Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Dwarkesh Patel" channel.

Believing your own propaganda is fatal, this lady is a dead woman walking.
9
@timmteller871 It's very clear you have no idea what makes a country powerful, buddy. Maritime order just mean trading via sea routes that existed long before the existence of the US or even Britain. Get over yourself, trade via land routes, for example the silk road is a perfectly suitable alternative. What makes a country rich is the production of goods and services. The Chinese are just better at that compared to anyone on Earth.
7
A lot of things changed on this planet since 70 years ago pal, you might want to study up. Ignorance is fatal.
7
@kristiansandsmark2048 You need a serious re-education on what economy, free trade, and power means. You're caught in so much lies that you can't even see the truth anymore. You're correct in the sense that Eastern Europe is totally irrelevant in economy development, but you're fundamentally mistaken on what's the point of the Ukraine war. It's not to get more land, buddy, Russia has enough land. Go get a proper education and you'll understand.
4
If India has any sense and wants to survive. Take everything Madam Paine said and throw it in the trash. She's a cowardice, incompetent individual who educated a generation of losers that inflicted nothing but death and misery to both the global population and their own country.
2
She has no idea how Putin and Xi thinks. The old hag never witnessed an actual battle in her life, never put her life on the line, never study anything that wasn't spoonfed to her by the same propaganda machine that she's trying to protect. These people need to be fired from the system, because they're buying their own lies and then make damaging decisions that kill people daily. She lives in a total fantasy.
2
@dinismantas7265 If by "depth" you mean it agrees with your mistaken narrative of how the world works, there's another word for it. It's just wrong. It's easy to be "deep" if you're making up stuff that aren't even true. You're not containing Russia, the one being contained and isolated are Western Europe and America. Don't you get it? America and it's lackey accounts for at best 15% of global population. Russia is in alliance with at least the 60% of global population. Do you understand basic math?
1
I have a question, if someone is a dinosaur who used stories from 50 years ago and think that nothing has changed on this planet since, are they a person with low intellect? And second, if Dr Paine never visited the modern China, can we classify her as an ignorant person on modern China because she has no first hand knowledge of any kind and only hear rumours / government propaganda.
1
That's not how history works, buddy. One single event in history doesn't make it the absolute template of every single other event going into the future. Your naive and childish assumption of "every counterpart is just Hitler" is a mentality that shouldn't have made it through highschool. Go get a better education.
1
No. But you bunch should start reading more books and having better education because you dummies don't realize the world considers your viewpoint a total joke.
1
It's easy to make everything clear if you oversimplify all of it and make it wrong.
1
Sarah Payne doesn't dare to engage any of the tough questions. What kind of expert is that? A fraudulent one.
1
@kristiansandsmark2048 I will give you an actually way better explanation, buddy. Russian is behind because you got a 70 year behind start due to the existence of the Soviet Union communist state and then the tragic 1990s mainly created by the US insane foreign policy of oppression. So you're totally wrong on why Russia is not prosperous, you're pretending as if this is a fair race and it's Russia inherent flaws that make them not prosperous, that's just childish and totally wrong. Russia is getting more and more prosperous by the year. They're behind because they're starting 70 years late, but they're catching and they will catch up. Natural resources is just one of many factors that are accelerating Russia's growth. They have surpassed Germany in becoming the 5th largest economy worldwide when you measure economy via production. And they're world leaders in Nuclear Technology by a gigantic margin. So buddy, yes, we know more than this very average professor that is respected by literally no one around the globe. Buddy, trade, whether free, or restricted, whether by land or by sea has been around for millenia. And there are many forms of it that are capable of bringing prosperity. Do not mistaken the current US led system as the only viable trade system, that's absurd in so many ways. You need a serious fundamental education in what economy, trade, power, means, because you're using really outdated as well as proven to be false concepts. You're living in a bubble.
