Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Fireside Chat Ep. 66 - Dennis and Charlie Kirk Take Questions | Fireside Chat" video.

  1. Okay, the first question about Anti Zionism and Anti Semitic is just radical right talking point. I agree with a lot of right wing talking points but not this kind. You can like Italian culture, food, music and you can hate the country Italy if the country is radical, committing crimes and all kinds of violation. Let's see whether you hate Italy under Mussolini, the separation between negative actions of a country and it's positive side is required, otherwise you need to love the Americans action of slaughtering Native American. By that talking point, Lincoln wasn't allowed to hate slavery if he loved America because this country was built using those resources. This is just sad, Turning Point USA and Prager U both do a lot of good, but that first question, think a bit.
    7
  2. @sYrup That country isn't supposed to exist, funny thing, land doesn't belong to people who lived there first and then leave, no, in that way, the US belongs to Native American. They took the land by force, and after WW2, and the Helsinki agreement, it's called invasion.
    1
  3.  @marcosvinicius-iq4lp  Here, pal, is there a country Israel before 1945? The answer is no, that country wasn't on the map. What would you say to Native Americans taking the US land on the basis that they lived there first? Move aside? You support Israel, a damn hypocrite, stop kidding yourself.
    1
  4.  @ab5olut3zero95  Like I said, pal. After the year of 1945, no such country is allowed to form. You can't just go in and take the land by force, just because you win in the war doesn't mean you get the right. The world cope with the principle that any nation conquered before WW2 by Western nations should be given their freedom back. Which also means that no new country could just go invade other people's territory just because you can. Next, Democratic state, that's a relative concept. Vietnam, China, Russia, are they democratic states? According to the world yes, truly, nobody knows. But their right of full sovereignty is secured. The detail of Israel may or may not function as a Democratic State doesn't give them right of invasion. Israel is a fake nation, their existence deny the right of negotiations and peace. They won their land through war, not centuries old war, current war, just decades old, their right isn't protected by any concept of the modern world. Stop using words such as "anti-semitic" to justify your delusional thesis of Zionism. You have no basis for it. The only basis for it, if it's true, then entire North America belongs to one and one race only, Native American State. You're just ignoring logic, pal.
    1
  5.  @MsElke11  Those countries have the right to sovereignty as in how those countries existed before 1945, whether it is legal depends on the condition of forming, not right or wrong, remember how the U.S is formed? Think a bit.
    1
  6.  @MsElke11  Those countries have the right to sovereignty as in how those countries existed before 1945, whether it is legal depends on the condition of forming, not right or wrong, remember how the U.S is formed? Think a bit.
    1