Comments by "The Laughing Storm Born Again" (@thelaughingstormbornagain1297) on "Steven Crowder Too Anti-Gay For YouTube?" video.

Too often I look at someone and wonder are they a complete waste of space or does their existence have any benefit? With those like Steven I believe the only positive thing that can come from their existence is the lesson to be learned of what not to be.
12
@smokedsalmon3907 You know Sam is a comedian right? You think Crowder has humility? What other personality traits are giving to Steven that he doesn't have? Every time he speaks I sigh and just have to take a minute to process how ridiculous it was. Every time it's a face palm moment. If you think Steven has any relevance other then being the @$$ end of a joke then we have more then we could possibly ever discuss in a YouTube comment section.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 Your false equivalency is very counterproductive and dangerous. Coming to agreements on what language means does not equal murder and that's whats happening. The right are just upset because they just so happen to fall on the wrong side of history. Since means of communicating your point outside of violence require thought they resort to violence. You basically just said it's OK for the right to murder when provoked.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 I understand what your saying. Language is violence though. If people showed up at your house, where you worked and every where else you stepped to call you names, get up in your face and scare you, you would feel attacked. The real threat are the people imposing their prejudices on others through acts of verbal and physical violence. Not those trying to address what verbal violence is. Do you really not see the danger in falsely equating these things? When you say those that are being bullied are just as bad as the bullies you have really misinterpreted what is happening.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 Where in my past statements did I support violence? I have only argued that you've mistakenly falsely equated the sides. In Charlotsville was it a leftist that ran over someone? Last year were the mass shooter's leftist? Last year was it a leftist threatening to bomb politicians? Do left wing politicians ever call for violence? Are there leftist militia's? The evidence doesn't really support the 'both sides are the same' argument. Only one side has hate in their heart that breeds violent individuals only capable of violent acts. I support making points through discussion, long and frustrating debate. Like right now, the right seem incapable of this. They let emotion cloud their judgement leading to them devolving to insults(verbal violence) or actual physical violence.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 Seems like a violent answer. I believe the person was creating a thought experiment to determine the limits of your 'words are not violence' theory. Which you ironically answered with words of violence, subtle but clear. The left try to be clever sometimes they succeed, the right seem to only understand violence. They see it as strength when it's actually one of their greatest weaknesses.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 You misunderstand, I was saying it wasn't literal. It was a clever thought experiment, I very much doubt Rainbolt was being literal. If you think about it, it tested your theory. If words are not violence then how come certain ones create it? We all have to be able to agree at least on a basic level that certain words are inherently violent and should be treated as such. It's a matter of integrity, do the meaning of the words you use matter to you or not? What you think the words mean is't the only consideration that should be made, what the rest of the world thinks matters as well. Some can accept that this is the way of language and with time words evolve, social norms change, whats acceptable changes. Some can maturely come to terms with this to adapt with the times while others are clearly still struggling to keep up. Using the terms of hate/violence that those like Steven love, I hope will only be seen for what they are dangerous and antiquated ways of communication.
1
@hyperretroactivehyperretro5992 How about you just name who think on the left is violent. I shouldn't have to do all the work here. How about you name the left wing person of note that calls for violence. Was it Bernie, AOC, Pelosi, Shummer, Warren or was it any just one on the left? Like maybe The Majority Report, The Humanist, The Young Turks, Ring Of Fire, David Packman Thom Hortan? No none of them because they've all been outspoken about being against violence weird it would seem all of the notable figures right now in the Democratic party are against violence. That's only scratching the surface and not looking back into past Democratic figures with similar views on violence. (cough)OBAMA.
1