Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @wayneenterprise463  Nice lies, kid, no wars have been going on ever since 2011, stop making up wars, The entire military budget now is 700 billions, mostly to secure areas, you want to disband military? It will lead to WW3. Then your UBI won't mean much, think! Lobbying isn't measured in trillions, learn some math. Tax breaks create jobs and growth, which actually filled the tax, successful with Reagan and now Trump. And tax breaks are too all American people, don't be angry just because you don't pay taxes, therefore gained no benefits. How about getting actual facts and stop typing lies? Idiot.
    1
  2.  @alib9937  Yeah, there hasn't been any investigation, pal. Everybody is stealing money. That's how they live. The Teamster Union stole money, that's how they built Las Vegas. The point is that they have been ignoring it as long as it don't do any harm. An intentional distinguish between the 2 organization is hypocritical
    1
  3.  mmmkay C  You think that Planned Parenthood is a clean organization? Nice try, pal, the world is not that pure and sweet. Every non-profit organization all skim profit to survive. The hypocritical attitude when it comes to the NRA here, that is not acceptable. Clinton Foundation, that is being ignored.
    1
  4. "We have to do this, we have to do that, yet we don't know how to any of it". That's Bernie Sanders, Ocasio Cortez and the idiots for you.
    1
  5. Fox News didn't learn much, huh? They're not the controller of the people, the people chose them because they were able to restraint from the biased reporting. And we will throw them out when they're not anymore. We're not morons like the CNN viewers who chose networks by name. We actually understand the content.
    1
  6. That idiocy will never get passed, soon enough it will be 2 years and she would've done nothing because she can't do anything decently. Her "base" will throw her out and elect the next clown in line. Totally predictable.
    1
  7.  @johnpatrick1647  Nope, not now. People have ignored politics for 10-20 years now, they won't anymore.
    1
  8. Nimarata just keep swinging, it doesn't help that she always lands on her face every time, though
    1
  9.  @jhonathanmarquez9987  Unfortunately, 22 millions illegal votes was counted. Go back to school, kid.
    1
  10.  @Cynna1065  You don't know how to read or you're just trolling, kid. The evidence is the number itself. You can't disprove something, you can't prove something, but you have all the reasons to believe in it. It's called thinking. The numbers are real, the motive is real. Go back to school, you're just being pathetic. And if you're trolling, you'll have better chance at a Clinton Campaign ad, it's full of morons there. But not here.
    1
  11.  @Cynna1065  Fine, do you have any prove that those people didn't vote? Where's your prove for that? The source? Well, images of illegal immigrants fleeing from law enforcement, the existence of ICE itself is the evidence showing that those illegal aliens are committing crimes and do not wish to stop. Therefore they have the motive not supporting the people who are capturing them. And that's the motive. Where's the proof for that? Call the FBI and ask them how they narrow down their suspects. This is a theory, very likable theory based on how nobody can disprove it, but half of the country is disallowing proving it. You're just ignoring facts because you're short sighted, pal. It's not my instinct, it's logic. Learn it. Kid. You can't disprove it. We're prohibited from proving it due to the corrupt nature of the Democrats, disallowing voting registration requirements. There, those are the facts. If you can't see, you're very blind. You can't show and prove something that is hidden, kid. You know what it's called Investigating, thinking, logic. It's also how democracy was formed. Ideology that has never been seen before put into application due to logic. There. Your version of show and prove is not much more than a show and tell of a third grader, can only be applied with very trivial stuff. If you want to argue, pal, I suggest learn how to think by using what you see, not just reciting what you see however it was given to you. Pathetic!
