Comments by "OK" (@OK-pi6fq) on "'Fisherman's Blues' Could Lead Supreme Court to Overturn Chevron" video.

  1. I understand how this is being painted to look, but the point is if you want a business you have to pay for all the parts to operate it. If you need a monitor to operate it too becomes an operating cost. The point of removing this cost from businesses is to weaken or kill the epa or other regulatory structures as if the government has to foot the bill to monitor every company from doing harm to the environment or workers or protecting social security it will be too much cost for the government ultimately weakening them to a point of failure to do their job. Every one of the things mentioned are drastically good for the masses but bad for business. The supreme court is hard core republican, and republicans have wanted to kill ( with countless efforts to do so ( sneaky with social security, but still do it)) all of those programs. They tried and did real damage to the spa. They are in mid attempt to dismantle many labor laws that protect workers, and want to dismantle social security. I feel like the Supreme Court will change this by selling it I. A way that the population will not understand the writing like this video. That talks about it as a I’m paying for a product you’re making me have, but not as an operating cost. You pay for services in business all the time that includes the operating cost of the business selling it. Gas, electricity, building code requirements, and inspections. In fact everything you purchase for your business comes with the cost to produce it or operate it. Regulations are necessary, as companies do not will not do the right thing on their own, and it got us to the point that we killed off nearly everything in a few generations.
    3