Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Is Putin Right About Nato's Eastward Expansion? - TLDR News" video.

  1.  @badluck5647  Ukraine sovereignty on paper cease to exist when that coup happened in 2014, which violates the entirety of Ukraine Constitution, they removed a President via a coup, which makes that Ukrainian Government an illegitimate one, completely nullified the previous agreement made with the rightful government of Ukraine.
    1
  2.  @badluck5647  You can't impeached a President through a regular majority vote as if it's a law, study the Ukraine constitution, pal. The government when Russia annexed Crimea is an illegitimate one, also, those locations in Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk all have their own referendum to secede from Ukraine, so Russia really didn't "invade Ukraine", it was welcomed by Crimea and the Donbass. And then, the current Ukrainian government lost it's legitimacy in Russia's eyes when they waged war against the Russian speaking people in Donbass.
    1
  3.  @badluck5647  Well, the impeachment is unconstitutional but nobody seems to care. So those region hold a referendum. Equality sucks, huh? Russia cares about the law all the time, they just stop caring if the law is broken with impunity like it was in the coup of 2014.
    1
  4.  @badluck5647  Never proven allegations, genius. Those lovely conspiracy theories are equivalent of the CIA assassinating JFK. Get back to reality. It's probable but you can't just accuse people out of allegations.
    1
  5.  @theprofessional1375  My goodness, that is adorable. An independent organization investigation with no proven or even verifiable claims, having no jurisdiction whatsoever. I mean, who can ignore that? Get real, pal. Do not confuse what you lie to yourself with the truth, pal. Boris Nemstov was killed in his car, on a bridge near the Kremlin, not inside of it or in front of it. Unproven claim, kid. Like I pointed out, you can't just allege people with murder just because it's "probable". That's not how the world works.
    1
  6.  @theprofessional1375  Again, pal, no jurisdiction organization can never make a credible "investigation". CNN can't even do a thorough investigation in America, it's quite laughable to think they can do "investigation" in Russia. Get your head out of your ass. And of course, the Navalny poisoning is another joke, it's laughable because Russia was denied and contact to the investigation, a biased one sided investigation made by the Germans, who's practically American's puppet. They made a claim and then a bunch of request, that's not how investigation works. Nemtsov assassination happen when he was walking, that I was mistaken about, but again such assassination can not be proven to have any ties with the Russian government. Your whole rant about "surveillance camera" and Kremlin camera is total conspiracy theory. Where is this source? Any link? Anything? You again mistaken the Crimea situation. nobody installed a government to hold a referendum, the same parliament of Crimea that was voted on before the 2014 coup in Kiev voted to install Aksyonov as the Prime Minister and that some parliament voted for the referendum. Was that vote "fair"? Nobody knows, because there's no footages inside the building, it has the same credibility with the vote to remove Yanukovych in Kiev a few weeks ago, when protestors broke into the parliament of Ukraine and cut off all communication. You can't just recognize coup you like and ignore coup you don't like, pal. Troops might have been there since February 20th, but they never made a move until there was a coup in Kiev. So blame the coup in Kiev, Putin was masterful at predicting the events, wasn't he. The Westerners think they can just back a coup in the capital and the minor states or "Oblast" will just fall in line? No chance. The referendum questions were quite clear, join Russia or stays independent. The people did not choose to stay independent and be a part of Ukraine, they chose to join Russia. It didn't achieve a majority, it achieved a super majority. Crimea is not a part of Ukraine anymore after that 2014 coup where the impeachment of Yanukovych violated the Ukraine Constitution, after that event, the Ukraine country is under a new ruler that defies the previous constitution, making those previous attachments useless. You can't just chose the coup you like and the abandon the coup you don't like, mate. Because the removal of Yanukovych was already unconstitutional, any actions the latter follows such event, caused by the ousted of the legitimate President over the entire territory of Crimea, which is Yanukovych, any actions following his impeachment is no longer legal under the Ukrainian Constitution. Again, you can't just violate this section of the constitution and then force the other part onto everybody else. Zelensky was voted to be the President of a version of Ukraine to no longer include Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. That version of Ukraine does not exist in the Ukraine Constitution. After the coup in Kiev in 2014, those places are no longer part of Ukraine, which makes any claim of Zelensky being a legitimate President under the old Ukrainian Constitution completely voided. Again, you can't just violate the law where you like and then force other people to follow that same law just because you don't like them. The people who orchestrated the coup should have thought it through before organizing it that way.
    1