Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Face The Nation: Terri Sewell, Rudy Giuliani" video.

Yes, it is also covered in the actual report. Sources, sworn statement of people, aka, the next best thing to actual testimony is given to him by the people who tried to give it to the Obama Administration. Ever heard of corruption? Go back to school, study.
2
These morons don't understand that a complaint can be true or false? Just because that coward files a complaint doesn't mean it's true. You can't keep claiming that it's true when people even released a transcript and pointed out that it's wrong.
2
@parkerxgps No, it's direct evidence that he didn't do anything. You can live in a bubble, kid, but it's gonna burst. Go back to school.
1
@TheStupidWaffle Because he's doing a very good job? Kid, maybe the pathetic leftist don't realize this because you're very blind, this story of Biden corruption will be the biggest scandal of a politician, Watergate isn't much compared to this. Just wait, after this whole failed attacks on Trump crumbles, Mr .Biden will be crushed.
1
@corryjookit7818 You see how you can't even point out any evidence or argument to back up your claim, kid? You can't just claim something and ignore how to prove your claim, it's called stupidity. My evidence of how Biden committed corruption, him admitting it under tape, his son working and receiving direct money from foreign governments, and about 5 different affidavits, aka sworn testimony by Ukrainian prosecutors, first hand knowledge that Biden committed corruption. You want to pass on this fake information of how the prosecutor Biden removed was corrupted? Kid, he was very poor and Biden son worked in an oil company with no expertise on any of it. Idiot.
1
@TheStupidWaffle Yeah, it seems like that, isn't it? that's what you called fake press. When somebody committed a normal action and the fake media lies about it and turns it into a massive crime, it seems that way. But it's not.
1
@corryjookit7818 Yes, it's not my research, it's Rudy research and because you can't disprove any of it, they're valid. That's how it works, kid. Did you talk to the prosecutors of Ukraine? Did you interview Biden? Do you have sworn statements that Biden didn't do it? Idiots, don't be a troll, kid, go back to school.
1
@TheStupidWaffle Like I said, you need to go back to school. Just because you're talking about something that exist doesn't mean you're talking about it truthfully. Here, Abraham Lincoln is a real historical figure, but to say that Abraham Lincoln was pro-slavery is a lie. Clear of that pal? The press lies of what the transcript actually means and what are in the transcript. study, pal.
1
@TheStupidWaffle No, that's what you've been trying to lie. Kid, read the actual report, don't listen to fake news. Here's what actually happen, Trump withheld an aid to Ukraine first, because he has the authority to withheld aid to a nation that he deemed troubling. And then he calls the President of that country to ask him to take care of that problem, which is corruption within the system. Joe Biden admitted on tape that he interfered with the removal of a prosecutor, which in the call with Trump, the President of Ukraine also says that he is looking into that unlawful removal. So what you have is a corrupted guy, aka Biden, he admitted it, and Trump asked the President of Ukraine to investigate corruption, which the President of Ukraine also acknowledge that Biden is a part of it. Pal, it's not Trump's fault that Biden is corrupted and accidentally be his political opponents, Biden admitted it.
1
No, the FBI and Ukrainian claim that they have no proof, but sworn testimony of statement is the next best thing to a solid proof, so yeah, study, kid. The claim of no proof can only be valid if you have no proof, when you have proof then there's a massive probability that they're lying.
1