Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. Somebody make a petition for them to throw Adam out. Can't they get a qualified and intelligent person to argue the opposite point?
    17
  2. The best option would be for Trump to drop out and support RFK. RFK is smarter, more fit, he's actually a better candidate.
    8
  3. The ideology is that President Trump is trying to save The American Dream, which can't be save due to an entire generation of stupidity flooding the US. That's a noble ideology, but a difficult, not to say impossible.
    4
  4. PBD is just not smart enough. He really doesn't. Historically, the government has bully people. I don't understand if he know what history or government means. Government by definition is the body that governs a pool of population. Whether that body regulate harshly or regulate loosely, depends on the body. Countless kings have and countless kings have done bad. Most of PBD argument are nonsensical arguments. It's like he's that fluent in English. History of mankind is infinitely more diverse than history of America.
    3
  5. There's a clear similarity in the extreme left and the extreme right is that they're both equally insane. Owens need to get out of that place, she deserves better. Terroristic occupiers do not have the right to defend itself against the oppressed people.
    2
  6. DEI in basketball sense means those white guys are the minority. So you know, your argument crumbles on itself. It's by looking at the pool of white players can they find Luka. Therefore, DEI works in this case.
    2
  7.  @randyhuke3773  Yeah, and now it's 20 years later. Catch up with the time.
    2
  8. Tucker is far, far bigger than Shapiro. It's not just the US audience, Tucker international audience is about 3 to 4 times as big as Shapiro entire audience base.
    2
  9.  @bellmeisterful  It was the king because it was the only one, the others are either too small (France, UK), or just went out of a war (almost every other country). There's no money to be made here, at least not when China and other countries are dumping prices on labor. But the truth is the truth, America is country full of idiots. Incapable of creativity or hard work like Chinese workers. So this is a failed cause, either those morons pick themselves up or they're gonna burn.
    2
  10.  @jupitervideos7702  Physics wise, Wilt is in a different weight class in history. A guy that big, that fast, that strong, that durable is never heard of since.
    2
  11. Well, no because they literally paid for the Open AI API to run Open AI model. Similar to how Open AI just steals every single copyrighted content in the world to train theirs in the first place. Can't be ignorant, buddy, it's fatal.
    2
  12. There is no guarantee that Snowden didn't reveal some of America secret to Russia, it's highly unlikely that he revealed all of the stolen secrets. But revealing just some of it in exchange for living the rest of his life as a free man in Russia with his wife, being forever known as the hero with the protection of the Russian Government. It's a decent deal. It's pretty clear in Snowden's eye that the American Government has been acting like the villain for a long amount of time, and acting against the villain's interest, it's not too shabby.
    1
  13. PBD and his goons need to get off the mentality used in the last century. The reasoning of Friedman is very true in the last century, but in his new era, his arguments have been absolutely disproved. China version of "capitalism" is radically different from what Friedman proposes. And the number of people that system lifted out of poverty is about 10 times the American system nanaged to do.
    1
  14. The example that Friedman gave during that interview really showcases his last century mentality and a total ignorance of world history before the 1850s. Necessary government regulation and guidance has always been presented during any act of economic activities. Even Einstein and Henry Ford. If there isn't a proper social program, Einstein wouldn't have been able to live, go to school, etc. Henry Ford wouldn't have been able to take a loan or start a business paying little tax. Every single achievement in human history is a combination between individual effort and environmental conditions. I mean, he had his time but he's proven wrong. No government at all means absolute anarchy. Human escaping poverty has nothing to do with "capitalism", it's because of technological breakthrough in fertilizer which makes food abundant, breakthrough in civil construction which makes cement and steel more easily producable. Breakthrough in medicine for example antibiotics. Human technology breakthroughs have happened long before capitalism.
    1
  15. The perfect response for the Hunter Biden nonsense is that the dude is a crack addict, unqualified, dysfunctional loser that magically got a job as a board member of the biggest natural gas company in Europe while his condition would make him unqualified to do exotic dancing in Sacramento. Do the math.
    1
  16. On one side is a religious fanatic man child with vulnerable feelings easily hurt by facts while the other side is Candace Owens. Come on, homie. It shouldn't be handled privately, the incompetence of a figurehead should be exposed quickly and that dude need to be replaced.
    1
  17. There's nothing global about having 40 different genders, that is exclusively an American idea. Please show some respect, simpletons.
    1
  18. They must be stealing from God then because whatever they used in their products didn't exist on this planet before.
    1
  19. Companies like Apple gets to keep most of their profits while manufacturing cost went to China and not the US. Kid, a US manufacturing company doesn't do much good to the US if every chain of manufacturing is put in China. China has been taking advantage of unfair trade for years, it's called dumping. Learn some economics. You can import material, but labor? That has to be domestic. Otherwise it's another country's product.
    1
  20.  @isaacelric1807  That economics is the same as dumping, pal, nobody cares but that is exactly what it is. They're dumping the price on labour and what happened to countries dumping prices on oil, should happen to them too. Every other countries in the world protects their domestic economy because that correlates directly to their people's status. America needs to face the reality that its value of liberty should only be applied to it's citizens.
