Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "VICE TV"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@diannawilson1329 Diane you are so wrong about many things here. There was plenty of gold located in their vaults which was removed after. Yes people certainly used the event to make money, as is always the case, but Larry Silverstein who leased the complex didn't get a double payout, in fact he got paid out only half of his claim. He tried to claim it as two separate events, as would anybody in his position, but they paid it as one, leaving him way out of pocket. His claim didn't even cover the cost of the rebuild let alone all the money he lost in revenue and 100 million lease he still had to pay each year to the Port Authority. The Put Options claim has been debunked and isn't how truthers like to claim it. If you search '911myths Put Options' then you should find the full details of this there.
It isn't true that an unusually large number of people didn't turn into work and by ethnic group, I'm assuming your referring to the mythical 'Jew call' that was made as a joke by a comedian, that truthers ran with as being genuine. There were hundreds of Jews in those towers that day, and a number of the victims who perished were Jewish.
Zero evidence whatsoever of thermite of any kind present, that was proven to rubbish. All they found were red paint chips from the red oxide paint used to prime the steel, and iron microspheres which were present in huge quantities in the materials used in construction, which were liberated in the collapse. There were also huge numbers created during the actual collapse as they're simply the result of sparking.
Never heard of the image of Bush on Epstein island so can't comment on that. Seems a bit silly that one to me but whatever. You are right in that the US government weren't behind it as there's no doubts it was Al-Qaeda, the evidence is overwhelming.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@liukang3545 Ok stupid, first off I'm not American so as per usual, wrong from the outset. Secondly, the fact you have managed to convince yourselves that you know more about demolition than the ENTIRE demolitions community speaks for itself and exposes your delusions of granduer and general mental instability. The world's leading authority on controlled demolition literally stated it would be "impossiblecl" to have brought those towers down in that manner via a controlled demolition, but once again you know better because you looked at the footage and concluded with your ZERO knowledge of demolition that it was a demolition. Anybody with the first clue of demolition would know that it would be impossible to bring to the towers down at the impact zone. Demolitions start from the bottom up you tool, not from two thirds up 🤣 Any demo devices located anywhere near those locations would have been instantly destroyed by the plane impacts, let alone manage to survive 60-90 minutes if raging fires! Demo devices are EXTREMELY sensitive to things like heat and geometry, which demo experts understand and which is why there aren't ANY who agree with you 😏🖕🏽 Finally, NO beams exploded you freaking crackpot, what footage are you looking at?? You're such a liar lol. The only thing i can possibly think you're referring to is the air being violently expelled as entire floor slabs are slamming down on to one another. We observe the exact same thing during verinage demolitions which don't use any explosives. You are demonstrably wrong and you have nothing, literally NOTHING to back up your kooky conspiracy claims. And you know it 😉
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1