Youtube comments of John Crawford (@JohnCrawford1979).
-
47
-
38
-
37
-
34
-
30
-
25
-
Not even sure people are surprised as much as wanting to get in their take. Shawn Michaels is probably the best at nicely talking about how gullible the WWE audience is, and adding how that's what he likes about it, because they keep coming back, filling the seats at the arenas and getting the eyeballs fixed on the TV, paying for the Pay Per Views, buying all the merch. And hey, the wresting YouTubers cash in as well - or at least get all the likes and views they know will come from talking about these wrestlers. Is it authentic? Well, the Rock has always been about selling himself, his gimmick, his brand. That has never changed, so that's at least commitment to the part, if not being authentic to what he's all about.
24
-
Just on legalities:
1. Statutes of limitations were dropped, thus making the trial a kangaroo court. Court of public opinion, you can have your opinion and believe what you want in public opinion, but you need more than hearsay and gossip in a court of law, at least one that is fair and balanced and not swayed by the politics of the day right or left. You may call this delusional, but either we have a court based on the procedures of law, or we have the case where you can cheat the law and cheat even the innocent that are held on loose ties and false/tampered evidence, or people paid to give false witness. There are criminals let go due to bad procedure that ruined the evidence, and there are people sent to prison for false witnesses that managed to slip through the process. But we need the process to work out what is true, or possible beyond a reasonable doubt, otherwise, we could sentence innocent people to death or life in prison over gossip and slander paid to the highest bidder.
2. Cosby already had a trial, and he served time in prison. Unless a new case comes up, one where he commits a crime after being released from prison, he can't be tried again. It's called double jeopardy.
23
-
23
-
23
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
There isn't anything orthodox about the problem. If there was a 'right teaching' or at least 'best practice' on how to make Linux work, that's one thing. But what is going on with woke culture and the insanity of the hyperbole is a problem. Aside from maybe Islamic countries, there is no one calling for a bad ending to befall trans people, though there is a call for teachers to stop grooming kids, and instead going back to what schooling is supposed to be for, teaching the basics on reading, writing, math, science, etc. It's not a teachers' job to push kids into any sexuality, nor to push cultural warfare in the classroom.
18
-
16
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
Unions can be good, but sometimes the company manipulates the contract. Like, say you're guaranteed 20 hrs, the company might say, "Ok, fine, everyone gets 20 hours - no more, no less." Then, when you ask your manager why you got your hours cut, they say to you, "We're sorry. we had to cut hours because the union won't let us work people more than 20 hours a week." The union may not have meant a 20 hour limit, but that you're guaranteed those hours. But this is part of the issue besides wanting a wage increase. Companies will find ways to cut costs to get you to work more for less one way or another. So yeah, why be loyal to any work, union or not? Corporate hacks are corporate hacks wherever you go.
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I like what Pipewire can do with audio. Still going to wait to see how the video side comes out. Theme of the story: If it sounds too good to be true, it possibly is. So better to wait and see. I really don't like doing the Jack GUI. It's the least intuitive, even for professional AV sound designers, because so much of the physical jack outputs had been given digital solutions that are far more intuitive for front end use. With DAWs, much of the jack style audio is over-complicated, especially when you're just looking to edit and compose. Heck, it was easier working with the physical jacks and MIDI ports back in the day, outside funky stage setups, but the plug and play was simple for a basic sound, AV studio setup. Jack overcomplicates it. Which is why I love Pipewire without diving into a bunch of GUI graphical nonsense. All you really need nowadays is something that looks like an AV/soundboard with check boxes for enabling/disabling the devices you want or need, and bon't bother with virtualizing the back end jacks. It's not as intuitive as you think, there's simpler front end controls, and if you really want that 1970's - 1980's over-complex synth experience, just get the VST plug-ins. Otherwise there's plenty of soundfonts and VST sound banks and samplers that create the sounds just fine without all the funky wiring.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
The only problem there is a lot of companies work around this by saying they put up a job, but never advertised it all that much in house or on job boards. Thus few people even know there's a job available. Or if they do know, the company goes phones in the interviews, glosses over them, and then say, "We can't find a qualifying candidate, even among those we interviewed." Then they can claim they have to outsource, or otherwise bring someone in on visa because they went through all the motions and claim they couldn't find anyone. In reality, they already knew what they wanted, and regardless if anyone interviewed was qualified or not, they can boil it down to not a 'right fit', but the guy on visa that they can pay less for, is what they really mean by who's qualified.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Mastodon is like a book or game. It's something either published, or with a platform. So this raises a different issue. When you distribute a publication or put a voice on a platform, guess what? Not everyone is going to have the same views or hold the same values as you. A publication has every right to choose whoever they want to publish. We already have publications like the Jacobin, which takes its name from political club during the French Revolution that became identified with extreme egalitarianism and violence from mid-1793 to mid-1794 and helped play a factor in the rise of Robespierre. Christians have all sorts of publications like the Christian Science Monitor, or the National Catholic Register. And, guess what? There are Christians that may read the Jacobin, and atheists that might read the Christian publications mentioned. As a conservative Christian, I can't stop an atheist from reading a Christian publication, nor would I want to. Even a Satanist can read a Bible. Albeit I'd hope they might convert after doing so. But I can't just go over and take the Bible from the Satanist and declare it not for him, and that he and all other Satanists must be banned from reading the Bible. Maybe I'm not like the Bible thumper of old, who themselves were a form of woke, and we learned not to follow their bigotry. Ironically, the left is going the way of the old stereotypical Bible thumping, book burning, Satanic Panic fundamentalist Christian they still whine about when it comes to their narrative about that era. But apparently the left learned to be woke bigots.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@codahighland - I've been roughly moving through the realms of conservative, centrist, and libertarian for most my life. I could tell you what was right wing in the 80's, somewhat in the 90's, though I'd say bipartisan neocon politics of the 90's was starting to muddy the waters. The 2000's was mostly moderate 'compassionate' conservative defined by W Bush, and what currently (since roughly 2010) is considered RINO spineless so-called Republicans that more often than not vote with Dem and show disdain for much of the conservative and libertarian right. But to say what is popular American right, in current times, I don't know what defines that. Trump is not right wing. Before he ran for president, he identified mostly as Democrat, which is partly why his presidential bid was taken as a joke by most, until he actually won. But I still wouldn't call him right wing. He's probably more or less a centrist, but he caters to people that, yes a lot are definitely on the right, but there's plenty that are not and are just fed up with how far the left has gone and has fallen into this ideological purity spiral on who can be the most authentic leftist, checking every single box they can, being loyal to every single leftist organization and activist group out there. And I can understand how some might consider that orthodoxy. but I think it's much more fundamentalist, even a weird sort of anti-matter twin to the conservative fundamentalism of the 80's and 90's who also were trying to censor video games, and held a political stronghold on the right. Yes, there's still a religious right, but it's laughable to say it has anywhere close to the power that the radical left fundamentalists have right now. Even as much as I am a Catholic, traditional conservative religiously, I really fear that we are looking at another French Revolution reign of terror from the left, where you can't just agree to disagree, since there are people being jailed for any sort of activism on the right where far worse things on the verge of rioting on the left is paid a blind eye to. Modern visions of segregation are mostly on the left, especially with how safe spaces are utilized. Bret Weinstein is an example of this sort of thing, who is a former professor of evolutionary biology, having served on the faculty of Evergreen State College from 2002 until 2017. Evergreen for the longest time had been considered the epitome of the most liberal of liberal colleges. Weinstein would traditionally have been fully well check marked into the left in years gone by. He was basically ousted for saying that this whole DEI and safe spaces might be going a bit too far and that it's discrimination to tell white students they are not allowed on campus in order to fight 'who-aight supreme pizzas'. He's among a few people on the left that appear sane enough to call out that something's really wrong with what's going on, and because they won't tow the line of modern leftists, they at best are considered right wingers, if not far right extremists. It's unfortunate we're in such sensational times as these. I hope we can find a way out of it before we see a real genocide or holocaust transpire from all the insanity.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Yes, I do remember meritocracy being something nerds cared about, especially when they'd get passed up on for a job, raise, or promotion to the guy whose big attributes were either going to the same college, being in the same frat, or loving the same sports teams, with a major boost if the guy played and was liked for his role on said sports team, but otherwise could barely do any of the work assigned to him. Anti-meritocracy is similar in that the person hired, getting the raise or promotions is liked because of hitting favorable quotas, and not for if the person can, or actually has done his job well to merit such accolades.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
A baker makes money off a cake. He is offering a service, though doesn't necessarily have to bake a cake, and could give any reason for doing so, such as already being booked up on orders, or because they've already closed and are not taking any more orders. However, by civil rights law, the refusal cannot be made in the case of discrimination against religion, race, creed, and added in later gender or sexual orientation. I get the baker's issue, but, I also don't like smoking, yet I still have to sell cigarettes if I work at a store that sells them, which most grocery stores do. Can there be a religious exemption? Maybe, but we don't have that yet, so we still have to follow the law until such time as it might be changed. You can protest it, but it's still the law of the land.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Just one last aspect, the four terms for 'love' in Greek used to be a common sermon, or teaching among evangelical Christians, as well as a few other Protestant sects, particularly those with roots coming from the Anglican/US Episcopal sects. It became common after C.S. Lewis did a series of radio talks in 1958 on the concept of love, which were later compiled into his book, “The Four Loves,” exploring the four classical Greek terms for love: storge (affection), philia (friendship), eros (passionate love), and agape (charity). The radio talks were apparently criticized in the U.S. at the time for their frankness about sex. Until Pope John Paul II's Theology of the Body, which began with a series of 129 lectures delivered by the Pope during his Wednesday audiences from 1979 to 1984, C.S. Lewis' "Four Loves" was among the few most notable candid talks on sex and love that was had among Christians, Protestant or Catholic, in modern history to date.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The irony it is 20 or 30 years ago, he would have been the typical lefty that took up these oddball subjects mostly because of the shock value it got from conservatives. I still remember the arguments among furries, who at one time actually cared not to be related to as being into certain things with animals just because a certain then growing section of the community was obsessed with drawing anthro characters in adult situations.
Then there's been the past decade of weebs who have had people freak out as much about their youthful looking anime girls as they do that many of them are Trump supporters. I get it, 4-chan is the dumpster pit of all vile things Reddit used to be (and in some areas still is), but really, cringe is cringe, regardless politics.
But Stallman is mostly a throwback to the old hippies. Not necessarily the first openly cringe fringe society group (the Greek cynics, literally called so as a reference to behaving like dogs, had at least a couple thousand years), they were the rebellion to what they considered a whitewashed society of the 50's. Ironically, once being the one's pushing to rage against the machine, they have become the machine to rage against.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@stuart3753 - Even outside of wrestling and politics (at least national politics, most everything about humanity is political in some way, be it because of family drama, and what plays out in civilized society, there's always the tale of two cities in life), a lot of people cover for people involved in all sorts of stuff. You are a hypocrite if you think WWE or the US government, or the current person claiming to be president are the only ones that have ever been involved in covering up for people, or permitting it, or even being involved in sick stuff. There's schools, churches, hospitals, cops, pretty much all businesses and corporations, that do just that on a daily basis. Much of human history can be told around who has been covering up for who on the world stage, or in whatever capacity of history you want to go down. Heck, you've probably covered for people yourself, and even had people cover for you. But like most hypocrites, you're going to say the crap you have covered up, or what people covered up about you comes out smelling like roses compared to WWE or the government's issues. Maybe so, but still a hypocrite to pretend like you can cast the first stone when you're guilty of covering for others, and have benefited from people covering for your follies in life.
3
-
I think the problem they hate about the losing funds is because it goes to that one dig of going woke = going broke.
This has been the reality of AAA gaming since 2014, when Sargon of Akkad became Sargon of Akkad, for better or for worse. I say better because of how he was about to return to YouTube, and how the Lotus Podcast has been able to maintain success and keep Carl Benjamin relevant, and become more humanized since he doesn't have to speak behind the Sargon mask and explain his points without being seen as just an angry gamer neckbeard.
I'd personally love to just be about music, how I've enjoyed composing music since the days I was writing MIDIs on mid - late 90's Twelve-Tone Cakewalk music suite I got with my first MIDI keyboard that I used on an IBM Aptiva 486 that initially ran on Win 3.11 with wavetable, which was later upgraded with SB AWE 64 with soundfont instrument banks and and capable to create your own. Basically the origin of today's modern VSTs and other virtual instruments, and the basic MIDI standards. Moving to Linux, It wasn't any hate for Win-10. which I liked, as being the successor for 7. which was the successor for XP, which I would still be on because that was the most table and long term experience Microsoft ever put out that was great. I think They even know that XP is the best they ever will have, especially if they continue the way they are with what they are doing now. Linux wasn't something I expected to be freedom from that, until I started try out distros and seeing what they have to offer. Currently, I'm between Fedora 40 and Garuda, both of which I run Hyprland on. Fedora is, next to Debian, one of the best long term distros while Garuda is a fun, current of the cutting edge of Arch. It's how I learned about Pipewire, Hyprland, and Wayland - two of which impact the actual multimedia aspects of how things like MuseScore, Ardour, Audacity, GNU, OpenShot, and other apps I need for my workflow.
While I love the decentralization of much of the Linux distros, there is indeed a problem that only Bryan Lunduke is saying something about it. I don't live in Portland, But I do live in WA state, and as much as I believe it is necessary to pay attention to local government, 2020 showed that there's a problem there too. Microsoft basically owns my state, even now buying up farmland (and votes) in counties that are, or used to be red counties. There still are a lot of counties red, and fairly independent, and really, everything county that's not in the Seattle-Tacoma, Puget Sound area, heck, even a few counties in that area would love to break away because Seattle politics defines far too much of the politics of the rest of WA. There's similar parts of Oregon that would like to defect from Portland, just like Northern CA would love to be detached from Southern CA, and some of Southern CA misses when they were much more rural and conservative. TX may still be fairly red, but it's growing more purple. Titus is lucky to be living in a red state where he can be middle of the road centrist and not have to face a bloated, corrupt Dem controlled state governing juggernaut that is backed by some of the largest tech, music, and entertainment corporations in the country, if not much of the world. Talk about local? I've been local to my area for a long time, with my education being from Washington State University in Pullman, WA, That's about as far east and rural local college town WA as you can get up here in the Northwest, and heck, I went even farther with taking a few classes offered from University of Idaho in Moscow Idaho. I'm sure HRC would like to claim me as a Russian spy for that one. 😏
And yes, out of college, I wanted to be more centrist, and still believe that both the left and the right are problematic. Yet they are pretty much all we got to work with, considering you get the anarchist side of libertarian, regardless if they are left or right, But, yet again, Carl Benjamin is a UK Centrist, and yet the Labor party is pretty close to where the DNC is on things, and even the Tories are more or less RINOs, with maybe a few with any backbone, but most just go along to get along with Labor. That's a trend we have in much of the West, on both sides of the pond, throughout UK, Europe, Canada, and the US. South America is in its own world of hurt with both the the illegal drug cartels and corrupt politicians that make out politics seem pretty mild in comparison. But much of the West is from the world stage down to the mayor is major trouble. On every level, it's backed by the corporations that back the major parties, and may have certain channels going through less legitimate ways to make change. Sure, we have a lot of channels on TV, and the internet has held a lot of open space, but the people that control it from the world stage down to the local level are held by a handful of media moguls. These moguls are either big tech, or owned by big tech, or otherwise are influenced by big tech. Ironically, it's the left that I first learned about why not to trust big corporations, even while it's the left that currently is benefiting from big corporations, as well as big governement, who might as well be one and the same, the way things are going.
Again, I'd rather be composing music, learning more about how MIDI and other aspects of AV work on Linux, and how to more effectively utilize social media to market and stream my music. Carl Benjamin just wanted to play video games, Bryan Lunduke would rather geek out on tech, and I'd like to just enjoy the geeking out between both Lunduke and Titus, especially on what distros and apps they might think are great for AV type things, and how to make the greatest laptop AV streaming studio ever. But no, the things we love are being used against us. And indeed, there is nothing more local and personal to a geek than their computer. Add to that people who are discriminating certain values, principles, religion, or politics, claiming I ought to be banned and treated as the monster they clam me to be. As a US citizen, that believes in the Constitution, there is something really wrong here. Conservatives get it, and have been warning about this sort of culture shift for a lot longer than any of us, back when it made sense to call the corporate enterprises more or less right wing capitalists. Right now, it's ridiculous to call these companies capitalists, especially after selling themselves out to China. And it shows when they show greater respect to China, and then back in the states, they keep fueling the culture war, and try to ramp it up even further, even to the point where you don't think they even care about going woke and making their company lose money and open themselves to lawsuits and boycotts, or people just tired of the BS, and grow wary of giving their money to companies that hold outright animosity and hatred for them.
Again, I'd love to go back to enjoying tech and making music, etc. But, sometimes you have to say enough is enough. Otherwise, they will just plough right over you and try to bully you into submission.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
True, the Greeks were somewhat conservative, especially if you are talking about being religious and traditional. Even in not being Christians, there was a strong sense of morality within Greek/Hellenic society. That's to be expected, as per the city-state held the νόμος (nómos), the law, rule, code, or 'norms' of the people within that city-state. These laws were regards to behaviors to either persuade or dissuade people doing things in order to keep the public unity. Plus this was long before state and religion being separate was a thing, so obeying the laws was obeying the gods. And yes, I do find it humorous that they think conservatives are humorless when it comes to sex or adult humor.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@markislivingdeliberately - Employees have rights. There are labor laws, rules, regulations, and company policies that are enforced by legal contracts, which is why you go to court if you feel your employer reneged on their end of the deal and sue them.
God Himself laid out that it is for humanity to labor as per the Bible back in Genesis. Granted, it was after being kicked out of the Garden of Eden, but it is made clear that we are called to work.
It's funny you take this line here, and then, you, and many others that take this line of BS will go around telling people to go get a job. Yeah, well, she had a job and they fired her. They said it was about performance, even though they have no proof that she wasn't doing her job. They, the employer, made that mistake, when they could have just laid her off and maybe had to pay severance, rather than now having the public spotlight showing how crappy their HR and upper management is. Now that she has the evidence, she has a very good case to take them to court and sue them for wrongful termination. If not that, there are a lot of people that would be happy to take up the cause against corporate serfdom.
Sorry, but your world of employers crapping all over employees and squeezing the heart and soul out of them before sending them to the curb is going to die, and I hope it is a painful hemorrhaging.
3
-
3
-
I grew up in the Hogan, Randy Savage, Andre the Giant era, as well as was going through high school back when Shawn Michaels was playing the whole Heartbreak Kid gimmick. So I also remember the whole Hollywood Hogan, NWO era of WCW, and between rivalry of WCW and WCW, as well as the console wars of SNES v. Genesis, that was a fun time to be a fan of both. But, after a while, you realize their all human, you realize that it's all business, and you grow up knowing you got your own business to get out there to make your own living. It's sad that today's fans don't understand this. Sure, enjoy the narratives, but realize, that's all they're trying to do, is build up a story and see which ones the hook the audience.
3
-
3
-
2
-
This is why I don't use Steam that much, because it is just renting. You pay how much you would to own a game to rent it.
For now, you may mock Win 7 users for being frustrated for what is effectively planned obsolescence, but then, why be mad at Ubuntu and other major Linux distros when they choose not to support older versions? Valve may support and run on Linux for now, but they are not beholden to remain doing so. They don't even have to continue to use Chrome.
Win 7 an XP are not unsafe, and I think there is a good case to make that, when older OSes do get put on planned obsolescence that the company that no longer supports the OS no longer has control or rights over how people may use it, and effectively make it free and open source.
