he rarely, if ever plays metal. Yet, in the video, you can watch as he takes notes, and analyzes how the drums are being utilized in the song, and when he comes around to playing it, plays through it perfectly. That said, it is a disproof of you're poorly thought out idea that you can't be critical, or make a technical analysis of something you're not familiar with. It is precisely because of Larnell's technical understanding in jazz that he can take what he knows there and incorporate it in how to assess the techniques used in metal. You can do the similar with film without being familiar with the genre, or not liking it. You can still critique a movie from a genre you're not familiar with, or don't like, simply based on knowledge of film studies. But even without that, films are about story telling, which means if you are an avid reader, maybe have taken courses or are familiar with reviewing books, you can also review and critique movies. Albeit, most book readers have a bias for the books vs movie version of books, which comes from changes that are made in the process of making the movie. Things are left out, of characters are changed from how they are in the book, and if you come from reading the book first, there are going to be things that will be disappointing when it comes to how the movie does things as opposed to the way the book did them. But you can still appreciate, if not at least point out the technical aspects of the nature of the storytelling done in the film, and maybe possibly pick up on other aspects of cinema that maybe are accurate presentations of themes, landscapes, and background of the story. It's having the basic set of tools that make it possible to cross over from one genre, or even a different format, between music to film to written literature, which makes for a true critique that can either appreciate what he's critiquing, or at least have the technical tools to be able to state what he does not like about something of a given genre or format. For instance, 'to provide color' has meaning of reference in various forms of art, be it the literal color choices made by a painter, and how they may contrast to the pallet of colors (or lack thereof) used thus far. Or it can mean in music harmonic, rhythmic, or melodic color, such as using an alternative chord structure from the normal triad, changing up the cadence of the drums, or other rhythmic elements of a musical piece, and the particular way a melody is interpreted, or improvised upon. There's also use of dynamics and tempo, and more modern aspects of using an equalizer and compression to alter or highlight sounds. Even with films you have the use of pre-defined color schemes, such as triadic colors, to create a specific visual tone, which sounds very similar to the use of chords in music. Visually, it's similar to how the painter uses color on the still frame of a canvas. Likewise may a literary author use a color scheme in how they visualize the particular scene currently taking place in the book, such as down by the clear blue lake that mirrors the sky above, surrounded by the evergreen sentinels of the forest. Heck, even WWE wrestling talks of adding color when they want to draw blood for additional pop from the audience. Diverse genres and forms of art/entertainment, and yet they all can easily be critiqued objectively without a huge amount of knowledge, just by knowing the ways in which art/entertainment has these overlapping theory of concepts and ideas.
    1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564.  Youtube Sucks ass  - The movie came out in 2006, based on a story around Corporal Joe Bauers, as US Army librarian that was put in suspended animation for 500 years. Even so, it's not so much a parody of today as it was regarding more specifically the early to mid 2000's, at the time the story was being written. Thus a lot of it parodies the Bush era policies and Bush era conservatives, because Hollywood loves pretending that the world can be simplified to liberals = smart people who believe in science, and conservatives = stupid, backward thinking barbarians. But I previously stated that it parodied late 90's to early 2000's because most of the cultural references were to things that became popular during the 90's, such as monster truck rallies, electrolyte infused sports drinks, etc. The jokes for that movie aren't relevant to today, even though they might still apply to the adults today that were kids or young adults at the time this movie came out. Sure, you could apply it to Tim and crew, in that capacity of being an antiquated cultural reference from 15 years ago, but the story itself didn't predict the rise of woke coming from a predominantly left of center origin because left of center was supposed to be the smart people that died off, leaving the stupid conservative people to survive because they bred like bunnies. That didn't happen. Although we'd have to wait 485 more years to find out how accurate the movie really was. But currently, it appears the left is in regression, even while pretending they have science on their side. Currently, corporations are leaning more left and investing in woke for some strange reason that doesn't make sense if all they cared about were profits.
    1
  565. May not be popular takes, but... 1. You can like the old Cosby Show, Fat Albert, etc. without liking Bill Cosby. Yes, among other, and worse things, Cosby the actor was a hypocrite, and irl tried to play off being a respected TV dad that he forgot he's done stuff real dads should never do. I also am not avoiding comedian Cosby because, in his pre-TV dad days, he was much more up front of who he was, joking about certain things that that made it clear he at least knew about, if not partook in those bad things that got him in trouble. But for TV, it's the show is a family sitcom, and if you can separate the TV dad character from the actor, you can still enjoy the show, focusing on the characters and stories, remembering they are fiction, and their actors only represent them as characters in the story. The real life actors? Mileage may vary in whether they are nice people on and off the set, in character and out. 2. As social commentary, even being a bit prophetic of the times ahead, Seinfeld's ending was incredible. Maybe it could have been executed better, but who else was able to predict things like cancel culture and everyone having phones, gawking everyone else? This came out before Gawker was even a thing. Facebook and the concept of social credit/currency was close to a decade from being conceived. Even MySpace was yet to go online for a few years. Blowing up on national news was a big thing back then, and now is overshadowed by going viral online. Who would believe that people could get jailed for making jokes, even if they were in poor taste or over the misfortune of someone else? That was nearly two decades out from the whole 'pug salute' joke that did lead to a guy getting jailed. That so many things that were laughably ridiculous back when the finale aired have become reality is eerily fascinating. So, it's not a bad finale as much as being ahead of the reality that came to be.
