Comments by "Julian Petkov" (@julianpetkov8320) on "Facebook bans 'stop the steal' content" video.

  1.  Ulitarism  "Turns out businesses don't like to do business with DOMESTIC TERRORISTS. Who knew?" ...until you get declared "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS" yourselves. 😁
    2
  2.  @drewb2901  They don't turn the comments off for you. They turn them off to block the Truthers. Liberals and Conservatives are welcome to bicker all they want because it only reinforces the fake narrative. You guys only disagree on the interpretation of it, and accept it as real.
    1
  3.  @drewb2901  I am talking about their yutube channel. I don't know what they do on their own webpage. I wouldn't be surprised if they moderate their own webpage. So yeah, they do engage in censorship.
    1
  4.  @soyoucametosee7860  DATA is much smarter than Zuck, but Zuck steals DATA.😁
    1
  5. @cronemagic "I type everything and paste the link in so everyone can see I am fact-based" I don't see any links from you. Censored?
    1
  6.  @Locoandchooch  Yes the Liberals are hypocrites but hey are not Left.
    1
  7. Yes, Facebook is stealing user data. Maybe that is why "stop the steal" triggered them. 😁
    1
  8.  @RUTHLESSambition5  "we write the rules" Which social media do you own?
    1
  9.  @ThatGuy-tg7uj  Facebook has never been for Free Speech. They started censoring and deleting Truthers a decade before the started censoring Conservatives. This is why I don't support Liberals and Conservatives - you are jumping with joy when somebody gets censored and you even mock them, then you cry like little girls when they finally come for you.
    1
  10.  @brianrussell7691  "you can have all the free speech you want, just so you don’t use your fabricated stories" Umm, Facebook has been censoring people for over a decade, on vast array of subjects, if they contradict the Official Mainstream Narrative. Free Speech does not begin and end where your State Propaganda Scholasticism begins and ends. People hold alternative opinions on many subjects and for a very good reason.
    1
  11.  @timothymiddleton6651  ...and they should tank if they don't care for the voice of the People.
    1
  12. @Jason Pick one - Public Platform or Private Business. They shouldn't be protected under Section 230 if they cherry-pick which opinions to allow.
    1
  13.  @BrooklynBeTheBoro  ...and 140 million Americans rejected biden. Now what?
    1
  14. @Jason Yes I am a Socialist, and no, they can't cherry-pick what to allow if they are protected as a Public Platform under Section 230. North Korea and China are not Socialist countries. They are Communist Dictatorships.
    1
  15. @Jason What do you mean? They have a full blown censorship apparatus. I am against Censorship.
    1
  16. @Jason Social Media are not pubs. If someone is a threat then let the threatened user call the police. This is what youtube tells me every time I file a complaint about threats. Neither Facebook nor any other media, ever cared for my safety. Youtube actually demonetizes and even deletes successful channels only because they have opinions alternative to the mainstream, so it is not about business either. They just want to maintain the status quo and shape public opinion.
    1
  17. @Jason If they don't want to be a Public Platform then they should apply for a Publisher. The internet should become a Basic Human Right, and the Big Tech should be categorized as Public Utilities. This is what I believe.
    1
  18.  @1Biswet  News and Social Media should be forbidden to censor comments. Got a problem with a comment - then the police should handle it. Hire some police and open comment departments.
    1