Comments by "Miguel D Lewis" (@MiguelDLewis) on "THIS Is Why They Lied About Our History..." video.
-
193
-
57
-
23
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ghost-user559 I'm referring to English translations, obviously. The KJV, Douay-Rheims, and Peshitta in Plain English are the only authoritative English translations. So no, the age doesn't matter. What matters is the accuracy of the translation into English. If your English translation translates shachor (שְׁחוֹרָ֤ה) as "dark" rather than "black", it's a mistranslation.
You have to be specific of the "ancestors" you're talking about. Are you talking about the ancestors of Moses? Or do you mean the ancestors of Jacob and Abraham? How far back in the genealogy are you talking? Which specific generation are you referring to? You're being too vague. Generally, the Israelites have had ancestors from Ur, Canaan, Egypt, Ethiopia, etc. David even married a Hittite. If we go back far enough, Adam and Eve were also ancestors of the Israelites, and they were from Eden.
If you can post verses that contradict these verses, I'll admit that I'm wrong:
"Moses married an Ethiopian."
- Numbers 12:1
"I am black and beautiful."
- Song of Solomon 1:5
"I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt."
- Hosea 13:4
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ghost-user559 “And after some days my son Methuselah took for his son Lamech a wife, and she became pregnant by him, and bore a son. And his body was white, like snow, and red like the flower of a rose, and the hair of his head was white like wool. And his eyes were beautiful, and when he opened his eyes he made the whole house bright, like the Sun, so that the whole house was exceptionally bright. And when he was taken from the hand of the midwife, he opened his mouth and spoke to the Lord of Righteousness. And his father Lamech was afraid of him, and fled, and went to his father Methuselah. And he said to him: "I have begotten a STRANGE son; he is NOT LIKE A MAN but is like the children of the Angels of Heaven, of a different type and NOT LIKE US.”
- 1 Enoch 106:1-5
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Maxrodon Wikipedia is not a peer-reviewed journal. I ask for scholarship, not rumors or hearsay. If you look at the Severan Tondo, you can clearly see that Severus had black skin. It's obvious that black isn't synonymous with African as Papuans, Dravidians, Jarawa Indians, and Australian Aboriginals are black as well. Yet none of these people are African. North Africa was not Arab during his time. The Arabs didn't come to North Africa until the Muslim invasions. Your thinking is anachronistic. The Netflix documentary is a completely different issue so let's just focus on 'Been Here from the Start' for now.
I understand you, I just disagree. The song never said Cheddar Man was black by "today's standards". You've been brainwashed by Darwinism to think that black is a "race" and not a skin tone. This is a common misconception. Blue eyes weren't mentioned because they're irrelevant. The song was solely about skin tone. Skin tone is not irrelevant since that's the focus of the song.
I'm not entitled, I'm just a student of history. Darwinism has spread lies about black people, saying we're "uncivilized" and "savage" and comparing us to gorillas.
"At some future point in time, the civilized races of man will annihilate and replace the savage races: as the negro, the Australian, and the gorilla...the blood of some more humble creature flows in his veins."
- Charles Darwin, the Descent of Man
Also, the black contributions in Asia are well known. There was a black samurai in Japan named Yasuke. There's an abundance of anime and video game characters inspired by him. He's just one example.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ghost-user559 Moses wrote the code for indentured servitude, not slavery. Servants are not slaves.
"And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.”
- Exodus 21:16
"Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour."
- Leviticus 25:44-46
The KJV translation gives clearer picture than those unofficial mistranslations of the bible.
“But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.”
- Leviticus 19:34
2
-
@mish375 That's an interesting interpretation but you'll need to provide bible verses to back it up. Hosea 13:4 doesn't seem to be saying that God is bound to a particular country but that he revealed himself in a particular country. Even Abraham met the Lord face to face in the form of three men in Egypt.
"The LORD appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day; 2And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground"
- Genesis 18:1-2
His first son, Ishmael, was also Egyptian.
"And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is. Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation."
- Genesis 21:17-18
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ghost-user559 Not at all. I'm basing my theories on biblical evidence. You're making false accusations because you don't want to admit that Shulumite was black? You're also assuming that the initial meeting between Queen of Sheba and Solomon was the only one recorded in the bible.