    1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. As for blaming the internet, I see it more as the internet is more of a snapshot as to where we are as a society. People have done stupid stuff for a long time. We could blame shows like America's Funniest Home Videos, or more recently Fail Army. Gawker could be among the list, saved for they were successfully sued out of business, never mind their attempted comeback. Yet, people were doing stupid pranks and stunts long before the camera was accessible to most people. Never mind the slapstick of the Three Stooges, or Charlie Chapman, who was among the first to disavow their Nazi related comedy content. I personally don't find what this guy and his crew did as funny, but most pranks are cheesy/stupid setups that, in the back of my mind, I hope backfires on the pranksters. So yeah, I love when the Roadrunner speeds past a bundle of dynamite that's set to go off, but doesn't until Coyote goes to investigate what went wrong. So yeah, unless what causes it to happen is a tragic murder! I'll laugh when the guy in the video messes around with the wrong person and his prank backfires on him, especially if he finally serves jail time. The one thing I'm not going to do is blame the internet. The internet wasn't around to document that. If anything, the internet makes it easier to bust criminals that are stupid enough to film and upload their crimes. Or, with more and more security cameras with live streams, it makes it that much harder to deny a crime's existence, at least for as long as it remains accessible on the internet. If anything, the things law enforcement step in to intervene on as a crime tells you a lot about the state of both politics and law enforcement. Even in the example of the person and his crew talked about in the video. The only time he got serious backlash was when he targeted Jewish people. Otherwise, his threats and harassment were not even a slap on the wrist when the targets were white people, even regardless if they were women. That's a document of piss poor, politically correct driven law enforcement, that basically says white people don't matter, you can do whatever you want to them, even threaten to kill them. Hell, maybe white homicide is ignored because the police are perfectly fine with that as well. Who knows? But it's to that point where such questions aren't just a patter of 'far right' or 'white supremacist' conspiracy theories, but well documented realities that are being posted as 'pranks' that prove how far a black person can go when the target isn't a protected class, and this is done by an all black crew of their own free will.
    1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. I actually just upgraded Fedora 40 to 41, and it was a relatively painless operation. Even easier than migrating from one version of Windows to another. Albeit, this is not always the case with other distros. I tried moving an older computer from stable Sparky Linux 7.5 to the unstable 8.0. It is essentially a variant of Debian, so this process is similar to migrating from Bookworm to Trixie. Bookworm is the current LTS main version of Debian, also called Debian 12. Trixie is the current experimental release, also known as Debian 13. Between Debian and Ubuntu, outside their different philosophies and strategies for development, they are very much the same, particularly in use of APT. Thus, both the positives and negatives of Debian and Ubuntu hinge on APT. besides that, Ubuntu is basically a fork of Debian, and thus among the first distros that were based on Debian. Difference nowadays is Ubuntu has its separate repositories and development releases based on the name of those repositories that are based on animal code names. For instance, when I started with Mint, a initially based on Ubuntu, they were on Jammy Jellyfish repositories. The current LTS is Noble Numbat (24.04), with a mid-experimental release Oracular Oriole (24.10), and the expected new LTS to be code named Plucky Puffin (25.04). The code names between Debian and Ubuntu are confusing enough, but the one thing you need to know is APT is great on most things, but can suck on some major issues - namely crossing over from the dying LTS over to the next one, or to its crazy experimental unstable version cousin. Fedora has made it pretty easy with DNF, and even DNF5 as its successor is pretty awesome as well. But OG DNF is what I used to transfer my old Fedora 40 to 41, and it was amazingly smooth. I can't say the same for Debian Ubuntu. I'm currently looking at having to do a clean install. With a live boot, I might be able to recover some items I forgot to back up, simply because I thought I was going to keep on Spaky Linux 7.5 for a while. But the smoothness of Fedora's migration made me curious how smooth Sparky might be. Let's just say the sparks flew. So yeah, mileage will vary on Linux regarding ease of use and updates from one version to another.