Plus, look at what the retro gaming community, and demo scene, that utilize old computers as far back as the Amiga and Atari ST. You can even find people that try to refurbish old Commodore PET to play some of the most ancient versions of Snake. Then there's the Atari consoles and people that make home brew games for thr 2600, 7800, even the 5200. These are console and computers that, for some, even their original company has long went out of business. Security-wise, there's few people left that even know how to program on them, let alone want to make viruses in BASIC. not to mention, with RAM based computers, you just turn them off, and the malware is killed because RAM is short term memory, which is shut off when the computer shuts off.
You're selling the Win 7, and the XP argument short. It's not just about Steam, but also a mater of right to ownership and right to repair. The only thing that makes Win 7, XP, or even earlier versions of Ubuntu obsolete is that the people that once worked on it no longer do so. So why can't those that, for whatever reason, decide they want to use the OSes form communities that continue to work on support on their own? Isn't this, in a way, how Linux carries on, and part of why we have so many distros is because of older distro that are no longer around, but there is still a dedicated community that forks off of them? Why is it laughable for Win 7 and XP to now become free and open source distros of their own right? Especially when the company that used to support them abandoned them. It doesn't even matter that the company that abandoned them still exist, for then you might as well say Ubuntu shouldn't exist because Debian still exists. Or, a little closer in similarity, Fedora and other Red Hat distros shouldn't exist because Red Hat still exists, open source copyright notwithstanding. Because, legally, such copyrights don't seem to hold water anyways, since Redhat can trample over it anyway and say it's their code and they can use it however they want, regardless, and the courts seem to side with Red Hat.
Anyway, and as it is, GOG wouldn't have existed, nor would Steam eventually pick up certain classic games, like Doom, if it wasn't for abandonware. It's only later, after companies that still held the licenses realized they could still profit from older games, that the older games wound up on Steam and consol stores, or repackaged in all-in-one nostalgia console cash grabs. Because otherwise, the argument would remain that people got ROMs for old abandoned games because either no one was selling them, the originals became insanely expensive collectibles that no one wanted to damage the hardware, so ROM backups were the better option to play them, or just simply the game companies no longer supported them, or no longer existed to support them - hence being called abandonware.
All I'm saying is there's more to the story, and a lot more that ought to be hashed out legally, which gets into the archaic views we have of copywite, and how they work (or how abusive and dysfunctional they are) in modern contracts, licensing, etc. if anything, Linux and the abandoned OSes like Win 7 and XP are on a similar path. When it comes to rights of ownership, what it means to have community driven support for an OS, and being able to maintain these things. Steam shouldn't be beholden fo chrome. But moreover, your argument about security of an OS that has to rely on a dedicated community for support is shooting Linux in the foot. Linux is a diverse community that has people dedicated to updating and maintaining the particular distros that have built up to become a community. The difference for Win 7 and XP is they are already a built up community that has been abandoned. The probably are mad most especially at Microsoft, so the lashing out at Steam is from putting salt on an already open wound. What would you say to them if you continued having trouble with Windows native games, with Wine and Proton failing to get them to work, and they said, "Just give up and run Windows!" Oh, right, some did say that, and yet you didn't give up on Linux, despite you could have gotten on Win 10 or 11 for free. But hey, that's the banter among competition.Yet now that they have reached the time of forced obsolescence, they don't have to be enemies any more. They can help push for a more free and open world that isn't subject to the whims of big tech on whether we are made obsolete, or otherwise get locked out simply because the choose to do so.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I seen it happen with a local coffee shop chain. Sure, the guy was a felon and registered offender, but that was well over a decade, and having done time, and the guy's clearly been trying to turn his life around and showing some success. But nope, none of that mattered when it came to 'St. George', who inspired the 2020 'summer of love', and naturally, coffee shop employees wanted to wear BLM shirts to work to show their solidarity with their favorite saint. Backlash came when the owner decided it wasn't work appropriate. Sure enough, even after giving an apology and trying to explain how he can relate with St George, the BLM fanatics still wanted their pound of flesh, and used the guy's past conviction against him. All those years of trying to prove he's more than just a convicted felon, poof! Gone because of stupid activists that have no sense of nuance or basic human empathy. Became yet another example of how the left eats itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Counterbalance_ yeah I liked the original three. I played the original two in the arcade boxes, as well as Genesis, SNES, Game Gear, and Gameboy. Obviously the handheld weren't great, though the Game Gear version was fun on road trips. After the original trilogy, from my perspective, they lost sight of what made the arcade games awesome. I didn't play MK I - III for some elaborate story line. It was a fighting game, with the caveat of fatalities as an extra 90's style rub the win in their face, tongue in cheek sort of manner. It still feels kind of absurd that friends (as well as enemies and rivalries) were made over decapitating their character after a flawless victory. But that was the way of the arcade, which is lost these days. Even online game play isn't like it used to be before people wanted to play to become top streamer internet famous. Just a different vibe for a different generation.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Bernie seemed authentic until twice bowing down to the DNC establishment. Plus, after he made some money after shilling his book, he didn't seem to go after the millionaires as loudly. Then, if you consider he has three houses, where the average American is barely able to pay their rent or mortgage, it makes you wonder how authentic he is about being in it for the little guy, rather than doing Karl Marx and just happens to be a self-loathing grifter that gets by due to the people he cons into supporting him or the cause he claims to be a part of. But, then again, as much as the DNC wants to hold power by giving lip service to popular socialism of the idiocracy, maybe that's why he falls back lock step with the establishment left, because he's not a 'true believer' of the cause. After all, if you have property and prosperity, why would you want to seriously take up a cause against it? Socialism is a con made up by a burgeoise grifter that played into the burgeoise conscience about the poor, and worked to rouse up the rabble in the proletariate that felt disenfranchised by the burgeoise. But the equity that socialism calls for ultimately leaves everybody poor and divided, save for the con artists that caused all the discord, who take power, and often bleed countries dry of both economic success and horde all the natural resources. In other words, modern Venesuella, and what you see in Seattle with a city council that actually does have a Communist on the council and a statue of Lennon in one of its parks. Their 'democratic socialism' is going about as well as it is in other democrat/socialist run cities in America, such as San Francisco, Chicago, and is partially what we get with Biden and the popular socialism in DNC establishment policies.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AllLogarithmsEqual - No, it's not a reasonable concern, but having that concern can hint to someone's bias or view. I don't see how Lunduke can be said to be any more or less honest just for consolidating his content. It seems more that he's conceding to how you can't be apolitical any more.
I get it, to a point, being that, in the 80's and 90's, video games and computer magazines were about as apolitical as you can get. They weren't without their biases. Magazines that were published by, say Nintendo, Sega, Atari, and Sony, they obviously were going to write exclusively about the consoles and the games on the consoles of their parent companies. But, regardless if they were exclusive to a company, or included any and all things related to video games, it was the common expectation that they would just keep to writing game reviews, talk on the tech and peripherals of the current or up and coming consoles, as well as events, like the E3 expo. About the only time there was anything political talked about in the magazines was when politicians were talking about censoring or banning games, and how games shouldn't be taken so seriously, that it was more a problem with bad parenting. Nowadays, you have game journos that are more like the censorship advocates in the 90's Or, for whatever reason, they have to inject some random rant about how they hate Trump or JK Rowling that has nothing to do with gaming whatsoever.
That Lunduke doesn't go out of his way to bash Biden as the worst president ever, or talk about how Stephen King should stick to writing horror novels because, even as bad as he is at writing those, his politics suck worse, isn't to me hiding his politics, or somehow being dishonest. As it is, I don't even know what his views on Biden and Stephen King are. But I'm just saying that you don't have to go out of your way to be overtly political to prove what your politics are, nor even have to state them. Yet you can't get away from reporting about the politics in tech that leads to things like the Hyperland - Freedesktop controversy, and I think it a fair assessment to say that certain voices in the opensource and Linux movement can be quite extreme left, especially when they are calling for people who hold views different from them to be barred from Opensource and using Linux. Might as well just say Linux and Opensource are free and open to everyone, except if you are right wing. At least someone is reporting on the bias, because many of us are leaving the corporate world because of similar toxic polarization. For it seems you can't love tech, games, a lot of things, if you don't follow the leftist cult, because they demand allegiance to them, or else.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jordan Myers - I can agree about the Bible not having its origins in the West, but that's not even an argument raised here. It's a matter of the influence and impact of the Bible on the West, which JBP argues that it's the bedrock of western society. Whether you believe the west has twisted it, you can believe that all you want. But the impact of the Bible and Christianity on the West is indisputable, at least not without twisting the history of the west that would be intellectually dishonest. There are parts of the modernist, industrial and technocratic sides of western society that do dispute it, and using Marxist sophistry, make some of the most absurd and very intellectually dishonest arguments out there, fueled by their own twisted agendas. But at least their hatred and subversion to usurp the Bible are straightforward, rather than hiding behind a facade of reverence for the Bible, as humanists did during the Protestant Reformation to begin to divide and attempt to conquer Christianity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Catholic Tradition teaches that we believe in the resurrection of the body. Since the Cultural Revolution of the 1960's, the question arose due to some fusion of Eastern religions that practiced cremation, as well as modernists who believe that Earth is overpopulated, also believe that we don't have enough room to bury, or otherwise keep the body at cemeteries. It's still advised to be bodily interred (burried or in a tomb), but whether a Catholic or Christian cannot be resurrected without their body, or if cremating leads to Hell, has led to, well, a 'diplomatic' answer of that the Church can't say what will happen, but the soul is eternal, and awaits its judgement regardless. Because Man cannot judge the soul of a person, because only God can, we thus cannot say for certain what a soul's eternal destination is if their body was cremated. The revised Code of Canon Law (1983) states, “The Church earnestly recommends the pious custom of burying the bodies of the dead be observed; it does not however, forbid cremation unless it has been chosen for reasons which are contrary to Christian teaching” (Canon 1176.3). Thus, The Church can say 'it's not forbidden', even though the tradition is burial or entombment. As long as the purpose does not reject the resurrection of the body.
2
-
@FatLingon - As a conservative, I try to drown out most of the hyperbole. as for SUSE, because they are actively banning people, that's when I'd draw the line with a distro. I'm sure with Arch, Mabox, and Garuda that someone using or developing these distros may not like my politics, and that's fine. I can agree to disagree. I just find it ironic they lump all conservatives as fascists when they themselves are big in the politics and tech corporations, and most conservatives aren't and have been weeded out because of politics. That's why Rumble, Locals, and Oysee, among many other alternative media came to exist. They're saying we shouldn't exist, like Hitler didn't want certain people to exist, but we conservatives are the baddies? I think there may come a time after this era that might be like post WWII, when people wonder how they got so extreme and became monsters for a cause that really wasn't worth being so worked up and warped over. until then, hopefully the left doesn't start a whole new holocaust. Big they are saying things openly, in both government and industries that are worrisome.
2
-
2
-
@sayaneechan5799 - I don't even know if my reply got to you, because apparently the algorithm either doesn't like me talking about being a conservative, or voting for the previous US president, or otherwise presuming saying it's OK to have a certain skin color was a no-no phrase. Or bringing up w-0-ke. Who knows what YouTube is so sensitive about?
Anyways, since I can't have grown up conversations on YouTube without childish YouTube censors deleting things, all I'm going to say is, American history and culture has been, and always will be a mix of cultures and people with skin colors. We talk about culture in color because we have a lot of color in our people. White makes sense to us since that's the color of our skin. Our culture is remotely European - especially if our lineage goes back to the Mayflower. I'm Sotts-Irish from my Dad's side, but it's been about three or four generations that we had a relative that actually lived in Ireland or Scotland. On my Dad's mother's side come the closest ties as I believe my great-grandmother, my grandma's mom, had come with her parents from Germany to the US. But again, my great-grandma moved here as a child at the turn of the 20th century, so I have little to no direct connection to Germany save memories of a sweet old lady that smiled at everything and everyone, but likely didn't know everyone nor what was going on since Alzheimer's kicked in. She died some time when I was in grade school in the early to mid 80's. So why call it European culture when most of us have little connection to Europe?
For a while, this culture was called WASP, as in White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. I suppose that works fine for some, but Italian Americans are generally Catholic. And what about Jewish Americans? So it's easier to lump it all together as 'white'. That should be simple enough to understand, right? Unfortunately, a lot of baggage gets lumped into the term, which, fair enough, it is part of our history, and something we have to learn from. But we don't have to become self-loathing over it either. Nor do I believe that we forever pay a debt for the wrongs done by white people in the past. Eventually after repenting of something, there needs to be forgiveness and to move on with life. I don't own a slave, and no one in my family has that I have any recollection of. If they did, it's their sin, not mine. I have nothing to feel sorry about, and I have no reason to hate my skin color, especially if color of one's skin shouldn't mean anything about who one is as a person. Yet it is still tied to a history and a culture in the US. It shouldn't be used as a club against us, but it also shouldn't be something absolutely hated or vilified either. White people were involved in freeing the slaves, and white people helped fight for civil rights. History isn't black and white, it's full of color with many stories to be told and lessons to be learned.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I can understand the diverse package managers, being that Linux is not just one OS, but numerous OSes under one kernel. Sure, it could seem like a Tolkien style one kernel to rule them all, but thankfully it's not. So far, virtually anyone can use the kernel to create their own OS from scratch, which I'd love to challenge myself to do some day, but to the 'average user' (TM), who may shreik in terror at the thought 9f touching command line on Windows, the whole concept that you can compile a program for yourself is a daunting task. There are quite a few people in this world that having choices, thinking and doing for one's self is a frightening proposition. But that's part of having freedom.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Liberal has been a 'bad word' for decades because of it being intertwined with what we call today 'woke'. Consider how you have so many conservatives agreeing with what you talk about. It is by no means that they, nor are you some racist 'yahtzee' bigot -istophobe. They've been using this tactic even back when they smeared McCarthy for pointing out the communist infiltration, which is becoming less able to deny when we see how it has finally latched on with the rise of woke. At the time, it was seen as fear mongering, and now we're the ones subject to blacklisting because of warning about this infiltration, and we tried to stop it at its inception before it grew out of hand. Now, decades after the year 1984, the warnings of the book are starting to look more and more like the reality we had hoped would not happen after the Berlin wall came down and the USSR collapsed. Yet it took a somewhat 'Brave New World' turn, as was realized the best way to enslave people is through pleasure and vice, and even a false promise of eternal youth. Sure a death cult may keep the population youthful, but by killing off the old, as is done with legalizing, and government advising on euthanasia. But will cutting life off at both the beginning and end of life ever satisfy this Malthusian social Marxist death cult? Probably not. The French Revolution showed us how proto communism will kill off its enemies, then eat its own in a purity spiral infighting that will kill off any one they feel has betrayed them or hasn't been fully loyal and on board with the cult regime. Yet as bad as the left can get, it cannot be noted the other problem when conservatives fail to do anything but preserve the revolution, or in our current year - preserve the decay and corruption caused by the current leftist death cult. I wish conservatives would finally step up to the plate and truly defend Western civilization from the hive mind, death cult virus, but they worry about social etiquette that has long since been thrown out, and that the left tramples over. For you can't be 'nice' to these people. Regardless how much you cater to them, they will continue to spit on you, insult you, call you the literal Nazi, and wish for your death - until they can make it legitimate in their eyes to go out and kill us. The conservative areas are called by them flyover states, and that's only because they haven't found a way to fully infiltrate and destroy the conservative states. But the can control them to some degree by was of weak conservative Republican leadership that still thinks bipartisanship was a good thing, and that it is a viable option still. Yet what did that get us besides Obamacare and 8 years for the left to build and grow strong enough to take the strangle ho.d they have over our society today? And that's still only hitting at the surface of the iceberg. I wish we had conservative with the spine and fortitude to actually stand up to the left. Maybe if they did that decades before we wouldn't have needed Trump to be the bulldozer to attempt to dismantle the swamp. Maybe if they stood strong and unified, we would have been able to have gotten to the truth of a certain date and the certain fraud that sparked it. But no, for some reason the GOP can't or won't stand up to the left, and act more like controlled opposition, rather than any real contender against the left. Until conservatives, or some new party rises that actually could stand against the left comes about, we will continue to be screwed over by leftist tyranny.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It will depend on some factors. For the DEI, they didn't allow for much punching back. There's some shows that did ok because they let some banter go back and forth between right and left, black and white, straight and gay, etc. If you don't do it where one side is always right, or always wrong, and allow for dimension in characters where they can grow that becomes problematic. That's storytelling 101. Plus, look back at the original Transformers, they actually gave the kid audience the benefit of the doubt, and didn't water down intellectual arguments. They didn't name the philosophies, but as you get older, and you study the philosophies, you can see Starscream is somewhat Marxist/socialist, always trying to usurp Megatron, partly because he thinks he's better than Megatron, but he always tried to get Decepticons on his side promising to treat them better and be less a tyrant. Optimus Prime and Megatron battle over fascism and might makes right v. freedom and a more democratic society where people work together for the common good. It's really amazing how much depth is in some of the cartoons back then, and sad how that has gotten watered down.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's gotten far worse in the last 20 years. Used to enjoy visiting Seattle, going to the Space Needle, seeing Sonics, Seahawks, and Mariners games, back when they were affordable, or, in Sonics case, before being sold off to another city. Now, I wouldn't want to go near Seattle, with all the crime and people crapping in the streets. Portland and Seattle both had some big city problems over the years, but not as bad as they are now. Maybe the 70's was bad, but they've surpassed even that across the board in all big cities run by corrupt Democrats.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MrGamelover23 - which would be why something that can mode switch/set in accordance to what Wayland does best, while also doing the same for what X-11 does best. Virtually all other OSes have had to figure that out with their own kernels and core drivers, etc. It would be great if can figure it out with the ability to support as many computers and systems as possible, but there may have to be a fork made somewhere between legacy and modern. Exactly how? That's above my paygrade and knowledge. I'm just saying we have to figure out how to do this, because, unlike Windows, Apple, and Google, Linux is a community (well, numerous communities) that try to make computing for everyone, regardless of if they are trying to run it on the latest and greatest $10,000 power gaming PC, or some $10 refurbished 386 PC they found at the GoodWill.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So it's a conflict of physical v. virtual. But let's not hide the fact that many of these sites with ads also offer a premium membership that can be purchased. The thing is, the internet is not just a server admin utility any more. It is becoming something similar to what Lunduke speaks of. In fact, this concept of a virtual shop can go back to around 2006, when Second Life was growing a virtual economy around user generated content. Most content creators on SL are going to have a more Lunduke oriented concept because they have built virtual shops that you could visit as your virtual avatar. You can buy virtual clothing and other ×ahem× 'components' to make your avatar more representative of the gender, and species you want your avatar to be. So yes, you could be a trans furry Charizard if you want to be, and buy all the parts you need to make it.
The point is this 3D virtual world blends the lines of virtual world with the physical world. They've also had to deal with age verification, especially to crack down on age players and people misrepresenting their age, both as under aged wanting to go on the main grid and old people pretending to be younger to be creepers on the now defunct teen grid. Eventually both were merged, an adult only island created, and under age users were restricted to private G-rated sims (this is cotroversial among SL users to this day). So, really, there's no point to joining SL until 18.
At any rate, there are virtual shops. The virtual goods they sell have a certain value to the shop owners, and a certain value to those that visit the shop and choose to purchase said purchased product. While there may be an agreement of value, there may not be an agreement on what one has a right to do with the product. SL manages this with metadata within the object called object rights. In this, the creator of the object can give the next owner permission to copy, modify, or transfer to another avatar.
