Comments by "" (@zachrodan7543) on "After Roe v. Wade, What Next?" video.

  1. I find it hard to believe that the court would refrain from arguing that contraception and decisions about who to have intimate relationships "pertain to potential life". the whole point of contraception is to prevent the unintentional creation of "potential life", and having non-heterosexual intimate relations means you are doing nothing with your potential to contribute to "potential life". I don't buy that they will refrain from making such arguments if given the chance, and it terrifies me that they would prioritize the "life" of a "potential life" over the "liberty and pursuit of happiness" of an active, existing life.
    67
  2. does this mean that an unwilling pregant mother who is unable to get an abortion in a state like arizona now has the right to sue the fetus for making a mess of her body and ruining her plans for the future? because one of the rights that comes with personhood is the right to be sued
    13