    1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. Catholics and Protestants alike believe in original sin. The Catholic view is that it is a wound on human nature, and thus something that can be healed through salvation. Protestants vary on what is believed and is dependent on their religious tradition, be it Lutheran, Calvinist, Baptist, etc., and the actual views today may not be the same as their founders. For example Martin Luther believed that humans were dung that are merely covered over in salvation by God's saving grace. That might shock a few modern Lutherans, while more traditional Lutherans would consider it hyperbolic and intending to stress the need to rely on God's grace for salvation, and not one's own works. I do agree with the basic premise, that critical race theory is similar to a cult of a religion, however I disagree with the comparison to original sin while misinforming on the Catholic doctrine of it. While it is true that original sin has been passed on to humanity since the first sin of Adam and Eve, this belief is not exclusive to Catholics, and is often maintained in more rigorous views among Protestant Christians. But yes, the problem with critical race theory is that it is utilizing a spiritual/religious narrative in order to condemn a certain race as being unforgiven and with no redeeming value. It might of been crass for Luther to say humans are dung, but he at least merited the possibility of salvation through God's grace. Critical race theory seems more like Calvinism, in that all people of color are the saved ones that are of the elect, and thus are above reproach, while white people are forever damned with no chance of being saved.
    1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. Jagd Töpfer - The nonsense of the early 20th century skeptics. The mythologies of the world tend to start off with Chaos as the beginning of all things, and then a myriad of gods appear to somehow bring order to chaos and create the world. The Bible does mention a void, but God is there from the beginning and brings forth light and creation of the cosmos. This is one God, and His angels may have helped bring order to Creation in some manner, but even the angels were created by God. The mythologies basically portray the gods that make up a given pagan religion's parthenon of gods as essentially inbreds, with cosmological deities as the most pure or supreme, and with their offspring the elementals/titans revolting from the higher lineage with lesser supremacy over the earth, fire, wind, water, etc. Then came the gods that created humans by spilling their seed on the ground, and these were also less superior gods that basically toyed with humans like chess pieces for their own amusement. Still further were the demigods that were a mix of the gods with men. Sure, you can mangle a warped similarity out of the pagan stories, such as to downplay the birth of Jesus, but you have to adapt Jesus' narrative to that of being a demigod, and basically a halfling, rather than Jesus being the Son of God in the traditional and orthodox meaning that Chrritianity has, in which Jesus is both fully God and fully Man, and united to God the Father and Holy Spirit as in the Holy Trinity. The Bible doesn't read as merely a collection of myths mangled together. The story of Creation and God's plan for Creation flows throughout, from Genesis to Revrlation. While there are some unique texts out there, no other religious text than the Bible is comprised in this manner. There is something about the Bible that us unique unto itself, and the way it impacted western culture for 2000 years is truly remarkable.
    1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. Nintendo's biggest competition is Atari, which has embraced their place in retro gaming. The 2600+ plays 2600 and 7800 carts. It's drawback is it's powered by the Stella emulator, but it plays the games in HDMI, so you can play them on modern TVs. They also have a non-cart system that works through online gaming that's a bit more powerful and can play modern games. However, it would have been awesome for the 2600+ to have been capable of running a modern cart system because just consider on storage alone, you can get anywhere between a 16 GB, up to 512 GB USB drive for between $8 - $50. Most modern games are around 1 GB - to 10 GB, so one could easily store the data fora game in the storage, and still have plenty of room in an Atari sized cart for and special chips etc that could bupoost even more power to the graphics and CPU before even getting to the consol hardware. Unfortunately, the 2600+ use of Stella's has the9 drawback of being able to use a cart's additional chipsets which is why games like Pitfall II are u nable to work on the console. If they fixed that, and put in hardware that rivaled the Switch, they would still have an impressive system to bridge the gap between retro and modern with. However, they probably are looking at the VCS to be that gap, which itself has its issues, such as raking 2 hours to setup and install just to run it for the first time. Yet the Zvcs has a full computer under the hood, and that, at its age, is comparable with the Switch. The difference is the modern VCS has a dedicated library of Atari games, plus a promise of newer titles underway. The Switch has the larger library of Nes SNES, and other classic console games, along with Switch titles. Between retro and modern gaming markets, that makes Atari and Nintendo the two main rivals. For cutting edge, it's mostly between X-box and Playstation whose consoles are basically hardware updates. However they too have a market for nostalgia among some of their major game franchises. But, as far as retro, Atari and Nintendo are the main rivals in that market.