The bible also doesn't say that the three men who visited Abraham was the Holy Trinity, but we can logically conclude that based on the description. You have to read the scripture using your spiritual discernment. Also going to extrabiblical sources for archeological evidence helps as well, as scholars have done when finding Shulumite/Sitamun.
Moses still watered the flock. So by your logic, he wasn't a royal. Shulumite keeping a vineyard and pasturing a flock is not unbridgeable to her being a royal. Also, why are queens and concubines praising Shulumite if she's just some poor, low class girl?
What verse says explicitly that Shulumite is from Jerusalem?
Being a direct relative of the Israelites and being foreigner are not mutually exclusive. Esther was a Persian, yet she was also a Hebrew. Moses was a Hebrew yet he was also an Egyptian. Sephora, the wife of Moses, was also a child of Israel, yet she was Ethiopian.
"Moses married an Ethiopian"
- Numbers 12:1
Israel was composed of many different African and Asian ethnic groups, including Kushites, Midianites, Egyptians, Hittites, Persians, Canaanites, etc. Even Jacob (Israel) lived in Egypt. So based on all the evidence Shulumite and the Queen of Sheba are the same woman. Even the archeological evidence proves that Sitamun, Queen of Semna is the very same Shulumite, Queen of Sheba recorded in the bible.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The flaw in your thinking is that you assume Europe was unified during America's colonization. The British, French, Dutch, Moroccan Moors, Barbary Pirates, and various Amerindian tribes were fighting for control. The Revolutionary War saw French and British soldiers slaughtering each other, The American invasion of British Canada saw the same thing. So, yes America is a nation of immigrants; but it's also a nation of invaders and natives as well. Also, the United States was never constitutionally Christian. If it was Christian, it would've ended slavery like the British did. Britian has Christianity in its constitution. And Christianity is of African origin, not European. Moses was from Egypt, in Africa.
"I am black and beautiful."
- Song of Solomon 1:5 ✝
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@magistar2243 It's not dishonest. You just haven't yet been educated on contemporary anthropology. What you call "today's standard" is actually outdated Darwinism. It's a pseudoscience from a bygone era of Europe's history. You think "black" is a "race" when it's a skin tone. Many different haplogroups, haplotypes, and phenotypes include black skin globally. So, you would only view the song as dishonest if you still subscribe to the 19th century Darwinist concept of a "Black race". The song is about the skin color and nothing else.
There is no attempt at revisionism in the video or the song. It's more revisionists to say that Anglo-Saxon identity is "British" when the Angles and Saxons actually originated in what is today known as Germany. They're Germanic originally, not indigenous to Britain. The song isn't an "assault" on anything, let alone African history. Black is not synonymous with African. When you realize this, you'll realize the song isn't revisionist.
If white people made a "Been Here from the Start" about Africa, and they show Subsaharan albinos, Duarte Lopez, and Ptolemy, they too would be correct.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@verindictus3639 Primary: "Septimius Severus, the first black Roman Emperor, who led an expedition into Northern Britain..."
- Walking, Landscape and Environment, David Borthwick, Pippa Marland, Anna Stenning Routledge, Nov 13, 2019
Supplementary Sources:
Romans and Blacks: A Review Essay, Lloyd A. Thompson & Frank M. Snowden, Jr. The American Journal of Philology Vol. 111, No. 4 (Winter, 1990), pp. 543-557 (15 pages): The Johns Hopkins University Press
Rediscovering the “Lost” Roman Caesar: Septimius Severus the African and Eurocentric Historiography, Journal of Black Studies (March 31, 2008)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@verindictus3639 Primary: "Septimius Severus, the first black Roman Emperor, who led an expedition into Northern Britain..."
- Walking, Landscape and Environment, David Borthwick, Pippa Marland, Anna Stenning Routledge, Nov 13, 2019
Supplementary Sources:
Romans and Blacks: A Review Essay, Lloyd A. Thompson & Frank M. Snowden, Jr. The American Journal of Philology Vol. 111, No. 4 (Winter, 1990), pp. 543-557 (15 pages): The Johns Hopkins University Press
Rediscovering the “Lost” Roman Caesar: Septimius Severus the African and Eurocentric Historiography, Journal of Black Studies (March 31, 2008)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1