1
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most delusional point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies". I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it. The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what leads to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses. Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind. So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West. Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2. Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining. Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it. Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple, and this simplicity shall break your fantasy completely. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia. But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US. So get over yourself, buddy, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most delusional point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies". I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it. The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what led to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses. Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind. So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West. Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2. Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining. Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it. Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia. But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US. So get over yourself, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
@kristiansandsmark2048 One of the most inaccurate point I saw that you're buying into is this absurd notion of the "West" prosperity is due to this "free trade" and "maritime societies". I'm very sure that you have no idea what either of those words even mean. I'll give you a clue, that's not the reason why the current West is "prosperous". Here's a fundamental historical knowledge, kingdoms, countries have been engaging in economic activities, achieving technological breakthrough long before the existence of the current "Western society". The world history is long and it's not just the last 200 years, even though you might want to lie to yourself about it. The current prosperity of "the West", or to be more correct, the US Empire is because of how devastating WW2 is to all of the other competing power around the globe. The US Empire is leave in tact and rise as the victor, claiming most of the spoil despite hiding away for most of the war, that spoil of war, which includes the poaching of everying promising scientist and engineer around the world, that's what led to the US prosperity. That and of course China and Russia strategical mistake of adopting "socialism" instead of their common tradition of common trading between businesses. Here's another fact that you probably never even heard of. Free market also existed long before the existence of "Western society". People have been trading with each other, under the form of merchant, craftsmen since the ancient time. And that system of people trading with each other has been unlocking human productivity since the ancient times, it's not a Western invention of any kind. So the West poaching of talents plus the standard application of free market plus China and Russia losing their way for about 50 years is what lead to the current prosperity being enjoyed by the West. Nothing exceptional here, you're just very lucky at that specific point in time after WW2. Now such "lucky" scenario is changing, rapidly. Both Russia and China have gone off the socialist regime and they have returned to the standard free market economy that should have been adopted from the first place. And they're catching up, making up time for the lost 50 years or so. China started earlier than Russia, under Deng Xiaoping in the 70s, and Russia started in the 2000s under Putin. They are catching up, they are ascending, while you're declining. Now there are many factors to your declining but the declining is obvious in your share of the global output. China and Russia share has been steadily rising, while your share is decreasing. The most obvious marker is the BRICS and G7 comparison. Now the BRICS+ is the world leading economy bloc, no doubt about it. Now you might be confused about why these countries are ascending, well it's quite simple. It's the idea of economic convergence proposed by Adam Smith. It's that the productivity of a person, regardless of race or ethnicity, given the same amount of education and the same amount of resources shall be the same. Meaning that a person in China is just as smart as a person in US or UK, the same with a person in Russia. But the imbalances here where it will show why they're ascending and you're declining, is that the people in Russia has way more natural resources than you in US. And the people in China has way more education than the ones in the US. So get over yourself, this isn't the 1800s, this isn't the 1900s, this is the 21st century.
1
@wakyjedi Then again, you need a better education because that view is outrightly rejected by approximately 85% of global population. That's why the US usually goes to war, the Russians are completely different.
1
This Blair guy doesn't get it one bit. It is his Western system that is intimidating, bullying and oppressing everyone. When the bully thinks his bullying is normal behavior, any kind of normal action seems like irregular behavior.
1
Sarah Paine is the "expert" that does no debate, respected by no one, invited to no talks and is the main guest of this YouTube Channel. Come on, buddy, India is a bit lagging behind but this is desperate. Catch up with civilization.
1
So this is why the US military always make mistakes and loses every single war they fought in the last 30 years or so. They put losers in charge of teaching the officers.
1
AMA: I would like to ask Dr Paine why there's literally no footage of any of her debate with another serious intellectual on the internet and has she ever done one? If she did, where can the footage be found because Dwarkesh do not have the expertise knowledge to recognize the fault within her argument so it would be great to witness a fair exchange. Second, if she never did a debate, can she even be considered an expert considering how she was never reviewed or scrutinized by anyone?
1
@beatdizzy That's obviously a very productive way to get to the truth? Lock yourself up in a gigantic echo chamber, nice.
1
@beatdizzy So can you answer my question for me? Why this expert never does any debate with anyone and if so, can she even be considered an expert?
1
@beatdizzy Hey hombre, where are you? Do you learn after Dr Payne admirable character of cowardice and run as well?
1
We have a bunch of these delusional dummies in the US, they think they lead some kind of "global order" instead of China. Despite China having the bigger population share, being the primary trade partners to more countries, being in the biggest economic alliance on Earth in the BRICS. I mean, buddy, China can kick you out of the global order, because their influence is actually sort of global, unlike yours where it's a bunch of lackies in Western Europe. Japan will follow China and abandon you in an instant.
1
That's because someone is a simpleton.
1
@beeasy9927 Yes, it's called every single Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer interviews. You know, the actual experts that actually did something and are actually respected?
1
@nshk9737 Nice try, homie. Why don't you get out of the gigantic echo chamber?
1
@beeasy9927 You mean the sane type? Buddy, are you aware that this lady is a fraud respected by no one, that's why this channel of this YouTuber is the only place that invites her?
1
You're kidding, right? Where did you go to school? Wyoming?
1
@carsid73 That's not a threat, it's a fact. Come on, hombre, read between the lines. It might have something to do with she spewing nothing but unsubstantiated lies and false beliefs.
1
If this is a professor in the military, the US is screwed. She's ignorant, unqualified, buy into her own lies without realizing that they're not accepted anywhere on Earth. An insane person trapped in their own gigantic echo chamber. The first example is the astonishing hypocrisy when talking about the situation in Ukraine. "Denying country membership to please ego in Russia". That's like saying USSR shouldn't have stopped sending nuclear weapons to Cuba in 1963 just to please some ego in the US, it's childish, dangerous, highly incompetent.
1