    1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805.  @logicplague  - On some level, I agree. I'm you're average white American mutt with family lineage coming from Scottish/Irish, German, possibly French descendents. Europe is/was predominantly white by color, and the cultures do have variations that are based more on region. Granted, there are various regional cultures in the US as well. We're a pretty huge land mass with 50 states, each with their own particular statewide culture, as well as each county in the states with their own traditions and folklore, etc. I've lived in 4 counties in my own state, and have visited others, and I can say that in Washington state, you can find differences of culture between King County where Seattle is, compared to Yakima, Benton, and Franklin, where there are cities and towns most people don't know about, and probably don't care about, especially if they bare care about Seattle to begin with. American history is just as much about the European settlers as it is about the black slaves and native Americans. Many of our counties in Washington state are named after tribes that were local to the region, with some of them remaining in the area to this day. Monolithic group means nothing to me other than BS people make up when they want to make an argument, rather than discuss a subject. Of course I know there are all sorts of tribes that were all over what is now the US. Which is also why it's stupid to claim they were all genocidal barbarians. They all as tribes had their particular cultures, just as the Euopean clans did that eventually became nations in Europe. Or do you thing those clans held hands with each other and never fought among each other? Heck, even when they became Christian nations, they fought among each other. So all I'm saying is no one has a moral high horse of superiority when it comes to war. All of humanity has partaken in war, so no clan, tribe, or nation is without blood on their hands.
    1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817.  @rhetorical1488  - Erasing, or manipulating history, as well as political agendas are all part of human nature as well. It's why in both history and current affairs you have to take what you read, hear, and watch with a grain of salt. After all, Romans had their particular take on history and their interactions with other clans and countries they 'interacted' with. The Greeks, Goths, Celts, and the like have their versions of these 'interactions'. That is to say war, trade, and any other way that people might be towards another, things happened. People that survived, or, for history, people who's writings survived, are the stories that we come across. Whether we choose to believe them or not is another thing, as is whether we can verify that there is something true from their stories worth counting as history, or the truth about current events. As it is, propaganda goes back as far as the hieroglyphics, possibly longer. Who knows? Maybe a caveman hunter painted a lot of deer on his caves to boast that he was a better hunter than he really was. But hey, if he was looking to have a larger harem to keep him warm at night, who are we to judge? But, by and large, that is what most propaganda and political agendas are all about, a numbers game and to try and convince people one person or group is better than another. Erasing, or maniplulation of history is something many people do without really thinking about it. I mean, how many people honestly, truly are candid about who they are in their bios and profiles? Sure, like in a resume, we try to put our best foot forward. I'd imagine the Egyptians, if they suffered the loss they did to the Hebrews that the Bible accounts as being held as slaves, they probably did what they could to hide and erase that out of their histories.Same would also go with their depopulation practice of slaughtering Hebrew babies, not unlike China had done in more recent times under the one child policy. China themselves are a modern example of fudging the history so that events like Tiananmen Square are erased, or at least part of a silent, underground history known by those that lived it, but not spoken of in public. For us in the US and Canada, such censorship sounds appalling, as it should in countries that value and try to safeguard free speech. Yet with that also means being discerning about what you read and hear. It's not a new thing, this policing speech. There are certain things you can't discuss about WWII or the Holocaust in Germany without potentially being sent to jail. As offensive, over the top comedy as the 'saluting pug' was, was it really something to be jailed and taken to court over? On the other hand, there are some journalists out there covering controversial topics that are difficult for most people to bear reading, listening, or talking about that get jailed, partly because of the sensitive content, and partly because it's about a protected race or class of individuals or people. People wonder why it took so long to go after Epstein. Is it really that hard to figure out, considering all the rich, famous, and powerful people in the world he had going to the island? But I'll leave at that for now, because I've probably already hit a lot of key words and phrases that the algorithm is likely to flag and erase this. Yet, that's another case of erasing and manipulation, for if you can suppress speech without human intervention, just because, well then now we have the machines doing the tyrant's work so the tyrant doesn't have to take all the blame. It's just the algorithm. No one to blame but code.