    1
  12.  @Cynna1065  Okay, kid, you're just embarrassing yourself. You have no idea what you're talking about concerning law school, Columbia Law here, want to meet? You're just ignoring information and demand proof before anything can be proven, that kind of thinking would lead you to believe that the moon landing is fake, and something mysterious happened in Roswell, here's a piece of advice, if something can't be prove or disprove, we, by law are required to act based on the presumption of innocence, but it doesn't mean that information can be ignored just because they're not directly linked, idiot. That's how thesis, theory is formed. You want to ignore that, fine. Keep living in that bubble if you want to. I did show what I had found, kid. It's a case, which has really obvious evidence, number of illegal immigrants, by definition is criminal, millions of them, will be prosecuted and arrested if the policies against illegal immigrants are passed. So if you don't consider that as valid motive, then maybe you should ignore witness protection, because there is no proof whatsoever that the criminals will "harm" the witness, right? Where did you go to school, Ixtapa? There are 2 kinds of prove, idiot. Direct proof, and indirect proof, the direct proof is used to convict someone, but the indirect ones are used, when the direct ones aren't available, they're used to make a case against something, such as criminal records, motive. That's how people got investigated before being arrested. You're seeing the situation as whether something is absolutely proved or it is false, which is ignorant. Clear? Disproving or proving something in an absolute way requires hard evidence. Which are usually not available because most criminals aren't that stupid, they're smarter than you. But we're also more clever, we have the right to suspect somebody of something, as in how the police department have the right to suspect anybody and listed anybody related into the investigation if they don't have solid alibi, and even when they have alibi, the police still have the right to suspect that something happened, because out of all possible situation, there are more situation that something happened indirectly than nothing happened at all. So given the information above, it's reasonable to assume that something is happening and demand an investigation into the matter, but we can't. Those illegal immigrants are being protected by the same senators, representative that they support and committed crimes to vote for, information, kid, learn it. Where would people learn that? Law school, kid, they even taught that in college, maybe you should go there. There isn't proof, because if there was proof, the majority of Democrats would be impeached, like I said, it's not absolute, we're in the process of investigating. You're really delusional, aren't you. Copying words without even thinking what they meant. The proving and disproving something is only required in the court of law, why? Because it's in that court of law that the government will use their tremendous power to exercise those judgement, and that requires a relatively correct judgement. But when discussing about a case that isn't in a court of law, for example, like this one. You need to give information to make a case. Otherwise we can't catch any murderer if they're not caught at the scene, why? Because you can't suspect anyone because there are no hard proof. So, learn to read, and then learn to think about what you read. Because you're just embarrassing yourself An old Chinese saying for you: If you know, say that you know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how you know. You don't know anything, kid. Go back to school, pathetic!
    1
  13.  @insideline2162  People do pal. You hate to admit it, but a lot of people still believe in stereotypes such as blonde, leggy conservatives don't know a thing. You need to attract their attention first.
    1
  14. Oh yeah, talk to your father first, Chelsea.
    1
  15. @The Cadaver Poor kid, what happened? Majored in sjws degrees and now being worthless? Have some shame,kid.
    1
  16.  @MegaRudyray  You should think before you type, kid. Learn to read,
    1
  17.  @maxsmart645  Yeah, that's not how it works, kid. Learn to distinguish actual responsibility to defend the nation and made up ones. I feel sad that somebody can look everything through such lensof stupidity. Go back to school.
    1
  18. @Thomas Anheuser Learn actual history, kid. It happened after he abolished slavery and entered history as the greatest President we have had till now. You're just embarassing yourself.
    1
  19.  @matthewk2175  We have a thing called coast guard. It's easier to guard the coast than the land border placed in a desert. Think.
    1
  20.  @jrich745  Well, you will loose. Here's a piece of advice, don't take a bet when you know nothing about the things you're gonna bet on. Doing the opposite would usually bankrupt you, that is if you're smart enough to have anything.
    1
  21.  @alexocasio-gomez5267  Nope, stop typing propaganda, you should go to Beverly Hills, the maids aren't black or "Latin". We, as in smart people, not just white people, value legal works in any form. You would know that if you can get a job.
    1
  22.  @joelisSHI  "were", not anymore.
    1
  23. @Henry F Wagons You'll have better chance trolling at McDonald's. Not here, you're just embarassing yourself, small time troll.
    1
  24.  mako zero  Nope, we're not stupid, sorry.
