General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Dirk Diggler
Real Stories
comments

Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "Real Stories" channel.

What? Loud bangs in a huge building fire?? Surely not??? How unusual! And given they knew a terrorist attack was happening, to assume bombs is also extremely odd too right? 🙄 lol. I could list a hundred reasons why louds bangs/explosions would occur in such circumstances without invoking bombs. I could also EASILY refute any notion of those bangs being bombs on several grounds. The towers collapsed from fire.
20
Thankfully! Good riddance to such socially damning hogwash. Twoofers deserve nothing more than ridicule and i strongly advise anybody with a sense of rationale to actively ridicule such crackpots at every given opportunity.
12
@serjherman Nope, they were completely random, out of sequence and inconsistent with any controlled demolition. Why on earth would they set off explosives an hour prior to collapse? That isn't how controlled demolitions work. If you'd ever witnessed a CD then you would know this was no demolition. Please explain how both towers collapsed at the impact zones? Impossible in terms of a controlled demo. Just name ONE demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed or have you managed to convince yourself that you know more on the topic than the entire demolitions community? Reports of explosions going off before the planes hit have been completely refuted by the seismic data alone. Again, why would they set bombs off in the basement an hour to ninety minutes before collapse from the top down??? lol, there is no way whatsoever that those towers were demoed.
12
So even though his own mother said he had introduced himself on the phone to her this way before, you STILL say conspiracy?? 🙈 Need we say any more? I'm afraid that no amount of evidence could ever change a mind like yours.
11
🤣 Damn right, can you imagine being stuck with that??? 🙈
8
@Oldschooldan1 Bravo 👏 You have more patience than i do with these window-licking kooks and i commend you for trying. These morons are clearly broken beyond repair but your efforts do help those still on the fence who are open to opposing evidence and do genuinely have a concern for truth. Keep up the good work sir 😁👍🏼
7
@eddygoodwin7089 Oh Eddy, reading the blinding ignorance contained in your comments is quite tragic. Even after having it explained to, you still refuse to accept reality and clearly have no desire to try and understand. Some people just love conspiracy and prefer fiction to fact. Unfortunately for you, the opinions of those sort of people don't matter.
6
@leonbroekx They're all things we know for sure occurred within those towers that day, plus many other rational reasons that don't include magical, fire/impact resistant explosives. The point is, loud bangs were absolutely expected and are common place in building fires. As for the steel being shipped off, that was ONLY any steel that was shown to have no bearing on the collapse. Any steel that was of interest was kept for further investigation along with debris that was literally sifted through for years after the event. It was properly investigated.
6
@eddygoodwin7089 What would you like to know that hasn't already been explained to you?
5
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. No, yours disappear when i open the thread too but if you just click in the comment in your messages, it will take you to it and you can reply. Nice strawman argument though! 😂👍🏼 Just because i don't accuse Bush for something he clearly didn't do, doesn't make me a fan. I don't blame Hitler for WW1 but that doesn't make him my hero. Can you just address what I said and admit you're wrong about what you've said regarding buildings collapsing from fire? What's so difficult about that? 🤷🏽‍♂️
5
🤣 Which part of the debunking managed to convince you to ditch reality? What a truly bizarre conclusion to reach. Just goes to show, there's no fixing stupid 🤷🏽‍♂️
4
@jonathanvince8173 I see you chose to ignore the facts rather than address them in order to discern truth, just like every truther must do in order to cling on to his whacky conspiracy beliefs. This literally happens EVERY SINGLE TIME i try to debate a 9/11 truther, and this is why nobody of worth takes 9/11 truthers seriously or ever will. People who run from the evidence clearly have no real concern for truth.
4
@itzjcee557 Best comment you've ever read on YouTube???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Yours is mine 🤪👍🏼 lol
4
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. Bye then 👋🏼🙄
4
@rumble8014 Uh-oh, i smell a ReTrumplican 😬
3
@jamescameron277 Are yoh saying you disagree with those incontrovertible facts?? The degree of wilful ignorance witnessed by those window-licking dullards is breathtaking.
3
@Matthew Smith Ah, but Eddy apparently has 'common sense' so doesn't need a background in engineering to know the intricacies of how skyscrapers are built 🤷🏽‍♂️
3
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. My reply that began with the words; "l know all of this because.....". If you like i will copy and paste it for you again if you wish?
