Comments by "Scented-leaf Pelargonium" (@scented-leafpelargonium3366) on "Yorkshire Building Society CLOSES Vicar's bank account after airing views on bank's Pride agenda" video.

@craigwest4741 : Well they certainly have enough money. I wonder would they charge interest or obey the Bible concerning usury? 🤔
5
@karenpearson6991 : What "freedom"? Don't you mean repression (under Christian views)? 🤔
3
@rewdwarf123 : But that's the bank's point. He was using his religion to discriminate against others. The knife cuts both ways. You can't expect special protection and liberties yet not want to grant them to others. Would he boycott it if they put up a Happy Easter poster or an Xmas tree?
2
@cyberianwolf790 The sword cuts both ways. The whole Pride movement began because of heterosexual bigotry and discrimination. The "free speech" that they want condemns & judges.
2
@smike9884 I know many prideful and haughty Christians too. These things affect mankind, not just one segment of society. Take the beam out of your own eye before taking specks of sawdust from out of others, or in other words, Let him without sin cast the first stone. For with what measure you judge others it will be meted out to you. Judgement begins at the House of God!
2
@Missdoubletrouble541 Repression is not being able to be yourself and GIVING UP YOUR FREEDOM in order to follow the Messiah named Yeshua (by God in His lifetime, before the non-Jews changed it into the man-made terms you use, namely "Christ" and "Jesus"). Certain love is prohibited by the Church, so freedom is certainly curbed. Yeshua was against religious hypocrisy, which is what I see today masquerading as Christianity in the churches & cathedrals today. 🙃
2
@foundthetruth2003 : Yes, within the churches. 🙃
1
@rangreen6387 : Hello True Christian with Christ living in your heart and defending righteousness. ✝️✝️✝️ What does "BS" stand for in your encouraging sermon? ("Biblical Statement"?) 🤔
1
@karenpearson6991 Because Christians only inpose their version of love that is allowed in their eyes according to their religious doctrine. That is repressive if you are not 100% heterosexual and when Christian vicars complain to banks about any representation of non-heterosexuality. What about criticising companies for displaying Christian symbols at Christmas and Easter? Just ban all expression then it will be an even playing field for all.
1
@robot336 A robot typed this.
1
@medler2110 If I were to complain to the bank for putting up symbols for the Christian festival of Christmas as it doesn't match my beliefs and therefore objectionable to me by writing a letter criticising them would the likes of this vicar and his cronies say that that is repression of their rights as Christians? It's all acceptable until the shoe's on the other foot. Bunch of hypocrites.
1
@kimdeambrosis : Your language sounds pretty intimidating to me. 🤯🤬
1
@serenashaw-q3y Who needs a "vicar"? The only Person in history who was truly VICARIOUS was Jesus Christ, no one else.
1
@rewdwarf123 His "comment" was against Gay Pride, which IS discriminatory. If I complained about some Christian celebration being displayed in a bank would I be discriminating against Christians (in letter form like the good Reverend) or am I just making a "comment"? I think you will find the vicar's comment had quite a direct negative agenda.
1
@rewdwarf123 They are now that it's come to public knowledge, but his stance is still discriminatory 100%.
1
@CS-mo7xp Well we accept crass commercial advertising and images of Church festivals in most bank branches (except when I lived in Israel), yet those religious adherents (to Christianity) object to anything else other than their own promotion and interests. No tolerance. No love.
1
@rewdwarf123 Yes, the bank should just stick to banking and the vicar should stick to vicaring. If a bank put up paraphernalia up for the Christian festivals of Chrismas and Easter (as they do) if I were to write to them to complain as it does not represent my belief system, would I be "just making a comment" or would I actually be discriminating against Christianity outside of my rights in an official complaint letter? 🤔 What is good for the goose is good for the gander.
1
@rewdwarf123 I am not offended. The vicar was. He chose to write in complaint.
1
@WhyteZone Islam is as dominating as Christianity no matter what the numbers are or where I live. Religion tells other people what to do and their adherents make moral judgements on all. 🙃
1
@dpoole72dp : SIN = TRANSGRESSION OF THE LAW (OF GOD). Have you transgressed? 🤔 Pride is not all of sin on this planet, but only one. Others include lying, gossip, slander, theft, eating unclean animals ("ABOMINATION!"), not keeping the Sabbath of the LORD holy, etc. I have met many prideful, haughty, condescending, self-righteous, judgemental, condemnatory, and generally icy cold distant unfriendly unthoughtful and unkind Christians who all clearly sin.
1
 @jillosler9353 There are SIX more! 🙃
1
 @Adrian-jk4kx I find paedophile clergy in the 'perversity' bracket. Priests it should be beasts. 🙃
1
I'll stop eating Yorkshire puddings.
1
@ianbetts4435 : It is worrying that Christianity still goes. 😒
1
@Christina-uh8xk : Who is "we" ? 🤔
1
@CatBlack01 : Because everyone is trying to indocrinate and influence other people's minds.
1
@tubasil8786 What are you talking about?! Free speech need not descend into bigotry and hate crime. Just read some of the comments on here to get a sample of the narrowmindedness.
1
@healingvibrations7845 That's fine. If I have commited some crime I will admit it. Otherwise you are just acting out of intolerance and bigotry. What is reportable about my comments? 🤔 "With whatever judgement you measure out to others it will be measured unto you." (The Bible.)
1
@barryj388 My point is that "we" is talking for everyone. It does not apply to me, therefore I ask why the word "we" is used. Do you really lack the ability to comprehend that nuance?
1
@rb1062 There is intolerance on both sides. Both need to live and let live. Constant rejection will not endear your opponent to your side. There is nothing but negativity engendered here.
1
@brucejackson4219 So if that is the case it is does not apply to all readers. "We" sounds pretty universal and inclusive. I suppose other people can use "we" to describe those are not anti-Pride or anti-gay as opposed to the many of the commenters on here and the nice vicar. We just have to guess which "we" is which. 🙃
1
@brucejackson4219 😒
1
@healingvibrations7845 I have never reported anyone before, but I just did. Equality and fairness. Let YouTube decide why you are targeting me.
1
@brucejackson4219 I did read the entire text and understood it, and objected to the word "we" meaning only one group of people, when it normally means a wide audience, but in her narrow context I understood it, so I wasn't being ambiguous, but was pointing out the obvious and awful one-sideness of her exclusive members only "we." She was being mischievous in that, not me. 🙃
1
@brucejackson4219 😑
1
@brucejackson4219 You shouldn't have butted in then. I was asking Christina directly. You took it upon yourself to interject ad nauseum. Shalom ("goodbye") ! Maybe keep your nose out in future when your opinion isn't being asked for.
1
@loonranger469 : Whenever that vicar did.
1
@MartinJG100 : John Newton was a wretch. 🙃
1
@rb1062 And you do? 🤔
1