    1
  25.  @trueconservative6288  We're doing it, are you blind or stupid?
    1
  26.  @matthewk2175  I have friends at the border and they say it's way worse than the coast. Have you ever heard of something called a plan, we took care of the most urgent place first.
    1
  27.  @packerfan8862  No, he didn't. Use your brain.
    1
  28.  @matthewk2175  I have friends that works in police stations and ICE, they encounter illegal immigrants which are dangerous all the time. What's your argument against that? I also have friends who are in line for legal immigration, your friend broke the law, and get away therefore broke the principle of all men are created equal. What's your argument against that? Think.
    1
  29.  @packerfan8862  You'll have better chance trolling at McDonald's, small time troll. Pathetic,
    1
  30.  @packerfan8862  Nope, they're not facts. They you're baseless assumption. Learn to distinguish those. Pathetic.
    1
  31.  @russk8091  Nope, Lincoln ripped tge country apart fighting for something that he believe would make the country better. Learn some history, no Lincoln, no civil war, but that would mean slavery. Use your brain and think about that. Trump is doing the same thing concerning border security.
    1
  32.  @dexterjackson9525  You're a sad little person. Go back to school, kid.
    1
  33.  @jrich745  You need to stop ignoring facts and pretend that they're lies. That's just pitiful. You want to see how friendly aliens are, go ahead. Head down to the border, some border patrol officers died but you can take your chance. Film it, expose him if you can. Otherwise shut up. Terrorist could be flying in, they could also be travelling through the border. The head of the Executive Branch of American Government, who has all the possible means of getting of information say one thing, you say otherwise. Where's your source? CNN? They don't have a source. Read carefully because you're just embarrassing yourself.
    1
  34.  @rumi9005  It has always been a national emergency, people just have been ignoring it. It happened under Obama, Bush, before that, you didn't care. Now we do care, and we voted for this President, not the public vote, there's a reason why we don't use that. Learn it. You should ask Lincoln why slavery was a bad thing, Washington, Adams, Jefferson all used the system. Your arguement is as flawed as it's dumb. Think a bit.
    1
  35.  @matthewk2175  Nope, it's not. Here's some knowledge, the country resources are finite, the space are finite, too many people and we can't take care of them all. Want to see how people in China poor area live, not that great. Another piece of advice, if you can't give out any argument for it, all of your opinions are just worthless opinions, basically trash. Don't litter. It doesn't matter what you "think", it matters what they actually are.
    1
  36.  @jrich745  Where, give link, quote can be made up, kid. Give a source, official release? Anywhere? Go ahead, give a link. It's not a quote unless there are proof of that "quote". Where? Give one. You don't believe, not evidence, you could be stupid, who knows. No, Trump Tower has wall, like any other working building and houses, it protects the people inside, that's why we're going to build one. Learn to think. Pathetic.
    1
  37.  @jrich745  Yeah, I have a better one for you. The official release statement of the DEA, read it. It's long but not that long, mostly graphics.They actually discussed the matter in that article with full context. Let me break your illusion, First: Illegal border crossing isn't down, the article only mentioned illegal crossing that were apprehended, and furthermore, what do you think's gonna happen when they already gotten into the country? Did the people who got in just go out and re enter every year? Do the math, they stay, so of course it's gonna go down, but it keeps adding up Second: People who come into the country don't aim at border counties, idiot. You don't go to the border to deal drugs, or find jobs. You go for the center, or close the center, and again, "counties". Not state, counties. Think a bit Third, most undocumented immigrants don't sneak through the border, well they're the civilized one who could get a visa. The dangerous ones, (caravan) didn't, and furthermore is that this statement has no source. Fourth, fine, not terrorist, people with serious criminal history, intention of violence, criminals. They're slightly better, but if you think that you should let a criminal into your own home just because terrorist have been stopped from entering then you're crazy. Fifth, no caravan are sneaking, they're rushing the border, want to look? There are footage, asylum seekers don't attack border patrol agents and scale the barrier. Those actions, if happened domestically are called thieves. Study. Sixth, drugs entering, only known drugs, apprehended drugs are hidden. Why do you think they know that they're hidden? Think a bit, if the drugs coming in are caught at checkpoint, why would they go through the checkpoint, idiot. Seventh, Conservative political figures? Who? One representative? All politicians in the past agreed on the barrier? Need some footage? Eighth, 354 miles already have fence? So what, the border is way much more than that, do you keep your wall holed because 30% is already filled? Ninth, polls conducted by whom? Credibility? There was an actual election and Donald Trump was voted as the President, that's more accurate than any poll. And if you're gonna pull the "public vote", there's a reason we don't use that. Montana does contribute to the country, not just California. The entire article is a bunch of nonsense. I just did you a favor of pointing it out.' Read carefully and choose a better agenda next time.