Linden Labs is a company based in San Fransisco, and they base their ToS around California law. Thus they do see it as their responsibility to regulate adult material, and especially no age play, even though they allow child avatars, but in very limited capacity. Even places that are not intended to be adult shops, be they clubs or some other themed hang out, beach, whatever, ban child avatars because they don't want to deal with the legal side of things, not to mention losing their virtual land, or having their account banned from Second Life. This is a company from CA that's pretty much to the left, and much of SL is pretty well left of center. Pride month is in full swing, and most stores have some type of pride product year round. They have lesbian women only islands, gay bear men only islands, LGBTQ+ allied and friendly islands. But still, dealing with adult stuff and protecting one's business and islands, many places have their own rules, and sexual age play is both not allowed, it's illegal, meaning ban from second life altogether, and possibly of law enforcement involvement. Places on SL will ban you from their land if caught with an avatar that looks underage. So, regardless what you want to believe the internet should be, the fact is it is being treated more like a public utility, and thus a public space. It's had a marketplace feel since Amazon and the (dot)com boom. Virtual worlds will keep pushing the boundaries and bring with it more of an attitude towards virtual goods and services as Lunduke has, which has less to do with being left or right as it does the changing customs on how to do business in a virtual world. Like it or not, these changes have been made, and more of similar nature are coming.
1
-
1
-
@codahighland - True, and similar to letting a teen young adult house sit, or use the car to do to a high school dance or whatnot. Yes, there is a certain level of trust, but once the parents are off on vacation, or the teen's driving to wherever, a nything could happen. In the states, even in liberal states that where politicians oppose voter IDs as racist, they have no qualm with demanding people be IDed for tobacco, alcohol, lighters, cooking wine, medicine with alcohol or other restricted substances. Some places have made it to where the ID has to be scanned, regardless if the person is of age. So if you forgot your ID at home, tough luck, you won't be able to buy your beer or whatever until you come back with your valid and up to date ID.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Seriously, you don't even need power PCs. Which is why you have bargain computers with middle of the line components with 8 -12 GB RAM and at least 64 GB storage. Because I distro hop a bit on Linux, I may pick up a USB stick, or micro SD that has 128 GB or 256 GB on it for $15 -$25, and I have enough room to install the Linux OS of Choice, and add any games, or install Steam and see what games I can get to run, either through Linux natively or by installing Wine. And honestly, the tools for music composition on Linux are slightly better, and way less expensive.
Regardless all that, Atari with the modern VCS and 2600+ have about the right idea, though needs to be put together as one console. Also, no cheap Stella workaround. The cart slot needs to be compatible with the classic 2600 and 7800 games, possibly have an extension for 5200 games, and play the Atari's computer line of games and apps. Maybe the console could have an updated version of TOS pre-installed, and even setup with programs needed to help hobby game devs make home brews. It could be the perfect console/mini PC and hobbyist development kit all in one.
1
-
@treelineresearch3387 - It's a great idea in theory, unless you actually have sought to publish a book, music album, or otherwise try to sell digital content. There's a difference between a free market and a freebie market. Most want the freebie market when they want to get something, but as soon as you try to sell something, the freebie market isn't so great. Could they coexist? Sure. But I've only seen it work in a virtual world where noobs and cheap people go after freebies while those that want newer, nore fashionable stuff, tend to actually go buy stuff. Or you get the shopaholic constantly hunting down free or reduced price, bargain bin items.
But, irl, there are people that live off the residuals of royalties from their music and book sales. Not a perfect system, especially if in the industry and the industry gets the lion's share of the residuals, but if you worked on something, most people would like to get paid for their work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As a Catholic, it's more of a historical interest than anything. If it's real, awesome! If not, well, it is what it is. I think for the Church, is more a matter of pride in being able to hold a relic attributed to Jesus, his burial, and what it may mean to the resurrection. But ultimately, it's not the cloth we worship, but we may have a certain veneration to the relic because of its attributions to Jesus. Beyond that, if the Shroud is not real, it's a historical elaborate hoax, but has little bearing to the main, and most important aspects of Christian faith.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sadly, yes, Obama was actually better than both RINOs put forth with John McCain and Mittens Romney. Sure, McCain was a warhawk, which is why he bent the knee to Obama to beg for more military funding and wars in the Near East post 2012. As it is, Tulsi Gabbard hit home with noting that all the warhawks that pro peace Dems called for decades the ultimate evil people in the world were now endorsing Kamala. And they are supposed to consider that a win, that NeoLibs are basically the new warhawk NeoCons? But you see, while there are conservatives that may be pro-military, it's primarily support of the the troops putting their lives on the line to defend this country. It is not in support of the Military Industrial Complex and other deep state operatives that launder tax payer money and will put our troops in danger simply for profits, or otherwise deem soldiers as a lesser being that are expendable. We want to be rid of these deep state operators that think they know how to rule people and make tactical, and profitable wars.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Omnifarious0 - I've been roaming between Fedora, Arch, and Debian distros, and they all have their good and bad OS-wise. Arch has become a lot easier to install and setup with what you like. Debian can is probably the most stable, but that also comes with use of LTS kenels, so not eveything is up to the latest things. Arch is better for if you want things more current, but that also can comes with some risks when using the AUR. But that's becoming less of a thing as Pacman and Yay have gotten better with package management. However, Debian based distros are pretty decent with package management as well. Apt and .Deb packages are similar to Fedora's RPM, and probably easier to adapt to as for most things, you're switching APT for where you would use DNF in Fedora distros.
Nobara could also be an alternative distro for Fedora, if you don't want to stray too far from the DNF/RPM style OS. It's basically Fedora, but oriented for gamers.
1
-
Tim, people should already be ready for the flu, because that virus, or group of viruses, are in the same family as the coronavirus, and has already spread to 19 million people, causing 180,000 to be hospitalized, and 10,000 deaths in the US. Between 2017 - 2018, the death toll was 80,000 for the flu. We can't worry about acts of nature (although the coronavirus possibly came from China's mishandling of viruses held in their lab), but still a moderate bit of preparation is always beneficial.
1
-
Check out Dave Rubin and how he presents the Republican candidates on one of his recent live videos titled: Unexpected 2024 Announcement Just Shook Up the Race.
To cut to the short, with politics, you have to get past the theatre of it. For now, Trump is in the lead. There's still a question of if DeSantis will even run, but he would be the second in line if he did. And yes, the way he's playing things is working. For everyone knows that whoever runs against Trump is going to get hit pieces on them, and the more you're the target, the bigger the threat you are, because you're the most plausible alternative to Trump. DeSantis is definitely that.
But there are others running. Dave Rubin goes through a couple of them and explains how he sees them running as a good thing, even if it's obvious they likely aren't going to be in the top tier of potentially electable as Trump and DeSantis. For one, they can present a national messaging that is good, and appealing conservative principles, ideas, and the like that can, and ought to be adopted by the top tier, especially once the dust has cleared and either Trump or DeSantis winds up the GOP nominee. The other candidates right now speak on various voices among Republicans and conservatives regarding what's important, such as America first, the land of opportunity ideal, importance of the Constitution, free speech, gun rights, etc. Listening to them does not mean you're voting for them, and moreso, it can show you're not just a candidate cultists that's either Trump or DeSantis only, or I'm nor voting. You have to realize what an insane position that is, to be such a cult worshiper of any candidate.
But, anyways, just trying to give some perspective. Don't let the theatre politics get to you. It's not that much different than celebrity theatre, save you got crazies like Biden, who wants to bring back Obama's weaponizing the government against Democrat enemies, or the Clintons and their ever growing list of people that suddenly are no longer with us for having criminally damning information that could leas to their arrest, or anything else that would make their being in charge the next 4 to 8 years a hot mess. 😏👍
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@29.cHR1sT1nA - Indeed. Like we can't take any one American's religious and secular experience as the definitive way, I think it would be a disservice to the whole of Germany to say one German's religious and secular experiences are the definitive German way. Even in America, there is a diversity between the fundamentalists, conservatives, progressives, and liberals that make up Christianity. Even with soon to be former President Biden professing to be Catholic, especially in good standing, will cause a lot of debate among traditional, conservative, progressive, and liberal Catholics. Likewise, soon to be again President Trump as a Christian stirs up a lot of debate among fundamentalist, conservative, progressive, and liberal Protestant Christians. As for tithing, that varies from some Catholic Churches that have, or had once demanded tithing to be a part of the parish, as well as fundamentalist and progressive Protestants that may argue that tithing was an Old Testament thing that isn't necessary any more - though you can still give if you want.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is different than, say, an all black school doing a production, and it's obvious they are filling a role, and not trying to claim it as historically accurate. Yet, the same would have to be true at a predominantly white school, if they did a play casting MLK Jr. as white, or an all white cast of roots because there were no black kids present to fill the roles. Yet, you know why such productions don't happen? Because we white folk would fear rioting, or otherwise labeled 'yahtzee' who-aight supreme pizzas disrespecting another race or culture, even if we mean no disrespect at all. When the woke crowd does it, they praise themselves, and tell us in snide, condescending remarks that it wasn't made for us. Yet they get mad if we don't watch what they already told is not for us? Why should we pay or support 'inclusion' that excludes us, and insults us, only expecting us to say, "Well, you don't see us rioting over it!" That is, if we even say anything with so many acting like they aren't allowed to speak - and maybe they aren't, lest to woke mob burns down their house, and the woke government jails them for not giving the mob the matches and lighters to do so. We can't have real discussions, nor have decent movies because of this BS.
1
-
US is not a collection of ideas, but we are based off Enlightenment philosophy of capitalism and the free market, not just of exchange of goods and services, but also a market of ideas. However, what makes it possible to hold this ideology is, for the US, the Constitution. Without the Constitution, we would not have free speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and basically freedom to create and participate in a free society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim's all over the place. Craps on his audience, talks of retiring, throws his journalist under the bus. Are you really sure you want to be on his show? It seems your gut instinct to back away and do other things may be for the better. You have a great show already, and between, Crowder, Brittany Venti, and Anna - That Star Wars Girl, among others you've helped and have a good relation with, who knows? Maybe you all can join up and make that truly alternate media that doesn't play the business as usual BA that DW, and even Timcast plays that claims to push against the grain if YouTube and big tech censorship while basically enforcing it through contract. I don't know how that sort of new media business will look, but it will be interesting to see it form and potentially revolutionize how we do business. Because the current way just plain sucks, and that's putting it mildly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gruntaxeman3740 - I've been on both LTS and the more experimental. Even the LTS get a few updates here and there when the distro decides things are stable enough to do so, or if you add the more current repository. Even without constant updates, you're going to be wanting to add other apps than what the base package gives you. Sure, quite a few distros have MuseScore 3 still in their repository, and some may still install it as part of their base package. But that's not tge latest version, and it doesn't always work out of the box. So you have to install the current version of MuseScore 4, along with Muse Sounds to get the latest higher quality virtual instruments. Or maybe you wan Brave, or some other browser instead of Firefox. All those additional apps and their dependencies, along with any tweaks you may need add to bloat. That's just how it is for any OS/distro, regardless if they are LTS, or not.
1
-
1
-
@gruntaxeman3740 there is some translation between languages. At the end of the day, if you are a coder worth your money, you can easily look at any code in any language, on any platform and figure out what changes are needed to make the code work in that language or on that platform. This is especially true today when most of the changes needing to be made are at best, surface issues at the packaging level, like whether to use apt, yay, dnf, etc. Maybe a few tweaks when going between architecture, but nothing so vastly different, as porting a game on the NES to a 2600. Debian, among all distros, proves a modern OS could potentially work just as well in a 286 as it can in the latest most expensive gaming rig, adjusted and optimized for the hardware and withing the parameters of the type of software that can be used on said systems. There are limitations but emulation shows that virtually any program from any computer or console can run on a modern PC with the right parameters in the compilation. The code isn't the issue, unless it was poorly written in the first place.
1
-
@gruntaxeman3740 - Sure, in Debian based distros, if you want to package something in a .deb package, you have to learn how to compile what you want to package into it. Or, you have to figure out for apt. Likewise, Fedora/RHEL distros have RPM and dnf. Arch based distros have pacman and yay. Add to that Snaps and appimages. I would mainly argue that it is less about the code changing as much as it is how to package the code. Yes, applications may need dependencies. But these themselves are code used to help the main code function on the distro it has been installed on. Therefore, the distro is the platform that you want to deliver the package to, and the dependencies are the additional things needed to ensure what is unpacked from the package will run on the distro it's been installed on. So, I'm not sure what the problem is, since there are so many tools available to help assemble, compile, and build the application as needed to run on any given distro. I suppose it can be tedious work to make sure everything is put together correctly, and troubleshoot where issues might conflict among dependencies, but that's just part of the whole of putting it all together. I appreciate the people that have made doing these things easier, and those helpful at troubleshooting where the automation may have gone wrong. It would be awesome If I could get to that point of building my own LFS, but I'm happy with certain favorite distros that already exist and just work on getting familiar with the terminal and how to configure and tweak things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremyblackmouth3323 - That's the point of rehab for most professionals. Teachers may wind up taking sensitivity training or straight up rehab as a way shield their career as well, not to mention the schools trying to bury bad press by saying they are taking corrective measures, if the behavior of the teacher gets the attention of the press. There is probably some intention of rehabilitation, or reprogramming, as the point of it is to get the person back in line with what they want or expect. This can be, say a teacher called LGBTQ+ incorporation into teaching BS and is adamant not to do so in her classroom. Said teacher may get sensitivity training or have to go to some sort of conference or rehab to 'correct' her thinking, or else be fired. While actors don't have that direct sort of force, they do get canceled, as has happened with Will Smith and many of his upcoming projects indefinitely on hold or flat out canceled from. So not only does he have to pay a bunch of money for rehab, he also is taken out of lining potential work, which is crippled because no one wants to touch him while his brand is considered toxic. So he pretty much has to pay up to try and salvage his career. That's true for any professional that winds up in trouble, and the boss says, get rehab or pack your bags and get out.
1
-
@jeremyblackmouth3323 - There's plenty of people in an ordinary workplace that have managed to 'do a Depp', so to speak, where you can't believe they didn't get fired for all the crazy things they've done in the past, and even more so surprised what finally does get them fired, especially if it seems a rather tame offense in comparison to all the previous ones. The main difference between celebrities and the rest of us working stiffs is their dirty laundry is out in the open. But even that's becoming less of a gap since social media and stupid people being stupid enough to share their stupid actions online. And that even goes back to MySpace, when law enforcement would check out videos people recorded of fights and vandalism they were doing. Your problem seems to be about their earnings, and supposedly they can buy back their brand. Yet, who of us cost anyone millions of dollars if we screw up at work? You yourself stated that the producers can lose millions when a celebrity screws up and becomes unavailable because of a scandal. We lose our job, there thousands more to look for, and we can move to where no one knows us and start over. There are far fewer jobs in Hollywood, and the competition is cut throat. But, you know, you could always try getting a gig in Hollywood for yourself. If it's so easy, why not go and start booking auditions and start making some of that easy money yourself?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, not all public school teachers are rabid leftist woke advocates. In America, at least, how liberal or conservative a public school district is depends on a variety of factors. Rural and small town schools and school districts tend to lean conservative, while suburban and city schools tend more liberal. This also can depend on the state government itself and how liberal or conservative it is. But this is American society 101.
Also, private schools are not necessarily better than their public school counterparts. This can depend on who are the major donors. There are even Christian schools that have bent the knee to the highest bidder, and thus teach things contrary to the faith. There's also how our colleges and universities have been poisoned by the Frankfurt school of thought, as well as a variety of other philosophies that pushed the idea that going to college makes one superior, unless you fall back into 'superstitious' things like Christian faith and believing in God, thinking capitalism is good, and overal being a conservative Republican. Faced with that becoming a common and more dominant narrative in society, is it really a surprise we are where we are?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Platforms are not publishers. That's part of the problem there, besides the fact that social media was never meant to be an arbiter of truth, but a platform of free speech. This is where I disagree. If he can say Mein Kampf can be read, and people will find out why it's crazy for themselves, then why can't social media platforms be that free market of ideas wherein people come to their own conclusions? Yes, flat earth is a theory that we can prove today with visual evidence as wrong, but for thousands of years, it was the norm, even considered 'the science', much like Fauci proclaimed himself 'the science' despite so many times he's flip flopped, not to mention stole credit for things he barely had any involvement in. I'm sure you prance around the subject to make sure you can stay on YouTube, but I can say it - Fauci has done a horrible job, both in how he confused and divided people with regards to AIDS in the 80's and with COVID now. You guys talk of the evil and propaganda of the Nazis and can't see this similar sort of evil being tossed in our faces with vaccines, where they are using them to try and control people. They blind us with saying we ought not have borders or voter ID, but we better have our COVID papers in order just to go to a restaurant, go to a store, or get a job. Plus, while you talk of the millions killed by the propaganda of tobacco, yet speak favora ly about the 'healthcare' of abortion which there is evidence that they always put Planned Parenthood facilities in poor ethnic communities, and Margaret Sanger's ideology gives plenty of reason why. Sanger was back in the day of Segregation, and her ideology influenced Hitler as well. So yes, it is interesting what things you omit from the topic, the ideas that fade, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mmstick - I have tried to answer this several times, but for some reason it gets deleted. So will try again.
There is insurance for professionals and small businesses to protect against frivolous lawsuits. Besides that, small businesses don't collect any where near the personal data that the larger corporations do, and often have their payment processing go through another, larger company that specializes in payment processing, and it is they who have any data that can be leaked. The small business has minimal, if any personal data themselves. Same goes for gift and store cards, which, even the ones you get at, say, Kroger, or some other major grocery/retail store, all the gift cards, and their rewards and rewards + store cards are handled by some sort of bank, generally CitiBank, which is one of the major type of banks that handle credit cards and the like.
That said, it would be laughable to go after the small business due to security breaches that happened to the 'too big to fail' corporate bank they trusted to handle such things. It simply is not the small business' fault, because they were not the ones that held the data, and thus could not have been breached for any data that they personally didn't have. If their business goes under, it would be for trusting the big corporations with handling what they are supposed to be top professionals at handling.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mmstick - You're the one who doesn't know what you're talking about. All you are doing is talking around the point that small businesses and individuals are minimal at best the problem. I'm not trying to defend 'memory unsafe', I am simply stating small businesses are not the problem. You are trying to push your BS agenda in here when the programming language has nothing to do with how businesses decide what software to use. They are told they need to work with this bank or financial entity to do their payment processing through, and use whatever software these companies tell them are the standards to use, and work with whatever carrier for internet/wireless that is deemed the best in the area to work with. Nobody talks to them about whether it's best to use rust or C for programming code, it's not even on their radar. Again, all that matters to them is that their payments are processed and they can pay the bills and they're workers their wages. You are making it more complex, when the point is that small businesses are not at fault when all they are doing is following the standards of business. The big corporations and banks that make the standards, and time and time again, are the ones that have these periodic data breaches, are the problem. The government doesn't do much to change it, and have little incentive to do so when the major corporations and banks line their pockets. Add to that, we had a case over the COVID years that our state government was so mismanaged that it was found out they got scammed thousands of taxpayer dollars because some bureaucratic idiot was giving money to one of those Ugandan prince email hoaxes. But sure, you can trust the almighty gov if you want. Don't blame me for warning how heavily mismanaged they are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goodlookinouthomie1757 - ok... I am a Christian, and I believe in an eternal soul, so not sure what your target for 'you' is. But sure, it's a nice, artsy saying, which itself has been mass produced and mindlessly consumed as well.
But I think you miss the point that they do care, which is why they use the algorithms and AI to try and learn what people are interested in, and purposefully use that information to use what we consume in a manner that keeps us addicted and coming back for more. They study all this, and they study us, looking for all the common traits they can, and how to maximize the habits formed by those traits to make music that's 'safe'. That is to say, music that they believe will push the right buttons and make us move in the direction they want us to. Thus, whenever the left claim that to speak with opposing views is 'unsafe', they effectively mean that these are views they don't want because they challenge the status quo of the programming. They don't want the other side to be heard, or at least they don't want to be the one that introduces views contrary to the programming lest the people programmed start to think for themselves, or otherwise are swayed against the programming.