3
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. Arr you going to respond or just slope away again?
3
@Altt She's wrong about literally every single other thing she's said, so even though I've not checked, I'm guessing total horsesh!te 🤷🏽‍♂️
3
@MD-zy9xk Almost all calls were made using the Airphones on the backs if the seats. The one or two made on cell phones weren't made at altitude and were over land. We also don't know how many failed attempts were made usibg cell phones before they connected. Those calls were real, 100% and anybody who claims otherwise is being wilfully ignorant.
2
@BeastReview Unfortunately that is the downside 😔 lol
2
Why is their nationality a factor in this for you? I fail to see your logic sorry.
2
@jonathanvince8173 Didn't happen. Heat weakens steel, it's that simple.
2
@jonathanvince8173 Welding steel is incomparable to a steel under IMMENSE load losing strength through sustained heat. We see it happen all the time and can offer countless examples of this occurring. At around 550 degrees, the strength of structural steel is reduced by 50%. Given how temperatures in standard office/hydrocarbon fires exceed this, not to mention the fact we literally have footage showing entire floor slabs sagging and columns and beams buckling from the heat prior to collapse. Why on earth do we use fire-proofing if what you say is true?
2
@John-ed2wj A drill imagining 38 hijacked planes or scenarios?? I don't think so. Cite your source and prove me wrong by all means. Burden of proof is yours. Let's face it, you literally don't believe anything is a coincidence, ever........and you expect people to take you seriously?? 🤣 Coincidences happen ALL the time, every single day.
2
@Oldschooldan1 It's tragic such lunacy is so prevalent in our society. They have to be the laziest minds imaginable given how easily refuted their arguments are. Can you imagine convincing yourself you've discovered something so obvious that the entire physics community have missed? Talk about delusions of grandeur. As i said, i have very little patience with these people and after watching this episode of the series, being reminded of the kind of repugnant a-holes truthers generally are, i know why lol. Its all an unforgivable display of lazy-minded, wilful ignorance. Over 20yrs since the event and they STILL don't have a shred of credible supportive evidence that stands up to scrutiny to back up their crazy beliefs.
2
@eddygoodwin7089 Still waiting Eddie......🙄
2
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. What, like you shamelessly ignored my response and questions to you a month back? Hypocrisy, much? 🤔
2
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. None? You mean except for the Plasco building in Tehran, the Sight and Sound theatre in Pennsylvania, the Kader Toy factory and all the other steel framed structure that have collapsed ENTIRELY from fire without having thousands of tons of debris dropping on them from a collapsing skyscraper, resulting in massive structural damage? 🤔 Why truthers keep saying repeating this myth baffles me. It shows you just repeat what you hear on conspiracy websites without actually qualifying the claims made. This is the difference between us. I did, hence why i know full well the claims of conspiracy simply do not stand up to scrutiny. Aside from all the steel-framed structures that HAVE collapsed from fire, can you offer me a single comparable event? If not then your 'only ever time' argument doesn't stand. Comparing a concrete high-rise to a non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure is absurd. Concrete deals with heat much, MUCH better than steel. It's that simple. The Grenfell tower also hadn't sustained any structural damage and had fire fighters trying to put out the blaze. Incomparable for many reasons sorry. Wonder no more. Back to the fire fighters tending to WTC7, so what are you saying? We have four choices. They were either in on this alleged conspiracy; they made an exceptionally lucky guess; they were psychic; it was simply that obvious as they were fully aware that ANY non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure will ALWAYS collapse if left to freeburn long enough. It's the reason we use fire-proofing. Incidentally, the fires freeburned 2hrs longer than the fireproofing was rated it. There really is no mystery here and no requirement for invisible, silent, heat-proof demolition devices........or space laser 🙄
2
@AllHaiLKINGTIsHeRe3 Aw, don't spoil their fun 😂
2
@vodking Well i know there were literally thousands of people who directly witnessed the planes hit the towers, and i know there was plenty of independent, civilian footage of the second plane hitting, and i know there was 757 wreckage found at the crash site, and i know there were people hit by pieces of wreckage after it exited the tower.......but how can we be sure when we can't trust the governments MSM, d'illuminate, reptilian overlords? 🤪 lol, there's no way of reasoning with whackjobs like TI Joe. They see only what they want. Conspiracy theories make the stupid and dumb feel smart, and they're not readily willing to relinquish that feeling in hurry. Certainly not when they can find an echo chamber on forums like this, simply running away when challenged by evidence they can't justify in terms of their kooky beliefs, of which we both know there to be much. Still, it's all good fun right? 😁👍🏼
2
@TIJoe-te9qu Engines were found at all crash sites and jumbo jets weren't even invented when the towers were designed! 🙈🤣 But hey, who are we to question such a credible guy like yourself about the physics of a jet airliner striking a steel-framed skyscraper at 50mph? It's all 'just common sense', right Chuck? ✊🏼🤪
2
@FrankOWahl Sounds like a typical truther who's willing to lie in order to make facts fit with their agenda. Around 80% of those on that list have no relevant background, experience or knowledge of such topics and are indeed made up of all kinds of non-related engineering backgrounds. If you listen to the arguments of these people then you'll soon learn they bring nothing new to the table and just repeat the same, long refuted arguments the likes if you and ithers around here make. That isn't how science works sorry and they need to follow the rules if they wish to be taken seriously. They make up less than 0.1% of their respective communities and are very much the fringe. The AIA have spoken out to state they do NOT share their views nor wish to be associated with this bogus organisation. Nice try but no cigar sorry.