    1
  38.  Austino Brown  If you can't type anything decent, don't type anything.
    1
  39.  @jrich745  No, they don't. Every single plan in the past has been about building physical barrier and funding technology, the technology is still updating but the barrier didn't even start, stop making up things. The wall does stop illegal immigration, ask Israel. Why does your house have a wall of it doesn't stop people from entering? Think.
    1
  40.  @jrich745  "Drive under it". You don't think at all, do you. We have air control, coast guard, even sensors under ground. But what we don't have is a physical barrier. The more you type, the more desperate you get, if you can't give out actual reasons, stop lying to people, it's despicable. We're at the end of the 18th day, we addressed the nation, saying that he won't cave in. Let me give you a hint, that decision isn't made by him alone, it's made by his staff, consists of way smarter people than you. Don't be desperate.
    1
  41.  @russk8091  A piece of advice kid, if you can't give out any arguement, typing long won't make you less pathetic. People do read, unlike you. You have better solution, go ahead. The most simplistic thing exist for a reason. If you think that having walls won't help, answer this question, do your house have a wall? An old saying that is also medieval but very true. If you do know, say that you do know, if you don't know, say that you don't know, that's how people tell whether you know. You don't know anything, go back to school because you're just embarasseing yourself.
    1
  42. You can't say the letter didn't capture the context if your report has been released, idiot. That guy is so depressed because his career is over and he'll have to write a book lying for a living.
    1
  43.  @Plutonian  Well, they paid salaries to a lot of people who do pay taxes. Get that kid? Support package will only last for an amount of time, Amazon will pay in the future. But UBI will not be paid by Amazon, it will be paid by you, the people who use Amazon, it's how VAT works, study!
    1
  44. Sorry, why do they keep Wallace again? Is it because they're afraid that when they fire all the idiots, no Democrats would dare to come? Come on, just clean the trash.
    1
  45. There's no such thing as White Nationalist, there is nationalist, which is a synonym for patriot. And there is white, the color and the skin. Juan is a racist just by saying that term, he is categorizing people using skin color
    1
  46. We knew this 4 days ago. We also knew that it's fraudulent after the first day.
    1
  47.  Jhoopy theElder  Okay, idiot, the purpose of the investigation is to find Russian Collusion, not tax evasion. Hence, you're an idiot. It's fine that the guy is caught, but it's a waste of tax money paying for that useless Mueller to pick up pebbles and pretending that they're golds. That's what you do when you're 5, not when you're more than 5. Pathetic.
    1
  48.  thebestever475  Charges of what? Collusion? Any proof? Trump or Trump's team? Remember Panama? You're a moron for pretending that this investigation could do anything, go back to school, kid. Learn to think for yourself, and a piece of advice, don't listen to CNN anchors who don't have law degrees yelling against people who do and then believe those people. Pathetic.
    1
  49.  @tombarry1824  As in how decades old "crimes" are being brought forward with no relation with Russia. Are you a moron?
    1
  50. Somebody at the FBI has to set Juan up for a guilty verdict. If somebody had set you up purposefully, everything you do afterwards in result of that setting up is very much irrelevant. There was a case called Miranda.
    1