Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "VICE TV"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@youtube_chaplain I GUARANTEE you've not converted a single individual by spamming youtube videos with primitive ramblings. Not one. Why don't you be more like a real Christian and get out and help people instead of wasting your time doing what you're doing and annoying everyone else?
And no, it isn't about free will as many people (me included) couldn't believe what you believe even if we wanted to. Many people NEED evidence to believe in things, and rightly so. Believing in something without evidence is madness and leaves you open to all kinds of manipulation as history has specifically proven many times. No omnipotent, omniscient deity would ever make blind faith a requirement, and no omnibenevolent deity would ever condemm us to eternal damnation for not being physically capable of believing in something so absurd without ANY evidence whatsoever. If i told you there were invisible unicorns grazing in my back garden, would you believe me or would you need evidence? I rest my case. Another incontrovertible fact worth noting that is also very inconvenient for religion to deal with is that we are simply all products of our environment. If you were born on the bamks of the river Ganges of Hinidi parents for instance, you would bow to Shiva and Ganesh. Are you telling me that BILLIONS of people, through no fault of their own are now burning in hell for the crime of being born in the wrong place, at the wrong time, of the wrong parents? I don't wish to be part of that sorry, not could i if i wanted to. Believe whatever you like, just stop ramming it down the throats of the rest of us who you have literally ZERO chance of converting just by copying and pasting bible verses om every damn thread.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@astrofarmer9350 Ok, firstly well done for ignoring the actual fundamentals and glaring holes in your argument. Secondly, google isnt a website, it's a search engine. What actual site did you get thise figures from, give me the name? Of course it's a truther site because ONLY truther sites makes such ridiculously irrelevant comparisons.
Thirdly, we've already proven those attacks were orchestrated by Islamic radicals and ignorance doesn't quite cut it in the real world. You may be able to get away with this sh!t in the court of youtube, public opinion, but in a court of law, not quite so much.
Finally, the passport wasn't fireproof nor did it need to be. Passports often survive plane crashes as paper and the like are easily ejected by a blast due to their large surface to mass ratio. This is nothing new and nothing whatsoever unusual about it. The passport was found prior to the collapse, on the street surrounded by thousands of other pieces of paper that survived unscathed and ejected by the blast. Are you suggesting they were all planted also? And what would be the purpose of planting a passport of somebody who was on the flight manifest which proves he was on the plane? It would be an utterly needless risk.
1
-
@astrofarmer9350 Redone?? No. That had some maintenance work done, they were NOT "redone", whatever that means lol. Is this your evidence for foul play? If so then please explain why both towers collapsed precisely at the impact zones? How does that fit in with this theory? It doesn't, not that it matters to the tinfoil hat wearing lunatic fringe that you're part of. Care to explain how explosives managed to evade the bomb detection dogs present? To rig a tower of that magnitude would take many people many months and according to the world's leading experts in demolition, they wouldn't know where to begin with such a task. They also said that it would be "impossible" to have brought those towers down in that manner via a controlled demolition.......but you know better 😉 In fact there doesn't seem to be a single demolitions expert on earth who agrees with you that the twin towers were demoed. Mainly because they OBVIOUSLY weren't. Any devices located anywhere near the impact zones would have been instantly destroyed by the plane impacts and ensuing fires, yet you believe they managed to survive the plane strikes and without 60-90 of intense heat from the fires thay raged prior to collapse. In reality, we literally have footage of collumns and beams buckling and entire floor slabs sagging from heat in that area prior to collapse.
In respect to the ignited jet fuel flowing down the elevator shafts causing an explosion in the lobby, i assure you this could most definitely have happened and did. You're clearly unaware of the service shafts and the express elevator that was a continuous elevator shaft from top to bottom......and I'm the one who doesn't know anything about this topic you say? 🤔 You've not even read the reports or studies and uet you expect me or anyone else to take you seriously?? Reading those would be far too much like real research and would require a genuine concern for truth which you simply do not have. For you itsall just about conspiracy and you'll happily bury your head to any conflicting evidence which speaks for itself.
Larry Silverstein was just one of a large consortium of investors of which ALL maor decisions required their agreement. He was NOT the sole lease holder as you crackpots would have everyone believe.
The reasoning that they were demoed because of asbestos is beyond absurd and clearly something you've not thought through lol. Tell me, why would they need to strip out all of the asbestos and if it was such a major issue, why lease the buildings in the first place?
Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't even in power in 2001 🙈 lol. And who told you they are such close friends?? I can't seem to find any evidence for this whatsoever, but you just keep clutching those straws you antisemitic scumbag.