    1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. The repositories are not the main problem. Not updating the repository can be the problem, but it's also having unofficial packages in the repository. Yet, as noted in the video, it's more convoluted than that. I have to wonder how many people realize if they were working with any other company than Valve, who's actually invested in making Linux work, this whole Linux community project relations would be discontinued and distros maintaining their unofficial snap or other package would be getting a cease and dismiss order before going on to sue the distro maintaining the repository out of existence for not removing the unofficial package. This is why we have all these multiple streaming apps for games and other content to begin with. It's also what happens when we remove the physical content that we used to purchase and effectively own. At least I have not heard of a company trying to remove some one's VHS or DVD copy of a movie because Netflix no longer has the rights to stream it. Most people understand why that would be weird, since you own the physical copy and purchased it at a physical store.But ownership in a the virtual metaverse that is the internet, while the concept is there, it's as if it's completely foreign. Then, when the non-com world of the virtual world meets the commercial world of the 'real world, it's not often too pretty. It's not like there hasn't been attempts at making a commercial based virtual world work. Second Life is an example of trying to put free market capitalism to work, with user generated and user sold content. But even it locks horns with OpenSim, which would even exist if Linden Labs didn't make their source content free and open-source over a decade ago, back when they were obsessed with interoperability. Turns out, that didn't vork out to well, since the ability to move from one virtual world grid to another meant using a hypergate. When you do that, all the metadata that that was used by the home grid was reset and the metadata for the content would default to the current user. The same also would happen if you ported content by the various means of downloading and uploading content. So yeah, that didn't go over well with the user based content creators, and Linden Lab had to shut down the hypergrid. This led to the wars between open grids and closed commercial grids that were hoping to make their own virtual economy. Much of this is what I remember from being active between both worlds around 2009 - 2015. The two virtual world factions are there, even Second Life still exists, but it's kind of kept to being it's own niche thing, gaining a little interest when stuff like Meta or NFTs float into mainstream attention. Content is still being made by users, and even virtual land rented out. You just don't hear as much in the media about someone quiting their job because the revenue from their virtual store pays better, or that a land barron in SL made millions off of virtual land sales. That hype is long gone, but a dedicated community remains. The point? This argument over content and ownership has been going on for a long time. I doubt it will ever get resolved to anyone's liking. But we should appreciate Valve has been a lot more patent with the Linux community than, say, Nintendo or Sony would be.
    1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. Now I'm intrigued, because Hyprland is often called a WM, even though it's a Wayland compositor. Why do Wayland compositors get lumped with X-11 WMs? Also, now that I have learned the jargon, it begs the question: What are the most light weight X-11 WMs, and what are the most lightweight Wayland Compositors? Currently, on my newest HP laptop, a 10th Gen Core i-5 Intel from 2019, I have Fedora 41 installed on the internal hard drive, while I side load a PNY micro SD that has Garuda Arch installed on it. On both I use Hyprland for my Wayland compositor. I also have a HP from 2015 that I installed Debian Bookworm on it. This was after hopping around, and, considering that most distros I tried on it, and had best experience on it, were Debian based, it really made the most sense to just go with original, instead of the forked distros. Debian just works, and this seems to be the case especially with older computers that are getting to be around 10 years old, and generally have pretty small RAM in them. Even with my newer HP that's only 4 years older, it has 12 Gb RAM compared to the HP from 2015 that has 4 Gb RAM. Anyways, so far, I've found i3 to be the WM for me on the 2015 HP. It's meant to be my mobile office laptop that I might take to my parents on a quick visit between days off, or to do things at the coffee shop before or after work, depending on what shift I have. However, I find I love the workflow I have on i3. It's almost similar to what I have on Hyprland, just with less frills. It's a little more minimalist, which I like on the 2015 laptop, and it manages to keep things going better than most other environments I've tried on this laptop. There's just something about i3 that rivals for me the great experience I already get with Hyprland on the 2019 HP. I don't know. What do you think? Is i3 the best of the best X-11 WM s? Where does Hyprland fit for you in your ranks of the best Wayland compositors? Also, what happened with Weston? I tried it a few times on Fedora 40 before I upgraded. It was an interesting concept, but sadly underdeveloped. I could get a few apps to work once I figured out how to get the terminal up and try loading them from there. But it was definitely not going to work for a main environment. But it was fun to play around in. Just wish it got developed more.