I won't say that the right is without its own aspects of programming. It's almost impossible for anyone to not have programming. It's part of some aspect of our cognitive learning, particularly by rote. To this day, so many people know the nursery rhyme 'Ring Around the Rosey'. Until a certain age, we may not even realize the context of the rhyme. Yet somehow we learn these things by rote, even before we understand the meaning. In a sense, sing-song and subliminal messages are cousins to this sort of programming. That's part of the issue with pop entertainment, is what are the messages they are trying to ingrain in our minds? Is it historical, like the nursery rhyme, or is it trying to push messaging in order to shape the way we think or believe that may go against what we currently do think or believe. Not that this is necessarily a bad thing, but if you're a Christian, and your child begins listening to rock or rap music, starts using slang and slurs, emulating the musicians or rappers, and decides he's no longer Christian, and practically chants the chorus of the rock stars about how they don't believe they can be they can be saved, or that it's easy to imagine a world with no God or heaven, and how some day they too will be a rock star and be more famous than Jesus, well you might wonder if the music had any influence. It would appear there is some type of programing and a particular messaging against Christianity and God. Thus the messaging does matter, because you can become what you consume.
1
-
1
-
The average American can find Ukraine on the map. It's even easier this day for anyone to look up Ukraine on the map just by searching it online. It's that it's on the other side of the world, and no one really knows what we are doing spending trillions of dollars on a war we have little to no business in it other than Biden via his son Hunter has certain ties and involvement in Ukraine. Regardless if there is a 'pure' reason for us to support the war is at best tainted. Granted, roughly half the US understands this, or at least are aligned to believe those that point out Burisma and Hunter Biden somehow being involved with it and the real quid quo pro that was going on with it. The other half of the country has political blinders and wishful thinking, wanting Trump to be the one to be impeached over it, despite the phone call was one asking about investigations into what was going on with Burisma. Was it quid quo pro? Honestly, I don't know with that phone call, but close to half the country believes that, despite they don't believe, or have refused to believe the quid quo pro regarding Biden and Burisma has as much, if not more evidence, as there is a video out there of Biden when he was VP bragging about holding funds to Ukraine hostage if the Ukranian president at the time wouldn't fire the person investigating Burisma. Interesting enough that Trump asking about that investigation was what got Trump impeached for quid quo pro, but Biden's involvement in getting the investigation quashed by threatening to stop our foreign aid to Ukraine if they do not is overlooked and not even questioned.
Thus why I can agree that it's more about what people believe is more important in their own mind. Thus the media, who has been believing for quite a while that they are the people in charge of what to tell people to believe is supposed to be important to them, have been filtering to one side or the other, which had decidedly been to the left. Most in the media are leftists. They were educated that way, and many had been brought up that way, or, they grew up in a right of center family and had been more influenced by things considered more left of center, and kept going down the rabbit's hole on the left until they fully believed most, if not all the talking points, or at least saw that they could have a certain amount of power or influence to hold to what the left was saying is true, or how to make 'your truth' a reality, or at least something that can bend reality to your will.
I'm not saying that it doesn't happen on the right. Rght-left dichotomy isn't something that holds to a firm boundary. We talk about RINOs on the right, and that's our term for those Republicans that claim to have conservative values in some way - usually claiming 'fiscal' conservatism, but are 'compassionate' on moral and social issues. This is similar to the 'left' in Christianity that claim 'all are welcome', save if you hold to conservative/traditional Christian values - the 10 Commandments seeming to be watered down as the 10 suggestions, the miracle of being able to feed the masses being a miracle of being able to get people to work as a community and share what they have, or otherwise taking a more social/socialist interpretation on things. We call them RINOs politically because it's obvious they are more aligned with the left, but pretend to be on the right by claiming they will not raise taxes (and yet they wind up doing so anyways), but are just 'moderate'.
I can't say that you are 'outside the optics', but you are more open to questioning both the left and right spectrum that we all have grown up with in the US. It can be very difficult for many of us that have lived in this duality that is, not just American politics, but a sort of bi-polar mindset of our country as a whole. There are really few that are all in on the right, or all in on the left. Which is why you can have people like Caitlyn Jenner, who many people knew for decades as Bruce Jenner before that was made a dead name, who are for the rights of transgenders to be recognized as individual people of merit and worth. Yet, despite being for the most commonly held human rights concept of trans rights, Caitlyn is considered 'far right' for believing it is wrong for tans women to participate in women's only sports because of the physical advantages their natural biology can have over biologically born women athletes.
Our politics and identity as Americans is rooted in a lot of things that have, compared to Europe, a fairly short history. We have conflicts, like the one you mentioned with Native Americans v. those of us that came in as pilgrims/immigrants, which also ties into our issues regarding legal and 'undocumented' immigration. Yet, we also have those that migrated here not of their own will, which also ties into the issues of migration, and slavery. To say our roots are rather twisted and mixed up is to state the obvious, but, outside of the longer roots that Native Americans have had in the land, they are not as long as those of Europe, and thus why were are also called here the New World.
Does the average American know all this? Maybe not. Some people choose not to be grounded in the roots, Even the Enlightenment ideals that make up core components of the United States as a Constitutional Republic, which refused to be run by a monarch or tyrant, that is decidedly locked into the concept of 'We The People' - particularly in the importance of voting as a civic right and duty to decide the direction of our country, and the grounding of laws in the US Constitution as the bedrock of our laws, even with all this, there is still a portion of the US that does not follow even the basics of these things and some choose to be subversive to them.
I'm not saying the US Constitution is perfect, but it is the law of the land. It's what expresses our rights and what is to be protected and upheld by the law of the land. From my conservative Christian, and traditionalist Catholic perspective, it is far from perfect, and I can name the many ways it doesn't align with my religious and political views. But the point for the US Constitution is not to be a religious document, nor necessarily even to appease the secularist nor the dogmas of the political factions. There was supposed to be something of objectivity in the Constitution that not only denied single rule under monarchy, but also was not going to go along with every whim and will of the mob of a democracy. Certainly, it was never going to appease the anarchist, nor anyone that wants to be nomadic to any form of law and order. But it was meant to preserve the rights of all, regardless of any one's agreements or disagreements with how Constitutional rights are protected and preserved. To me, I can be ok with that, as long as it is understood that human rights are God-given rights, and not things that the government can give or take away. So this is the difficulty that law and justice faces in our country, is to hold to a certain level of objectivity that recognizes the difference between protecting and preserving our rights over controlling and being the arbitrator of them. It can be too easy to say that the Constitution needs to change or be absolved to fit what any one individual, group, or community would rather have, but as long as 'We The People' see the need to protect and preserve them, the Constitution will remain the law of the land.
Thus, Benjamin Franklin's response to Elizabeth Willing Powel's question: "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" His answer remains true today, "A republic, if you can keep it.” The newer question, which we all as Americans in the United States ought to ask is, "Do we want to keep it?" For in this question, if we seriously ask it in consideration to what we believe, and what we strive for, will be the response that manifests going forward. For me, while it may not be fully perfect to the core of my beliefs, politics, etc., I can still concede that our Constitution is at least “near to perfection,” at least to what can be expected in an imperfect world. On the positive, despite all the divisions in the US today, which can give as much question to whether we have come to a point where we might see the the loss of the union, I can also agree with Benjamin Franklin, who was unsure during the conventions to ratify the Constitution, but said, "I have often and often, in the course of the session, and the vicissitudes of my hopes and fears as to its issue, looked at that behind the President, without being able to tell whether it was rising or setting: but now at length, I have the happiness to know, that it is a rising and not a setting sun."
1
-
1
-
That's just among unhinged liberal idiots, usually white people pretending to be talking for black people. But I will say, simply being called "Yo white guy!" Would be annoying. Can't speak of how much more or less annoying than some one black being called, "Yo black guy!" It's somewhat disrespectful, though can be understandable if someone is trying to call for you, and your skin color is the most notably different feature about you then the rest of the guys around you. Preferably, most people would like to be called by their name, especially if you know their name. Yet, even there, some people don't even like their name. So maybe for some, "Yo black dude!" would be preferable than, say, being called Peewee, because that's what your parents named you after because they liked Peewee's Playhouse, and named you before the whole getting caught wanking it in a porn theater incident.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don't worry so much. You didn't force me to unsub from Tim Pool. This is about the 3rd time I've un-subbed from him in the past 10 years for being a javkass. He sometimes needs his ego burst. You had nothing to do with Crowder and the DW, other than help spotlight an issue with entertainment business contracts that will always be there for as long as the industry does its business in the way it does. EB did herself in, and we need to expose grifters that manipulate social media, regardless politics.PV sounds like it was a time bomb waiting to go off, just by the personalities and technicalities that have been aired.
There is certainly tension right now, especially with DeSantis v Trump. But maybe we do need a shake up. The left gave up a lot of their soul to unify under Biden, despite for decades of knowing his corruption. Our battles on the right are with bad principles on the left and right. We know there are RINOs out there who will sell our country to China for a larger stock portfolio, that want the Ukraine war to go on to keep money flowing for the military industrial complex, regardless what's good for America, or even the world. We see it on how they refuse to take the Ohio disaster seriously. So we need James out there to uncover the corruption without fear that his board of directors will shove him under the bus for fear of the political whales mad that he's getting too close to the source. Also neither should we keep from exposing the cons and grifts. It isn't the same as a purity spiral, because the principles and standards do not move to the whims and will of the politics or agenda. That's why we can't galvanize or unite just for the sake of uniting. If there's a legitimate issue, we need to cover it and resolve it as best we can. We can forgive, but not put issues under the rug. It's part of the checks and balances that help us speak truth to power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trembledust6819 - That sill does not mean you can fire whoever, whenever. It still depends on the contract, and there are many people that have fought back and won lawsuits against at will employers. It's like pretending no fault divorce means you can hook up and marry someone and later divorce them without having to deal with all the 'who gets what' mess in the aftermath of the agreement to get divorced. Also, if you try to fire someone because their are about to take you up on criminal charges, well, they're probably already on their way out, for who would want to work for a shady company? Not to mention, if it's criminal enough, it might just take down the entire company, which means, for the employers, something worse than being fired.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trembledust6819 - By the fact that it is common is the very reason it went viral. Anyone that's been fired can empathize with her.
The poor performance is a cop out, considering she hasn't worked there that long, which is why HR would have been better off saying that the woman was right, it was because of downsizing and needing to do layoffs. It sucks, but it would have been a much more understandable thing to say, and wouldn't have led to all the rest of the drama. For anyone in her position would want to defend themselves, whether they actually do or not. Thus, HR screwed up what should have been a simple answer of yes, you were laid off, and we are sorry we had to let you go. At that point, they might add about trying back in 6 months. That would have been much more proper.
The point is, by stating poor performance, it's as if to say 'with cause', and if there is a cause, she is entitled to know what that cause is. Generally, this is going to be the meeting where they ask the employee about a situation, and listen to their side of the story first - and yes, this is often written down by HR, and, if applicable, a union rep is present. Some may decide to lawyer up. And these are rights you have if a company tries to fire you with cause. You have every right to defend yourself with regards to allegations. And it can come about that they can't fire you, or otherwise the employee can sue for wrongful termination.
And no, I'm not going to get into case details. We all have Google and search engines to find that info. Plus, this is a YouTube comments section, not some legitimate debate forum. So debate rules don't apply. Good luck googling what you want to know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Both Vivek and Elon got it wrong. Plus 'winning' doesn't look like making American workers compete with outsourcing, or bringing in cheap and/or slave labor. That goes against capitalist free market values. To 'go to war' over this is for Elon to essentially say he's no longer free speech and no different than the woke left. Yes the system is broken, and I'm glad that Elon Musk backpedaled after that FYITF remark. But he has to know, after saying it, he wasn't talking to an out of touch elitist like Bob Iger, he was talking to the American people. He basically was saying FYITF and that he was going to war with the American people. That's rather off-putting to say the least. But if he truly wants to start a war with the American people, he's going to hear over 300 million people tell him to GFY, FYITF, and probably call for Musk to be sent back to Africa if he can't respect the country any better than that. He could also see a lot of people leave X for Truth Social, or some other social media, and not just woke people going off to Mastadon, And for those that call this woke on the left, they might as well be considered RINO moderates that are no better than Liz Cheney.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AnDyH79 - most women don't want to be toxic in their relationship with men. Women that identify as feminist get a hard pass from most guys. When talking most guys, I'm not talking the barefoot and pregnant, or woman's place is in the kitchen, but guys that have no qualms about women going to work, are perfectly fine with women voting, having their own space to play sports, serve in the military, and basically consider the sexes, male and female, as being equal. These women that don't want to be feminists see the movement as mostly man-haters, possibly lesbians, or just bitter old divorced ladies that want nothing to do with men. If a person is a woman that still likes guys, feminism just screams, "We're not for you!" And they do hate housewives, the more traditional woman, and pretty models that they constantly jeer as mean girls, regardless if it's true or not. In short, feminism carries a lot of baggage that both a lot of men and women are happy to do without.
1
-
1
-
This is your classic Avril Lavigne 'Sk8er Boi' story. The girl kind of likes the 90's wannabe punk rock skater that also tries to look like a Eminem white boy rapper, but she marries the Ken doll man of her Barbie dreams, and is unhappy that he is so perfect. It's not even that the guy is even feminist, nor even 'woke' vanilla 'nice guy'. Her claim to be 'bored' with him is more about her. She doesn't think she measures up to his perceived perfection, and thinks she'd be happier if he wasn't such a good guy. But the problem is really her own neurosis, or anxiety that she doesn't measure up to him. She's 'bored' because she doesn't know how to deal with it, and uses an immature defense mechanism of blaming his supposed perfection for why she can't seem to be a better person, or at least as good as she believes he is. Saying she wants him to cheat on her is merely her way of lashing out at him being so perfect in her mind. But she doesn't really want him to do so. She just is frustrated that she can't figure out how to be a better person, or how to compare with him. So she might fantasize about some skater boi she used to know, or whatever 'bad boy' she once might of had a fling with when younger, and maybe that fantasy causes guilt, too. But, she can't describe this stuff any other way, so calls it being 'bored'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What we're seeing with woke was the reaction/rebellion against religious evangelical Christian conservatism that was at its peak in the 80's under president Ronald Reagan. However, we ought to remember that evangelical conservativism was something that was in both the Democrat and Republican party. People forget that, Jim Jones of the Jonestown infamy, from which we get the phrase 'don't drink the kool-aid' due to the tragic mass 'exit' event, while he was a fundamentalist of the Pentecostal denomination, as he grew into cult leader, he rejected traditional Christianity and began promoting a form of anti-capitalism he called "Apostolic Socialism." Of course, like many cultists do, he started laying claims to his own divinity. When you look into the various woke organizations, you will find them riddled with communist, Marxist, and anti-capitolism groups, and even a few that claim some form of socialist Christianity or Christian liberation theology. All of it points back to wanting to radically revolutionize, or otherwise destroy 'imperial America' to create a more Marxist/communist sort of America. Democrats often scoff at this and pretend this aspect of the radical left does not exist. Yet, in 2020 alone, the radical left's so-called 'peaceful protests' resulted in the ransacking 200 American cities, up to $2 billion in property damage and at least 25 deaths. Yet, for all this domestic terrorism, companies and corporations pledged or contributed $82.9 billion to BLM movement and other extreme leftist movements. To put this into perspective, in 2022, the Ford Motor Company's profits were $23 billion. For being so anti-capitalist, they sure are getting a lot of capital.
1
-
1
-
1
-
From a more traditionalist standpoint, the aspect here is more politically charged. In earlier times, things were more about the actions in the scandals that, in earlier terms would be considered 'buggery' or 'sodomy'. These would be things one would expect a priest to get defrocked, but, instead they did like the secular world did with problematic teachers, or how domestic disputes were handled by covering up, paying a blind eye, shuffling them off for another community to deal with, etc. Still kind of happens today, though politics are different,so the reasons for playing the same shuffle game are different, such as the case where a highs chool student identifying as female went into the hischool female bathroom and did things against the will of a biological female student. That student who identified as female was tossed off to another school where the same sort of incident as before happened to another biologically female student. Politics aside, most people would say if a person did such things against the will of another person, the person that did such actions should be charged and tried appropriately under criminal law. But, because of the politics, people don't want to touch it, lest they be labeled some sort of 'istaphobe'. In prior times, it was keeping things as private, domestic matters. But now, with things out in the open, people cover more for their politics. Even among traditionalists, we've had bad leaders and priests that got cover because people couldn't believe said person would so such things because, what was seen in public was them doing God's work, or otherwise showing as a face of a holy person. The scandal with Church Militant is a major example of it, and it's still hard to believe a person that went so hard in the fight against priests and Bishops doing bad things would himself be doing similar bad things behind the scenes. It may have been something taken out of proportion, but it could just be trying to look for a benefit of the doubt where there's none to give, which then becomes hopeful, wishful thinking. But that's just taking it from the angle of actual actions of abuse, and a general consideration for the way things were and still wind up being done, and a few reasons why. Between the public and private matters of any community or group of people, there are certainly many twists and turns that make it impossible to simply explain or define, as much as people may want a 'simple truth', which is practically an oxymoron in and of itself.
On the other aspect of priesthood, the barring based on sexuality is relatively recent, and reactionary to the priest abuse of the 1950's - 1970's among the Church in the US. At least that's part of it. However, there were scandals throughout the world, and while young boys were commonly preyed upon, there were cases the other way. But there is also the matter of the wording of the matter, and the implied meaning conveyed. It's like how conservatives opposed to a certain 'procedure' call themselves pro-life, and those at least wanting the 'procedure' to be legal in what they claim to be 'reproductive rights', or the 'right to choose', regardless the human developing in the womb neither did anything wrong, nor gets any choice in the matter of whether to live or die. People have this uncanny ability to define things, especially what is unsettling, in ways that can justify just about anything, regardless if it's justifiable or not. When it goes beyond an individual's private creed, and becomes that of a group or community, that creed becomes something like a cult and makes those beliefs more unshakeable because of having others around that believe similar, that share in the same creed. The secular equivalent is a shared ideology, which is what we get with politics. This is what we're up against with the sexuality issue in the Church, and even despite the attemp to keep people with deep seeded view of themselves attached to their sexuality, and thus the desires and actions thereof out of the priesthood, the creed of these alternate sexualities still entered the Church, and are adopted into the mix of political ideologies of the liberal, or leftist Catholics. Pope Francis belongs to that camp in a unique fashion that in Argentine politics is called Peronist. It's essentially the use of double speak, which can leave one confused as to what the Pope really stands for. In this, the actions speak louder than words, but yet the words effectively distract from the actions. Thus why traditionalists commonly believe by tossing out this leak of his naughty word and kind of weak apology, serves to distract from the supposed agenda to allow priests of alternate sexuaity to join the priesthood - the more liberal, the merrier.
Otherwise, if it wasn't for politics, I would agree that simply having a certain orientation should not bar someone from the priesthood. But with that comes with all things that makes a Catholic priest a priest. That boils dow to the role of alter Christi, being 'another Christ' by way of leading the congregation in the formal prayer of the Mass, presenting one's congregational community with the Sacraments, and all and all giving one's life fully to God to help serve His people, His Body, the Church Militant along this path of struggle to keep to the things holy of God in a world that constantly mocks it and tries to tempt the faithful away from the faith. The priest is there to help lead us to Heaven, bring us closer to God, and help us to become holy saints in our own right, regardless if we become canonized as one of the greats, or unsung heroes that made it to the Beatific Vision. It's a tall order, but being a priest isn't just another job, it's a lifetime service and calling of God. Because of the politics, that vision of what a priest is supposed to be is blurred, and diminished greatly by those who push their politics over their calling from God.
