Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Batman Saves Sex-Slaves | Batman v Superman The Ultimate Edition" video.

@Young_Special Judging from the trailer, you are wrong. They casted a skinny dude with squeaky voice. Christian Bale was pushing it with his physique but at least he managed the mental side of Batman. If you want to portray that scary physical side, there's no way Pattison can pull it off.
7
@Hei-Jai-Ramni-Ankxolo-Kumamura Right, because years of being trained by the leagues of assassin gives you no muscle. Pal, this Batman is an entire new fictional work made up by Reeves to enact his noir style movie. It's not really an action movie.
5
@funtv4920 UFC fighters fight in a cage, pal. They don't fight multiple opponents at once, having to knock them out in one blow. If he's a UFC fighter, he's a strawweight while Batman's supposed to be a heavyweight.
5
@Young_Special The Batmobile is a modified dodge Charger, think about that.
4
@funtv4920 I don't think you understand that goons and thugs do have their training, right? They're not high school students. Bale batman has nothing to do with action, it's more about psychological storytelling. The comic depiction of that character is what meant to be realistic. Batman is not Superman, if he's not physically dominant, he can't fight physically more powerful opponents. The welterweight thing is just unacceptable, what is unrealistic here is that despite wearing that incredibly tough bullet proof suit, which will be surprisingly heavy, his physique is still that underwhelming, that is unrealistic.
3
@funtv4920 Okay he's a welter weight, still not a heavy weight. Batman doesn't fight average joe, dummy. He fights professional criminals. And of course, he fights Bane as well. Think about it for a bit.
2
@funtv4920 Obviously you never read a batman comics. If batman only relies on his gadgets then it would be a boring ass comic. Throw a batarang everytime. The physical side can not be overlooked. Usman, Khamzat, Colby or whatever their names are shall be whacked if faced against an equally skilled heavyweight fighters. In case of Batman, most of his foes have some sort of super strength, not as strong as superman but far exceeds a normal human being. A welterweight wouldn't managed to get a blow.
2
@funtv4920 Usually there isn't because parkour is much more difficult if you're a heavyweight but Batman is not something that happens "usually". You can see this clearly in the comics and in the cartoon.
2
@darrencommanda7736 You're just an adorable guy. Reeves in a million year will never get the support Snyder did with his Snydercut. The batman getting a trilogy is just another bad investment decision by Warner Brothers, Reeves had no vision, no story. The Batman is basically a mystery movie that loses it's appeal the moment the story is revealed. It will soon hit a box office slump, because after seeing it once, you don't really want to see it again. It doesn't get multiple spinoff shows, Warner Brothers plan for that spinoff shows way before the release of the movie, it needs content to pad for HBO Max, and because it's Warner Brothers, they're churning out shows that nobody really care for. Even Wonder Woman got a sequel, you know how that ended, poorly. If you want to compare the quality of Reeves movie to a trilogy, compare it to Batman Begins, you can see Reeves version lack in every meaningful notable aspects.
2
@darrencommanda7736 I don't know which standard of measurements you're using but that "bunch" pulled off a nearly impossible achievement in Hollywood victory. I doubt Reeves will ever get such support, so is his movie. It is a good film to them. And had that been released before or after the pandemic, it would definitely beat the Batman box office by far. We don't blame Joss, Joss is responsible for that mess, like I pointed out, Snyderverse in general is the biggest phenomenon ever seen in Hollywood history, compared to this diluted water version of "cinema" Whedon and Reeves are promoting, the depth and quality of Snyderverse is far greater. One of Snyderverse executive producer is of course, Christopher Nolan. You've been outclassed, pal. The difference in class in undeniable.
2
@darrencommanda7736 No, it's just facts. I'm sorry those simple things are too complicated for you. The Batman is so so, it's not really good and it's not impactful.
