Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There was nothing extraordinary about any manoeuvres made by Flight 77 that day. In fact the fact he came in too fast and too high, forcing him to make the final turn, showed his lack of experience. He wasn't a good pilot, just reckless. Structures were hit on approach and confirm the wingspan and engine separation of a Boeing 757. It would be impossible for a missile to hit structures that distance apart, unless you know of ones that zigzag to their targets? 136 people watched that plane approach and hit, every one saying they saw a plane. There were even pllots amongst the eye witnesses who confirmed it to be a 757, as does the wreckage, including the black box. The blast you mention is clearly a kerosene explosion and nothing like a missile detonation.
Building 7 didn’t collapse at freefall, the facade of the structure did after it had become detached from the building. The actual collapse of the building itself was already well underway at this point as we can observe from the Penthouse collapsing first. Contrary to truther belief, freefall can and does occur from buckling. The difference between that and freefall created by demolition, is almost instant, not midway through the collapse.
Your anecdotal tale of structural engineers isn't really offering much. Have you got any names at least, or any of their actual arguments against the NIST investigation?
1
-
1