1
-
The outfit stuff is kind of cat-ish drama. As far as I can tell, the worst thing she did was try to get other v-tubers to exclusively work with her. Even there, people are still playing games on Nintendo game consoles and giving Nintendo their money despite how they tried to make exclusivity agreements under the seal of quality era, which pretty much made it difficult, if not impossible for competition, since every third party was locked in with Nintendo. People still watch the WWE despite that they killed off the majority of other promos, and despite Vince McMahon's issues. Granted, Vince McMahon no longer runs or has ownership of the WWE, but the point is, brands and people can live on after the drama, especially dumb stuff over 'copying' outfits. It reminds me of on IMVU when there were cat-ish dev fights when they would DMCA each other even over the use of a color, as if you can copyright a color and claim exclusive rights to use that one color. It's some of the ridiculousness that comes up in business competition. Cheating with boyfriend aside, it really boils down to the usual business as usual garbage, because some people and companies just don't like competition and will do everything they can to get rid of competition. It's shrewd and ruthless, but is it really unexpected when money becomes the end-all, be-all of a person's existence? This is really the problem with 'business as usual' and how corporations exist only to maximize profits, even despite that a lot of times they wind up destroying their products and brands in the process of trying to squeeze that extra bit of profit. Maybe the reality is thee is something wrong with how we've come to do business and what has become the corporate business model and way of thinking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mrconroy4672 - It's hard to say. Things aren't like they were in the bit war era, where each generation of consoles had demonstrably better graphics, sound, etc. The last graphics gimmick I remember being pushed was ray tracing. Granted, Second Life is making a big deal out of physically based rendering (PBR), which I think may also have to do with making 'real', albeit virtual mirrors, but by mimicking the real life physics that creates reflections. However it be, it's just additional layers that push graphics cards, or the integrated graphics of a processor. Most of it isn't necessary for a game, and tweaking all these things is part of why games take longer to make. Games have gone from extreme limitations in everything, to the extremes of virtually no limitations. Sure, you could make an 'Ultra-Crysis' game, needing 1 Tb of memory, 128 Gb of RAM, requiring the top of the line graphics card as minimum requirements to run it. But why? Games can run on far less specs and still look decent, and, most importantly, can be played by a larger audience than the few die hard gamers that can afford a $20,000+ gaming beast of a machine. In this economy, I don't even know how people can afford a game console costing more than $200. At the going price, migh as well shell out for a low to mid end laptop or desktop. They have just enough power for most games, even if not all the bells and whistles on newer games. Add on to that, you can even learn how to make games.
Long story short, I don't see why Nintendo would want to make too huge a leap in a game console. The console itself doesn't make money. The games are what sell the system and make the money. Seeing how modern games are doing, it's probably best to hold off on producing a new console until the dust settles in the gaming industry and the economy rebounds.
1
-
@mrconroy4672 - not sure what snagged in my reply, but I'll just more concisely say that, with the way the economy is going, and especially its hit on games and entertainment in general, it might be a while until a new console. Besides that, we're to a point that there aren't all that huge, or at least barely noticeable leaps in graphics. Ray tracing mainly was an old concept that took advantage of higher 64-bit capabilities, storage space, and RAM that wasn't available on the Amiga.
One could make an 'Ultra-Crysis' game that tries to be the new benchmark, such as needing 1 Tb memory, 128 GB RAM, and 64 cores minimum to run. Few but those that can afford huge beastly Gamer PCs costing $20,000 would be able to play it. So yeah, I doubt there will be anything too fancy for consols for a while.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I liked the version of Cakewalk I first used to compose with, but I won't deny it was with its shortcomings. It had better notation then, possibly because of competing with Finale, and other notation based MIDI composition software at the time. However, as it developed into Sonar, and continues development with BandLab, it's shifted to being more of a DAW, with a more DJ, sampler sort of focus, with the notation being much simpler than it had in the late 90's to early 2000's. Though I might have still used it today, I've shifted to MuseScore, especially with the quality of their Muse Sounds for orchestra. I can also use soundfonts. Possibly VSTs, but I haven't explored that as much.
But that's part of software is that it develops over the years, and it adapts to what it's users see as the key features. Cakewalk likewise adapted when it went from a music composition suite to a DAW. MuseSore retains it's music composition and arranger format because people use it for that purpose, including to print out sheet music.
I can't really say if Emacs is for me because I don't understand what it does. I hear Vim, and I think, ok, coding and editing. Beyond that? Well you say the possibilities are endless. So what can it do for a musician or a music composer?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marsovac - As for if Beethoven could have made good techno music, all you have to do is take any of his music and remix it, such as what Will Borders did with Beethoven's 5th Symphony. The Rad Man proves that Beethoven would have been awesome at Trance, as well with his remix of Beethoven Symphony No 7 in A major Opus 92 (2nd movement). We consider him good because he was, in many ways, truly the rock star of his age, and the influence of rock stars to come in future ages. John Lennon was nspired by Beethoven’s “Moonlight Sonata”, so much so that the song “Because” (1969) with Yoko Ono, used the piano chords from the sonata. Billy Joel paid tribute to Beethoven in his song “Piano Man” (1984) from his album “An Innocent Man”. Joel has mentioned playing Beethoven’s music before his own compositions. The Beatles version of Chuck Berry’s “Roll Over Beethoven” (1964) showcases their appreciation for classical music and Beethoven’s influence on rock and roll. Chuck Berry referenced Beethoven’s music with the desire for rhythm and blues to be respected as classical music.The Electric Light Orchestra's music often incorporated classical elements, including Beethoven’s symphonies, into their rock sound. The list can go on and on, and so can the remixes in all sorts of genres.
Also, I have much respect for Larnell Lewis on Drumeo, who learns how to play the drums to Metallica's "Enter Sandman" after hearing it for the first time. He's mostly a jazz musician, and in the video states he rarely, if ever plays metal. Yet, in the video, you can watch as he takes notes, and analyzes how the drums are being utilized in the song, and when he comes around to playing it, plays through it perfectly. That said, it is a disproof of you're poorly thought out idea that you can't be critical, or make a technical analysis of something you're not familiar with. It is precisely because of Larnell's technical understanding in jazz that he can take what he knows there and incorporate it in how to assess the techniques used in metal.
You can do the similar with film without being familiar with the genre, or not liking it. You can still critique a movie from a genre you're not familiar with, or don't like, simply based on knowledge of film studies. But even without that, films are about story telling, which means if you are an avid reader, maybe have taken courses or are familiar with reviewing books, you can also review and critique movies. Albeit, most book readers have a bias for the books vs movie version of books, which comes from changes that are made in the process of making the movie. Things are left out, of characters are changed from how they are in the book, and if you come from reading the book first, there are going to be things that will be disappointing when it comes to how the movie does things as opposed to the way the book did them. But you can still appreciate, if not at least point out the technical aspects of the nature of the storytelling done in the film, and maybe possibly pick up on other aspects of cinema that maybe are accurate presentations of themes, landscapes, and background of the story. It's having the basic set of tools that make it possible to cross over from one genre, or even a different format, between music to film to written literature, which makes for a true critique that can either appreciate what he's critiquing, or at least have the technical tools to be able to state what he does not like about something of a given genre or format.
For instance, 'to provide color' has meaning of reference in various forms of art, be it the literal color choices made by a painter, and how they may contrast to the pallet of colors (or lack thereof) used thus far. Or it can mean in music harmonic, rhythmic, or melodic color, such as using an alternative chord structure from the normal triad, changing up the cadence of the drums, or other rhythmic elements of a musical piece, and the particular way a melody is interpreted, or improvised upon. There's also use of dynamics and tempo, and more modern aspects of using an equalizer and compression to alter or highlight sounds. Even with films you have the use of pre-defined color schemes, such as triadic colors, to create a specific visual tone, which sounds very similar to the use of chords in music. Visually, it's similar to how the painter uses color on the still frame of a canvas. Likewise may a literary author use a color scheme in how they visualize the particular scene currently taking place in the book, such as down by the clear blue lake that mirrors the sky above, surrounded by the evergreen sentinels of the forest. Heck, even WWE wrestling talks of adding color when they want to draw blood for additional pop from the audience. Diverse genres and forms of art/entertainment, and yet they all can easily be critiqued objectively without a huge amount of knowledge, just by knowing the ways in which art/entertainment has these overlapping theory of concepts and ideas.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They forget that most of what makes Thor is Loki. Loki is like Joker is for Batman. But, outside a TV series, you can't really do a Thor v. Loki movie, save maybe once a decade. Maybe a trilogy if you have a story ark you can build up and end in three movies. But even there, a trilogy is roughly a generational film, like LOTR, with the books, the animated movies, and the live action trilogies comprising fans across nearly a century and three modern human generations - Boomers, Gen-X, and Millennials. Maybe Gen Z is ready for Hobbits, or maybe they are still trying to figure out who they are, after the past three generations have confused them to the point that they hardly know what gender they are. So who knows what the new generation even wants, or if they would rather be left alone now.
1
-
For the most part, Christians that didn't believe the Earth as round were among the illiterate and uneducated. Or, they took too literal things like the four corners. However, the circle is interpreted by many Christians as the world being round. However, early pagans did have a view of flat earth. After all, the cosmology described in the Prose Edda assumes a flat Earth. Aristotle even claimed the earth flat, so can't jest say it was a Christian thing, and as per Aristotle, we can't deny that the concept held sway in academics for quite some time. Even today, people will still deny the earth being round, despite having the best evidence from pictures from space.
1
-
Though more on the conservative side, I did find this humorous. Though I definitely would not consider this 'officially' conservative. You don't even have to be Christian to be conservative. However, mixed in with traditional nuclear family values that are mostly talked about by Christians, with some secularists stating their cases as well, by and large, Christianity and conservatism tend to run parallel. But for classic, non-Christian conservatism, I'd consider Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero to be the best examples. You get a more modern version in St. Thomas More, who was known as the man for all seasons, who kind of runs in the sort of moderate conservative lineage that more current conservatives might consider RINO or cuckservative, yet he kind of proved himself by standing beside his principles, that he would not bow down to King Henry VIII, who considered it treason if one did not denounce the Catholic Church and accept him as head of the Church in England.
Anyways, you might like G.K. Chesterton, who once said, "The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected." However, he also said elsewhere, "He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." 😸
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Youtube Sucks ass - The movie came out in 2006, based on a story around Corporal Joe Bauers, as US Army librarian that was put in suspended animation for 500 years. Even so, it's not so much a parody of today as it was regarding more specifically the early to mid 2000's, at the time the story was being written. Thus a lot of it parodies the Bush era policies and Bush era conservatives, because Hollywood loves pretending that the world can be simplified to liberals = smart people who believe in science, and conservatives = stupid, backward thinking barbarians. But I previously stated that it parodied late 90's to early 2000's because most of the cultural references were to things that became popular during the 90's, such as monster truck rallies, electrolyte infused sports drinks, etc. The jokes for that movie aren't relevant to today, even though they might still apply to the adults today that were kids or young adults at the time this movie came out. Sure, you could apply it to Tim and crew, in that capacity of being an antiquated cultural reference from 15 years ago, but the story itself didn't predict the rise of woke coming from a predominantly left of center origin because left of center was supposed to be the smart people that died off, leaving the stupid conservative people to survive because they bred like bunnies. That didn't happen. Although we'd have to wait 485 more years to find out how accurate the movie really was. But currently, it appears the left is in regression, even while pretending they have science on their side. Currently, corporations are leaning more left and investing in woke for some strange reason that doesn't make sense if all they cared about were profits.
1
-
May not be popular takes, but...
1. You can like the old Cosby Show, Fat Albert, etc. without liking Bill Cosby. Yes, among other, and worse things, Cosby the actor was a hypocrite, and irl tried to play off being a respected TV dad that he forgot he's done stuff real dads should never do. I also am not avoiding comedian Cosby because, in his pre-TV dad days, he was much more up front of who he was, joking about certain things that that made it clear he at least knew about, if not partook in those bad things that got him in trouble. But for TV, it's the show is a family sitcom, and if you can separate the TV dad character from the actor, you can still enjoy the show, focusing on the characters and stories, remembering they are fiction, and their actors only represent them as characters in the story. The real life actors? Mileage may vary in whether they are nice people on and off the set, in character and out.
2. As social commentary, even being a bit prophetic of the times ahead, Seinfeld's ending was incredible. Maybe it could have been executed better, but who else was able to predict things like cancel culture and everyone having phones, gawking everyone else? This came out before Gawker was even a thing. Facebook and the concept of social credit/currency was close to a decade from being conceived. Even MySpace was yet to go online for a few years. Blowing up on national news was a big thing back then, and now is overshadowed by going viral online. Who would believe that people could get jailed for making jokes, even if they were in poor taste or over the misfortune of someone else? That was nearly two decades out from the whole 'pug salute' joke that did lead to a guy getting jailed. That so many things that were laughably ridiculous back when the finale aired have become reality is eerily fascinating. So, it's not a bad finale as much as being ahead of the reality that came to be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
To be fair, Garfield has had a lot of voice actors, and not all of them sound the same. The original voice actor was Scott Beach from The Fantastic Funnies of 1980. He's not bad, though has that old folksy style cadence and tinge of southern/western drawl, and quite a bit more base than I'm used to. But then, I grew up with Lorenzo Music, as many of us did, between 1982 - 2001, so it's hard not thinking of him or Bill Murray as the voice of Garfield, partly for how long they have been associated to our favorite fat cat, and partly for how much they sound alike. Jon Barnard, who had been doing the voice since 2004 is okay-ish, maybe, and Frank Welker, who has also done the voice since 2007, does alright. But it's really hard to beat Lorenzo Music. But I'd give Chris Pratt a pass. I can't believe he's 12 days younger than me! But seriously, there's no way he could have missed watching Garfield and Friends back in the day. If you listen closely, at least to what can be heard in the trailer, there is a hint of Lorenzo, with a bit of bravado signature of Pratt mixed in. It's not a terrible mix, and the 3D animation is pretty decent. At the end of the day, it's a family and kid's movie you can enjoy, not feel too embarrassed admiting to liking among friends and family, and comfortable letting your kids watch. That makes it a pretty rare gem among most kid to PG movies nowadays.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As for blaming the internet, I see it more as the internet is more of a snapshot as to where we are as a society. People have done stupid stuff for a long time. We could blame shows like America's Funniest Home Videos, or more recently Fail Army. Gawker could be among the list, saved for they were successfully sued out of business, never mind their attempted comeback. Yet, people were doing stupid pranks and stunts long before the camera was accessible to most people. Never mind the slapstick of the Three Stooges, or Charlie Chapman, who was among the first to disavow their Nazi related comedy content.
I personally don't find what this guy and his crew did as funny, but most pranks are cheesy/stupid setups that, in the back of my mind, I hope backfires on the pranksters. So yeah, I love when the Roadrunner speeds past a bundle of dynamite that's set to go off, but doesn't until Coyote goes to investigate what went wrong. So yeah, unless what causes it to happen is a tragic murder! I'll laugh when the guy in the video messes around with the wrong person and his prank backfires on him, especially if he finally serves jail time.
The one thing I'm not going to do is blame the internet. The internet wasn't around to document that. If anything, the internet makes it easier to bust criminals that are stupid enough to film and upload their crimes. Or, with more and more security cameras with live streams, it makes it that much harder to deny a crime's existence, at least for as long as it remains accessible on the internet. If anything, the things law enforcement step in to intervene on as a crime tells you a lot about the state of both politics and law enforcement. Even in the example of the person and his crew talked about in the video. The only time he got serious backlash was when he targeted Jewish people. Otherwise, his threats and harassment were not even a slap on the wrist when the targets were white people, even regardless if they were women. That's a document of piss poor, politically correct driven law enforcement, that basically says white people don't matter, you can do whatever you want to them, even threaten to kill them. Hell, maybe white homicide is ignored because the police are perfectly fine with that as well. Who knows? But it's to that point where such questions aren't just a patter of 'far right' or 'white supremacist' conspiracy theories, but well documented realities that are being posted as 'pranks' that prove how far a black person can go when the target isn't a protected class, and this is done by an all black crew of their own free will.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really, this is gaming on the level of casinos. Only thing is, casinos do have a chance for a payout, even though, in the end, the house always wins. Because this is akin to gambling, games that do this sort of micro transaction, or pay to play style, ought to be regulated like casinos/gambling. Should crack down on free to play micro-transactions that target kids under 18.
However, simulations like Second Life are an example of micro-transactions that can be done in a better way. For one, it is an actual inworld economy where the people in the world can create their own products and put them up for sale on the Marketplace, as well as sell them in world, either at simulated malls, or at one's own store. People can also manage virtual land by buying a full sim and renting out parcels. The point being that it isn't just an economy to serve Linden Labs, who are kind of like the central bank, but one that the users of the game can participate in.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mk V2 - I am am sure you are an overreacting U-tard commentor that doesn't know what he's talking about, and puts words into people's mouths to build a strawman to argue with. For I never said everyone in the 90's had a computer, nor does that even make sense as an indicator of computer literacy. Most people didn't own books when the Gutenburg press was invented, but availability and expanse of literacy is still attributed to it. The money companies like Microsoft and Apple put into schools that funded computer science rooms, and virtually put a computer in every classroom, was a boom in computer literacy and helped grow the demand for computers in the home. It also helped that computers were coming down in price and becoming more affordable by the mid to late 90s, making home computing more possible than it could have been in the 70's and 80's, when far less powerful computers cost way more than the entry level multimedia home PCs of the 90's. Add to that, with gaming consoles getting into the $300 - $500 range, those multimedia PCs, while maybe a few hundred extra, promised to do more than just play games.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@likeorasgod - If it was about performance, her manager would have said something. It was also during the holidays where hardly anyone makes sales because most people's money is going towards retail stuff. But hey, if they wanted to try and sell a bunch of stuff, they should have had product to sell on Black Friday at any major retail store. Even there, retail took a bit of a hit post COVID, as well as with the economy going all to crap. Which may be a good thing, in as much as the death rate of people getting mauled at a store while shopping on Black Friday went down.
Really, the company wouldn't have been in the situation they were in if they were honest that they needed to lay her off because they hired too many people, possibly not expecting the down turn in the economy when they hired her. Granted, it still would be crappy, and the company still would look stupid for not realizing they couldn't take on more people, considering the economy's been tanking well since before Thanksgiving, but at least they would have been honest. Heck, I've had managers from previous jobs talk about how they would give me a good recommendation, or offered me another job elsewhere after layoffs, and they settled into a new management job elsewhere. That would have been a better way to handle things than making up some BS about performance, especially when they obviously don't have an record of poor performance to go off of.
