Youtube comments of Mr Grinch (@mrgrinch837).

  1. 333
  2. 48
  3. 40
  4. 33
  5. 28
  6. 24
  7. 21
  8. 19
  9. 19
  10. 16
  11. 16
  12. 15
  13. 13
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 12
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. 10
  25. 10
  26. 10
  27. 10
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 9
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 7
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 6
  55. 6
  56. 6
  57. 6
  58. 6
  59. 6
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 5
  66. 5
  67. 5
  68. 5
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112.  @Slava22222  I apologize, I didn't read your comment fully, only skimmed the first parts. There's a lot of people who just love to argue nonsense. Again, my apologies. In answer to your question, I get the math while on active duty and you are correct. We had a company in Tustin California that wanted to upgrade our F model cobras to the Super Cobra standards at that time. The Department of Defense said instead of spending 3.7 million dollars to upgrade a single F model COBRA to the Super Cobra standards they decided to spend 12 million dollars on a single Apache. What can I say, I don't control the credit cards. The Pentagon is spend crazy. At the time this is before the D model came out, the Apache had a horrible operational Readiness rate compared to the cobras but the Marine Cobra is a completely different animal. As far as the payload, you can mix and match whatever type of Ordnance you want depending upon the enemy threat as well as the temperature because that has a great deal to do with how much ammo we could carry. Both Apaches and Vipers have more power available so they can lift virtually a full tank of gas and full ordinance, ours we have to decide on whether we wanted to fly longer or carry more firepower. At the time the Marine Super Cobra was far more Superior than hours. I can admit that. But if you want to compare bones to bones, a 20 mm 3 Barrel M-197 gun on the Cobras have a much tighter shot group or impact points at distant targets between 1500 to 1800 meters than the apache. When a 30 mm fires off the dispersal pattern of those rounds go every freaking where. Ours was more like a sniper in comparison. All the bullets are landing in pretty much the same zone. You don't have much dispersion. Ours could fire between 12 to 15 rounds per second which worked pretty well for us in a direct fire mode when supporting ground troops. The Apache gun does have better range though. It's just when they fire, they have the potential to get a lot of collateral damage.
    3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184.  @just-a-purple-ork  hey jerome, I'm not sure how much you know about what's called the Air Land Battle Doctrine. I spent 10 years as a paratrooper and 10 years as an attack helicopter pilot. As far as the battleship goes, airplanes is what technically took out the battleships which are stationed on obviously aircraft carriers. As far as the warthog flying in contested airspace, it does not. The Fix Wings assets are controlled by awac aircraft hundreds of miles from friendly troops. That's why the warthog doesn't do anything in that realm, it's job is to protect ground troops like I used to be. There is never, and I cannot emphasize this enough, never ever a chance that an enemy fighter can be anywhere close to our ground troops. That just can't happen with awacs coverage with hornets, raptors, strike eagles, Lightnings etc. The A-10 Warthog does not fly against enemy aircraft. As far as losses go we only lost four combat losses. Compared to the hundreds of sorties that were flown in Desert Storm 4 is a microscopic amount. The fact is that plane can take more damage than Can Be Imagined upon it and bring the pilot back alive. I flew cobras, those are obsolete now but Apaches have refined skills that even the A-10 doesn't have but you need both. The only real reason to pull the A-10 out of service is for the money that they can apply to other programs, but it leaves grunts like myself vulnerable. Everything in a combat zone is a risk, that's why we do the job. If you're afraid to go out there and be shot at then possibly you shouldn't volunteer.
    2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259.  @Justin-dy2ib  just to let you know I was Airborne infantry for almost 10 full years and then went to flight school. That's my photograph that you see flying a huey in flight school. After that I wanted to cobras and flew those for almost 10 years. I went to the Apache transition, and I got to tell you it's one of the safest aircraft we had in the inventory. We take aircraft incidents extremely seriously. I'm not sure where you're getting this whole idea about the aircraft disintegrating and flight but that just doesn't happen. I think that you should probably find reference material someplace else. Additionally, the United States Army has more aircraft than the Air Force Navy and Marine Corps combined. Do we have incidences that occur, of course we do. It's just a factor of pure numbers but what you guys are laying here are just ridiculous. As far as the attack series, anytime we had an aircraft with major upgrades we change the designation. I went from flying the AH-1S through the AH-1F model Cobra all the way to the ECAS model in Korea. They look the same but they sure as hell ain't the same machine. Therefore they change the designator for that aircraft. This from a retired attack helicopter pilot. I realize that you guys are only listening to stuff you see online but there's a lot of bad information out there. Boeing has had a couple of spectacular incidents so now everything that they built is garbage? What in the world! Boeing presently has hundreds of thousands of aircraft in the skies and they don't fall out of the sky every minute of the day. They had a couple of incidences, that doesn't mean the company only puts out crap. The Apache is one of the toughest aircraft I have ever seen up close and actually sat in. I hate to say it but it out did my aircraft by a mile. It's tough to shoot down, not impossible but it is absolutely survivable. It's comparable to the Russian tanks as opposed to the Western tanks. They just don't blow up when you look at them the wrong way. So, in closing you guys are listening to some horrible information and just kind of spreading it around.