2
@FinnaRealtawk2323 The towers collapsed from the bottom up?? And with that we can safely dismiss everything else you say as the inane ramblings of a mad man. The footage CLEARLY shows the towers collapsing at the impact zones. To say otherwise is lunacy.
2
The individual you speak of who made such comments (although your take on their remarks is somewhat false) was talking about them PRIOR to the further training they received and PRIOR to them gaining commercial pilot licences. There was nothing spectacular or difficult about any manoeuvre made that day; they weren't ace pilots nor did they need to be. They were merely reckless. Crashing a plane is the easiest thing in the world so why you're trying to make out otherwise i don't know. It's an incredibly weak argument based on lies, ignorance and incredulity.
2
@VETTEDZ06 Erm, thanks. I'd say nice face tatts but I've never been a fan of American wrestling.
2
@jamescameron277 Researched it and found ZERO truth to truther claims. This truther myth has been well and truly debunked.
1
@VETTEDZ06 Yes, Airphone calls.
1
@VETTEDZ06 So where is she? Are you suggesing Ted is in on this alleged conspiracy also? As for it being a good story, facts remain facts whether you accept them or not. Those calls were made from Airphones.
1
@VETTEDZ06 No answers? Are they not reasonable questions, or do you prefer people not to question your poor logic?
1
Wouldn't you get frustrated by such insolence and level of breathtaking ignorance? He's a comedian, not a journalist and good on him for calling out those morons on their lunacy.
1
Of course it's one sided! Did you seriously expect it to lend weight and pander to long refuted conspiracy theories if the lunatic fringe?? No, this was meant to highlight how lost and incapable of reason some truther nuts are in light of opposing evidence. It just goes to show how for some people, regardless of the evidence, they believe only what they want to believe. This is why nobody of worth takes any notice of 911 truthers.
1
@TIJoe-te9qu Keep making dumb strawman arguments that only show how little you've reaearched this beyond watching notoriously unreliable conspiracy videos and blindly believing everything they say 🐑
1
@SM-mz2hz No. When did I say that?
1
@SM-mz2hz Yes because it shows you're not serious. Anybody who has read the Commission report or has even bothered to find out its purpose understands how this question is irrelevant. The job of the Commission report was to determine the events leading up to the attacks. The second the planes hit, that became the job of the NIST to detail, & they did just that with a specific study of WTC7 dedicated entirely to it. It's like asking why the Old Testament doesn't mention the Gospels.
1
@BenWinder108 You were a child and are still clearly child-minded given the lunacy of what you believe. Only unlearned dullards with youtibe educations believe what you believe which is why you all gather here to desperately try to gather some form of confirmation bias. The reality however is that your ridiculous conspiracy theory completely fails under scrutiny. Regardless of what you believe, it DID indeed happen as we have been told it happened. Provide ANY evidence that shows otherwise.
1
@noblecyborg-savage Fortunately your baseless opinion doesn't count for anything and what you believe has no bearing or foundation in reality.