    1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855.  @vocassen  - I started on Cakewalk way back on Win 3.11 around 1996. For me, it had the features I needed for notation composition, and the soundboard was basically each MIDI instrument or Wave sample had their own volume control with basic features for panning between left speaker and right speaker, and adding chorus and reverb. You then had the master volume as well. So it's basically a bit more advanced version of volume control. You could add patches to the software for extra effects, but it also depended on what sound configuration you had on your PC, particularly with regards to hardware, from a basic SoundBlaster 16, to Roland Sound Canvas, to the SoundBlaster AWE 32/64 series that introduced soundfonts, which improved the quality of sound banks, as well as allowed for creating your own. So, at the time, the better the sound card, the better quality effects and instruments you can have. But, that changed after integrated sound, and as RAM and storage increased. more currently, we have VSTs, (virtual instruments) that are similar to sound fonts in adding more quality to the sound bank, but also implementing Instruments, and sets of instruments that nor set to the old MIDI sound bank presets, but instead are specialized for, say, a variety of drum sets that, in their own app you can adjust the volume and sound of the each part of a drum set, from the snare, the bass, cymbals, etc. These are outside of the soundboard, or the instrument selection of the DAWS (Digital Audio Workstation), or composition software, but may be accessed within the software, and edited to use with the main composition/DAWS software. Just typing it might make it sound more complex than it really is. But the basic framework for the soundboard has been around for decades, and is pretty much standard to most DAWS and composition software like Sibelius, Finale, MuseScore. PreSonus, Rosegarden, Reaper, LMMS, and Ardour, to name a few. For my current setup, I have MuseScore 4 for music notation composition and editing, with a little bit of basic mixing of MIDI soundfonts and VSTs to at least get the basic adjustments of a musical piece. Then I export each track, along with a master track (optional). and tweak the instrument tracks in Audacity. Sometimes I'll compare the master track to the Audacity edits for a bit of quality control. If I really dead to do anything more advanced, I might use Arduous for mixing, but it all depends on the workflow, which I've changed up several times. The basic soundboard has remained a standard in most any music composition and mixing software I've used. But you can get into nodes, which many of the modern DAWS have as plugins. There are also VSTs that have a similar node style to mimic old sythns that relied on the whole wiring and jack system to change sounds that most MIDI synths can make. I have no trouble with people wanting to toy with such a VST setup. It's just not essential, but can add some interesting sounds or effects. But to try and setup virtual jack/node system for my laptop's sound? Eh, I'd rather have a basic soundboard/volume control, and the option to enable and disable the audio and video devices and drives as needed. In Mabox, the audio is done through Volume Control, with tabs for Playback, Recording, Output Devices, Input Devices, and configuration. For the short, basically, if you know how to use volume control, chances are you are not going to have too much trouble with the soundboard mixer in most common DAWS and music composition software. However, you might have trouble getting the audio to work with some of them (*ahem* Rosegarden, Ardour), specially it they are tied to needing JACK setup in a certain manner. Again, I switched to Pipewire to get away from having to configure JACK nodes and have my audio just work.
    1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. It's a difficult topic because it's a matter of circumstance and association. This is at the heart of real racism and bigotry is the us v. them mentality. I don't think it fair to blame it all on mental illness. It might have a little to do with processing information and not having the sort of filters that most people do, but the issues Kanye has with the entertainment industry run deeper than who he currently blames for his issues. That said, we should have a more open discussion about the Holocaust and the 'Yahtzees' because there are a lot of things happening in our own culture that parallel with what happened then. A lot of our current industries made money off of that regime, even benefited from some of the tech and science that built many things things we commonly use today. We also have to understand the ties there were to the eugenetics program of the regime and how that has effected the development of genetics as we know it today. Then there's Albert Einstein who was by birth Jewish, but did not practice the religion, and even turned down the offer to be president of modern Israel. There are so many intriguing aspects of that era of history, and where we are currently about these matters doe a disservice to the lessons we should have learned regarding how such a genocidal regime could exist, then play a blind eye to the genocidal tendencies if the communist nations, of which we can't speak a lot about because it's 'bad for business', just like what our companies probably knew about the Holocaust would have been bad for business for them to speak out about then. This is why we need to talk about it open and honestly, for otherwise we are just as bad as those that looked the other way when it was a certain German regime doing the atrocities.
    1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886.  @SuperColdLemonade  - A lot has changed since 2012, or maybe it started a little before then, but somewhere around that time YouTube was transitioning from being more libertarian towards it's more leftist woke mob mentality today. Somewhat the same with FB and Twitter as well. That's about when we were starting to hear about these odd things called safe spaces popping up in universities, and even black masses being held, or trying to be held at major ivy league universities. I don't even know if woke and satanism are even all that much related to each other, but it was an oddity that the both began to rise up in the universities about the same time. That, and pop music, and other entertainment that's usually been more influenced by soul music, and other genres in that Christian/country/gospel slant, were getting a darker vibe. Like Katie Perry's Dark Horse. I mean, not more that 10 years before 2012, I can remember substitute teaching in a high school weight lifting class, and the radio was turned to a local rock station. One girl in the class asked if the radio could be turned to a pop station, saying that it would be better than listening to devil music. This was in a public school at the time, and I did not miss the irony of claiming pop music is not the devil's music even then. But that's also to put perspective on where the culture has gone with this weird sort of nega-fundamentalist/puritan cult of woke that is like a dark mirror image of it's more conservative Christian days. So I don't know if it's Joe Rogan lost his edge as much as he let the woke mob get to him with their character assassination attempt. Why it didn't seem to matter when on YouTube is hard to say. Maybe he did sell out to Spotify. Who really knows? But the pressures of the current culture are eating at a lot of people. It's so unfortunate so many bend the knee, especially among those that pushed the message and rebelled In the 70's, 80's, and 90's against censorship happening with conservative Christian fundanentalists. Apparently they are all for it now because it's their political and religious cult doing the censorship.
