General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Strife
Today I Found Out
comments
Comments by "Strife" (@strife2746) on "Today I Found Out" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
No one should feel specifically responsible either. Isn't it everyone's responsibility to make sure we keep the peace we have today? And feeling responsible isn't supposed to express itself by silencing and demonizing anything that's even remotely on the right of politics, and that is exactly what you're doing.
3
No one should ever feel ashamed of something they didn't do.
3
The education system needs to change if it leads to crippling guilt and silencing political statements that are even remotely on the right.
2
@brittany5416 Of course you have blue hair. 🤣
2
@svejobaron Criticizing isn't the same as cutting in someone else's freedom. That's exactly what the woke culture wants you to think. But, if you want to play that game... You're being silenced if you claim MENA migrants/refugees are overrepresented in crime statistics, which is 100% true. Women quota to favor women over men instead of talent. Diversity quota to favor colored people and sometimes in the worst case white people literally aren't allowed to apply anymore. Getting arrested for misgendering someone. Getting arrested for posting a picture showing the Fuhrer worked together with muslim leaders. Literally silencing everyone who said Cologne NYE was perpetrated by MENA refugees. Putting transwomen in women's athletics which makes it horrrribly unfair for the biological women. But yeah, rightwing people are the "problem". Don't kid yourself.
2
Do you also teach them to have Nazi guilt and every white kid still has to pay for it today, 70+ years after the fact?
1
@new_romemusic4212 Why? So they can develop their own kind of Nazi guilt and pay for it by mass immigration and demographic replacement?
1
@svejobaron How could you not have read about that terrible night on Cologne NYE? It was worldwide news. How old are you? Well, it did happen. Blog writer Michael Stürzenberger had been sentenced by the Munich court to six months in prison on probation. Six years ago he published a text online in which, according to the indictment, he described Islam as an autocratic ideology and presented it as fact. At the end of his comments was a photo of the Fuhrer wearing his controversial symbol. The court saw the publications as an insult to denominations, religious communities and ideologies combined with the use of symbols of unconstitutional organizations and sentenced Stürzenberger to a suspended prison term. Now granted, Michael is no saint and he is definitely pushing it. According to the court, the problem is that he posted the picture without adequate context or description. If he had done so, the posting would fall under the Sozialadäquanzklausel which permits the publishing of anti-institutional symbols and the like for academic, scientific or historical purposes. Luckily, on December 8th of the same year the same court acquitted him of all charges. But the fact this entire legal proceeding was even necessary is just ridiculous. Anyone who read the Quran would know he was right about islam.
1
@svejobaron How could you not have read about Cologne NYE? The news went global. How old are you? And it did happen. Search the blog writer Michael Stürzenberger arrested.
1
@svejobaron To give you some insight: Blog writer Michael Stürzenberger had been sentenced by the Munich court to six months in prison on probation. Six years ago he published a text online in which, according to the indictment, he described Islam as an autocratic ideology and presented it as fact. At the end of his comments was a photo of the Fuhrer wearing his controversial symbol. The court saw the publications as an insult to denominations, religious communities and ideologies combined with the use of symbols of unconstitutional organizations and sentenced Stürzenberger to a suspended prison term.
1
@svejobaron Now granted, Michael is no saint and he is definitely pushing it. According to the court, the problem is that he posted the picture without adequate context or description. If he had done so, the posting would fall under the Sozialadäquanzklausel which permits the publishing of anti-institutional symbols and the like for academic, scientific or historical purposes. Luckily, on December 8th of the same year the same court acquitted him of all charges. But the fact this entire legal proceeding was even necessary is just ridiculous. Anyone who read the Quran would know he was right about islam.
1
@svejobaron Then read up on it. Right now.
1
@svejobaron Did you read up on it or not?!
1
@TaIlonIV Did you forget to take your medicine?
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All