Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @hellogoodnite8447  Because it was Trump's voice? And furthermore it was confirmed by the White House correspondent? Pal, the virus is deadly, everybody should have known that when it was posted in China that the Chinese government lockdown every travel from that city to the rest of China. The point is that it should have never been presence in America. China ban every travel from Wuhan to Chinese cities, but allow flights from Wuhan to the world. That's their fault, and that is the reason why the virus spread.
    2
  2.  @drzaius1121  No, it is. Freedom of religion, people fighting defending the country. Learn some actual history.
    2
  3.  @johnkillinger453  No, they didn't. Deceleration of Independent, endowed by our "creator", which could means any religion, but surprisingly, inauguration are performed under Christian minister. "So help me, God", the last of the oath. Use your brain, kid.
    2
  4.  @johnkillinger453  Why don't you think before you type. The cross is there to honor Christian soldiers who fight for this country, which is against Christianity due to taking lives. This is about freedom of religion, kid. Learn to think.
    2
  5.  @johnkillinger453  You're not even reading, kid. You don't have the right to tear down a war memorial, honoring soldiers just because they're shaped like a cross. It's a memorial honoring soldiers dying on the battlefield for their beliefs. Not a religious memorial, it's not a church. If you take the memorial down then you should abolish any grave that is shaped like a cross, right? Including thousands of those in Arlington? Learn to think, kid. And even if that is a religious memorial, there's no such law requires you not to have it. Congress shall make no law putting a religion over the other, you need to proof that this memorial is built for the purpose of putting one religion over the other, and not just to honoring the religion of ones who died. You're way over your head trying to argue this, so I suggest you go back to school. Freedom of religion. It's one thing to build a memorial, it's an entirely different thing to remove one. This memorial has been built by previous administration, and you'll need substantial reason to remove it. Otherwise, Arlington, White House, Monument of Liberty can all be disposed by the current administration.
    2
  6. ​ @Captain_Wet_Beard  Because those companies create most of the wealth, kid, and also because those companies employ thousands and thousands of people, which in a chain, create thousands and thousands more jobs. And also because those benefits came from the fact that they almost went bankrupt and you didn't care, hypocrite much? And also, the working class doesn't pay most of the tax, in fact 47% of the population, I assume this is your "working class". They pay no tax. And the top 10% pays 70% of all tax, even though they only earn 40% of the wealth. Why don't you have some sense of dignity and stop advocating for stealing.
    2
  7. And the unfortunate thing is that this stimulus package doesn't pick a target, doesn't have guarantee on the purpose used, and it's also taking money from people that it doesn't stimulate or help, it's stealing. Learn some math.
    2
  8. So even Obama acknowledges that there's no way these idiots can beat Trump?
    2
  9. Well, they also screamed around the word "Russia" for 2 years, nobody takes them seriously. Here'a suggestion, stop believing people commentating on law without law degrees.
    2
  10. I'm so eager for this, they're gonna fail badly.
    2
  11. Fredo is the N word, genius. What a moron.
    2
  12. To be honest, this might be the trash section of Fox News. Inviting 2 clowns to discuss policies. They don't even understand the difference between discussing and agenda put forward and blindly support whatever put forward. We don't know what kind of fix is gonna come, so it would be stupid to support it. President Trump's words are unclear. So this entire section is just a distraction.
    2
  13.  @jmedlin81  So you can't provide any evidence to boost your ridiculous assumption, way to go, thank you for proving people's point. Go back to school, small time troll.
    2
  14.  troy stevens  Because she's advocating false information and inflicting terror, that's terrorism, read a book. The "war crime" she mentioned was, don't know whether did or didn't happen, by whom, due to whom, is a very tiny part of our policy there, using a tiny part to talk about the entire thing, is called. STUPIDITY. Go back to school, kid.
    2
  15. Well, these fences are way lower than 30 foot but they can't seem to bring a ladder, use your brain.
    2
  16. Celebrities need to wake up, just because a lot of people like their music or movies doesn't mean they're qualified over other individuals to talk about these things. She didn't go to college, no degree, qualification, her songs have barely any meaning. Just because they're catchy doesn't mean they're a catch.
    2
  17. ​ David Williams  You have no argument against any fact anybody have given out, so are you a troll or a moron? Either way, go back to school, kid. Here, UBI is stealing money, you're giving money to people who don't work by taking the majority from the people who do work, and your excuse for that is because their jobs are being replaced. Now that is really stupid, when somebody is out of work, you find them new job, not give them free money, assistance might come, but need to be returned, otherwise it is a handout. Because if they don't have jobs, they don't pay tax, the money they're given is not like stockholders privilege, they haven't put any money in for equity. If people don't create values anymore, taxing tech companies will not make any money, they don't have jobs, they can't pay, they can't buy stuff, tech companies will fail, aka, your taxing will not work. Your big idea is to change them from workers in storage housing into what? Nurses? Painters? Artists? All of the above requires a market, which the people worked in storage housing used to be and now if the market is gone, or severely gone undersized, those jobs value will also decrease. Now I get your intention, it's good, you need to figure out a way to adapt to change, the unfortunate thing is that your way is stupid. If giving people free money can make more money, they would've done it already, but wait, nobody does it, even socialist countries, because the presumption of it is anti-science. Go back to school, kid.