    1
  21. ​ @CineGisticMedia Buddy, go get an education because your ignorance is fatal. Even Nvidia says in their public presentations that Moore's law is dead, the race is now about architecture optimization, which is very similar to algorithm optimization which you just got crushed on. Short version, you may have better gear but they just demonstrated that they have better brains.
    1
  22.  @CineGisticMedia  Buddy, that's not how it works. The cost of Open AI and Google Gemini has literally nothing to do with the development cost of Nvidia chips. So you're comparing all the wrong stuff. Ignorance is fatal, hombre, you have to study up. For a start, you might want to type your answer into Chat GPT itself and it will show you how wrong it is.
    1
  23.  @CineGisticMedia  Ignorance is fatal. You need to remove it quickly.
    1
  24.  @CineGisticMedia  And no, to make it that cheap, you would completely new technology and innovation which is literally spelled out for you in Deepseek new technical papers. You can ask Chat GPT about it, even that has a better understanding of this than you. You're being very similar to the flat earthers, completely unable to accept reality, that's no good.
    1
  25.  @CineGisticMedia  Troll
    1
  26. @CineGisticMedia  No, literally everything you said is false. For example, you claim that the cost of development for Open AI, Google and Meta model has everything to do with high costs of chip development, which is nonsensical, they use the exact same generation of chip. They have to buy more of those chips developed by Nvidia, nothing more. That's where the money went. This is the actual public knowledge. And that has nothing to do with developing technology, that's just wasteful spending, because all of them were using the same variation of an inefficient learning method. So again, study up
    1
  27. Most people do not care at all, buddy. So deal with that reality.
    1
  28. Well, it's giving US taxpayers money that was meant to be spent at home to help people in the US. I mean did you even go to school? Go learn some math, hombre. And it's math, not meth.
    1
  29.  @olehholovey3695  You can keep telling yourself that, kid. But it's more complicated than that. The most important thing they send is ammunition and rockets, which are replenishable and they have to make new ones to keep sending them. I don't think you understand, patriots missiles and Patriots missile defense system ain't old equipment. Why don't you go learn some math and stop functioning based on make beliefs And again, every piece of equipment sent over is replenished at home and you have to spend money again. So math, kid. Go study some math.
    1
  30. Look, the guy never lived in those kind of societies. Only idiots think that Mao or Stalin lived in a communism lifestyle. The man is a naive little boy with a beard. The people who disgusted communism the most is the people who runs communism themselves, they need to know that it's a fantasy to rule and manipulate their society into believing it. The guy needs to learn some math, life expectancy of the world is roughly 60 years when Stalin took over. Stalin didn't improve anything, that's the norm of a civil society with laws and order, health basic care and stuff. Did he establish order? Yes. Is that order anymore special than capitalist order of any kind? No. No capitalist nation sees that kind of increase in that span of time because no capitalist nation had the bad of a life expectancy at that moment in time. Stalin did an average job, technology, healthcare procedures of the world, if implemented shall always bring the life expectancy to 60. It's like previously you scored below an F and now you score a C. That's an increase better than students scoring a D and then scored a C. But you're still just doing it averagely.
    1
  31.  @randyhuke3773  Yeah, but 20 years ago the politicians are a little bit less corrupt than now. Catch up with the time.
    1
  32. I don't think you have any idea what the word "baby brother" means. Try Terrorist Proxy State.
    1
  33. He's severely delusional. They're overpowering you right now. Too much Hollywood propaganda screw with your head. You can't draw a red line against somebody whom you're weaker against.
    1
  34. You'll need to find better sources. Those scores aren't real in China. Where is this official website for that scoring policy? How do one even view their own scores to know that it's lowered or increased? This weird myth is ridiculous. There is scoring for businesses in China, like there is in the US or Europe. But there is no score for individuals, especially for social behavior. But court offenses and not paying fines is actually called criminal behavior.
    1
  35. That's exactly the most unfair thing ever. Because if you go with just the grades, literally no American University should even accept American students, because American students are some of the worst students in the developed world. The Chinese students will crush you. They have better scores, they have better grades. But they also went through a tougher, more academic oriented education. So you have to look at the entire case.
    1
  36.  @Antonia777fly  This is the standard. The standard of looking at the entire journey, not just the grades, that's the new standard. It's not lower or higher, it's an entirely different set of standards. Why don't you go read up on this?
    1
  37. This content clearly shows that PBD, despite being a rich guy and quite competent in a very specific field, is just a noob when it comes to other problems. He has no understanding of what an economy is, how it works, how to manage it, and he also has a lack of knowledge in actual history. He's well versed in propaganda history though. Stick to selling insurance and media event, buddy. Your ability is not up to par here.
    1
  38. These guys can be catgeorized into the Delusional category. This isn't the 1990s, you will be destroyed in a traditional war. You're weak as hell and you're pretending to be strong. Go learn some math and spare us your ignorance.
