Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "Joe Rogan on the Moon Landing Conspiracy" video.

There were some bodies situated at the back of the plane which remained relatively intact. There are first responder accounts of the charred remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which were used in court as evidence during the Moussaoui trial. There was NOTHING "impossible" about the turn Hanjour made as it was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to reduce altitude. There were no insane levels of G that military pilots wouls struggle with, that's total horsesh!t like everything else you've said. Back up your claims or quit spreading lies. As for Rumsfeld, the Pentagon is THE largest office building on earth so it was quite likely he would be in another part of the building. Such dumb reasoning. For the record, the alleged missing 2.3 trillion was later accounted for, was announced back in 1999 (as opposed to the day before as truthers like to claim) and was never missing in the way truthers say. It was merely a case that they were using computer systems that were incompatible making it extremely difficult to track between departments.
5
@jimbobalob2491 There were plentynof CCTV cameras but, as per the nature of CCTV, they were set up to monitor the perimeter of the building (eg. people coming and out/exits and entrances) and were OBVIOUSLY not set up, pointing away from the structure down the street. Why would they?? Believe it or not, they never envisaged somebody flying a 757 into the building and for such a camera to capture an object travelling over 500mph, it isn't very likely when they're set at such a low value f.p.s. It's such a naive, ignorant argument made in desperation. Who cares if we don't have footage?? Are you just going to ignore all if the witnesses, wreckage, or any of the other evidence we have that categorically proves AA Flight 77 crashed there that day? For the record, there is a still from one of the CCTV camera's that, when zoomed in, shows what is obviously a large plane displaying the American Airlines livery. But don't concern yourself with the actual evidence and reality of the situation because for you guys, it's all about conspiracy and nothing more, and that's why nobody of worth takes any notice.
5
brettski I'm sorry but you're talking like this is in question when it isn't. We have public documents proclaiming this missing money from 1999 so anyone stupidly claiming it was announced the day prior in an attempt to cover it up is easily refuted and demonstrably wrong. Why would they bother announcing it at all if it was as truthers claim?? It makes zero sense. Just another half truth, truthers seize upon in another desperate attempt to make the ridiculous conspiracy theories fly.
4
@bar_king_peezy9133 Well you'll be ok then given how you seemingly skipped school altogether.
3
brettski Exactly, 2 yrs prior as opposed to the day before in order to use the attack as a cover-up. Why mention it at all if it was the money used to fund an alleged inside job? Like i said, that's just illogical and makes no sense.
3
Oh shut up lol. Is there no end to yhe paranoia of you whackjobs? What's so hard to accept he has changed his mind after becoming better informed?? I hate to admit it but i once believed 911 was 'an inside job', but after some thorough research, it soon became evident there was no truth to any of the conspiracy claims.
2
@tek3311 TWA800 is a whole other discussion and i don't personally believe it was blown out of the sky as such claims have been adequately discredited as far as I'm concerned. But let's just stick to 9/11 here and not muddy the waters. Flight 93 was most definitely not taken down by a missile, no way on earth. The military had orders to do so, they admit this as well as admitting they truly believed it had been shot down when the news came in it had crashed. The reality however is that it wasn't and those brave men on board without doubt tried to take back control of that aircraft and the pilotsid everything he could to prevent them, which led to the plane coming down nose-first into that field in Shanksville. They'd have no reason to lie given how they openly admit the order to shoot down was given. No evidence of any missile attack whatsoever so unless somebody can provide some, i simply cannot believe otherwise.
2
@tek3311 Rubbish. You think a missile would hit the plane and the passengers would simply report a little bit of smoke on board?? The transcript of Edward Felt from the plane's toilet is pretty vague and fsil to see how anything he said doesn't fit with the official story. Can you explain what you mean by that and how it fits with the plane being hit by a missile? If the plane was hit by a missile, there would have been a hige explosion, instant decompression and people and objects on board would have been ejected. This clearly did not happen. How have you concluced the 'let's rolls' story is fake?? This is the first time I've heard anybody claiming this so can you explain how you've come to such a conclusion, based on what evidence? How also have you concluded that they didn't get into the cockpit? The transcripts from the CVR clearly show that they DID indeed intentionally bring the ane down as they knew they could not fend off the uprising of passengers. The debris field was perfectly in line with the official story so where you've got this from i don't know. That myth has been well and truly debunked. The only pieces that were found miles away were paper and very small pieces of sheet metal which would have been carried in the wind. All large pieces were found locally to the crash site, as were ALL physical remains of those on board.
2
@tek3311 Well done ignoring everything else and providing zero sources for your specious claims. There is no doubt they were trying to get through the door. Whether they did or not nobody knows for sure but it's irrelevant as the hijackers knew they eventually would and knew their plan had failed, hence why they decided to ditch the plane.
2
Weske Harry Is that seriously the best reasoning you can offer for a global conspiracy spanning millennia? 🙈 Weak. You do know we've been to space right? You know we can literally observe earth's curvature here on earth right? You do know there are many experiments that we can all do, all confirming the earth to be a globe? How people like you get through life with this irrational level of disdain for authority blows my mind, but let me assure you, nobody needs to believe 'the government' about the shape of the earth.
