Comments by "Julian Petkov" (@julianpetkov8320) on "Ukraine: Sending tanks weakens UK forces, says Army's top general" video.

  1.  @davidkottman3440  The Budapest memorandum was demanded by USUK as part of the Nuclear Reduction demands against weak Russia at the time. It has nothing to do with Russia disarming Ukraine.
    2
  2.  @gambrydew2059  Agreed. It needs to be scrapped. What better place to sink it than the Black Sea.
    2
  3. USUK financed a hostile coup in 2014 (Obama: we spent $5 billion). This is direct violation of the security assurances.
    1
  4. No. It was made for "protection" against disobedient 3rd world colonies - Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria.
    1
  5.  @inconvenientfacts8896  No, they can't produce them any more. OPEC+ and BRICS have refused to finance the USUK war machine. Even if they could, they are still hand made and 83/pa is the ceiling.
    1
  6.  @neilba1  "No Russians do..." 180 000 dead civilian Iraqis vs 7 000 Ukrainians says otherwise.
    1
  7.  Symoni Batmitziev  The UK has 227 tanks only, not 2 800.
    1
  8.  @frankrhemrev3572  "better to use tanks where they are usefull (Ukraine)" Pretty much kiss goodbye any future British aggression overseas because of this offensive belligerence against Russia.
    1
  9.  @neilba1  Nope! UN: Iraq 180 000 | Ukraine 7 000. And lets not forget that the Kiev Junta killed 14 000 in Donbas, before Russia intervened.
    1
  10.  Symoni Batmitziev  Check your math 14 tanks aren't 0.5%.
    1
  11.  @neilba1  Yes my figure 180 000 for Iraq is what USUK admitted to. Iraq claims over 1 500 000. Almost 10 times that. What does it feel to be on the side of Pure Evil?
    1
  12.  @inconvenientfacts8896  No the US depends on the Petrodollar daylight robbery system to finance its war machine. Every time the US wants resources from the rest of the world it just prints worthless petrodollars. When the rest of the world refuses to give away their resources for nothing, the US will not be able to sanction or regime change all of them.
    1
  13.  @inconvenientfacts8896  Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Ethiopia, India, China, etc. would beg to differ. Russia has no history of attacking its neighbours for no reason. Russia has a history of beating back combined European invasions.
    1
  14. "Isnt Russia our main adversary?" The whole world is either your boot-licking vassal, obedient colony or "adversary"
    1
  15.  @terranaxiomuk  The Royal Navy is only geared toward suppressing a hypothetical mutiny at a Royal American carrier group. No idea how this would play out as all the senior American staff are members of the Greek "Freemason" network and in constant paranoia of being watched.
    1