    1
  39.  @guillermodelapuerta5243  All of what you're talking are propaganda, pal. It's very unlikely that any updates coming to you from the media are truthful. Those propaganda were not truthful in the case of Vietnam, it wasn't remotely truthful in the case of Iraq, and it continues not to be now. You need to wake up. Even before the war, any information that comes out of such region so far away where people doesn't speak English is nearly unverifiable, now during the war, it's even worse. What you do know, however, it's that such region is none of you Westerners's business.
    1
  40. Mr Elder has this naivete about him when he said nobody lied about Iraq. That's adorable. They intentionally gathered untrustworthy "intelligence" and then murdered over 1 million people because of it. If the people Elder talked to admitted that they have lied then they would've been sent to jail. Wake up, hombre. The government lies to you more than you know.
    1
  41. Look, Patrick was slaughtered. Pakman is a clown, you have to stop him where he razzle dazzle with meaningless words and call him out on his lies. He ask where's the data that proves countries fear Trump more than Biden, well ask him where's the data that backed up his judgement of countries respect US more under Biden. Pakman is a guy who takes figurative speeches and take them literally pretending that he is a genius, the guy who abuses mentally inferior people.
    1
  42. Nope, kid. The war mongering idiot is the real downfall of America. Have you found any WMDs in Iraq yet?
    1
  43. Musky is complaining an awfully lot for not having to pay for extra spaces at the office. Weird.
    1
  44. That's absolutely false, because professional sports teams are setting scouts all over the world to seek for potentials. The reigning MVP of the NBA, Joel Embiid was scouted in Africa, and he was not as good as other candidates at that time. But he has gigantic potential. As if you're intentionally not understanding this, buddy. DEI is not about lowering merits, it's about looking at better qualities that will eventually bring back higher returns.
    1
  45.  @schwaaard  That's because the idea is being executed poorly by a bunch of incompetent people. If a person can't do math properly, is the fault lies in math? or the fault lies with the person? And no, your argument is absolutely wrong, because you can use statistics to summarize whether having a certain attributes such as gender, race, actually means that candidate will have a higher probability of facing adversity, providing you're doing it correctly. Most people are doing it the wrong way, doesn't mean that the methodology is wrong. DEI has always existed in human civilization, what, you think that's some new term never thought of before? Treating people as a whole, including their background, their story, not just one indicator of merit has always been around. Go study real history. Looking at the whole picture of human beings, that concept has existed at least since the ancient Egyptians. I'll do an example for you in the case of Joel Embiid. The reason why they even set up a scouting place in Cameroon in the first place is because they've applied the DEI spirits, on lowering the standard of minimum requirement of official competition result to set up a scouting location, based on the situation of the country. A poorly connected country, no organized basketball, players with far lower ability, but because of the socio-economic factor of the place, their "merit" indicated via official competition results was ignored. Contrary to places like in China, etc. In case of Joel Embiid, they did say that because he's Cameroonian, never played basketball till he's 15, his lower quality skillset can be put aside and judge him completely different from how they would judge a black kid in America playing basketball from when he was a kid. You're intentionally twisting, lying about an idea and then pretend as if your version, which is full of lies are the official version. Get over yourself. Nobody judges one applicant solely based on one single criteria, you're making that up. What's actually happening is that they're judging multiple criterias and in those multiple criterias, race and gender plays a role in deciding the final result. Another easy example, if an Asian kid and a black kid, same middle class background, no noticeable difference in every single category, by statistics, the black kid will be more talented than the Asian one academic wise, because statistically speaking, unfortunately black middle class families are usually less educated, or has a less impressive education. You need to deal with that reality, now does that principle means that it will be right every single cases? No. But it will be right in a majority of cases providing a large enough number of samples. DEI was exactly why Joel Embiid was found, because the DEI spirit is about looking at the whole picture. If they had just applied a crude merit approach, they would have said that this guy has never played basketball in his life, he's horrible compared to his peers who started basketball earlier, he's not good enough. DEI spirit focuses on the actual merit of human beings, what you're focusing is not merit, it's crude and false version of what is called merit.
    1
  46.  @schwaaard  You're intentionally twisting, lying about an idea and then pretend as if your version, which is full of lies are the official version. Get over yourself.
    1
  47.  @schwaaard  Go study some statistics, hombre. Of course from some attributes, you can extrapolate the probability of something being true or not. For example, on average, Asian househoulds are more educated than Black, White, or Hispanic households, meaning that any kid born into an Asian family has a head start on all of the other kids, and therefore his or her potential and "merit" has to be judged with that head start in mind. Like if 2 F1 cars race each other and one car has a 1km head start, if you don't take into account that head start factor, you can't compare the performance of the cars. Now will it be right on every case, this statistics based approach? No, but it will be right on a majority of cases, provided that it's done properly, meaning correctly identifying the proper head start amount, and that's very difficult to do and most schools and doing it horribly. But that's the school fault, not the idea's fault.
    1
  48.  @schwaaard  Yeah, I typed a longer explanation for you but YouTube deleted that. I'll repost it soon.
    1
  49. To the really good academics, teaching is the worst part of the job, it gets insanely boring after a while.
    1
  50. I think Ro Khanna exposes himself quite clear when he became the sponsor of Sam Bankman Fraud.
    1