    1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312.  @philsalvatore3902 Sorry to be so wordy, just to add as far as a tactical perspective, I flew Cobras for 5 years out of Wheeler Field in Hawaii, and I live in California and have gone by Camp Pendleton tons of times and when I see Marine cobras flying up and down the coastline one thing that I do note is that they fly a whole lot higher than we do overwater. That makes him a great target as the lower we fly the harder it is for heat-seeking missiles to lock onto us. I don't know if they do that over ground but the tactics are the ground guys call us in and tell us generally where the bad guys are. We use maps or nowadays GPS systems to find their location and we sneak in low level, extremely low level pick them up through the 13th power telescopic sight unit. Once sighted the gunner select a particular weapon and then wreaks havoc. Our weapons range is so far away that you're never going to hear us, you're never going to see us. All that you know is that things around you are blowing up. A cobra hovering in bushes or a tree line from 2.6 Mi away is virtually impossible to see. But there is the odd grunt out there that may have you in Rifle Range but that's why we have the 20 mm autocannon slaved to the helmet sight system. All you have to do is look at a person, pull the trigger the gun automatically swivels in his or her direction and it starts unloading at 15 rounds per second. It's primarily a self-defense weapon and generally the pilot will control it while the gunner is targeting the enemy in the distance. Again all you have to do is look at your target and pull the trigger it can turn a human into a red mist out to 1500 yds. Keep in mind, we fly in packs of 3 to 5 cobras, if you start shooting at one of us the other two to four will take you out. If there's a grunt out there, my advice is don't shoot at cobras, or apaches. Or so the Viet Cong figured out 2 months after the Cobra was introduced into Vietnam. The bad guy stopped shooting at them because they knew their weapons gave out a muzzle flash signature which would attract attention from the snakes. They quickly realized that these things will shoot back, they'll shoot back a lot. Again, we travel in packs. If we don't know where you are then that's the best survival tool you have. Don't attract attention!
    1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. @blacklight4720  a lot to unpack here. I'll answer as much as I can. I was electronic warfare tactical operations officer so my job dealt specifically with the aircraft defensive systems such as chaff flare dispensers infrared Jammers and radar jammers. That is very in-depth but I can tell you this, along with all the electronic warfare equipment and flying low to the ground there is virtually no chance that a man pad will take out a helicopter. In the ukraine, all the Russians are flying in the nosebleed section. We don't do that. We skimmed the treetops. Missiles are not designed to go after aircraft that low to the ground. The avionics are becoming more advanced Through The Years along with microprocessors the weight of the components are lighter and lighter. The Apache and the Marine Cobras have twin engines, they have no power problems whatsoever. In actuality we had an engine that put out 1800 shaft horsepower but the transmission couldn't take that much power so it's been d-rated to 1180 to 1250 shaft horsepower. That way you don't destroy the transmission, the Apache as well as the Marine cobras don't have that problem so they can carry all the ordinance as long as they have hardpoints and full load of fuel, we have to tailor our fuel load and our weapons load depending upon the temperature of the day. The Apache has been outfitted with a wing tank so it could get better range but ordinarily we don't go much further than about 40 miles forward of our operating base. We travel at 2 me a minute so we can cover 40 miles and 20 minutes.
    1
  319. @blacklight4720 list of part 2, the reason why they needed that Wing tank was to go on extended missions such as taking out the Iraqi early warning radars. That is an extremely rare example. Ordinarily a wing tank would be used to Ferry the aircraft from one place to another. It's not generally used in most Mission profiles. All hard points are used to carry weapons when you go into battle. My opinion, the Marine cobras and that includes the super cobras as well as the Vipers are the absolute best attack helicopters under the sun. The only thing the Apaches have is the Apache can take hits and still keep flying. None of the cobras are able to take hits and not crash. The profile is made to engage targets out to 2 to 4 MI away. When you're hovering in the tree lines from 2 mi away you're pretty much invisible. With a tow missile I could hit a 4 by 4 ft box moving 2.3 Mi away. The Hellfire has a lot greater range than that. The Rockets along with the targeting systems has range up to approximately 3.5 MI. The only issue they may have is some loan Rifleman who can spot them hovering 20 yd away. That's why we use the flex gun. It can aim and put out bullets in less than a second. Beauty of it is all you have to do is look at The Rifleman pull the trigger the gun automatically turns and starts firing and you turn him into red mist. But as survivability goes it is the best flying but a drill sergeant once told me you want a guarantee buy a toaster. The pnvs / Tad systems have problems as far as picking out trees and such while flying so while I was in Ah-64 Pilots were using night vision goggles to get into the target area and then they switch to the thermal systems on board their aircraft. And this ANVIS6'S were the best night vision goggles we had at that time. I retired in 97 so I'm sure things have changed since then but as far as the avionics go again, the communications and navigation systems have only been enhanced since I left. As to avionics failures, while stationed at Fort Polk and Fort Hood we had 64 in the hangers next door. Cobras flew a lot more because the aircraft was a lot easier to work on whereas the a model 64's were a computerized nightmare. Most of the problems have been fixed they filled it the Delta model and the Echo model is even better. I hope that answers your questions.
