Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "VICE TV"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ScheerMagic For the most part, yes i accept the evidence that shows it to be true. If you know of any actual evidence that opposes it, let's hear it.
What do you need explaining about WTC7?? It had thousands of tons of debris drop on to it which resulted in huge structural damage and widespread fires across many floora that were left to freeburn. As the fire fighters said that day, hours before it fell, a collapse was inevitable. No mystery, no need for bombs, thermite or magic space lasers, just fire. It was a non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure of which had sustained much damage and was allowed to freeburn for 2hrs beyond what it's fire-proofing was rated at. If you think it was so unusual, i guess you must believe the fire fighters tending to the building that day were in on this alleged conspiracy?
Edit: If you're genuinely concerned for truth, why haven't you bothrred reading the official study? Too much like real research for you huh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
What difference does it make where the hijackers were from in terms of them being able to fly & crash a plane?? 😂 What election fraud??? The only one guilty of election fraud is Donald Trump, you do realise this right?
No, both planes that hit the towers were Not grey military drones at all lol. Witnesses, wreckage, ATC evidence, there's plenty that proves that false. What would be the purpose of "explosive pods", whatever they are? 🤣 "Neither towers needed to be removed", you're just making it up as you go I swear, its madness!
WTC7 houses no such documents & COLLAPSED due to uncontrolled fires across many of its floors. It burned for several hours beyond it's fire proofing was rated at. Nothing unusual about a non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure collapsing after being left to freeburn, hence how the fire fighters knew it would fall. The 2.3 trillion was made public 2 years before 911 & has since been tracked. Again, where are you getting your information from, can you cite any sources? The last bit of what you said is just paranoid nonsense with nothing to debunk. As with election fraud, the only ine guilty of wanting to destroy democracy & do away with the constitution is Trump. It's not going to happen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davepowell7168 Leslie Robertson who designed the twin towers said on numerous occasions they were designed to withstand strikes from 707's, but one low on fuel in the scenario i previously stated, specifically '‘A low-flying, slow-flying 707 heading for Idlewild.’
'According to Mr. Robertson, the buildings had been designed to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, but the planes flown into the towers were heavier 767s. And his calculations had been based on the initial impact of the plane; they did not take into account the possibility of what he called a “second event,” like a fire. When the planes struck the towers, they sliced through the steel frames, but the buildings remained standing. Many engineers concluded that conventionally framed buildings would have collapsed soon after impact. The twin towers stood long enough to allow thousands of people to escape. But the fire ignited by the burning jet fuel raged on. The floor trusses lost strength as they heated up, and they began to sag. The floors eventually began pulling away from the exterior columns before the buildings fell.' Being lost in fog whilst coming in to land is the only real way in which a plane like that could potentially hit the towers. Under what other scenario could it realistically happen?
What are the inexplicable effects you're speaking of? We literally have footage of entire floor slabs sagging and beams and columns buckling from the heat near the impact zones, i fail to see any issues here, to me it's blindly obvious how this occurred. Where is the mystery? Steel weakens when heated and steel under such immense load is always going to succumb even quicker. The official studies stand up to scrutiny and are accept by the vast consensus of engineers in relative fields. Anybody who serious issue with them only have to submit their findings to the MIT or the likes and if their claims stand up, they overturn the official stance. Why hasn't anybody managed to do this in over 20yrs?
Would you mind answering what i asked you in my last comment please?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davepowell7168 Did you delete your comment David? I managed to read it before it disappeared and find it funny how you have the audacity to question other people's ability to think critically, whilst claiming the government are paying people to comment on youtube in order to counter the already debunked arguments, that hold no weight whatsoever in academia. Paying people to literally assist in the cover-up of the murder of thousands of their fellow countrymen, without a single individual's conscience getting the better of them and blowing the whistle on such a heinous crime. I mean, you clearly haven't thought this through. Do you have any evidence of this going on, or is it all just based on you irrationally believing anyone with an opposing view and a voice, is automatically being paid by the government to fend off people like yourself, to help keep the conspiracy going? Twenty years later and it's still going on? Quite the long con, I wonder how long they'll keep paying all these unscrupulous creatures to do their treacherous work? I wonder what the recruitment process is? 🤔 If you can't see how utterly absurd such a belief to be, then you have no place questioning the cognitive abilities of others.
Happy at least that you now accept the openess of the floors of the twin towers. Quite like yourself, they were pretty much full of hot air. And farts.
1
-
1
-
1