Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "VICE TV"
channel.
-
23
-
19
-
15
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
@jeremiahjohnson6082 A plane is made from "almost paper"? Lol, you really need to think before you speal because that statement right there is insane. Aircraft grade aluminium is actually stronger than structural steel, but in terms of the forces at play when a 150 ton mass slams into an immovable object (like say, the planet fkng earth) at full throttle, there really isn't going to be much left. I already explained to you VAST difference between a typical crash site where the pilot is doing everything in his power to keep the aircraft airborne, and one the nose dives at full throttle into the ground, but this seemingly went over your head. Its akin to throwing a bulllet at the ground and firing a bullet from a gun at the ground, the extent of the forces at play are slightly different.
Like i said previously which you also ignored, is that 95% of the aircraft was recovered along with everyone on board. Are you suggesting this was all planted? They buried the engines and other wreckage from AA93 several meters underground, scattered thousands of other pieces of wreckage and human remains over such a large distance all without anybody seeing? You can't possibly be that deranged as to believe that to be possible, surely not?
As far as the Pentagon goes, watch the video right here on youtube of a Phantom F4 sled test where they slammed it into a heavily reinforced (as was the Pentagon perimeter wall) wall at 500mph and look what happened to it. After watching that, it's a miracle any of AA77 was left at all. There was plenty of wreckage however retrieved, including again (like AA93), the black box which when decoded showed the data from AA77's final 11 flights. On top of this, 136 people directly observed it and all confirm it to be a plane; radar evidence showing a radar track from Dulles airport to the Pentagon before abruptly stopping. The damage to surrounding structures hit on approach confirm the wingspan and engine separation of a Boeing 757 too. There really is no doubts whatsoever that this plane crashed there that day as ALL evidence confirms. If not then what exactly do you believe did??
For the record, there are other crash sites that have similarly left very little debris in respect to large pieces that you assume should always remain regardless of the circumstances (which is nothing more than an argument from incredulity). I've seen images of them that were presented over on the Metabunk forum, but i can't remember the full details as this was quite a long back. They are there though if you bother to search.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3