Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "National Geographic" channel.

@AlexB-yi1lg Yes, that's exactly what happened but I'm guessing you think you know better and believe it was a controlled demo, right? 🤪👈🏽
9
@treatb09 Not true. Mark Loizeaux from CDI Inc. knew the moment he saw the planes hit that they would eventually collapse and tried frantically to warn the authorities but unfortunately, in all the panic and confusion going on, his warning fell on deaf ears. The designers even said the fact they remained standing for so long was nothing short of a miracle which enabled many to escape with their lives. Yes they were designed to withstand a plane strike, but the scenario imagined was them being hit by a smaller, lighter aircraft with all its fuel spent, lost in fog whilst coming into land and therefore travelling at around 160-180mph. They were NOT designed to withstand a hit from a 757 sized plane, fully laden with fuel travelling in excess of 500mph. Such scenarios are incomparable. That said, both towers stood up amazingly well to the plane impacts and remained standing for 60 and 90 minutes. It wasn't the impacts that brought them down, it was the ensuing fires. The way they fell were the only way they could have fallen in line with the physical laws that govern our planet. The top sections toppled at the impact zones before gravity corrected the angular momentum, bring them crashing down through the path of least resistance ie. through the remaining structure below. The fact both towers collapsed from the impact zones alone PROVE these were not controlled demolitions as any explosive devices located anywhere near those locations would have been destroyed instantly by the impacts and ensuing fires. Such devices are extremely sensitive to heat and geometry and controlled demolition go from the bottom up, not two thirds of the way up, down. Show me one demolition that even remotely resembles it. Also, try and find ONE demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed. Just one name will do. In reality there aren't any because anybody with any knowledge of CD's knows to drop them in that way would be impossible.
8
@bro-hk5xz Because it wasn't you clown 😂 Claim otherwise all you like but ask yourself why there aren't ANY demolitions experts who seem to agree with you? That speaks for itself.
4
Name one single demolition expert who agrees with you. Demolitions initiate from the bottom up, not the top down. The reason they came straight down is because of gravity. The top sections tilted massively before gravity corrected the angular momentum, bringing it down through the path of least resistance. Those towers were hollow, 95% air.
3
The sadder part is that you believe that 🤪👈🏽
2
@Baker-im1tq It was ignited jet fuel, NOT bombs.
2
Yes, by huge airliners travelling around 600mph, carrying thousands of gallons of fuel.
2
@Fahid911 Your feeble grasp of the English language was enough for me, but your insane belief that the American government was behind 9/11 really does expose the kind of basket-case crackpot we're dealing with here. Seek help before your mental health deteriorates any further.
1
@ghurabaa114xx Quit talking about things you CLEARLY have zero knowledge or understand. Literally nothing you say makes any sense you rabid lunatic. The 'building buckling was atypical'?? Seriously, what are you talking about? Yes, the HUGE top sections of the towers weighing thousands of tons dropping down on to a floor designed to withstand nowhere near the dynamic load being dropped on to it, WAS most definitely enough to have brought those towers down. Your uneducated incredulity doesn't quite cut it sorry princess. Bombs you say?? Maybe you can explain how bombs managed to survive the plane impacts and ensuing fires? How did they rig such a structure with explosives without anybody seeing? How did bombs elude the bomb detection dogs that were present in the buildings? Why no corroborating seismic signature? Why were any explosions/loud bangs heard out of sequence and completely inconsistent with a controlled demolition? I could go on but I've made my point.
1
@RahRoots777 Ok Mongo, whatever you say 🤪👍🏼
1