1
@thomaseland3136 What a stupid generalisation which is of course completely untrue. Most people seem to distrust the US government, as do I. But that doesn't mean they're behind every bad thing that happens. Most people reject your dumb conspiracy for no other reason than it fails under scrutiny. You refuse to accept this because you're a conspiracy nut who's only concerned with conspiracy and therefore immediately rejects any facts or evidence that opposes your view. That's why rational people don't take people like you seriously and why you're forced to seek an echo-chamber of like-minded crackpot's in the comments sections of YouTube videos.
1
The exit hole in the Pentagon was mainly due to the landing gear which can be seen in the photographs. Obviously conspiracy sources don't want you to know this was the exit hole as it doesn't fit with their agenda. We have so much evidence confirming Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, it's insane for anybody to claim otherwise.
1
@jamescameron277 Fire is the simple answer.
1
You believe 'the government' should pander to the whims of conspiracy theorists who's claims fail miserably under scrutiny and have long been utterly debunked? You believe you crackpots should be given a platform to spout your lunacy and spread further ignorance?? Don't be ridiculous. Only the tinfoil hat wearing lunatic fringe think 911 was 'an inside job' and quite frankly, nobody care what you kooks believe.
1
@Meep P Oh well Meep, if you say it was an inside job then i guess that settles it 🤪👍🏼 Moron
1
Taken down in embarrassment by many who later came to their senses and realised just how ridiculous they were being.
1
Thankfully a personal opinion is subjective. If anything he shouldn't have humoured those mindless imbeciles as much as he did.
1
@inlinek939 Far too many things? Every single one refuted. Just give us what you consider to be THE most compelling evidence for it being an inside job. I am yet to hear of any that stands up to scrutiny.
1
@inlinek939 Indeed. I'm still waiting for you to respond to my previous message which began, 'Far too many things?".
1
@inlinek939 Well?? Are you seriously going to just pretend I've not replied? 🙈
1
@eddygoodwin7089 You should try to learn what resistance means to save future embarrassment. If there was no resistance as you bizarrely believe, the towers would have collapsed at freefall. This didn't happen ie. there was resistance.
1
You mean fringe lunatics who fail to follow the rules and/or fraudulently try to circumnavigate the implicit route of peer-review? Nobody cares what they think sorry.
1
@russellgood2542 Great, except 136 people witnessed it and all reports were of a plane and not a single report of a missile. Just to put into perspective of just how insane and absurd your claim truly is, a Cruise missile is 20ft long with a wingspan of 9ft whereas a Boeing 757 is 155ft with a wingspan of 125ft. You're telling us that those 136 people who watched the approach and impact (some of whom were even airline pilots who flew 757's) couldn't tell the difference?? 🤣🤣 You're mental. The damage to surrounding structures perfectly coincide with the dimensions of a 757 and yes, we DO have footage of the plane moments before impact that when paused and zoomed in, we can see what is quite obviously a large airliner with the American Airlines livery emblazoned across it. We have the wreckage to back it up, including the black box which when decoded showed details of AA Flight 77's final 11 flights. All planted right? All without a single soul noticing 😂👍🏼 The physical remains of everyone on board was retrieved from the crash site; all planted too? And please explain the blatant kerosene explosion that was quite obviously not a missile detonation. When you've done that, feel free to explain how a missile could have created the exit hole we observed, or how a missile took out lampposts on either side of the road and sliced the tops off trees? I really could go on all day but i think I've made my point and highlighted why nobody of worth takes a blind bit of notice any of your nutty claims.
1
@FinnaRealtawk2323 🤪👈🏽
1
LIAR!!!!! For your information, it was fire that brough the towers down, ot the planes. Why would youtube care about your silly strawman arguments based on blinding ignorance? To even suggest that youtube are in on this alleged (utterly debunked) conspiracy is the height of lunacy.