1
-
1
-
@markislivingdeliberately - Yet the problem is, when she asked for a reason, they gave a reason. They said poor performance. They would have been better off to say they had to downsize, and unfortunately she was one of the people they needed to lay off. It's not so much like talking to a cop, because there are reasonable cops out there that, if you don't have a long list of speeding tickets or other moving violations, are likely to just let you off on a warning. I've had a cop pull me over for a bad tail light, and, they only gave me a warning because I said I was looking to get it fixed in the morning. Not only that, after getting pulled over, and trying to get my car to start, they helped me get it going again. So, as bad a rep as cops get, they are not all bad, and they can be much more human that many of these upper management HR people can often be. So I'd say they are worse than cops, because a cop doesn't necessarily have to give you a ticket or arrest you as long as you are cooperating. However, HR apparently has no power in these situations to pause firing or laying you off, and can only do the discharge. That lousy HR, especially when I have dealt with HR that will sit down and listen, and will choose whether or not it must be a disciplinary action, or whether there are other issues going on, like a lousy manager that screws up the work schedule, and thus may have more of a cause to be disciplined or fired than you do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Linux has enterprise, especially with RHEL, and thus the free variants, like Fedora. AlmaLinux, Asianux, ClearOS, Fermi Linux LTS, Miracle Linux, Oracle Linux, Red Flag Linux, Rocks Cluster Distribution, Rocky Linux, and Scientific Linux.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I actually just upgraded Fedora 40 to 41, and it was a relatively painless operation. Even easier than migrating from one version of Windows to another. Albeit, this is not always the case with other distros. I tried moving an older computer from stable Sparky Linux 7.5 to the unstable 8.0. It is essentially a variant of Debian, so this process is similar to migrating from Bookworm to Trixie. Bookworm is the current LTS main version of Debian, also called Debian 12. Trixie is the current experimental release, also known as Debian 13. Between Debian and Ubuntu, outside their different philosophies and strategies for development, they are very much the same, particularly in use of APT. Thus, both the positives and negatives of Debian and Ubuntu hinge on APT. besides that, Ubuntu is basically a fork of Debian, and thus among the first distros that were based on Debian. Difference nowadays is Ubuntu has its separate repositories and development releases based on the name of those repositories that are based on animal code names. For instance, when I started with Mint, a initially based on Ubuntu, they were on Jammy Jellyfish repositories. The current LTS is Noble Numbat (24.04), with a mid-experimental release Oracular Oriole (24.10), and the expected new LTS to be code named Plucky Puffin (25.04). The code names between Debian and Ubuntu are confusing enough, but the one thing you need to know is APT is great on most things, but can suck on some major issues - namely crossing over from the dying LTS over to the next one, or to its crazy experimental unstable version cousin. Fedora has made it pretty easy with DNF, and even DNF5 as its successor is pretty awesome as well. But OG DNF is what I used to transfer my old Fedora 40 to 41, and it was amazingly smooth. I can't say the same for Debian Ubuntu. I'm currently looking at having to do a clean install. With a live boot, I might be able to recover some items I forgot to back up, simply because I thought I was going to keep on Spaky Linux 7.5 for a while. But the smoothness of Fedora's migration made me curious how smooth Sparky might be. Let's just say the sparks flew. So yeah, mileage will vary on Linux regarding ease of use and updates from one version to another.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You should check out Brian Lunduke. Linux dodged the bullet earlier this year when, ironically enough, a Microsoft engineer found what became the XZ vulnerability. If this wasn't caught earlier, this would have effected most of Linux, be it OS or server distros, personal and enterprise, being that this attacked the way packages are distributed. But, even there, there are numerous systems that depend on one person, or a group of people to keep things going, or otherwise key components of our digital ecosystem could cause the whole thing to crumble. That's regardless if you are on Windows, Linux, or Mac, because they all use these components at the core of their systems.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@palinurosec9154 - True, but it also depends on what the distro gives for choices. Not sure if Fedora still has it, but they did have Hyprland in their repository, making it relatively easy to add on after installation. It's not as optimal as having the option during install, but at least it's an option. Either that, or have a choice of ISOs pre-built with the desktop/window managers to choose from. But, I get it. Some distros prefer to only develop on their flagship, with setting they prefer, or consider most optimal to them. Plus, there are lots of distros to choose from that at least one might work out for you. Or, you can build your own.That's what makes Linux great, having the options and freedom to find out what works best for you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Spot on here! Seriously, I miss game magazines that had level maps and would hint at hidden areas, and not just spoil them. Having a bestiary, weapons and armor guide, potions catalogue, or a class tree were great meta products you could have in a game's companion guide. The instruction manual should just have enough info to help you start the game, which would be a great reason to read a game's PDF manual, whith questions of what to do after reason for interaction in a game's forums. Why game magazines went away from actually informing about how to play games, I don't understand. Most gamers want to know what to do in their favorite games, not all this toxic woke garbage. But, then again, I'm 43. So what do I know about what kids these days like or don't like. And with all the social grooming going on, do these kids even know what they want?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TukikoTroy - We do have laws, and if people break them, they go to jail. Plus, a lot of world nations, save China, India, and Russia, don't have even close to the land that we do in the US. Many of your European countries are barely the size of Vermont. So apples to oranges when comparing a country that's about half the North American continent to one of your puny shriveled up raisin sized countries. But hey, if you want all the mass murderers, gang members, druggies, thieves and other criminals, we'll be glad to send them to you as 'refugees'.
As for the so-called riots, those are political prisoners that will shortly be returned to their homes as soon as Trump returns to the White House. Heck, I'm surprised some of you are allowed to say Nazi, as that's something you can be put in prison for in Germany.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim, do you remember the Waco Massacre? Granted, it was a religious cult, but they had their own compound, their own autonomous zone. There had also been a ranch in Oregon that was had claimed autonomy from the government as well. Idaho and Montana had their share of militias and the like that sought autonomy from the government, but many of them were either in fact skin heads, or labeled white supremacists, and that's when the feds get involved. For whatever reason, Antifa and BLM are supported by the leftist politicians and anyone who disagrees is a white supremacist. You may not care because you have the luxury to move and aren't rooted in a community. But, you know, blacks in the South were in a similar bind during segregation. Yet your solution to them would be to move? You realize those that didn't move and fought the unjust system are the ones who fought for the Civil Rights you claim to benefit from today. If they just moved, you wouldn't have those benefits. In fact, people moving without a fight is the very reason our rights are eroding as we speak.
1
-
I'm hoping this shows that FOX definitely is not in line with the Peronist anti-Pope dictator's agenda. That is, unless they are in some way being used as a form of MSM astroturf to claim that at least one major news network is covering what the rest of them are avoiding like the plague.
However, I would advise that FOX and Ben Shapiro, if they are indeed legit on their coverage, to look at the facts more closely, as 80% of the victims of priest sexual abuse were post-pubescent young adults. Milo Yiannopoulos got in trouble for frank words about his pederast abuse by a priest when he was around 13 or 14, making mention of something that is common in the homosexual world, where they really are groomed into the lifestyle by older men.
When it's called child abuse, by and large, this is doublespeak to gloss over the biggest portion of the issue, which is that these pederast homosexual priests, bishops, cardinals, and now even the Pope are using the their power and persuasion to push the homosexual agenda in the Church. The Lavender Mafia is an open secret in the Church now, and we can see that it's infiltrated a good portion of the highest ranks in the Church, including the See of Peter.
1
-
1
-
Catholics and Protestants alike believe in original sin. The Catholic view is that it is a wound on human nature, and thus something that can be healed through salvation. Protestants vary on what is believed and is dependent on their religious tradition, be it Lutheran, Calvinist, Baptist, etc., and the actual views today may not be the same as their founders. For example Martin Luther believed that humans were dung that are merely covered over in salvation by God's saving grace. That might shock a few modern Lutherans, while more traditional Lutherans would consider it hyperbolic and intending to stress the need to rely on God's grace for salvation, and not one's own works. I do agree with the basic premise, that critical race theory is similar to a cult of a religion, however I disagree with the comparison to original sin while misinforming on the Catholic doctrine of it. While it is true that original sin has been passed on to humanity since the first sin of Adam and Eve, this belief is not exclusive to Catholics, and is often maintained in more rigorous views among Protestant Christians. But yes, the problem with critical race theory is that it is utilizing a spiritual/religious narrative in order to condemn a certain race as being unforgiven and with no redeeming value. It might of been crass for Luther to say humans are dung, but he at least merited the possibility of salvation through God's grace. Critical race theory seems more like Calvinism, in that all people of color are the saved ones that are of the elect, and thus are above reproach, while white people are forever damned with no chance of being saved.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jagd Töpfer - The nonsense of the early 20th century skeptics. The mythologies of the world tend to start off with Chaos as the beginning of all things, and then a myriad of gods appear to somehow bring order to chaos and create the world. The Bible does mention a void, but God is there from the beginning and brings forth light and creation of the cosmos. This is one God, and His angels may have helped bring order to Creation in some manner, but even the angels were created by God. The mythologies basically portray the gods that make up a given pagan religion's parthenon of gods as essentially inbreds, with cosmological deities as the most pure or supreme, and with their offspring the elementals/titans revolting from the higher lineage with lesser supremacy over the earth, fire, wind, water, etc. Then came the gods that created humans by spilling their seed on the ground, and these were also less superior gods that basically toyed with humans like chess pieces for their own amusement. Still further were the demigods that were a mix of the gods with men. Sure, you can mangle a warped similarity out of the pagan stories, such as to downplay the birth of Jesus, but you have to adapt Jesus' narrative to that of being a demigod, and basically a halfling, rather than Jesus being the Son of God in the traditional and orthodox meaning that Chrritianity has, in which Jesus is both fully God and fully Man, and united to God the Father and Holy Spirit as in the Holy Trinity. The Bible doesn't read as merely a collection of myths mangled together. The story of Creation and God's plan for Creation flows throughout, from Genesis to Revrlation. While there are some unique texts out there, no other religious text than the Bible is comprised in this manner. There is something about the Bible that us unique unto itself, and the way it impacted western culture for 2000 years is truly remarkable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nintendo's biggest competition is Atari, which has embraced their place in retro gaming. The 2600+ plays 2600 and 7800 carts. It's drawback is it's powered by the Stella emulator, but it plays the games in HDMI, so you can play them on modern TVs. They also have a non-cart system that works through online gaming that's a bit more powerful and can play modern games. However, it would have been awesome for the 2600+ to have been capable of running a modern cart system because just consider on storage alone, you can get anywhere between a 16 GB, up to 512 GB USB drive for between $8 - $50. Most modern games are around 1 GB - to 10 GB, so one could easily store the data fora game in the storage, and still have plenty of room in an Atari sized cart for and special chips etc that could bupoost even more power to the graphics and CPU before even getting to the consol hardware. Unfortunately, the 2600+ use of Stella's has the9 drawback of being able to use a cart's additional chipsets which is why games like Pitfall II are u nable to work on the console. If they fixed that, and put in hardware that rivaled the Switch, they would still have an impressive system to bridge the gap between retro and modern with. However, they probably are looking at the VCS to be that gap, which itself has its issues, such as raking 2 hours to setup and install just to run it for the first time. Yet the Zvcs has a full computer under the hood, and that, at its age, is comparable with the Switch. The difference is the modern VCS has a dedicated library of Atari games, plus a promise of newer titles underway. The Switch has the larger library of Nes SNES, and other classic console games, along with Switch titles. Between retro and modern gaming markets, that makes Atari and Nintendo the two main rivals. For cutting edge, it's mostly between X-box and Playstation whose consoles are basically hardware updates. However they too have a market for nostalgia among some of their major game franchises. But, as far as retro, Atari and Nintendo are the main rivals in that market.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Christianity at least has, in traditional/orthodox teaching, an actual moral and logical principle behind it. You ask what's wrong with fetishes? I'd say it's what had once been said with SIMPs and THOTs on this podcast. Free will, you're certainly free to your opinions, actions, and thoughts, as well as what you may want to obsess over, but these things have consequences. The traditional/orthodox teaching is two sexes, man and woman, and matrimony is a sacrament around a covenant between a man, woman, and before God. The vows are made before God, and the purpose of marriage is to have children and raise a family. Even before gay marriage was a progressive mantle, traditional marriage had its conflicts with modern secular ideals, which some have wanted to go as far as abolish marriage and break up families. Who would raise children, if they were even allowed to be born? The state, which we used to deride this ideal as the nanny state. Coming from this understanding, and seeing the current state of things, I'd consider that the gay marriage agenda exploited LGBTQ+ for the purposes of breaking down the traditional family and thus subvert the culture.
1
-
@anyanyanyanyanyany3551 - unfortunately, relativism has hit the Church, too. There are the obvious ways, among the liberal Catholics and the progressive mainline Protestant sects, as well as the community churches that at least are honest enough to leave out Christ and the cross from their podiums, and leave up the pride banners of their 'true religion'. But the more subtle relativism is found in the more fundamentalist, personal Jesus sorts. Unfortunate, as the general conservative slant among them makes them allies on many political and social issues with traditionalists and the more orthodox oriented Christians. The main issue is the subjective manner of relating to Jesus, in the manner of 'me and my Jesus'. While we agree for a need to have a relationship with Jesus, the relativistic part comes when a person thinks they always speak for Jesus, that their opinions are the opinions of Jesus as well. To create a god in your head that always agrees with you and always affirms you as right can make it very hard for such a person to admit when they are wrong, or even can be wrong.
1
-
1
-
It appears FOX definitely is not in line with the Peronist anti-Pope dictator's agenda, at least if this second posting here is not deleted. Otherwise FOX may prove itself in some way being used as a form of MSM astroturf to claim that at least one major news network is covering what the rest of them are avoiding like the plague.
I still would advise that FOX and Ben Shapiro, if they are indeed legit on their coverage, look at the facts more closely, as 80% of the victims of priest sexual abuse were post-pubescent young adults. Milo Yiannopoulos got in trouble for frank words about his pederast abuse by a priest when he was around 13 or 14, making mention of something that is common in the homosexual world, where they really are groomed into the lifestyle by older men.
When it's called child abuse, by and large, this is doublespeak to gloss over the biggest portion of the issue, which is that these pederast homosexual priests, bishops, cardinals, and now even the Pope are using the their power and persuasion to push the homosexual agenda in the Church. The Lavender Mafia is an open secret in the Church now, and we can see that it's infiltrated a good portion of the highest ranks in the Church, including the See of Peter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@logicplague - On some level, I agree. I'm you're average white American mutt with family lineage coming from Scottish/Irish, German, possibly French descendents. Europe is/was predominantly white by color, and the cultures do have variations that are based more on region. Granted, there are various regional cultures in the US as well. We're a pretty huge land mass with 50 states, each with their own particular statewide culture, as well as each county in the states with their own traditions and folklore, etc. I've lived in 4 counties in my own state, and have visited others, and I can say that in Washington state, you can find differences of culture between King County where Seattle is, compared to Yakima, Benton, and Franklin, where there are cities and towns most people don't know about, and probably don't care about, especially if they bare care about Seattle to begin with. American history is just as much about the European settlers as it is about the black slaves and native Americans. Many of our counties in Washington state are named after tribes that were local to the region, with some of them remaining in the area to this day. Monolithic group means nothing to me other than BS people make up when they want to make an argument, rather than discuss a subject. Of course I know there are all sorts of tribes that were all over what is now the US. Which is also why it's stupid to claim they were all genocidal barbarians. They all as tribes had their particular cultures, just as the Euopean clans did that eventually became nations in Europe. Or do you thing those clans held hands with each other and never fought among each other? Heck, even when they became Christian nations, they fought among each other. So all I'm saying is no one has a moral high horse of superiority when it comes to war. All of humanity has partaken in war, so no clan, tribe, or nation is without blood on their hands.
1
-
@logicplague -however, I disagree that a color, black or white, diminishes anything. There is both a white history, and a black history in the US, and it's something we as a nation ought to recognize. Likewise with the differences of culture. Likewise with native Americans, because there's a lot to learn about the history before the US was a nation, and before European Pilgrims came to settle here. All this woke BS muddies the waters. It does nothing to help learn about these things. People would be more open to exploring the history and culture if not for people saying you should hate your white/European ancestry. And what point is there to expecting most people, save the self loathing to accept that they will be forever unforgiven and have no way to ever repent of whatever wrongs their ancestors may or may not have participated in? That sort of stuff is the rhetoric that leads to genocides, rather than people coming together to celebrate diverse histories, cultures, etc.
1
-
@logicplague - I don't know if anything got lost by the censors, but I think we agree more than we disagree. We may categorize differently, but I don't think it disregards anything. Of course there are numerous American tribes, each with their own histories and cultures. The same is true when we talk about US American history and culture, because each state, as well as the various counties, cities, towns, and native tribal reservations have their own particular histories and culture. Not all of history is found in textbooks, and a lot of it can be lost without the storytellers and people that keep record of such histories and cultures. Sadly, these local histories tend to be ignored, even deemed unimportant to the people that live there locally. Unless you're in Seattle, NYC, Los Angeles, or any of the 'important' cities that have a certain amount of name recognition around the world, that have been put on the map, as it were. Even there, you also have the so-called fly by states, the history of how a huge chunk of the US gets ignored, despite how much the farm land has been important for feeding the whole nation, and how they suddenly become important when it comes to getting votes and electing a president
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sayaneechan5799 - Probably because being a conservative and voting for Trump, people call that voting literally for Hitler. So I'm used to hearing that rhetoric.
All I'm saying is it's OK to be white. You don't have to be ashamed of your skin color. Call yourself whatever you want, but I'm perfectly fine with being called white. And outside of the woke BS that goes all over the world, most Americans are fine talking about American white/European culture or black American culture, native American culture, and Latin American, etc. Most Americans that haven't gone woke insane can talk about the different cultures and histories and learn from them. 'Colorblindness' is nonsense. We live in a world full of color, from sky to the sea, to the earth, plants, animals, and yes, even human beings have color. I refuse to live in a bland and boring colorless world.
1
-
@rhetorical1488 - Erasing, or manipulating history, as well as political agendas are all part of human nature as well. It's why in both history and current affairs you have to take what you read, hear, and watch with a grain of salt. After all, Romans had their particular take on history and their interactions with other clans and countries they 'interacted' with. The Greeks, Goths, Celts, and the like have their versions of these 'interactions'. That is to say war, trade, and any other way that people might be towards another, things happened. People that survived, or, for history, people who's writings survived, are the stories that we come across. Whether we choose to believe them or not is another thing, as is whether we can verify that there is something true from their stories worth counting as history, or the truth about current events.
As it is, propaganda goes back as far as the hieroglyphics, possibly longer. Who knows? Maybe a caveman hunter painted a lot of deer on his caves to boast that he was a better hunter than he really was. But hey, if he was looking to have a larger harem to keep him warm at night, who are we to judge? But, by and large, that is what most propaganda and political agendas are all about, a numbers game and to try and convince people one person or group is better than another. Erasing, or maniplulation of history is something many people do without really thinking about it. I mean, how many people honestly, truly are candid about who they are in their bios and profiles? Sure, like in a resume, we try to put our best foot forward. I'd imagine the Egyptians, if they suffered the loss they did to the Hebrews that the Bible accounts as being held as slaves, they probably did what they could to hide and erase that out of their histories.Same would also go with their depopulation practice of slaughtering Hebrew babies, not unlike China had done in more recent times under the one child policy. China themselves are a modern example of fudging the history so that events like Tiananmen Square are erased, or at least part of a silent, underground history known by those that lived it, but not spoken of in public. For us in the US and Canada, such censorship sounds appalling, as it should in countries that value and try to safeguard free speech. Yet with that also means being discerning about what you read and hear. It's not a new thing, this policing speech. There are certain things you can't discuss about WWII or the Holocaust in Germany without potentially being sent to jail. As offensive, over the top comedy as the 'saluting pug' was, was it really something to be jailed and taken to court over? On the other hand, there are some journalists out there covering controversial topics that are difficult for most people to bear reading, listening, or talking about that get jailed, partly because of the sensitive content, and partly because it's about a protected race or class of individuals or people. People wonder why it took so long to go after Epstein. Is it really that hard to figure out, considering all the rich, famous, and powerful people in the world he had going to the island?
But I'll leave at that for now, because I've probably already hit a lot of key words and phrases that the algorithm is likely to flag and erase this. Yet, that's another case of erasing and manipulation, for if you can suppress speech without human intervention, just because, well then now we have the machines doing the tyrant's work so the tyrant doesn't have to take all the blame. It's just the algorithm. No one to blame but code.