1
-
@astrofarmer9350 NO molten steel was found anywhere, feel free to provide any non-conjectural evidence to show otherwise. Molten metal doesn't necessarily equate to molten steel. Was molten metal present? Yes, lots of, just as we'd expect there to be given the temperatures and metals present in such vast quantities, namely aluminium. But no molten steel. A fireman saying he saw molten steel doesn't quite cut it sorry. Without chemical analysis, this is just pure guesswork and assumption. We now know better given the information we have and we can say with the utmost confidence, no molten steel was found.
Nope, dust tested has never shown any traces of thermite and the only ones making this claim is the pair of crackpot conspiracy kooks who purposely tried to fraudulently circumnavigate the scientific process, knowing full well their pseudoscientific buIIsh!t wouldn't stand up to actual scientific scrutiny. This really does expose your blinding ignorance and breathtaking credulity. So desperate to believe the conspiracy. All those two clowns found were red paint chips that came from the red oxide paint used to prime the steelwork st the time of construction, and iron microspheres which were not only present in HUGE quantities in the materials used in the construction that were liberated during the collapse, but were also created in HUGE quantities during the fires and collapse. I cannot believe how easily truthers are duped, it's truly mind-numbing.
Secret societies like who, and what exactly do you believe their purpose to be? Be specific. There's no such thing as the Illuminati if that's what you're suggesting, just like there is no group of wealthy, evil Jews plitting world domination. I do hope this isn't the path you're taking me down because i already think you're an idiot, i don't need it confirming any further. This is what happens when you get your new from places like InfoWars 🙈
Fox news interviewed Bin Laden? Are you sure about that?? Lol, you're literally just making this up as you go. Are you referring to the ABC interview back in 1998? You really are all over tha place and clearly well out of your depth here.
As for Sadam, we KNOW he had been stockpiling WMD's and he'd even used them on his own people, therefore we had very good reason to believe he had them. He had plenty of time to get rid of them however, but that said, we did find his plans for nuclear armament. Last time i checked, nuclear weapons fall into the category of WMD's. Let's just pretend though you're right about America using the attacks to invade Iraq, firstly, why blame the attacks on Saudi nationals? Secondly, using the attacks as an excuse to invade Iraq doesn't mean they orchestrated the attacks. You do realise this right?
1
-
1
-
@astrofarmer9350 You can make these outlandish, baseless claims, but that doesn't make them true. Putting blame using the most flaky, utterly debunked reasoning on a man just because he's of Jewish heritage is most definitely antisemitic. Your remarks about an entire nation being "evil" confirm this. You're an antisemite, own it instead of denying it.
Silverstein and his conglomerate of investors, were victims of this attack, not the purportrators. They lost a fortune in the event which hardly indicates him having any involvement. The asbestos argument is a nonestarter on several grounds, it's utterly absurd beyond reason. To think the best solution they came to would be to hijack civilian planes and convince somebody to commit suicide by flying them into skyscrapers, covering Manhattan in a cloud of toxic dust just to save a few quid on asbestos removal is insane on so many levels, i struggle to take anything you say seriously on this basis alone.
Keep repeating the lie that there was molten steel, but your failure to do as i asked and offer ANY non-conjectural evidence demonstrates otherwise. If you knew of any, you'd be ramming it down my throat, but your only defence seems to be 'nu-huh, yeah there was' which doesn't really hold much weight in the real world. This again serves to show how readily you'll accept erroneous claims with zero evidence as long as it supports your theory; but you immediately reject facts you can easily verify for yourself purely because they oppose your version of events. You're so clearly not somebody who cares for truth.
How would you know it wasn't accounted for in the NIST report when you've not read it?? It wasn't accounted for because there wasn't any, it's that simple. Prove me wrong and show me on what grounds you take it on. Conjectural claims of fire fighters and the like, nothing more. Not good enough sorry.
Your next falsehood is again, your dismissal of another easily verified fact, that there was an express elevator and service shafts from lobby to the top. Yes there were 3 others which weren't connected, but ignoring the express elevator and service shafts again doesn't work in the real world. Take a few seconds to image search 'twin towers elevator system' and you'll see a diagram right there.
60% of the fuel evaporated on impact? Lol, are you serious??? 🙈 Where do you get this inane cr@p from? Cite your source for that little gem. Most exploded in a fireball whilst the rest (difficult to put a figure on how much for obvious reasons) flowed into the structure and caused flash fires whichbwere then sustained by the contents of the buildings. Some without doubt flowed down those shafts as evidence shows.