1
Liar or plain stupid? 🤔 I can't decide. Yes the towers were designed to withstand plane strikes, but NOT planes that size that were fully laden with fuel and travelling anywhere near those speeds. The scenario im mind they were designed to withstand was a 707 (the largest plane at the time of design) that was coming into land (and therefore very little fuel and travelling at a third of the speed those planes hit that day) whilst lost in fog. The circumstances were incomparable making your parroted point utterly moot. That said, in case you hadn't noticed, bother towers withstood the impacts amazingly well which allowed many people to escape. It was the ensuing fires that brought the structures down. Controlled demolition you say? 🤔 Hmm, strange how there isn't a single demolitions expert who seemingly agrees with you that the twin towers were demoed, so qhat you're claiming is that you know more about demolition than the ENTIRE demolitions community. Do you realise how mental that makes you sound? Maybe you can explain how both towers managed to collapse precisely at the impact zones when, as any demolitions expert will confirm for you, it would have been impossible for any such devices located anywhere near those locations, would have been instantly destroyed by the impacts and ensuing fires. The towers coming down did not resemble a controlled demolition in any way and no buildings that day collapsed at freefall. Seriously, could you possibly be more wrong? 🙈😂
1
Nice verse justifying murder.......but Islam is a religion of peace right? 🙄
1
@eddygoodwin7089 Great! So now explain the lack of evidence if any residue left from thermatic reactions and then explain how such devices managed to survive the plane impacts and ensuing fires. Both towers collapsed precisely at the impact zones and approx. 60 minutes and 90 minutes of being exposed to fire. I'm afraid that alone destroys your highly irrational theory.
1
@MD-zy9xk Strong women??? She's a disgrace and an embarrassment to womankind and humanity as a whole. She is the biggest Karen imaginable and an overall vile human being.
1
@steventhompson2511 The reality is, the ONLY reason MD respects such a repugnant, insanely bigoted, wilful ignorance is because he is on her side of the fence. It's brazen bias with zero substance. Charlotte is a vile individual with no concern whatsoever for truth. She believes only what she wants to believe.
1
@inlinek939 Because we've already proven what went on and have several unrefuted scientific studies to back it up. Until you chin-slapping loons decide to folllow the rules and learn how the very simple concept if 'burden of proof' works, you remain a laughing stock.
1
1) There have been several scientific studies on WTC7 that have all reached the same conclusion. Fire brought it down, just as the fire fighters tending to the structure that day publicly stated would happen hours before it fell. No mystery whatsoever and only those who have no real concern for truth are still seemingly confused by this. 2) The pilot levelled out prior to impact, just as you'd do uf you were coming in for a landing. No precision flying, just reckless and relatively easy, especially for somebody with a pilots licence, no concern for safety and suicidal tendencies. 3) Nothing to address there. What are you suggesting, that the plane wasn't real or wasn't AA Flight 77? That it was flown by remote control? Please explain to me what you believe and I'll gladly punch a few holes in your crackpot theory's with pleasure.
1
Typical twoofer guff based on half truthes. Let's just hunour your insanity for a moment, what exactly are you suggesting here was going on?
1
@John-ed2wj BS. You making that claim doesn't it true sorry. I know there were drills, but 38 hijacked planes?? No such thing as a coincidence??? Lol, what rubbish. You're going to have to better than that sorry.
1
@eddygoodwin7089 What i'm waiting for is you to get back to me to tell me what you believe hasn't yet been explained. When it comes to common sense, twoofers aren't exactly renowned for being bestowed with such a thing. If you did, you guys wouldn't pretend to know more about controlled demolitions than the entire demolitions community, NONE of whom seem to think the twin towers were demoed. That is what you believe isn't Eddy? 🙄
1
@drewhour I know you guys literally believe anything you read on the internet, but i don't sorry. You're not a pilot, you're just a lying crackpot. I can point you to a forum for real, actual pilots discussing this topic if you like? You might pick up some tips on how pilots speak so as to try and make yourself a little more convincing in future lol.
1
@hannahjean3553 Aw Hannah, do you need the comfort of an echo chamber rather than embracing reality and dealing with the facts? Listen to what you're saying here. You actually believe the fed employ people to come on to youtube to counter the inane, easily refuted and long debunked, scientifically rejected claims of 911 truthers 🙈 That's insane lol. All these people that allegedly know and who've actively helped cover up the mass murder of their fellow America citizens, yet not one, single whistle-blower? Sounds likely 🙄 lol. Truthers ARE crazy and ARE liars by definition, and all you've done is confirm this yet again.