1
-
@TheSuperappelflap - this is part of why I comment the way I do when people say, "no one in Europe ever refers to their skin color," because it's patiently false. Maybe they don't use the English term, but another language with a term that means the same color. As it is, in the places where Latin Americans migrated, even legally migrated, they clashed with black people over their word for black. Granted, there was also gang rivalry, but their word for black got responses, regardless if the one using the word had any idea that it was offensive. Add to that, language can be a personal thing for people, and to be told you're using a bad word, and it's one you've used all your life to simply refer to a color, and people are saying you can't use it, well, some people don't like being told what they can and cannot say. It's also partly why Spanish had become like a predominantly secondary language in certain parts of the country, and being bilingual in Spanish boosted one's employability in those areas. The geography has increased since then, along with more places becoming multilingual with immigrants from other parts of the world increasing as well. Why the increase? I'll leave that for people reading this to come to their own conclusions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sayaneechan5799 - Generalities are generalities. I could be mad at people calling me an American, but it is what I am, simply by living in America. Even saying North America is general, because it can mean US or Canada. Similar with Northwest. Even calling me a Washingtonian can still be too general, not to mention the state of Washington gets mixed up with Washington D.C., which is a city, the nation's capitol, and way over on the other side of the country from Washington state. Plus, there's differences between eastern and western Washingtonians, enough that this state has sought a few times to split into two states. And even that doesn't distinguish differences, because most of what is meant by western Washington politically is generally King County, which mostly comprises of Seattle. The issue for the rest of Washington is the domination of Seattle politics over the rest of the state.
Regardless all that, I'm an American, and I take no offense to being called one. I think our influence in the world is exaggerated. Wokism itself is an offshoot of the socialist/Marxist Frankfurt School that originated from the Institute for Social Research founded at Goethe University Frankfurt in 1923. So I don't know why Germany doesn't get blaimed more for poisoning the world with socialism and Marxism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The repositories are not the main problem. Not updating the repository can be the problem, but it's also having unofficial packages in the repository. Yet, as noted in the video, it's more convoluted than that. I have to wonder how many people realize if they were working with any other company than Valve, who's actually invested in making Linux work, this whole Linux community project relations would be discontinued and distros maintaining their unofficial snap or other package would be getting a cease and dismiss order before going on to sue the distro maintaining the repository out of existence for not removing the unofficial package. This is why we have all these multiple streaming apps for games and other content to begin with. It's also what happens when we remove the physical content that we used to purchase and effectively own. At least I have not heard of a company trying to remove some one's VHS or DVD copy of a movie because Netflix no longer has the rights to stream it. Most people understand why that would be weird, since you own the physical copy and purchased it at a physical store.But ownership in a the virtual metaverse that is the internet, while the concept is there, it's as if it's completely foreign. Then, when the non-com world of the virtual world meets the commercial world of the 'real world, it's not often too pretty.
It's not like there hasn't been attempts at making a commercial based virtual world work. Second Life is an example of trying to put free market capitalism to work, with user generated and user sold content. But even it locks horns with OpenSim, which would even exist if Linden Labs didn't make their source content free and open-source over a decade ago, back when they were obsessed with interoperability. Turns out, that didn't vork out to well, since the ability to move from one virtual world grid to another meant using a hypergate. When you do that, all the metadata that that was used by the home grid was reset and the metadata for the content would default to the current user. The same also would happen if you ported content by the various means of downloading and uploading content. So yeah, that didn't go over well with the user based content creators, and Linden Lab had to shut down the hypergrid. This led to the wars between open grids and closed commercial grids that were hoping to make their own virtual economy.
Much of this is what I remember from being active between both worlds around 2009 - 2015. The two virtual world factions are there, even Second Life still exists, but it's kind of kept to being it's own niche thing, gaining a little interest when stuff like Meta or NFTs float into mainstream attention. Content is still being made by users, and even virtual land rented out. You just don't hear as much in the media about someone quiting their job because the revenue from their virtual store pays better, or that a land barron in SL made millions off of virtual land sales. That hype is long gone, but a dedicated community remains.
The point? This argument over content and ownership has been going on for a long time. I doubt it will ever get resolved to anyone's liking. But we should appreciate Valve has been a lot more patent with the Linux community than, say, Nintendo or Sony would be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Now I'm intrigued, because Hyprland is often called a WM, even though it's a Wayland compositor. Why do Wayland compositors get lumped with X-11 WMs?
Also, now that I have learned the jargon, it begs the question: What are the most light weight X-11 WMs, and what are the most lightweight Wayland Compositors?
Currently, on my newest HP laptop, a 10th Gen Core i-5 Intel from 2019, I have Fedora 41 installed on the internal hard drive, while I side load a PNY micro SD that has Garuda Arch installed on it. On both I use Hyprland for my Wayland compositor. I also have a HP from 2015 that I installed Debian Bookworm on it. This was after hopping around, and, considering that most distros I tried on it, and had best experience on it, were Debian based, it really made the most sense to just go with original, instead of the forked distros. Debian just works, and this seems to be the case especially with older computers that are getting to be around 10 years old, and generally have pretty small RAM in them. Even with my newer HP that's only 4 years older, it has 12 Gb RAM compared to the HP from 2015 that has 4 Gb RAM.
Anyways, so far, I've found i3 to be the WM for me on the 2015 HP. It's meant to be my mobile office laptop that I might take to my parents on a quick visit between days off, or to do things at the coffee shop before or after work, depending on what shift I have. However, I find I love the workflow I have on i3. It's almost similar to what I have on Hyprland, just with less frills. It's a little more minimalist, which I like on the 2015 laptop, and it manages to keep things going better than most other environments I've tried on this laptop. There's just something about i3 that rivals for me the great experience I already get with Hyprland on the 2019 HP.
I don't know. What do you think? Is i3 the best of the best X-11 WM s? Where does Hyprland fit for you in your ranks of the best Wayland compositors?
Also, what happened with Weston? I tried it a few times on Fedora 40 before I upgraded. It was an interesting concept, but sadly underdeveloped. I could get a few apps to work once I figured out how to get the terminal up and try loading them from there. But it was definitely not going to work for a main environment. But it was fun to play around in. Just wish it got developed more.
1
-
1
-
@noahalcantar2431 - Sega was fairly friendly with Nintendo. Marketing was kind of silly, but on par with the whole 90's extreme era of commercials. But Sega did respect the region restraints Nintendo put on the North American market during the Nintendo Seal of Quality phase. Can't remember what lawsuit, but whichever set the precedence allowed for the arcade ports to all current consoles on the market, so that you could compare the different home ports and decide which console had the best port. Before then, non-Nintendo consoles had to distinguish themselves from Nintendo, and much of that was primarily with first party games, since most third party devs signed with Nintendo. At the time, we were led to believe the seal of quality meant Nintendo had the best games, while the competitors were in some way inferior. I don't think Nintendo can get away with that again, nor do they need to. If Playstation and X-box have indeed gone under, All Nintendo has to do is keep making good games that people enjoy playing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You don't know the out and out spiritual warfare in the Church. This has been boiling for decades, almost over half a century. The Church is the Body of Christ, and Apostolic succession of over 2000 years, the kernel of the seed started with Jesus and the Disciples in the Gospels, and born on the day of Pentecost. Your criticism from a sect that has only been around a few hundred years means nothing. While I agree with some of what you say, you don't know the fullness of facts, especially when you don't know about the conservatives and the traditionalists that do oppose this heretic Pope. You're also a hypocrite, for where were you when the Protestant churches fell to all of this decades ago? You already have women pastors, you already have gay pastors and you have them officiating gay weddings, and you have Trans Gospel reading and preaching LGBTQ indoctrination from the pulpit. Protestants fell long before now. The Church still has faith and hope that the gates of Hell will not prevail, and we may very well, as the Body of Christ, rise from this time of evil. Protestants do not have that assurance at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@slaapliedje - There is a niche cottage industry for reparing and refurbishing retro PCs and consoles, as well as, for the less purist that thinks the only way to enjoy classic gaming is on old school TVs and monitors prior to our current HD era to modify for modern output standards. In some ways, it's going back to a time in computing and gaming when the pioneers weren't the major AAA corporate studios, but hobbyists that managed publish a game, and it became successful, partly for the major demand for any content that would make getting a home computer or game console worth more than being an expensive calculator or overly complex electric typewriter. We're at a time where people know what a GUI is, even if they don't know the aconym. We have clear concepts of what a desktop screen should be, and the basics of how we expect things to work in that environment. Now, to come close to that pioneering spirit of working with things foreign to most people's understanding and expectations, you find yourself dabbling in the retro scene. On the other hand, some grew up with it, and like to relive the supposed good old days. Still, much future advancements and innovation has come by tinkering with something from the past. After all, Ford didn't invent the wheel or chariot. And you never know, what you define as junk may be repurposed and championed as the next great thing, like raytracing was made out to be, despite that Amiga was among the first to make it possible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vocassen - I started on Cakewalk way back on Win 3.11 around 1996. For me, it had the features I needed for notation composition, and the soundboard was basically each MIDI instrument or Wave sample had their own volume control with basic features for panning between left speaker and right speaker, and adding chorus and reverb. You then had the master volume as well. So it's basically a bit more advanced version of volume control.
You could add patches to the software for extra effects, but it also depended on what sound configuration you had on your PC, particularly with regards to hardware, from a basic SoundBlaster 16, to Roland Sound Canvas, to the SoundBlaster AWE 32/64 series that introduced soundfonts, which improved the quality of sound banks, as well as allowed for creating your own. So, at the time, the better the sound card, the better quality effects and instruments you can have. But, that changed after integrated sound, and as RAM and storage increased. more currently, we have VSTs, (virtual instruments) that are similar to sound fonts in adding more quality to the sound bank, but also implementing Instruments, and sets of instruments that nor set to the old MIDI sound bank presets, but instead are specialized for, say, a variety of drum sets that, in their own app you can adjust the volume and sound of the each part of a drum set, from the snare, the bass, cymbals, etc. These are outside of the soundboard, or the instrument selection of the DAWS (Digital Audio Workstation), or composition software, but may be accessed within the software, and edited to use with the main composition/DAWS software.
Just typing it might make it sound more complex than it really is. But the basic framework for the soundboard has been around for decades, and is pretty much standard to most DAWS and composition software like Sibelius, Finale, MuseScore. PreSonus, Rosegarden, Reaper, LMMS, and Ardour, to name a few. For my current setup, I have MuseScore 4 for music notation composition and editing, with a little bit of basic mixing of MIDI soundfonts and VSTs to at least get the basic adjustments of a musical piece. Then I export each track, along with a master track (optional). and tweak the instrument tracks in Audacity. Sometimes I'll compare the master track to the Audacity edits for a bit of quality control. If I really dead to do anything more advanced, I might use Arduous for mixing, but it all depends on the workflow, which I've changed up several times.
The basic soundboard has remained a standard in most any music composition and mixing software I've used. But you can get into nodes, which many of the modern DAWS have as plugins. There are also VSTs that have a similar node style to mimic old sythns that relied on the whole wiring and jack system to change sounds that most MIDI synths can make. I have no trouble with people wanting to toy with such a VST setup. It's just not essential, but can add some interesting sounds or effects. But to try and setup virtual jack/node system for my laptop's sound? Eh, I'd rather have a basic soundboard/volume control, and the option to enable and disable the audio and video devices and drives as needed. In Mabox, the audio is done through Volume Control, with tabs for Playback, Recording, Output Devices, Input Devices, and configuration.
For the short, basically, if you know how to use volume control, chances are you are not going to have too much trouble with the soundboard mixer in most common DAWS and music composition software. However, you might have trouble getting the audio to work with some of them (*ahem* Rosegarden, Ardour), specially it they are tied to needing JACK setup in a certain manner. Again, I switched to Pipewire to get away from having to configure JACK nodes and have my audio just work.
1
-
@cericat - Graphs are a whole different thing. I guess the simplest answer for what I mean is just a volume control.
I'm just used to considering it a soundboard, because each track on a soundboard has it's own individual volume control. The back end, as I understand it, would be the plug and play stuff, like the MIDI cables and sockets, or the audio jacks, from which JACK got it's name, and what the nodes are supposed to mimic. Most of that, with how each device is setup, ought to already be something that is done by the computer and the device drivers, and if I have to work with the devices, then some sort of AV control panel, or AV board similar to Volume Control or a sound/video mixing board. Nodes just seem to add too much complexity to the whole setup, like some 80's power synth that looks like some sort of wiring system in Frankenstein's personal lab.
1
-
1
-
@vocassen - VoiceMeter looks similar, but really, just something like volume control, but maybe a combination of AV. On Mabox, it's pretty simple to go up to the right corner, right click on the audio icon, and the first application I have under 'Sound and Music' is 'Volume Control'. I usually keep that open because Pipewire automatically adds whatever devices or applications are using audio, and I can tweak things there as needed. It's simple, but it gets the job done. From there, Muse Score has its own mixing board for MIDI/virtual instruments, and Audacity helps polish it off in sound editing, and maybe adding some extra effects in post production. It really comes down to how simple or complex one wants to make things, and I usually prefer to keep the basic workflow as simple as possible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's a difficult topic because it's a matter of circumstance and association. This is at the heart of real racism and bigotry is the us v. them mentality. I don't think it fair to blame it all on mental illness. It might have a little to do with processing information and not having the sort of filters that most people do, but the issues Kanye has with the entertainment industry run deeper than who he currently blames for his issues. That said, we should have a more open discussion about the Holocaust and the 'Yahtzees' because there are a lot of things happening in our own culture that parallel with what happened then. A lot of our current industries made money off of that regime, even benefited from some of the tech and science that built many things things we commonly use today. We also have to understand the ties there were to the eugenetics program of the regime and how that has effected the development of genetics as we know it today. Then there's Albert Einstein who was by birth Jewish, but did not practice the religion, and even turned down the offer to be president of modern Israel. There are so many intriguing aspects of that era of history, and where we are currently about these matters doe a disservice to the lessons we should have learned regarding how such a genocidal regime could exist, then play a blind eye to the genocidal tendencies if the communist nations, of which we can't speak a lot about because it's 'bad for business', just like what our companies probably knew about the Holocaust would have been bad for business for them to speak out about then. This is why we need to talk about it open and honestly, for otherwise we are just as bad as those that looked the other way when it was a certain German regime doing the atrocities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kensmith5694 - Initial fact is opinion. We don't know exactly what is on Mars, but it is a solid planet, likely having a variety of minerals that may be of interest, but we haven't the technology to travel there and find out what Mars may have to offer.
But yes, there are a lot of features that are wrapped up into one program, that in earlier days of programming would have been separate programs. I look at Blender, and the audio equivalents, like Cakewalk, and they are basically their own sort of OS environment that is mostly considered an application because they run on an OS.
Part of what drew me to Linux was more use of command line and terminal. Before Windows got divorced from MSDOS, there was more of a combination of the best of older forms of computing with the Windowing GUI on top. To come close to that today, would be to do Linux From Scratch, or compile your own Arch Linux installation. Tiling like Sway, Hyprland, and Openbox help change things, and greater use and understanding of terminal remains important in Linux to understand one's distro of choice. But, unfortunately, Linux keeps wanting to be "just like Windows!" So a lot of the creativity and ingenuity goes away from what makes better than Windows to how to pander to Window noobies, as if such patronizing makes such distros attractive to people leaving Windows for Linux. I was one of those Windows noobs, and yet I love Arch based distros, tile based desktop environments, and using the terminal.
1
-
Tim, this is late in the season for wildfires where I'm at. We've got a huge wall of smoke from these fires, and yes, rumors of BLM/Antifa possibly starting fires. We've had nearly 100 days of riots, which you reported as them using fireworks and starting fires. Our cities have neighborhoods that were burned down, and we're supposed to believe it's not possible for any of them to go out and start fires in the wilderness? Sure, some of them may claim to be environmentalists, but they also claimed to care about black people while burning down black businesses and neighborhoods. We can't rule out Antifa here, because, like you said, they've wanted to start stuff in rural America. Rural America is too spread out to cause the damage that they do in cities, so it wouldn't be surprising if the tactic was changed to burning and smoking us out. We prize our wilderness and farm land, and even if they started it in wheat fields or apple orchards, once the fire gets big enough, you can't control whether it will remain in the agriculture and cross into the wilderness. Of course, one shouldn't be trying to burn down either one, nor buildings in cities. We've seen what they have done to cities, so we can't rule them out as being the arsonists, even if it isn't their standard mode of operations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's the thing, with inflation, millionaire's are essentially the upper middle class of the US. These people about 40 years ago would be making more around $100 - $500 thousand, likely as small to mid sized business owners. Even your average grade school teacher is making around $50 thousand for about 9 to 10 month's work, and yet they complain that's still not enough. Retail makes around $20 to $40 thousand a year, which used to be a teacher's salary nearly 20 years ago. But now people claim they can't live on $20 thousand a year. The major problem is inflation. If we can curve inflation, that would go a long way to getting us out of the mess we are in. Yet no one wants to tackle the trillions of dollars that the US is in debt. No one wants to make less, but always more. Granted if you are an employer, you would like to pay employees as little as possible, so that you can make a profit from the business. Which is why, you, like many other YouTubers, are more than happy to be self-employed so that you don't have to deal with the overhead - that is, the cost of say, a professional studio, as well as employees that, while they could free you up to do other things, cost money, which means the need to make more money to pay for all the overhead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SuperColdLemonade - A lot has changed since 2012, or maybe it started a little before then, but somewhere around that time YouTube was transitioning from being more libertarian towards it's more leftist woke mob mentality today. Somewhat the same with FB and Twitter as well. That's about when we were starting to hear about these odd things called safe spaces popping up in universities, and even black masses being held, or trying to be held at major ivy league universities. I don't even know if woke and satanism are even all that much related to each other, but it was an oddity that the both began to rise up in the universities about the same time. That, and pop music, and other entertainment that's usually been more influenced by soul music, and other genres in that Christian/country/gospel slant, were getting a darker vibe. Like Katie Perry's Dark Horse. I mean, not more that 10 years before 2012, I can remember substitute teaching in a high school weight lifting class, and the radio was turned to a local rock station. One girl in the class asked if the radio could be turned to a pop station, saying that it would be better than listening to devil music. This was in a public school at the time, and I did not miss the irony of claiming pop music is not the devil's music even then. But that's also to put perspective on where the culture has gone with this weird sort of nega-fundamentalist/puritan cult of woke that is like a dark mirror image of it's more conservative Christian days. So I don't know if it's Joe Rogan lost his edge as much as he let the woke mob get to him with their character assassination attempt. Why it didn't seem to matter when on YouTube is hard to say. Maybe he did sell out to Spotify. Who really knows? But the pressures of the current culture are eating at a lot of people. It's so unfortunate so many bend the knee, especially among those that pushed the message and rebelled In the 70's, 80's, and 90's against censorship happening with conservative Christian fundanentalists. Apparently they are all for it now because it's their political and religious cult doing the censorship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Even though more traditional, conservative Catholic, I've come to respect you as a person, regardless if I agree with you or not. You're always informative and nuanced, plus the shared interest in history and culture, and preserving the objetive of it over 'your truth', which is more subjective, a personal perspective.Most times, our disagreements might be in regard to role of the Church, which just about everyone has difficulty holding objective and nuanced about, be it history or the current era. But I do appreciate when you reserve judgement and ask for more clarity on why the Church may do things one way or another. Point being here that people can learn and respect one another regardless of differences.
