Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Why 'Tucker Carlson Tonight' didn't air a segment last week" video.
-
21
-
15
-
9
-
4
-
3
-
@Temmie No, pal, I pointed out why he is troll, therefore my conclusion is that he is a troll, it's called reasoning and conclusion, you're the one who is lost, Clear? Don't be desperate, think for yourself instead of typing nonsense propaganda, need a definition for that, too? It means you're typing lies to advocate for something, propaganda. Clear?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Strange Quark No, those aren't facts, kid, those are your assumption, here's why:
You can't prove the reason why he didn't show the footage, my conclusion after watching the taped version is that the "interview" was a footage of Tucker trying to debate a clown, idiot Dutchman failed to give any argument, any counter argument, he insult the channel and the anchor. So it's a worthless interview full of lies, no reason to show it.
Again, you can't prove that this is an excuse, because you can't prove that he did anything wrong.
So yeah, your argument crumbled, if you want to learn how to give out better arguments, I suggest going to college.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davilakarlos Yeah, you didn't watched the whole footage, you took a glance at best, watching includes thinking, you can't called somebody out if all of your arguments are assumptions, anchors salaries are high, otherwise why would people want to be an anchor?
The "Dutchman" can not link the fact that most workers work for some kind of corporate to corporations paying people to follow them. Dutchman failed, as you failed to point out which part of Fox News is biased? Anything, go ahead, point it out, the "Dutchman" insult people for no reason and pretend to be righteous, it's just despicable, that's called watching, it includes thinking, try to think.
1
-
@emseek9822 You're mistaken. Pal, you can't quote part of the conversation and then claim that it's the entire conversation, it's called lying. Mr Dutchman his idiocy also accused Tucker of journalism misconduct, intentionally driving news to target "minorities", calling Tucker the "problem" to the country,
ALL OF THE ABOVE ALLEGATIONS ARE DUTCHMAN OPINIONS AND HIS OPINIONS ALONE, SUPPORTED BY NO FACTS INSTEAD OF HIS ASSUMPTION THAT TUCKER BEING A PART OF CATO INSTITUTE IS SOLID EVIDENCE, WHICH IT IS RIDICULOUS, BASELESS, TOTAL NONSENSE. IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO AND ARGUE WITH DIGNITY, AS IN HOW YOU QUOTE THE ENTIRE LINE, I SUGGEST STOP BEING A TROLL AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL., CLEAR? IT'S EASY TO SEE IF YOU TRY TO THINK.
1
-
@emseek9822 You're mistaken. Pal, you can't quote part of the conversation and then claim that it's the entire conversation, it's called lying. Mr Dutchman his idiocy also accused Tucker of journalism misconduct, intentionally driving news to target "minorities", calling Tucker the "problem" to the country,
ALL OF THE ABOVE ALLEGATIONS ARE DUTCHMAN OPINIONS AND HIS OPINIONS ALONE, SUPPORTED BY NOTHING EXCEPT OF HIS ASSUMPTION THAT TUCKER BEING A PART OF CATO INSTITUTE IS SOLID EVIDENCE, WHICH IT IS RIDICULOUS, BASELESS, TOTAL NONSENSE. HE CAN NOT POINT OUT FLAWS IN CATO'S PROGRAM, HE CAN'T POINT OUT MISTAKES IN THE INSTITUTE CHAIN OF REASONING OR RESULT, IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO AND ARGUE WITH DIGNITY, AS IN HOW YOU QUOTE THE ENTIRE LINE, I SUGGEST STOP BEING A TROLL AND GO BACK TO SCHOOL., CLEAR? IT'S EASY TO SEE IF YOU TRY TO THINK.
1
-
1