    1
  320. 1
  321.  @Slava22222  I posted additional information a few moments ago that didn't seem to post. Crap that was a lot of stuff. Us principally about avionics. It was an Electronics Warfare/ threat officer. My responsibilities dealt primarily with infrared and radar jamming systems as well as chaff and flare dispensers. When you look at these Russian helicopters being blown out of the sky the reason is because of their flying too freaking high. We skim the Treetops and in addition to the electronic defense systems it's virtually impossible to bring a helicopter down by a man pad. Those missiles were not designed to hit helicopters skimming the ground, there's way too much interference with a surrounding trees and such that makes it virtually impossible to bring down. Russians don't know how to fly. Anyway, I retired in 1997 and the electronics were getting much more sophisticated so we are borg, resistance is futile. I can only imagine in the 27 years that I have been retired all of the electronics have been improved. As far as super cobras compared to vipers honestly, they're just upgrades. The aircraft will perform pretty much the same. As far as range goes both are carrying a considerable amount of fuel and the only time you put the wing tanks on the Apaches is for deployment. Except for the attack of the early warning radar systems in iraq, there is no need to carry the wing tanks. The cobras I flew operated about 40 to 50 Mi forward of our operating base. We cover 2 me a minute. It would take us roughly 20 to 25 minutes to get out to where the shooting is. Once we get there we generally have about 40 minutes available on station. The newer Apaches and Vipers are better as they can carry more fuel as well as nearly full ordinance if not completely topping out. They're a good buy. I'm not sure of anything more that I can answer for you. And again I apologize I thought you were just some guy who's screwing around again. I got a lot of that. Anything else you want to know just ask.
    1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1) the difference in having close air support from a helicopter as opposed to fixed wing is like having your appendix out with a scalpel or a chain saw. Additionally and something most people don't seem to know, Manpads don't work against a helicopter flying at treetop levels as I was trained to do and that has an missile detection system, an IR jammer and an automatic flare dispenser. 2) AC-130's are not sent in when there's the possibility of Manpads from the enemy arsenal. 3) A-10's are designed to take a hit from a shoulder fired missile and still fly. That's why it has two engines as well as the reason the engines are built on pods away from the fuselage and kicks out flares during the attack run. They're not retiring the hog for a very long time. There is risk with anything we do, like eating a peanut butter sandwich without something to drink close by. As well as drones can only attack one target during their mission while all the aircraft you mentioned can stay above the battlefield engaging threats to ground troops for hours. We talk directly to the guys on the ground and they can inform us as to where the dug in forces are that we can neatly remove with a couple of hydra rockets using white phosphorus (my personal favorite) rockets. We kill tanks, we shoot ground troops. We're freakin menaces to enemy soldiers as well as making them piss their pants because we can do all this from 2-4 miles away. They can't see us, they can't hear us. And while extremely effective, drones just can't do that.
    1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525.  @ByeByeDEI  Yes, of course she's going to lose. Why would you want to hire someone who's been a lawyer, a prosecuting attorney, a district attorney, an attorney general of one of the largest states in the country who is responsible for taking some of the worst criminal offenders off of the streets. She only served as, a senator, and a vice president. Why would anybody want that in a leadership role when we could have a narcissistic rapist 6 times claiming bankruptcy who insults veterans and Prisoners of War, lead in Insurrection which was responsible for the assault and battery of hundreds of police officers and the deaths of six people as well as the imprisonment of almost 400 people under federal charges of assaulting said police officers, and responsible now for their criminal convictions and records that keeps them from having any kind of a meaningful job and has destroyed their families, and has nothing to stand for except giving tax breaks to Millionaires and billionaires, and oh by the way lies like other people just drink water. Oh, did I forget about the four indictments and the one conviction of 36 felony charges. As well as more or less responsible for more than a million needless American deaths during the covid crisis, and who told simpletons to inject themselves with disinfectant. A guy who cheated on all three wives, the last one while she was pregnant, felt the absolute entitlement to walk into the changing rooms of minors at a beauty contest because he felt the pageant, rambles on and on about complete nonsense at his speeches and for some weird reason seems to love neo-nazis in a way Adolf Hitler would be proud. Yeah, one would have to admit that's a real winner if you truly don't mind the United States being further embarrassed on the world stage, and I do mean the world stage when they actually laughed at him during his United Nations speech early on in his administration. Unless of course Hannibal Lecter is available. Yeah, she hasn't got a shot against such a charismatic soul.
