General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Mark Armage
Fox News
comments
Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Coronavirus whistleblower speaks out about possible COVID origin on 'Tucker'" video.
The entire thesis is based on how the RatG13 corona virus strain is a fake one, and of course, the China hid it so well that there's no way of verifying. The Chinese said they swab it in bats, where are the bats? They can't tell. So it's a paper pointing out obvious flaw and holes in the Chinese cover up, but because it's China, there is no way of verifying it on an individual level. The government from all of the countries can propose resolution for the Chinese to give out the actual living bats with the exact DNA sequence to verify their claim, but that process takes months. But the paper is out there, CCP can't censor what they don't control, time will tell.
2
Why do you think it's spread by mistake? China had it the earliest, yet the number remains low, that should be impossible because they should have no idea what it is or how to prevent it, or what is the right measures to take.
1
@Execute_Order__66 Because they're lying. If the virus is actually man made, the spread was not by mistake, it's a biological attack. Because if it had been made by them, they hiding it means they're attacking the world with it.
1
@vaguedesired6710 Logic, dummy. If you want some clue, people have made video games about these facts.
1
Wrong, kid. The people reporting this stories are the top staff at these "agencies". Indian scientists have reported this since May. Agencies can't confirm "science". Scientists within the agencies can question the validity of the science and that's it, kid. Nobody can confirm or reject a research. But interestingly enough, nobody dared to counter argue the report, nobody. The only claim against is that the virus strain is from the natural bats, which the report pointed out that it could be manufactured because there is absolutely no proof that those bats exist at all, no living sample, it's all claim by the Chinese government. So get back to reality, kid.
1
@nogthedervish Everybody, nobody have been able to counter the validity of the science in her report. The Chinese are resorting to the "WHO said this, WHO said that". And what WHO said has nothing to do with virus strain comparison or notable feature of the virus, but only bad hearsay claim that quote the Chinese government itself. That is enough to show that the Chinese are in big trouble.
1
@rassault Really, which part of the report are you claiming is wrong? Strain resemblance between the virus and another virus which are in the possession of Chinese military? Or how the claim of the virus origin is to a sample that the Chinese can not provide nor prove that it actually existed? Wake up, kid.
1
@nogthedervish You see, pal. It's not a scientific proof if you just quote opinions of people. That's not how it goes, kid. Subjective judgement of dummies claiming credibility is not proof of anything. Dr Yan published a paper, 26 pages document, exactly which part in that is unsubstantiated? Or is it you can't actually discussed it? Which part, which data, where's the real data? 20 words opinions to judge a scientific paper? Nice try, it's called trash. Get back to reality, darling.
1