    1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. Even though more traditional, conservative Catholic, I've come to respect you as a person, regardless if I agree with you or not. You're always informative and nuanced, plus the shared interest in history and culture, and preserving the objetive of it over 'your truth', which is more subjective, a personal perspective.Most times, our disagreements might be in regard to role of the Church, which just about everyone has difficulty holding objective and nuanced about, be it history or the current era. But I do appreciate when you reserve judgement and ask for more clarity on why the Church may do things one way or another. Point being here that people can learn and respect one another regardless of differences. As per influencer, I do agree for the need to take responsibility. This is not necessarily about taking it for the team, or a deserved punishment to serve as an example, for setting a good example as a mentor is a form of influence. While I don't talk on my channel, I do try to reference source material if arranging someone else's song, as well as what audio, video, amd musical software I use to compose and arrange songs. Doing that makes a difference between being responsible with copyrights and licenses, or otherwise not and being given a valid copyright strike. I'm glad when people enjoy my music, or arrangements, and take pride in showing my receipts as well. Anyways, thanks for the content, and was glad you didn't rush to conclusions. Regardless what happens, everyone deserves their day in court, if they need to defend themselves, and may mercy and justice prevail.
    1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. I love Arch, and I switch between Garuda and Fedora, both using Hyprland. They're almost identical to each other right now. The one issue I have with Arch-based distros that prevents me from making Garuda my main distro is that one program I use a lot, I can't save pictures from it. It's a virtual world program called Second Life, and, it doesn't matter what Viewer I use to access the world, whenever I try to take a picture in-world and save it to disk, it can't do it on Arch distros for some reason. Or maybe I'm missing something? Because I use the viewer that is in the AUR, and most everything else works with it fine. But Arch is the only distro that I can't save in-world pictures to disk. Fedora, Ubuntu, and Debian based distros save the pics just fine, though. So, for now, I'm keeping with Fedora 40 as my main distro, and with Hyprland, the experience is fairly similar to Garuda. Ok, one other app works better on Fedora for me than on Arch/Garuda, and that is MuseScore. For some reason, it's more prone to crash, or not work at all on the Arch distros I have used - even ones that were specifically configures for sound and music creation, or as an AV studio. But MuseScore works fine on Fedora as an app image, since that's how the current version is downloaded now. oddly, the music instrument manager can be downloaded as a .deb or .rpm. So I guess app developers trying to be more compatible with Linux are also trying to figure out what ways are best to package their programs for Linux. 😏
    1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. As for 'love', sure, modern English has let the term be used for all sorts of things. But we do have various terms, including traditional Greek derivatives, such as erotic, aphrodisiac, and nympho to mean similar to 'love' as in enamored, impassioned, hot, or sweet for, or on, have a crush on, turned on, lustful, or simply horny. The higher love, such as agape (ἀγάπη), would traditionally be, for Godly love, worship, devotion, or adoration. However, they are often used in modern context for someone highly praised, or a person that has become worthy of trust and respect, or someone that you strongly desire and admire. Philia (φιλία) would denote friendship, comradery, and is somewhat mixed with storge (στοργή), in as much as brotherhood and familial bonds are mixed among friendships and the modern way in which they are put together, such as instead of co-workers being mere associates, but becoming work family, or a friend that's been around and part of family gatherings and internal workings, is considered more like part of the family. Though we don't call it philautia (φιλαυτία), we do have some modern notion of self-love or self-affirmation of which we would distinguish between a healthy, positive, balanced self-awareness/self-acceptance that allows individuals to love and appreciate themselves, and unhealthy, excessive, narcissistic self-love that is characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance and a lack of empathy for others. We may have some differences on meanings of terms, and all I can really say here, is that I'd hope for our modern era, we return to using more of the terminology we have for certain cravings, desires, respect, etc., than simply saying, "I love that!" Especially when all you mean is that you like how a burrito tastes, or favor the flavor or color of a thing. Someone might just say, "Well, if you 'love' it so much, why not marry it?"
    1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. Accept the BS? Sorry, but this smack by Will Smith has been the best thing to happen to the Oscars whose ratings would have tanked without it. No one would be talking about the Oscars right now if this BS didn't happen. Trying to take a reasonable man argument here is just playing into it more. We went through a whole 'summer of love' in 2020 where people had done worse than smack someone and got away with it. There are still people getting randomly attacked in Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco, not to mention Chicago's continuous black on black shooting crime spree, and very few of them are brought to justice. Whether Will Smith's career will be over for smacking Chris Rock is mostly dependent on Will Smith. Jim Carrey, who may or may not have led to one of his girlfriends to commit suicide has no room to talk on this whatsoever. He's as much a scum bag as any of these Hollywood elites are. For all we know, Carrey might be among the vampire child molesting cult that is said to rule Hollywood. Will Smith, is no victim, nor saint here, but among all those who want to be outraged by his sin, none of them could cast the first stone. But it still hits Will the hardest because he was supposed to be one of the good guys. He probably still could come back, but why? Hollywood is a toxic environment. The entertainment business as a whole is full of some of the worse scum on the earth. Anyone who wants any shred of sanity would be a fool for going into it, and would be wise to jump ship out of it.