    2
  18.  @vilerebirth7806  No, it can stop more from coming in, while law enforcement kick the rest out. It's called math, learn some.
    2
  19.  @vilerebirth7806  If you're trolling, you'll have better chance at CNN where it's full of idiots, not here. Small time troll.
    2
  20.  @MrfuckinBeilke  Watched it, that guy is a lunatic, China is moving away from coal? Go back to school, kid.
    2
  21.  @Retrostarscream  Listen, pal. I just debunked your myth. You can't attempt to obstruct, obstruct is an act that happens immediately, just like you can attempt to commit perjury, study, pal. Stop typing propaganda nonsense. And immunity goes off after the term but there's no case anymore, what case? They just declared no crime, Mueller report declared him innocent, Mueller gave up his title by not giving out a conclusion, therefore Barr made that conclusion, it's the law. Study. Mueller's job wasn't to charge people, it was to find out crimes, he didn't find any. You found it, you say that there is, you don't, you say that there isn't. No middle ground nonsense, it's called distracting. And your entire previous comment, I debunked them too, pal. Read, the policy doesn't matter, you're hired for doing a report, which includes a conclusion, Ken Starr, Mueller didn't finish, he gave up and therefore the roles go to Barr, who declared no obstruction, no collusion as in lack of evidence, and if you're not guilty then you're innocent. If you're gonna keep typing a myth and pretend that it's a fact, i suggest staying quiet would be the better option.
    2
  22.  @Retrostarscream  Hey listen, kid. I know you're desperate but just don't be a troll here. I just refuted all your sources as in pointed how you're lying about the source. Those aren't sources, those are you lying of what the source actually means. 1. According to the McGhan story and Donald Trump telling him to deny the story of The President ordering to terminate the Special Counsel. This entire interpretation of Mueller and yours is based on a slippery slope definition. The definition of obstruction. Obstruction means perverting of justice, and you need to prove that the action of telling McGhan to tell a version of the story that McGhan doesn't feel comfortable with, or even that McGhan interpreted in an entire different way, therefore leading to misunderstanding of what the meeting is about and what he was told to do, is not related to "justice" at any point. So if The President told his son to say that they served Polish Vodka instead of Russian Vodka would also be obstruction? It relates to the Russian connection, think a bit pal. The detail of whether The President tell Don McGhan to say this or that, doesn't matter at all, because what he say, is not related in anyway to the investigation or any of the charges. That is my analysis to refute that passage of The Mueller Report, you know what this is called, it's called thinking, not just quoting false information like you. 2. That second paragraph you quoted about prosecuting somebody after office. That's just total irrelevant, Mueller there just typed a standard line, announcing himself to have executed his job properly, which is his opinion alone. That statement about " conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available", what, SO IF THE PRESIDENT HAS IMMUNITY AFTER OFFICE THEN THEY WILL NOT CONDUCT A THOROUGH FACTUAL INVESTIGATION? OR IS IT THEY WON'T PRESERVE ANY EVIDENCE? President has no immunity after office, but in order to charge them for the same crime as the crime that has already been investigated, they need to have declared him guilty in the report, Mueller didn't do that, Ken Starr did that, and in that case, if Clinton wasn't acquitted by the Senate, he would've been prosecuted after office. In Trump case, you can't charge him, you have nothing, what crime? You have an example up for suggestion and no conclusion, except for the conclusion that had to be made because of Mueller's incompetency, by Barr saying that he's not guilty. So yeah, they can preserve evidence, there's nothing to charge him. Mueller's words in that paragraph is just basic procedures. 3. Your thesis of Mueller Press Conference, THAT IS HIS FALSE OPINION. KEN STARR DID IT WITH CLINTON, IF MUELLER DIDN'T COME UP WITH A CONCLUSION, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHY, HE FAILED TO DO HIS JOBS. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW HE FEEL, THE FACT IS THERE, MUELLER GAVE UP HIS CREDIBILITY WHEN HE REFUSED TO FINISH THE WORK. It doesn't matter how Mr. Incompetent feels , if he can't conclude guilty, by his conscious calling or moral calling or whatever, by the Constitution of the United States, he declared that Donald Trump is innocent, as in how every citizen is innocent until proven guilty. Clear? Pal, stop posting lies that you made up. 4. "The constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrong doing". Again, this is his opinion alone, The Constitution require a different process to remove the President from office, but to ACCUSE, NO IT DOESN'T NEED A DIFFERENT PROCESS TO ACCUSE. DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER HE FEELS IF THIS IS FAIR OR NOT, THAT IS THE LAW AND THERE'S NO SUCH LAW BAN HIM FROM MAKING A CONCLUSION, HE GAVE UP. So yeah, pal, stop posting lies that you made up. Finally, if you already know that your argument are dumb as hell and you're still typing it because you're trolling, I suggest going back to school, small time troll.