Again, having work done on the elevator system doesn't mean they were using this as a ruse to plant bombs. That's one hell of an assumption to make to say the least. Have you got ANYTHING whatsoever in the way of evidence to back that up? Of course not, because people like you don't care about evidence. If you did then you wouldn't be a truther. As I said the last time you made this ridiculous claim, how did the bombs go past the detection of the detection dogs? How and why did both towers collapsed precisely at the impact zones? How would any devices located there survive the impacts and 60-90 minutes of intense heat when they're so sensitive to such things? The other thing you fail to acknowledge here is.......the work did get done on the elevators. Those guys were quite obviously elevator engineers. You also ignored what i said about ZERO demolitions experts agreeing with you. Is that not a concern for you?
I'm not even going to acknowledge your Benjamin Netanyahu remark. Show me ANY evidence of his involvement and I'll entertain you. Again, he wasn't even in power at the time.
I know nothing about the secret dealings of the United States? And neither do you!!! At least i admit it rather than deluding because I've watched a couple of episodes of InfoWars!
The towers didnt collapse at the impact zones? 🤯 Wow. You must be THE only individual on either side of the fence making this DIRECTLY OBSERVABLE fact. I mean, have you not even watched the collapse footage?? Evidently not. There's nothing i can say to that. It's like denying the sky is blue whilst refusing to look up. Those towers CLEARLY collapsed at the impact zones; the truth community accept this without question because it cannot be denied.
Your next insane claim tht they turned to dust is again, which is sheer lunacy. Firstly that would completely contradict your explosive/thermite demolition argument, and this is solely the argument of Judy Woods (a proven fraud, liar and general whackjob who's claims were debunked by truthers) and her kooky cronies. The debris pile was as expected and all steel and concrete was accounted for.
Many ironworkers said that did they?? LIAR!!!!!!! Name ONE! That is a shameless lie and shows you for what you really are. The ONLY claims made about steel being cut was by moronic truthers like yourself on the grounds of a single photograph showing a steel column cut at 45 degrees at the base of the towers. The fact this would have done ZERO to assist the collapse, the steel column in question was cut DURING the clean up using an oxy-acetylene torch. By all means prove me wrong but we both know you won't do anything i've asked, because you've proven in spectacular fashion that truth has no meaning to you. All you care about is your intensely stupid conspiracy theories. I guarantee you won't provide a single name or shred of evidence I've requested. Your next response will be to shout abuse to deflect before running away, that's my prediction.
1
-
@astrofarmer9350 As predicted, you failed to answer a single thing i asked you. And with that we can dismiss your bogus claims of molten steel, ironworkers reports of cut columns and all the othet things you've failed to acknowledge and address as more lies you've failed to back up with evidence. Still refusing to acknowledge the existence of the express elevator and service shafts?
As i already told you, the bomb detection dogs were present prior to the attacks and part of the security at the towers. How would all those demo experts who seemingly moonlight as elevator engineers (doing a sterling job of the elevator overhaul, whilst allegedly rigging the place for demolition) got the demo devices past the dogs? What if the dogs had of caught them? A very real and high chance of happening, WAY too risky.
Regarding Israel, I'm not getting into that argument. This is regarding 911, so if you have any actual evidence of them being behind the attacks, let's hear it. If not then I'm not interested as i, unlike you, only follow the evidence.
So Bin Laden was a friend of Bushes and worked for the CIA now too?? 🤣🤣 You're mental. Fox news never interviewed Bin Laden before or after the attacks. Again a 10 second browser search would prove this quite easily. Just search 'Fox News Bin Laden interview' and see what comes up. Nada. Stop repeating lies and LOOK FOR YOURSELF!! It really isn't difficult.
Yes, that image of that one column that forms the basis of all claims of columns being cut, and of which you've created your lie about ironworkers (hence why you can't provide a single name), was at ground level. No need for scaffolding of any sort, you really are just clutching at straws. The image was taken on October 29th 2001 and a separate image from earlier that day literally shows THAT EXACT COLUMN prior to being cut! Send me an email address and I'll send you the before and after photos along with links to back up anything else I've claimed. And contrary to your again, baseless assumptions of my background, i was involved in construction for many years. Why would you presume such things? You just continually set yourself up to fail.
No there are most definitely not secret societies controlling the world lol, get a grip. Your ridiculous conspiracy theories take away from the real corruption going on. You really are straight from the Alex Jones school of crackpots.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1