2
@darrencommanda7736 Oh, the story has tremendous meaning. Maybe try to watch the movie next time, pal. The Batman is the movie that are most void of meaning, it's a mystery movie that takes on the most cliche topic you can think off. Don't kid yourself, pal. You can see the impact between those 2 directors using their fan base, the support and the impact Snyder spread throughout the world rivals even James Cameron. Your opinion doesn't really say much, you can see the impact each director brings from the fan support. Reeves are brilliant at churning out cash grab that will get the average movie goers to talk about the film for 20 minutes after paying once and then that's it. Snyder left an impact for maybe years on people.
2
@Hei-Jai-Ramni-Ankxolo-Kumamura Either way, his number of muscle is definitely not enough considering the earlier art style of comic batman. But like I said, Reeves invented his own version of batman, quite disrespectful but that's his right.
1
@darrencommanda7736 There are only like 4 Batman films worthy of mentioning in the last 22 years. 3 of them are Nolan trilogy, which outclass this mess by far. Just watch it and you'll see. And the 4th one is Batman v Superman, which got cut from 3 hours to like 2 hour and a half. And Batman v Superman is the foundation to the whole Snydercut thing, that is the most admirable cinematic achievement throughout Hollywood History. So by any measurement of impact, this Batman movie ranks above the Batman and Robin thing, but below all of the notable ones. Money doesn't mean "success", even Aquaman gets a billion dollar.
1
@darrencommanda7736 It is, pal. It is unheard of for a fanbase to gather enough support to compel corporate studio to admit their failures. Compared to making a decent noir movie, it's much more impressive.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Shockingly, your belief are just your opinion based on your belief, it's not rooted in any widely accepted standards. My thoughts and a lot of other people thoughts on a whole is you are very ignorant with what you're talking about, intentionally ignoring information and taking on wild assumptions to pad up your delusional belief, which is detached from reality. Snyder made a realistic movie showing the dark nature of humanity and somehow you have a problem with it, you may disregard real life but that means there's rather a problem with you. And with the whole nonsensical video of that "nerd" dude, it's a meaningless video, even the montage he used in his video are out of context. He uses the "moment" cut out from a clip that literally has voice over in it to point out how Snyder are creating "meaningless moments", no those moments have meanings, you're intentionally ignoring a major part of it. And the whole idiocy regarding you have to slowly explain something to the audience on one set? Why does that even matter? People focuses on the characters, not the location those characters are in. Snyder built the story around characters and their emotions, sorry if you have a "location - fetish" but this isn't a sitcom. If those are the best critique of a movie, no wonder that guy's unemployed as a movie maker, those are useless critique that applies to himself and nobody else. The audiences aren't that dumb for you to jam the scenes into one location in order for them to follow, that's not a critique, it's an opinion. It's like saying you like the color red but the artist is using the color blue, a childish comment. Batman v Superman doesn't run for 2 and a half hour, it run for 3 hours, the guy who made that video can't even bother to see the correct version of the movie. Maybe you should start by seeing the correct version, pal.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Everything that video tried to say is factually wrong, because the guy who made the video can't even bother to see the correct version of the movie. You need to see the correct version, darling. In the fight scene, Superman tried to explain, when he's about to explain, Batman hit him with traps that was laid there before, that's why they need to fight it out, and one side can only explain after the other side is subdued. Imagine trying to talk to a person that's trying to kill you, it won't go down smoothly. This is why you need to watch the correct movie, pal, everything you said is factually wrong. His universe is not derailed at all, kid, again. That Snyderverse restoration is the most incredible achievement in Hollywood History, something will never happen with the fans of Reeves or Whedon, or like any generic directors who sold their souls to Disney, their work are as average and uninfluential as it can be. You claim Snyder has no substance, we claim every other movies churned out by the opposition, for example Joss Whedon has no substance, those movies have shallow substances, really poorly written material trying to be padded off as complicated thing, where it barely scratches the surface of any meaningful morality question, while Snyder work dwells right in there right in the first movie called Man of Steel. What would happen if a person is put onto an unwinnable situation? That happens rather too often in real life, that's the difficult question. When in Marvel movies or even the Batman, somehow even they tried to portraits the hero as losing, the hero has already won, it's ridiculous. The key difference is that we're committed enough to Snyder work and had made his vision came true, something that you idiots will never get, why? Because unfortunately for you, your level of attachment to those work are as shallow as the content of those work itself, very average. You don't understand those work, because there's nothing there to understand, you will be attached to 20 movies recycling the same idea under different name, shallow as it can be, you probably already have. So about the level of influence of each work, Snyder work might have a bit fewer fans, but quality of each fans outclass you average fans by a gigantic margin. First step in an argument, kid, do not get the wrong material. Maybe you should start by watching the correct version first, and start watching analysis video of the people who did watch the correct version.
