Comments by "Sandy Tatham" (@sandytatham3592) on "'We will return to our homeland': Dr Ghada Karmi on her experience as a Nakba survivor" video.
-
9
-
6
-
2
-
2
-
@tarana9329 : The Jewish people are #indigenous to the Holy Land, not Germany. When the Allied Powers (British, French, etc) defeated the Ottomans in 1918 they were under no obligation to give the land to anyone, but "in a spirit of democracy" and in return for support in the war effort, they chose to offer it to the occupants for self-determination. The Arabs got 99% of the Ottoman Middle East land (today's Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Saudi Arabia). The Jewish land forms only 1% of the former Ottoman Middle East land, and one-fifth of Israeli citizens are Arabs whose families accepted equality under the law with Jewish rule. Those Arabs who were hostile to Jewish rule should have moved to Arab lands, or accepted the 1947 partition plan and moved there.
Millions of people around the world in the last century have been #displaced through the creation of new nation states. In 1924 around 1.5 million Greeks and Turks were forced into a population exchange when Turkey was created. In 1947 up to 18 million people in South Asia were forced to move to the newly created Pakistan or to India. After the creation of Israel in 1948, around 800,000 Jews were forced out or had to flee their multi-generational homes in Arab countries.
Why are the Arabs who were living in Palestine in 1948, and who sided with the five Arab militaries which attacked the new state of Israel, a 'special cause' compared with all of the other refugees around the world? Why did they get their own refugee organisation UNRWA which was designed to perpetuate the limbo status of the Arabs from Palestine (some who were still relatively new arrivals to the area) instead of resettling them elsewhere like other displaced peoples?
I suggest you watch the 5min video called "Does Israel Occupy the West Bank" where Professor Eugene Kontorovich explains the international precedents which led to the dividing up of the land after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in WWI.
1
-
@NikoBellaKhouf2 : I understand that people might not be happy, but ever since humans existed they've moved around the globe, fought with each other, come to some resolution, and then got on with life. Over 750, 000 Jews were exiled or expelled from Arab countries over the last 100 years. Do they still WHINE about that today, or have they got on with their lives in their new countries?
I'm pleased that 'forced population exchanges' are a thing of the past thanks to international conventions. It seems that wherever Islam grows in power it forces its will on the minority populations, so your comment about it "not being necessary" is just nonsense. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey, Iraq, Egypt, Lebanon, etc. are all fairly recent examples of the persecution and exile of minorities living under Islamic rule.
Israel already shares the land with 21% Arab Israeli citizens, most of them being Muslims. They have #equal rights under the law with Jews and other minorities, and they have freedom to worship. The vast majority of these Arab Israelis say they prefer Jewish rule to that of the corrupt Arab Palestinian rule.
Wars have consequences. When the Ottoman Caliphate was DEFEATED in 1918, they didn't get to choose who ended up with what land. However, the Arab occupants of the Middle East were granted self-rule over 99% of that broken-up Ottoman land!!! The #indigenous Jews of Israel want less than 1% and they SHARE it with Arabs. I suggest you watch the 5min video called "Does Israel Occupy the West Bank" where Professor Eugene Kontorovich explains the international precedents which led to the dividing up of the land after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in WWI.
As for your comment below that "we're only getting stronger", that's sadly delusional. It's Israel which is getting stronger. Arab countries are finally starting to openly normalise their relations with Israel via the #AbrahamAccords. I don't hate anyone. I encourage my Muslim friends to use better critical analysis and to stop believing the propaganda.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@foreveravatar5874
Yes I do support human rights and I'm against the inhumane treatment by UNRWA which keeps the so-called 'Palestinians', with their special redefinition of refugee status, in perpetual limbo wherever they are living. The Arab countries do not generally give citizenship to the 'Palestinians' in order to keep them dissatisfied and resentful. This makes them #weapons against the Jewish state of Israel. But this is changing, so I am hopeful of a resolution to the problem in the coming decade.
Israel has full legitimacy for their nation state. They are obligated to protect ALL of their citizens, including the two million or so Arab citizens and other minority groups such as the Druze and Circassians, against the terror wave that we see coming out of Gaza and Judea and Samaria (West Bank) these days. They are also obligated to protect the 100,000 or so workers from Gaza or Judea and Samaria who spend their days earning a good living in Israel, or those 'Palestinians' who are being treated in Israeli hospitals.
I support all displaced 'Palestinians' being given support by the UNHCR and other organisations to apply for resettlement and citizenship in other countries, for example in my country Australia. I've seen reports that those living in refugee camps in Lebanon are not permitted to make applications for resettlement in Australia, probably because Hezbollah does not want the refugee numbers diminished. Remember that thousands and thousands of people make money from perpetuating this horrible refugee situation. It has become its own industry. And the leaders of the Arab organisations within the Palestinian Territories are now billionaires and millionaires. There is NO incentive to change anything. And there are the people who live safely outside the area who support it without offering any positive solutions.
I'm living in Sinai, Egypt. This country also 'blockades' Gaza. Egypt also puts Gaza under 'military occupation' if you prefer to call it that. Egypt doesn't want the terror regimes to spread here, any more than they've already done so. It's not 'apartheid' to defend your country against terror regimes, particularly when we know they are part of the larger threat of Iran's Islamic regime, or even part of the resurgence of the Islamic State in the region. I hope that clarifies my position on this subject for you.
1
-
1