As per influencer, I do agree for the need to take responsibility. This is not necessarily about taking it for the team, or a deserved punishment to serve as an example, for setting a good example as a mentor is a form of influence. While I don't talk on my channel, I do try to reference source material if arranging someone else's song, as well as what audio, video, amd musical software I use to compose and arrange songs. Doing that makes a difference between being responsible with copyrights and licenses, or otherwise not and being given a valid copyright strike. I'm glad when people enjoy my music, or arrangements, and take pride in showing my receipts as well.
Anyways, thanks for the content, and was glad you didn't rush to conclusions. Regardless what happens, everyone deserves their day in court, if they need to defend themselves, and may mercy and justice prevail.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brazwen - It's what I meant to type in the first place. Autocorrect is a thing, you know? The point was toward George Orwell's 1984. If you really want to be a nit pick about it then it really ought to be nineteen eighty-four, as the 1949 1st edition, and almost every other edition ever since has done. Sure, there are variations on capitalization, be it just the nineteen, as in the 1962 Penguin reprint, or the nineteen, eighty, and four, as has been done since the 1969 modern series cover. The only cover of the Penguin publishings that actually has 1984 in numerics, though as graffiti over the title that spells out the numbers, is in the 2009 publishing of the Modern Series redesign by Jim Stoddart. But originally, the first edition was without capitalization as nineteen eighty-four. That's if you really want to be a technical nit-pic about it, anyways. 😝😏
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And if you really want to show that you're not racist, go read actual slave narratives, or research the Civil Rights era. In both instances, it was Democrats fighting hard to keep control of the plantation, be it the literal ones that held slaves, or the political one that to this day still uses race baiting and fear tactics to keep people of color voting for them. Yet what has BIpig Tech, neo-liberal Dems done other than maintain the status quo of high crime, high taxes, high poverty, and turned their cities into crap? They don't care about people of color, save for keeping control over them to keep power. But sure, a black mermaid is really going to change all that. Nope, they just toying with you like a fish on a hook!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I love Arch, and I switch between Garuda and Fedora, both using Hyprland. They're almost identical to each other right now. The one issue I have with Arch-based distros that prevents me from making Garuda my main distro is that one program I use a lot, I can't save pictures from it. It's a virtual world program called Second Life, and, it doesn't matter what Viewer I use to access the world, whenever I try to take a picture in-world and save it to disk, it can't do it on Arch distros for some reason. Or maybe I'm missing something? Because I use the viewer that is in the AUR, and most everything else works with it fine. But Arch is the only distro that I can't save in-world pictures to disk. Fedora, Ubuntu, and Debian based distros save the pics just fine, though. So, for now, I'm keeping with Fedora 40 as my main distro, and with Hyprland, the experience is fairly similar to Garuda. Ok, one other app works better on Fedora for me than on Arch/Garuda, and that is MuseScore. For some reason, it's more prone to crash, or not work at all on the Arch distros I have used - even ones that were specifically configures for sound and music creation, or as an AV studio. But MuseScore works fine on Fedora as an app image, since that's how the current version is downloaded now. oddly, the music instrument manager can be downloaded as a .deb or .rpm. So I guess app developers trying to be more compatible with Linux are also trying to figure out what ways are best to package their programs for Linux. 😏
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@STCatchMeTRACjRo - Yeah, and 20 years ago, I couldn't fathom a game needing more that 250 Mb of storage space. There wasn't such thing as a hard drive with over 60 Gb, save maybe high end tech servers, and we're talking about large room sized servers with who knows how many top of the line hard drive daisy chained together. Heck, my HP Pavilion desktop at the time came with 64 Mb RAM new, which I later bumped up to 128 Mb. It's original hard drive was about 20 Gb, and it had an Intel Celeron running at 400 Mhz. I Missed out on the Pentium III era, but my Gateway from mid 2000's had a Pentium 4 that clocked around 3.5 Ghz with 2 Gb RAM, and and maybe a 250 GB hard drive. My current HP Laptop from 2019 has an Intel Core i5 10th Gen clocking in at 3.6 Gh with 12 Gb RAM and 1 Tb memory. Now, the base line for buying a new laptop is at 16 GB, up to 32 Gb RAM. It won't be long before RAM will reach 64 Gb, then a few years later 128 GB up to 256 Gb. After seeing the leaps in the past 20 years, the 1 Tb minimum when 5 to 10 years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are distros like Tuxedo OS that have Linux built in. The disadvantage is most PCs have Windows built in. They may say that they could have an option for preinstalling Linux, but they don't make it well known, or easy to find information to do so. You also have to buy direct from the manufacturer, since your local Best Buy is likely not to have anything other than Apple and Microsoft. It would take some sort of grass roots push to get Linux based PCs onto the store shelves. Online-wise, you have to do a lot more digging to find the Linux OSes that are prebuilt into a machine. Most people trust, or at least are most comfortable using a brand they know and have used in the past, thus sticking with HP, Dell, Apple, etc. Again, if the manufacturers had the option to put Linux distros in instead, they aren't making that an easy option to find. Likely because they have some agreement with Microsoft, or, in Apple's case, do not want anything but their own proprietary hardware and software to be used.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PoorDog69 - You have to consider wrestling is their life. Some, like Bret Hart, his father and brother in law were also in the business. Kayfabe rules supreme to the oldtimers and die-hard fans. For the Rock, that rings true because his father was in the business. Even Cody Rhodes is part of the 'royalty' of generational wrestling families who, while he'll talk about some things more open than wrestlers used to, he still has a fine line where he won't break kayfabe. They know where they get their money, they agreed to this sort of life, and they all have an understanding about protecting the business. Some of their real beefs are with anyone that doesn't know how to protect their opponent in the ring, and wrestlers they think are in some way doing damage to the business, of which breaking kayfabe is a big deal. That, and they get mad at anyone they think either has a better contract than them, or too big of a spotlight than their own. Which is why I pay no mind to any supposed rumor of a wrestler having a contract that they can never lose. Sure, they fudge things, like the Undertaker being claimed to be undefeated when he did have one or two losses. But no wrestler is going to go without a loss in their career. So rumors of a contract invincibility are just that, and usually brought on by whiny wrestlers that think it's their turn to get the spotlight.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't see how this is a matter that effects players, but rather content creators that are seeking to make a profit. Nothing says WotC or Hasboro can own the character you create. However, like using a professional dev kit, or using an established physics engine, what you create can be held to whatever copyright or license user agreement they make. If you're not making money off a home brew mod or otherwise using the DnD brand in a podcast, video, etc. This won't effect you. If you are making money off their brand, you honestly think they won't consider royalties or anything? If you make your own original content, like music, and someone takes your beats, goes viral and gets success, but you got the original on your own channel getting nothing, I don't know? You'd at least want some recognition, if not royalties, for being the one making the original content in the first place. That's why we have copyright and licensing agreements in the first place, because it sucks when someone's making money off of stuff that you first created and getting nothing in return for all your efforts.
1
-
1
-
As for whether pixels = $$$, well, consider how much it cost even to buy Atari and NES games back in the day. The popular games went for between $25 to $30 for Atari 4-bit cartridges, and $45 to $50 for 8-bit NES carts. Before this in arcades, the games were made simple for short, addictive game play, to push as many quarters into the machine by as many arcade gamers as possible. Heck, many of the commercials for Atari and NES games were all about how addictive the game play was, while also claiming to be family entertainment.
Beyond that, being able to modify or power up your character in a game has always been an appealing element. For the arcade, it added an extra element to keep you engaged and plucking down more quarters. At home, it was to keep the game play from getting too mundane. The microtransaction, pay to play aspect can be bad, especially when the game is built on the only way to finish the game, or to have fun with it is in having to pay for better optimizations. Having an option to be able to beat a game without having to buy stuff, or to be able to earn it, as in the old RP monster grinding, that would be a better option. But, really, pay to play has, in a sense, been around since as long as people have been trying to buy their way into Heaven. Not saying it's right, but that's part of free will. Even so, regulating the choice for moral and ethical issues is the very reason that we have laws. Otherwise, it's a lawless society where anything goes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cynthiaconner8601 - This is America. Just as companies can fire you for any reason, you can sue them for any reason. The way things are going, legally and socially, companies may want to reconsider their hard line BS on no reason termination. This is probably going to blow up real soon, especially with judges that may not be sympathetic with corporations, and a government that's not exactly business friendly at the moment. Plus, no company likes bad PR. And the more videos going viral, the more streaming and traditional talking heads in the media talk it up, and eventually Congress may take it up and say the corporate world equivalent to no fault divorce is no longer something to go unchallenged. Either fire with cause, and expect it to become a court matter, or lay off and pay the severance pay owed for being an ass for hiring too many people and turning around to fire them after just barely training them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As for 'love', sure, modern English has let the term be used for all sorts of things. But we do have various terms, including traditional Greek derivatives, such as erotic, aphrodisiac, and nympho to mean similar to 'love' as in enamored, impassioned, hot, or sweet for, or on, have a crush on, turned on, lustful, or simply horny. The higher love, such as agape (ἀγάπη), would traditionally be, for Godly love, worship, devotion, or adoration. However, they are often used in modern context for someone highly praised, or a person that has become worthy of trust and respect, or someone that you strongly desire and admire. Philia (φιλία) would denote friendship, comradery, and is somewhat mixed with storge (στοργή), in as much as brotherhood and familial bonds are mixed among friendships and the modern way in which they are put together, such as instead of co-workers being mere associates, but becoming work family, or a friend that's been around and part of family gatherings and internal workings, is considered more like part of the family. Though we don't call it philautia (φιλαυτία), we do have some modern notion of self-love or self-affirmation of which we would distinguish between a healthy, positive, balanced self-awareness/self-acceptance that allows individuals to love and appreciate themselves, and unhealthy, excessive, narcissistic self-love that is characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance and a lack of empathy for others. We may have some differences on meanings of terms, and all I can really say here, is that I'd hope for our modern era, we return to using more of the terminology we have for certain cravings, desires, respect, etc., than simply saying, "I love that!" Especially when all you mean is that you like how a burrito tastes, or favor the flavor or color of a thing. Someone might just say, "Well, if you 'love' it so much, why not marry it?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
This was similar to the Secombd Life and viewrs. There were the beta viewers that would log into the beta grid, and once stable enough, it became known as the stable release, AKA the release candidate, or RC. Other times, it viewers would be known as their development project name, like Project Snowglobe. Later the viewer update would be known by either the numbers, or the new feature, such as Windlight for one of the early environment updates that was later updated to the current Experiences environment. There was also Bakes on Mesh (BoM) that made it possible to implement the older system skins and clothes on custom mesh bodies and clothing. Before, there were applies that were only for retail use. Now, you can either purchase a designer's BoM skin or applies, or, if you are good at image editing and layering, create your own system skins and layered clothing. Of course with the quality, mileage will vary.
While the numbering is nice, it is also cool having the code names, especially when they represent the focus of the update.
1
-
1
-
Accept the BS? Sorry, but this smack by Will Smith has been the best thing to happen to the Oscars whose ratings would have tanked without it. No one would be talking about the Oscars right now if this BS didn't happen. Trying to take a reasonable man argument here is just playing into it more. We went through a whole 'summer of love' in 2020 where people had done worse than smack someone and got away with it. There are still people getting randomly attacked in Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco, not to mention Chicago's continuous black on black shooting crime spree, and very few of them are brought to justice.
Whether Will Smith's career will be over for smacking Chris Rock is mostly dependent on Will Smith. Jim Carrey, who may or may not have led to one of his girlfriends to commit suicide has no room to talk on this whatsoever. He's as much a scum bag as any of these Hollywood elites are. For all we know, Carrey might be among the vampire child molesting cult that is said to rule Hollywood. Will Smith, is no victim, nor saint here, but among all those who want to be outraged by his sin, none of them could cast the first stone. But it still hits Will the hardest because he was supposed to be one of the good guys. He probably still could come back, but why? Hollywood is a toxic environment. The entertainment business as a whole is full of some of the worse scum on the earth. Anyone who wants any shred of sanity would be a fool for going into it, and would be wise to jump ship out of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I watched the movie, and it's ok. What's really lasted the longest about GB-2016 is the cringe around it. If you took the politics aside, what you get is basically an ok popcorn flick. All women Ghostbusters is whatever, but it seemed like they still tried to push too much on nostalgia references that sometimes seemed irreverent to the original material. It was, in a sense, like when George Castanza in Seinfeld decided to do everything the opposite of what he usually would do, except, instead of it working out, it didn't do too well for GB-2016.
The base story was not bad, though. It's mostly the execution of it mixed with, well, what we're used to by now happening when woke left gets criticized and decides to consider it hate, rather than something to try to listen to and learn from. For a time, that sort of taking offence to the offence worked. But, people have seen where the woke has taken things, and there's a lot less sympathy going their way. But that's all external from the movie, which wasn't great, but not all that bad either. The angst over it has outlived it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@goldenealgefromdutchbros6834 - we need legislation that describes what ghost job postings are. This is about as hard as YouTube finding videos to strike for copywrite infringements. Do they always get it right? No, but you are able to contest it, and if you are either the original creator, have a legitimate fair use claim, or have permission of the copyright holder, you can have the copywrite strike cleared.
Why can't something similar to that be done? All we need is to describe the parameters of what constitutes a Ghost job posting, and use those for the tools to weed them out. We've had decades of online job postings, surely we have more than enough data to recognize patterns of Ghost job postings. We probably know what questions to ask an employer prior to posting a job to help verify intent. Companies and the gov already do similar to us to verify our job eligibility, so why can't we verify their job posting eligibility? Google, YouTube, Facebook, all the major online corporations have already built up their systems for filtering out unwanted content, certainly a job posting ought to be able to do so as well.
So the real question might be if the job postings are really that incompetent at moderating their job sites, or are they purposefully kept that way?
1
-
@iyellalot - I think we need those moderation tools on job postings as well. Social media may not be perfect at it, but they already developed standards for moderating that should be able to be implemented on job sites. There's also decades of data on these sites that ought to help clearly define parameters for what constitutes ghost job postings. From those patterns, and knowing why companies post ghost job postings, a list of questions could be asked of the job poster to clarify intent, and prevent ghost job posting by denying posts that sound questionable. We the job seekers are already given all sorts of questions to answer even before we get to the actual application, it only seems fair that job posters have their own hurdles to go through to verify the intent of their job postings, and if their posting is a valid posting otherwise. Not to mention, it would be nice on the job seeker side if we could filter out things like commission work. I get so many sales jobs in my posts whenever I try to find something on Indeed and it keeps on tossing me tons of commission only sales jobs that I don't want to apply for at all.
But, as to why such filters and moderation hasn't been done on job sites, you have to wonder if they are really that incompetent at such things, or if they are purposefully so.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Between the 1970's and 1990's that was kind of the main time for the Christian Conservative movement in politics. Heck, even President Jimmy Carter got in on it, as he used his Baptist roots to gain popularity. Liberals actually could have become what became the Christian right, but there was something of a shift that started as early as the 50's and 60's. Basically, legalizing abortion and the pill became a big wedge issue, with the left siding with abortion and the pill and the right, for the most part, siding with the growing pro life movement.
Regardless, conservative is something that has unique definitions that are not relegated to just US Politics. For instance, a conservative in the UK would essentially be someone that wants to conserve the commonwealth and the crown. For much of Europe, conservatives were those that wanted to return to royalty and chivalry. Christendom plays a part in that, but you can find conservatives that would want to go back to even pagan times, as chivalry itself is said to have evolved from Germanic tribes where all men were expected to fight and protect their community (which is still true in Switzerland to some extent, and other places where they are to effectively join their country's military by they time they reach a certain age). As it is, conservative elements became a part of Christendom in so far as much as the pagan philosophers of Plato and Aristotle influence much of the great philosophers and thinkers in Christendom, such as St. Augustine of Hippo and St. Thomas Acquinas.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not sure what happened to my post. I noted preference for 'year of our Lord,' and how BC can be 'before the birth of our Lord,' and how that can be a matter of style as much as communication. Or, in a manner of speaking, style has to do with the way in which one relays something, as in what is stressed and for what impact.
I mentioned the beginning of Homer's Iliad for example, since the way it is interpreted tends to boil down to style as well. For whether you start 'sing O muse,' or 'sing O goddess,' neither is wrong because the Muses themselves were considered goddesses. The use of 'O goddess' may be literally more accurate, as 'theas,' the feminine version of 'theos' (god) is used. Poetically, muse is not wrong, since we are talking about a work of literature, and the Muses were the goddesses of the arts. Further, if one wants to be really technical, the passage begins with the word 'menin' which is 'wrath,' as in an enduring anger that is usually reserved as the anger of the gods. However, it here conveys the anger of Achilles who is considered something of a demigod in Greek mythology. The Greek language is very relational in word usage, even though at times to read it in a literal left to right manner as is accustomed in English, it can sound like some excited boy who gives out a word salad from not yet forming the sentence structure we normally use today. But in Greek, the placement is purposeful. Why put anger before the goddess to sing? Because the anger of the fallen Achilles matches that of the wrath of the gods. Thus one of the major themes of the Iliad besides the fall of Troy, being the death of Achilles, to which even the chief god Zeus weighed in on the fate of this hero. Thus why one could poetically form even the literal left to right like this:
"To the wrath, sing, O goddess,
of the son of Peleos, the wretched Achilles."
For this conveys the meaning, along with stressing the key aspects of the passage in the manner of the original Greek, but in a way that makes sense in modern English. Even so, it's a translation made out of preference of a poetic, song-like lyric of more recent style or fashion of use in English. T may give a glimpse of how I may interpret the Iliad, which does have a way. Of being changed after reading it in the Greek, not unlike how the understanding of the Bible can change from reading, say, the Vulgate, the Septuagint, etc., as compared to the accepted modern English translations. Thus 'correct' often depends on what is accepted as truth, sometimes regardless what is indeed the Truth.
1
-
Also important to note about various similar laws, especially in as much as one can compare humans with the rest of the animal kingdom.
1. You can be fined and/or jailed for disturbing a sea turtle nest. (https://tapeunit.com/sea-turtle-101-what-are-the-penalties-for-disturbing-the-sea-turtles/).
2. Even though it has been delisted under the Endangered Species Act, the bald eagle is still protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, meaning one is prohibited from taking, possessing, selling, purchasing, bartering, offering to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import any bald or golden eagle, alive or dead, including any part, nest, or egg, unless allowed by permit, can lead to a first offense fine of $5,000 or one year imprisonment with $10,000 or not more than two years in prison for a second conviction. Felony convictions carry a maximum fine of $250,000 or two years of imprisonment. The fine doubles for an organization. (https://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)
Yet, when it comes to human life, our laws should be more lenient than these laws regarding animals? Comstock followed essentially the same sort of legal framework as these for protecting animals, as did the regulations regarding abortion clinics. But apparently we can say it's a 'right' when it comes to killing unborn humans, but perfectly fine to impose when it comes to the rest of the animal kingdom. Thus, it would be better to be born as a bald eagle or a sea turtle if you want your right to life from the moment of conception to be protected.
1
-
Californians are already doing that in Eastern WA. Before my apartment complex was taken over by CA land barons, my rent was at a reasonable $650/mo. They jacked it up to $850, add on $100 in utilities and hidden fees, despite I'm already paying for electric and internet, as well as rent insurance. Then the service for paying them adds on an extra $10 fee, so I'm paying $960/mo for rent, and they still want to push it up to $1,000/mo minus said extra utilities and hidden fees. At this point, I'm better off paying a mortgage on a basic house than dealing with that BS. But COVID, Biden, and our leftist governor has screwed rates for housing, gas, groceries, and overall affordability to live anywhere in this state. Ironically, the clown turd Inslee who screwed us over is leaving to retire in Idaho! What's that say when even the former gov that created all these policies can't himself live under them? And Bozo Bob is going to be as bad, if not worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1