    1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583.  @jgw9990  That's an interesting assessment you have their but, one, the A-10s not an air superiority fighter. It was never built for that job, that's the job for all the F-series aircraft. F-16 f-18s F-35 f-22s. The A10 is only designed to take out grown targets that are threatening to our ground troops. 2, unlike the Sukhoi 25 which the engines are mounted closely together, the warthogs engines are on pylons that are quite separate from the fuselage. It's designed that way so that in case of a manpads, which are heat seeking missiles being fired at it and hit, the plane will continue to fly. Both engines need to be taken out in order to bring the aircraft down. And number 3, I doubt we would ever even attack China. Our aims are to defend Taiwan from a Chinese attack. We have no desire to enter Chinese airspace. But even if we were to attack China, it's likely going to be done by submarines with cruise missiles. That is by far the most efficient way. We don't actually have to set foot on Chinese soil but again, our goals are to defend Taiwan. Just like the first desert storm, we didn't have to go into Iraq. Just push them out of Kuwait. Oh, and one other thing. You mentioned the Chinese defenses for air attack. Iraq had the top of the line service to are missile systems built all over baghdad. We got in there pretty much like we had our own key. Didn't lose a single fighter during the most intense anti-aircraft barrages defending just a small City compared to an entire coastline. That scenario does not bode well for China.
    1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662.  @thegrimreefer3185  you honestly cannot compare the operational time frame between a-10s and helicopters, they're completely different animals. It's like comparing a trout to a starfish. I can tell you and I was going to give a briefing but I couldn't get the data through Three Corps at Fort Hood Texas that the cobras, the gazelles and the little birds actually had more kills than the Apache specifically for the reason you mentioned, they're a mess to keep flying and the weather was playing Havoc with them as well as the a model Apache still had a lot of bugs in the system. They require computers and software to fly, ours didn't. Unfortunately because I believe of politics I was not able to give that briefing. The American public would really not want to know that a 12 million dollar helicopter at that time was outdone by a 3.7 million helicopter. But the main difference is between the warthog and attack helicopters is we have a shitload more Attack Helicopters than the Air Force does of warthogs. We operate with company and Battalion sized elements of the Army. We live sleep eat and breathe with army because we are the army. The A-10s are generally attached in a Zone whereas we go directly to the platoon in combat. We use the same radios with the same Cipher systems, so coordination with us is a lot faster. There are times when we actually do get on the ground and we talked game plan with the grunts or the marines. This means we have much tighter coordination than the Air Force does and I'm not knocking warthogs, I'm a huge fan. I frequently tell people the difference between having close air support from a warthog and close air support from Attack Helicopters is like having your appendix out with a scalpel or with a chainsaw. Either way that puppies coming out. As far as survivability goes in general because we come in hovering very low and we engage at targets very far away they never actually know we're there. A cobra is only 3 ft wide, we can hit targets out as far as 4 1/2 mi. There's not a chance that they would see us or hear us with a sound suppressive rotor blades we fly with. Things around them just start blowing up. As a habit we don't generally go forward of our troops, we don't have to, they're the ones calling for fire. As far as being taken out by a missile, that generally doesn't happen because of the electronic warfare defensive equipment as well as the ability to fly so low to the ground that we can't be picked up by heat-seeking missile systems. They're designed to go after hot playing engines against a blue sky, not a helicopter hovering in a tree line four miles away. Fixed-wing or rotary Wing is i flying in a hazardous zone so anybody could get a lucky shot off, it's just that if we get shot down we can be picked up in minutes instead of waiting for helicopters to come and get us and since there are 6 operable cobras per company, I'm pretty sure unless we owe them money are fellow attack birds are not going to be sitting by while we were captured. The last thing that you're going to want to do is go after a downed attack helicopter cuz again, there's five more of them out there. Either that or we're close enough to our friendlies that will be having lunch with the grunts telling War stories. I can just tell you this, by airframe with the tactics that we use in the defensive systems on board it's a lot harder to shoot down a helicopter than an A-10 flying hundreds of feet in the sky. Bottom line, if you can be seen, you can be killed. I give all the credit in the world. Those guys are really hanging their asses out in the wind, us, we're slithering around like a snake in the grass. Very hard to see, very hard to shoot at. As well if you are close enough to fire at us with our helmet targeting system all we have to do is look in your general direction and pull a trigger and bullets are headed your way special delivery. The Viet Cong noted after 3 months in Vietnam they stopped shooting at cobras.
    1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1