1
@darrencommanda7736 That is adorable of you thinking that Reeves is a great director, just plain adorable. Cinema runtime has been cut down even for James Cameron, so stop with the nonsense of length time, studio just wisen up, has nothing to do with the director's credentials. Your version of good film is just too low for us sane people to accept. You haven't seen those things before showcases your lack of knowledge of film in general. There's nothing exceptional about Reeves batman movie, he took the motive of a detective film and then apply to whatever characters you can jam in there that does detective work, nothing original. Batman is not about doing "detective" thing, it's a minor component of batman, not the entire thing. This is a character that shapes about 70 years of America pop culture, show some respect. What you consider to be good or bad film is your subjective opinions, nobody really cares. But don't try to pass it off as anything more than a subjective opinion, it's not shared by anybody, and even if it is shared, it's a rather shallow judgement, you don't commit to the content that you're talking about. So it makes your comment sort of worthless, like showing a movie to a 4 year-old. The kid can very much have an opinion whether the kid like or hate it, and the opinion is just as valid, the difference is in the level of commitment, or the depth of the judgement. Don't take such pride on average qualities and generic perspective, pal. It's not something to be proud of, really.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Reeves didn't make Batman the way Batman is written or interpreted by the writers throughout the last 70 years. So yeah, show some little respect, pal. No, the masses don't agree, even if they agree, those "masses" opinion are extremely shallow because they're trivial opinions, like I pointed out before, they don't commit. It is an above average movie of course, it's just not up to par with any other of notable ones. I'm not dumb enough to gamble my life on studying cinema, that's usually what idiots choose to do. People like you who don't really understand anything but you try to pass it off as if you do. Imagine learning how to write a book before you can understand the book, that's the most ridiculous thing ever. There are measurements of support, of commitment of the viewers, of the "impact" of something onto the mass, these can be seen, observed through the eyes, and at those measurements, "The Batman" just don't live up to par. Don't flatter yourself on mediocrity, darling, it's just pitiful.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Oh, Reeves will probably get to finish his popcorn movie verse. And then another guy comes in and another guy and another guy. Endless musical chair game of generic film makers. Like I said, you take too much pride in being mediocre, pal.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Those films are good enough to gain probably the biggest support and the most monumental achievement in Hollywood history. Think about it, pal. Snyder is in a different class of it's own, you can tell by the people who worked together on his film, most notably Christopher Nolan.
1
@darrencommanda7736 Nolan doesn't just put money on any Warner Brothers production, dummy. He select certain projects. If you think producers just "put money" into something and leave all the work to somebody else, you're a moron. Go study more about corporation. Anyway, you can see the comment of Nolan on Snyder to see that he's in a different class than Reeves, maybe in 10 years we can have this conversation, but now it's just disrespectful towards Snyder to compare Reeves with him.
1
@paulshaw2013 The score of the movie is great but Pattinson nailed nothing, the movie barely show his faces. He acted like a more broody version of Edward Cullen when he's not wearing the mask. Try seeing Batman Begins, pal. That's how you built "Batman". There's another side to the characters that The Batman just ignores. Granted, they're saving that side for the next movie but that's just unnecessary prolonging the time for an arc not that notable.
1