Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "AFP News Agency" channel.

  1. Nope, the impact hole was large, the exit hole truthers insist on claiming was the impact hole was small. If I remember rightly, it was around 95ft across (don't quote me on that) whereas the exit hole was created by the landing gear that punched through.
    2
  2.  @crimson9748  How is your question valid??? 🤣 His point is, god either doesn't exist or doesn't give a fk. I think it's safe to say he doesn't exist.
    1
  3.  @karantikoo9302  🤣🤣
    1
  4. The Hulsey report was funded by truthers who insisted the study began with the presupposition fire didn't bring it down, so we knew before the study began what their conclusion would be. Pure, unadulterated pseudoscience that holds less than zero weight alongst academia. ALL other serious studies concluded fire brought it down, just as the fire fighters that day predicted and publicly stated several hours before it fell. Also Wtc7 did NOT collapse into it's own footprint and it was fire that brought the twin towers down too, not the planes.
    1
  5.  @Colt8722  Yes. You sound shocked by this, why? It was right there, we can see it in the images of the exit hole. What's your issue here?
    1
  6.  @Colt8722  I'm referring to the exit hole in Ring C of the Pentagon which was caused by the plane's landing gear.
    1
  7. No steel melted, only weakened.
    1