    1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. Between the 1970's and 1990's that was kind of the main time for the Christian Conservative movement in politics. Heck, even President Jimmy Carter got in on it, as he used his Baptist roots to gain popularity. Liberals actually could have become what became the Christian right, but there was something of a shift that started as early as the 50's and 60's. Basically, legalizing abortion and the pill became a big wedge issue, with the left siding with abortion and the pill and the right, for the most part, siding with the growing pro life movement. Regardless, conservative is something that has unique definitions that are not relegated to just US Politics. For instance, a conservative in the UK would essentially be someone that wants to conserve the commonwealth and the crown. For much of Europe, conservatives were those that wanted to return to royalty and chivalry. Christendom plays a part in that, but you can find conservatives that would want to go back to even pagan times, as chivalry itself is said to have evolved from Germanic tribes where all men were expected to fight and protect their community (which is still true in Switzerland to some extent, and other places where they are to effectively join their country's military by they time they reach a certain age). As it is, conservative elements became a part of Christendom in so far as much as the pagan philosophers of Plato and Aristotle influence much of the great philosophers and thinkers in Christendom, such as St. Augustine of Hippo and St. Thomas Acquinas.
    1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. Not sure what happened to my post. I noted preference for 'year of our Lord,' and how BC can be 'before the birth of our Lord,' and how that can be a matter of style as much as communication. Or, in a manner of speaking, style has to do with the way in which one relays something, as in what is stressed and for what impact. I mentioned the beginning of Homer's Iliad for example, since the way it is interpreted tends to boil down to style as well. For whether you start 'sing O muse,' or 'sing O goddess,' neither is wrong because the Muses themselves were considered goddesses. The use of 'O goddess' may be literally more accurate, as 'theas,' the feminine version of 'theos' (god) is used. Poetically, muse is not wrong, since we are talking about a work of literature, and the Muses were the goddesses of the arts. Further, if one wants to be really technical, the passage begins with the word 'menin' which is 'wrath,' as in an enduring anger that is usually reserved as the anger of the gods. However, it here conveys the anger of Achilles who is considered something of a demigod in Greek mythology. The Greek language is very relational in word usage, even though at times to read it in a literal left to right manner as is accustomed in English, it can sound like some excited boy who gives out a word salad from not yet forming the sentence structure we normally use today. But in Greek, the placement is purposeful. Why put anger before the goddess to sing? Because the anger of the fallen Achilles matches that of the wrath of the gods. Thus one of the major themes of the Iliad besides the fall of Troy, being the death of Achilles, to which even the chief god Zeus weighed in on the fate of this hero. Thus why one could poetically form even the literal left to right like this: "To the wrath, sing, O goddess, of the son of Peleos, the wretched Achilles." For this conveys the meaning, along with stressing the key aspects of the passage in the manner of the original Greek, but in a way that makes sense in modern English. Even so, it's a translation made out of preference of a poetic, song-like lyric of more recent style or fashion of use in English. T may give a glimpse of how I may interpret the Iliad, which does have a way. Of being changed after reading it in the Greek, not unlike how the understanding of the Bible can change from reading, say, the Vulgate, the Septuagint, etc., as compared to the accepted modern English translations. Thus 'correct' often depends on what is accepted as truth, sometimes regardless what is indeed the Truth.
    1
  1031. Also important to note about various similar laws, especially in as much as one can compare humans with the rest of the animal kingdom. 1. You can be fined and/or jailed for disturbing a sea turtle nest. (https://tapeunit.com/sea-turtle-101-what-are-the-penalties-for-disturbing-the-sea-turtles/). 2. Even though it has been delisted under the Endangered Species Act, the bald eagle is still protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, meaning one is prohibited from taking, possessing, selling, purchasing, bartering, offering to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit, can lead to a first offense fine of $5,000 or one year imprisonment with $10,000 or not more than two years in prison for a second conviction. Felony convictions carry a maximum fine of $250,000 or two years of imprisonment. The fine doubles for an organization. (https://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html) Yet, when it comes to human life, our laws should be more lenient than these laws regarding animals? Comstock followed essentially the same sort of legal framework as these for protecting animals, as did the regulations regarding abortion clinics. But apparently we can say it's a 'right' when it comes to killing unborn humans, but perfectly fine to impose when it comes to the rest of the animal kingdom. Thus, it would be better to be born as a bald eagle or a sea turtle if you want your right to life from the moment of conception to be protected.
    1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1