1
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. I know all of this because i know how to conduct proper research. You can't just dispose of 200,000 tons of steel inconspicuously without there being some kind of paper trail which was of course all documented. Who said I've ignored any fire fighters? I've fully addressed this many times and it is truthers who choose to ignore the fire fighters, a good example being WTC7 where the fire fighters predicted an inevitable collapse several hours before it fell. So why do you choose to ignore the fire fighters? To address your question, the fire fighters heard loud bangs that they ASSUMED were bombs. These men were aware that this was a terrorist attack so it was natural to make such an assumption, not to mention the fact the towers had already been the target of a previous terrorist bombing attack. I'm sure I'd have thought the same at the time. We now however know differently. There were no bombs. As for the adult industry, well it just keeps going from length to length, i mean strength to strength 🙄
1
@NoLefTurnUnStoned. No problem. know all of this because i know how to conduct proper research. You can't just dispose of 200,000 tons of steel inconspicuously without there being some kind of paper trail which was of course all documented. Who said I've ignored any fire fighters? I've fully addressed this many times and it is truthers who choose to ignore the fire fighters, a good example being WTC7 where the fire fighters predicted an inevitable collapse several hours before it fell. So why do you choose to ignore the fire fighters? To address your question, the fire fighters heard loud bangs that they ASSUMED were bombs. These men were aware that this was a terrorist attack so it was natural to make such an assumption, not to mention the fact the towers had already been the target of a previous terrorist bombing attack. I'm sure I'd have thought the same at the time. We now however know differently. There were no bombs. As for the adult industry, well it just keeps going from length to length, i mean strength to strength 🙄
1
@TIJoe-te9qu What 'half of the thinking population' who've never done a days proper study on the topic believe, doesn't matter. Over 99% of experts in all relative fields, who seemingly have no issue with the official studies whatsoever, its their opinions that matter. I'm yet to encounter a single truther who's read the studies, that's how serious you people take your research. And no, I'm not relying on mainstream media, there are many independent sources to draw from, but you wouldn't know having only watched a bunch of conspiracy videos, believing now you're some kind of expert. You're not. Far from it. Look how you've claimed 'pull it' is an industry term in demolition, yet you have no clue as to what it refers to. It refers specifically to a structure being rigged up with cables attached to excavators, which in turn pull the structure down in a manner that doesn't cause damage to surrounding structures. Is that what you believe happened? If not then this makes no sense. It also makes no sense that a property developer would use that term when speaking with the fire department. In reality, it waa SOLELY the decision of Chief of Department FDNY Dan Nigro, who's decision it was, and he was referring to pulling the operation and pulling his men out and away from WTC7 in order to save risking more lives, allowing it to freeburn until it collapsed. They literally set up a safe collapse zone to pull everyone back to then sat back and waited for it to fall. How else do you explain the fire fighters tending to building 7 saying that it was "definitely" going to collapse, several hours before it fell? A question truthers usually choose to ignore.....
1
@thomaseland3136 The fact you believe the government are paying people to counter the arguments of d!ckheads on YouTube to help them cover up the mass murder of thousands of civilians speaks for itself. You need your head checking because you're clearly very ill. Seriously, what planet are you living in to think such a thing happens??? 🙈 I'd love to hear how you've concluded the official story to be a myth and discuss the facts you're obviously confused about, but that would require to have a genuine concern for truth, which you don't. Instead you just make even more outlandish claims about anyone who disagrees with your lunacy, is being paid by the government 🤣
1
@User0resU-1 Or rather it simply shows how dumb, broken and wilfully ignorant 9/11 truthers truly are. I think you missed the point of it.
1
@jamescameron277 You don't even know the difference betweem Iraq and Iran and no, the US did NOT say they had such weapons pointed at them, that's an outright lie so forgive me for saying, your unlearned opinion counts for nothing. We KNOW Iraq had used WMD's in the past and stockpiled them so we had good reason to believe such a thing. We also found Saddam's plans for nuclear armament so we got there just in the nick of time. There was no conspiracy, you're all just a bunch of crackpots who in my experience are beyond reason.
1
@TLO129 These people see no issue with the fact ae911truth demanded the study began with the presupposition that fire didn't bring the building down (even though the fire fighters who assessed and tended to it predicted it hours earlier) whilst immediately disregarding the several REAL studies by FAR more credible organisations that ALL concluded fire was the reason. You can't rationalise with such minds.
1
And? The simple answer in all 3 cases was fire. Is that seriously your 'red flag' here? 🙈🤣
1
WARNING - TINFOIL HAT WEARING WHACKJOB ALERT! WARNING Government funded roadtrip indeed 🤣🤣 How about you try and pick holes in the rational rebuttals made rather than making even more outlandish, truly mental conspiracy claims? You need some fresh air mate.