    2
  23. Give Snowflakes Fox News some safe space. Their bubble of Zionists extremism is being seriously offended.
    2
  24.  @DUSAbruddah  He should have stayed longer and explained why that idiot is a moron. Correct, but he wasn't wrong, the Dutchman is a moron. He failed to understand the core value of taxation and what it should be about.
    2
  25. @Strange Quark No, those aren't facts, kid, those are your assumption, here's why: You can't prove the reason why he didn't show the footage, my conclusion after watching the taped version is that the "interview" was a footage of Tucker trying to debate a clown, idiot Dutchman failed to give any argument, any counter argument, he insult the channel and the anchor. So it's a worthless interview full of lies, no reason to show it. Again, you can't prove that this is an excuse, because you can't prove that he did anything wrong. So yeah, your argument crumbled, if you want to learn how to give out better arguments, I suggest going to college.
    2
  26.  @jayray1714  Or maybe because the leftist are idiots, think a bit, pal, which part of News Fox covered was "fake"? Anything?
    2
  27. They are just full of delusions, aren't they? Pathetic lads. They'll end their life in a shameful career of politics.
    1
  28. That's not the point, dummy, they have copies, the point is that there are other morons who tampered with somebody else's mails
    1
  29. Donald Trump want the compromise deal because it provides grounds for saying the wall it's a necessary thing. Democrats shoot themselves in the leg, he'll use 1.375 billions for the wall in area Democrats agreed to, and the National Emergency fund will build the part through Texas. In your face, Bety.
    1
  30. The unfortunate thing is that Hunter Biden being that way is very much related to his father's corruption. Otherwise why would the Chinese and Ukraine gives him free cash? Being a cocaine advisor?
    1
  31. This is a joke, Fox News is a credible news network, but don't mistaken our support for stupidity, call her out on the nonsense she's been claiming. President Trump gives daily briefing, directly working with the task forces, while Pelosi went on TV show, showcasing her expensive ice cream that the people who she's screwing can not afford. Her delaying the stimulus package moves the date of payment back weeks, that's enough for people to go hungry without a job.
    1
  32. Vietnam is a socialist country, but we use the market system as well as anyone. Anybody who doesn't understand this should go back to school.
    1
  33. Finally, somebody with real results. No insult to the previous winners, except Obama, but efforts alone is not good enough.
    1
  34.  @getalife8234  The man of stealing. Pal, maybe you don't pay any taxes, have any jobs or responsibility, but we do. Go get a job and don't steal from people, clear?
    1
  35. Even in Vietnam, a socialist country, doesn't even have free colleges, they knew the act of full on socialism is stupid, so they don't do it anymore.
    1
  36. After 6 years, they must realize by now that you poor Economic Sanctions don't actually matter to the people of Russia, right?
    1
  37. What are they going to do? Force the DOJ to press charges? That's called violation of separation of power.
    1
  38. Is it me or Tucker Carlson is starting to sound like Will McAvoy from The Newsroom. Brilliant!
    1
  39. This is pure sellout, you're letting amateurs interviewing a cunning lunatic, bring in the actual journalist if that's possible, Or is it Sanders won't come on unless he're paired with the weak ones? Typical hypocrite, old man is feeling the burn, soon he'll actually be burned.
    1
  40. What happened to his eyes?
    1
  41. Bernie requested to be matched with weak interviewers. Typical cowards.
    1
  42. Of course you can't defend against other country's missile. They can't defend against your missile as well. That's why they develop the hypersonic missile, to break through the current missile defense system.
    1
  43. So you don't want a vote? That rat is pathetic.
    1
  44. Somehow she can't seem to slam Fox News, she's afraid of giving true information to her followers.
    1
  45.  @atpnguyen1442  Yeah, and you're the prime example why, intentionally twisted the lesson. It's not love one another when one part is doing all the work, kid. Medicare for all is stealing, why? Because to pay for it, you'll have to raise taxes for the ones who do pay taxes just to pay fees for the ones who don't pay taxes. It's called stealing, not loving. And you're being stupid, not kind or anything you're pretending to be. You're not a children of God anymore, if there is such concept then you're a fallen child, get back to the right path.
    1
  46. You can't say "facts are there" if the guy just pointed that your "fact" is a lie. Pathetic Left, Trump2020.
    1
  47. You can't develop enough evidence, that is just fabricating evidence. Nobody realized he admitted to treasonous crime on air? Or is it CNN viewers are as dumb as their ratings are low? I think the later.
    1
  48. Antonio Guanaes They didn't survive it, they weren't even part of the process, they hide and they we're clueless, and now they think that they're expert. Well, they're not.
    1
  49. Robert Hudson No, they don't.
    1
  50.  @MikhailKalashnikovMiG  Yes, we said this months ago. Florida, Oregon had history of doing these kind of vote counts, but for Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, this is the first time. You see the difference? Florida had 99% votes counted within 24 hours. Pennsylvania cost 4 days. Learn some math, little buddy. I know it's hard for you but that's the only way you can live a decent life.
    1