1
Says the tinfoil hat wearing member of the lunatic fringe who fails to state what would have stopped us back then, or offer ANY evidence to support your ridiculous belief. Care to explain how we've been able to bounce lasers off the lunar surface ever since the lunar ranging equipment was set up, or how we were able to point our directional antennae towards the moon and pick up the live transmissions being made by the Apollo astronauts in real time?? Maybe you can explain what it was we were observing when pretty tens of thousands of people were watched the trans lunar injection? How about you explain why America's arch rivals (Russia) didn't blow the whistle when they tracked every inch of the mission? How about the images of the equipment left behind by the Apollo missions taken by other space agencies like China? I could go on but let's hear you try and rationalise the above first. Good luck Mongo 🤪👍🏼
1
@tek3311 Succeeded?? I'd hardly say everybody dying was succeeding personally. The terrorists intentionally brought the plane down rather than failing, the CVR proves this, unless you believe the CVR data to be fake which is ludicrous. Can you answer the questions i asked you previously as i have addressed all of your claims? What did Edward Felt say that brings the official story into question and what evidence do you take it on that the operator taking the call would suddenly decide to conjur uo such a lie?? Your version makes little sense. Nothing you've claimed shows evidence of a missile strike, nothing. Like i said, they openly admit they initially believed the plane was brought down via a missile strike so clearly, they had no problem with doing that. What benefit is there to lying??
1
@tek3311 What do you mean it doesn't add up?? Of course it does. The last recording on the CVR qas 10:03. Again, what smoke amd explosions? If the plane was taken down by a missile, there would be no reports of smoke or missiles, the plane would have had a huge hole ripped through it and would have broken up midair, which we know it didn't. Claiming the government admitted the 'let's roll' remark was a lie is a total fabrication, cite your source because I'd love to know where you're getting this information from. I can only assume a notoriously unreliable conspiracy website. Of course it wasn't on the CVR, do you know what the CVR is?? How would a comment made in the fuselage be recorded on the cockpit voice recorder? Your argument makes no sense. The transcript is quite clear and the hijackers knew they had no chance against the revolt because they were outnumbered, so they made the decision to ditch the plane. They mpst certainly did breach the cockpit door by repeatedly smashing the heavy food trolley into it. No i dont speak Arabic an don't need to. Millions of people do and could easily translate it word for word. We're not talking ancient Hebrew here, this is momern dialect EASILY translated by any Arabic speaking individual. Oh p!ss off the coroner lied 🤣 You really are plucking this right out of your backside. Wallace Miller was a highly respected county coroner who you are accusing of helping cover up mass murder, that's disgusting. Show me ANY evidence of body parts found further afield. You won't because there isn't any. Only small, light pieces of the aircraft was found in the lake and the myths that form the basis of your ridiculous beliefs have been long debunked.
1
@tek3311 No, I'm saying they believe they didn't breach the door but they admit they don't know for sure so who knows. I don't mind admitting i believed they did but never did that much research into that particular claim because i don't think it bears any relevance to what happened. After now looking a bit more into it, om happy to accept that maybe they didn't. Unlike truthers, I'm mot immune to becoming better inforned and will happily change my opinion in light of evidence i may not have known of. Again though, irrelevant to the discussion as to whether 93 was shot down or not. EVERYTHING else i said however still stands. So now after being pushed for evidence to back up your claims, you've backtracked. I'd have had more respect if you'd just have admitted you were wrong rather than pretending you were 'just trolling' because that i do not believe for a second sorry.
1
@tek3311 Yeah because nobody knew that hey? 🙄 Talk about stating tbe obvious. They do not however lie anywhere near as much as truthers and regardless, the US government were not behind the 911 attacks 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
@tek3311 Just noticed another comment i didn't see yesterday beginning with "Believe what you will". In answer to that, i don't believe you. If you are just a troll, that makes you a bigger w@nker than i initially perceived. And if you do actually believe what you're saying, that isn't trolling 🙄 Again, it is not relevant for reasons I've already stated ie. there was a revolt and the hijackers dirched the plane rather than risking them being killed by the passengers and them landing the plane safely. IF this was all just a goverment ploy to trick the public, why the fk would they say they don't believe they did breach the cockpit??? That literally makes zero sense whatsoever! 🤣 They've been quite clear and honest by saying they do not know for sure and it remains a mystery, one we'll never know the answer to. You're clearly a very paranoid individual, probably believing the 'illuminate' are spraying us with chemtrails and lying about the shape of the earth because lets face it, conspiracy crackpots never, ever just buy into the one conspiracy; you likely believe them all 🤪👈🏽
1
@tek3311 What absolute nonsense 🤣 EVERY SINGLE truther is a liar by definition. Considering you're not one, you're certainly very much a truther apologetic, which i find utterly bizarre. But then again, who knows what to believe when it comes out of your mouth.
1
@leonkennedy8850 Are you seriously comparing a plane hitting a hollow steel-framed structure to one hitting a heavily reinforced, kevlar lined, concrete wall of the Pentagon?? 🙈 Jesus christ, what kind of morons am i dealing with here? There was plenty of wreckage, all from a 757 including the black box. The physical remains of all onboard retrieved at the crash site in what was THE biggest forensic investigation in history. 136 direct eye-witnesses ALL confirming a plane, not a single report from anyone if anything other than a plane. First responder accounts of the scorched remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which stood as evidence in a court of law during the Moussaoui trial. Damage to surrounding structures perfectly lining up with the wingspan and engine separation of a 757. The list goes on. What the hell do you think crashed there if not a plane?? You're clearly not aware of the volume of available evidence otherwise you'd realise how erroneous your argument is. As for explosives in the twin towers, would they be those magic explosives that are somehow immune to aircraft impacts and can withstand fire for between 60 and 90 minutes? 🤔 Seriously, get the fk out of here 🤣 You must believe you know more about demolition that the ENTIRE demolitions community given how there isn't seemingly single demo expert who agrees with you. Typical, delusional truther who hides from any opposing evidence.
1
@andyscoming4919 Thank you Andy, sadly they will. I guess it's just easier to watch and believe conspiracy videos than do proper research 🤷🏽‍♂️
1