1
@jamescameron277 So fkn what???? Why would they??? How many people were killed in WTC7??? That's right, NONE!!!! So who cares about a building that was predicted to collapse hours before it fell by the fire fighters who assessed it?? Literally EVERY SINGLE non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure that is left to freeburn will collapse 100% of the time. What part of that are you struggling with?
1
@JanAndhisfiets It's funded by us, the people and independent from government intervention.
1
@JanAndhisfiets Irrelevant. The BBC is now regulated by Ofcom. What exactly are you suggesting? It almost sounds as though you're suggesting the BBC are helping cover up an alleged conspiracy.
1
@JanAndhisfiets Great, so they now admit it? Again, they are NOW regulated by Ofcom and not the same organisation they were the best part of a century ago, as most aren't ie. Irrelevant. Again, can you clarify what it is you are saying here in terms of this documentary and 911 as a whole?
1
@JanAndhisfiets Sounds like you're deflecting. Seen it, just your typical conspiracy boIIox.
1
@jamescameron277 I'm sorry, i didn't realise i was dealing with such a sensitive soul. I won't use any more naughty words, just for you. As confirmed by the fire fighters tending yo that building, which we KNOW widespread fires were left to freeburn across at least 13 floors (if I remember rightly, maybe more) and they burned for over 2hrs beyond what the fire-proofing was rated at. Dr Leroy Hulsey is a fraud and a disgrace to his profession. He has allowed himself to be manipulated and corrupted by a bogus and corrupt organisation of which funded the entire study, INSISTING it began with the presupposition that fire DIDN'T bring down the building. That is NOT how science works. His study is a joke, fundamentally flawed and holds zero weight in academia. There have however been several other studies on building 7, by far more credible and respected organisations, ALL of which (although differing in detail) concluded the collapse was the result of fire. Please explain to me why, if it was such a shock and mystery, how did the fire fighters know it was going to happen? They publicly stated a collpase was inevitable several hours prior to it falling. They even established a collapse zone knowing full well it was just a matter of time because as i told you previously, EVERY non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure will eventually collapse if left to burn. It's the reason we use fire-proofing, to offer extended time for fires to be extinguished. Without it WTC7 would have collapsed much sooner. You claim it's never happened before but in reality, it has happened prior to that day and since. 3 example off the top of my head would be the Plasco building in Tehran, the Sight and Sound theatre in Pennsylvania and the Kader Toy factory in Thailand. There are more. In respect to your theory that it was brought down on purpose in order to destroy some paperwork, have you ever heard of paper shredders? Would it not be easier to dump it in the sea or just burn it? It's just all so ridiculous. Your conspiracy theory fails under scrutiny whether you accept it or not.
1
What happened was the planes smashed through structural, load-bearing columns of which the load was transferred to the remaining columns. Eventually the heat from the fires sufficiently weakened those columns that were under a greater load than they were designed to withstand, and the top sections toppled. As physics dictates, the angular momentum of those tilted top sections was corrected by angular moment, bring them down through the path of least resistance ie. through the structure below. No physical laws were violated and there isn't a demolitions expert on the planet who believes the twin towers were demoed. The math checks out whether you accept that or not and if you don't, why haven't you written up your findings and presented them to your local engineering department and exposed this alleged cover-up?
1
@FinnaRealtawk2323 The fact you believe those kids were actors only serves to show delusional and equally paranoid you are. Of course they were genuine you clown! 🙈🤣🤣 Is your username a summary of your life by any chance? 🤔
1
@jamescameron277 Tell that to the scientific community, you know, the one's who's opinions actually matter. Not a single one of your many conflicting conspiracy theories stands up to scrutiny, unlike tbe official studies of which have yet to be refuted by you crackpots.
1
@thegreatestevil1616 And i love how you clowns always claim nobody talks about WTC7 when most of us are forced to talk about it more than the twin towers due to you lot never shutting up about it. That is of course until you're asked to explain how the fire fighters tending to that structure were publicly stating a collapse was inevitable, several hours before it fell? That usually shuts you all up 😏
1
Seriously Kortnie? 🙈 You need to understand and accept that the conspiracy claim completely fail under scrutiny. Some people sadly just prefer fiction over reality 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
@thegreatestevil1616 The fact you're not even aware of the studies solely dedicated to WTC7 speaks for itself. Your breath-taking wilful ignorance doesn't wash sorry champ. In short, the answer as to what happened to it is, thousands of tons of debris from the collapsing tower fell on to it causing huge structural damage and fire across many floors which the fire department allowed to freeburn. As we know, ANY steel-framed structure (non-concrete reinforced) will eventually collapse if left to burn. Where exactly does your confusion lie?
1
@disclaimer6872 Erm no, it was definitely murder. If somebody hijacks a plane and intentionally flys it into an occupied building with the specific purpose of killing those on board and as many people in and around the building, that's mass murder, not manslaughter.
1
By other training exercises that have occurred on days of other terrorist attacks, you refer to 911. Another dumb conspiracy theory that holds zero weight.
1
@briansearle6868 So much wrong with what you're saying, wouldn't know where to begin. No faith on our side though buddy, just science and verifiable data that utterly decimates all the conflicting conspiracy theories.
1
@WerZiger67 3000 architects and engineers of which 80% of them have ZERO experience or knowledge of high-rise construction, structural engineering or controlled demolition? I mean, who cares what the likes of software engineers or electrical engineers think about such matters?? 🤣🤣 THE most laughable argument from authority I've ever heard! lol. What is even more tragic and pathetic is that it's taken over a decade to collect 3000 signatures (only 600 of them having any relevant knowledge) out the MILLIONS out there, who have all seemingly forgotten, who have in fact INTENTIONALLY tried to fraudulently circumnavigate the scientific process. Want to try again Mongo using actual evidence, or is this the best you can do? 😂
1
@albertlaane8667 Yes because anybody who rejects the mind-bending lunacy you subscribe to is obviously a Bush fanboy right? 🤪👍🏼
1
@legacylife2530 I don't know, how much gold and oil did America steal? Any proof to back this up? As for WMD, Sadam was well known for stockpiling WMD's and had even used them on his own people so we had good reason to suspect that murderous tyrant had them. We did also find his plans for his nuclear program so looks like we got to him just in time. But then you probably think he was a nice guy who didn't need toppling 🙄
1
@Gencturk92 What a despicable lie to tell. Mendez lost his life in a case of mistaken identity. To say what you're saying is disgusting, you're a disgrace.
1
Seriously? Why talk about things you clearly have no understanding of? You are COMPLETELY wrong in literally every claim you make. Molten metal came from the thousands of tons of cladding, the plane and many other things contained within the towers. The heat from the fire melted it. No mystery whatsoever. What about building 7? Try reading the studies dedicated to WTC7 that explain it in great detail instead of lazily believing the nonsense you read on the internet written by people as equally ignorant of the facts. The short answer again is fire brought WTC7, just like it brought both towers down.
1
No, but do go on and explain how it relates to this long refuted, truly insane conspiracy nonsense regarding 9/11 🤔
1
Yet MORE unfounded, truly insane claims. When are we going to get down to evidence or are you just going to continue running away like I predicted you would previously?
1
@eddygoodwin7089 The fact you even ask that question exposes how crazy, deluded and paranoid you are. I already answered on the other thread you ran from, the one you actually asked me the question on. Again, no i am not working for the government nor am i even from the US. Just more deflection tactics. Maybe you can detail where exactly you believe Real stories streched the truth, or is it like i said, just a baseless claim?
1
@freebee8221 To say the Israelis said they were "sent" there is an outright lie and extremely dishonest. They simply took photos to 'document the event' just like every single other person who pointed a camera at the towers that day. You've taken their words out of in order to fit with your presuppositions.
1
There have been several scientific studies/investigations on building 7 and all concluded fire brought it down, apart from the one funded by ae911truth who insisted the study began with the presupposition that fire didn't bring the building down ie. pure pseudoscience. The fire fighters knew it was going to collapse several hours before it fell so to act like it was unexpected or a mystery as to why it collapsed is nothing more wilful ignorance. Do you think the fire fighters we're in on this alleged conspiracy? If not (and i hope not), then how do you explain them knowing a collapse was inevitable? And how can you say it came down like a demolition?? What experience do you have in this field? Clearly none because if you'd ever even witnessed a controlled demolition, you'd know they are very, VERY loud. In respect of that, can you explain the lack of signature booms that ALWAYS accompany a demolition? For the record ae911truth are fringe lunatics with no credibility whatsoever. Most have no knowledge or experience in any related field making their opinions meaningless.
1
They should blame their own governments for allowing terrorism to flourish in their land.
1