Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
109
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
32
-
25
-
23
-
18
-
17
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Eternal Star Really? A society with no law enforcement shall have no crime?
Where do you live? Because in every place in the world without sufficient law enforcement, it's quite dangerous.
Like I said, Brazilian slumdog, pal, without law enforcement, it's not a society of law anymore, you think people have this hidden compassion where they won't hurt you to get what they want?
Go ahead, go to Africa, go to Columbia, go to these paradise, law enforcement there don't care, so there must be less crime, right?
You go risk your life there first before you ask other people to risk theirs, okay.
The only reason you're not killing each other is because there are consequences if you do so.
This is basic logic, in a world where you can get away with anything, all people succumb to their primitive desire, this is not an assumption it's a fact, the people who went to the place of no law enforcement to test it usually do not return alive.
The former territory of ISIS has no police, they must be safe, correct?
Don't take my word for it, go live at those places, places where you can be raped and no law enforcement agencies shall care, those place are so safe that people are fleeing.
A society without police is a society without law enforcement, without law enforcement, there is no law except the law of force, tribal war, if these philosophy talks are too complicated for you, watch the TV series "The Walking Dead", even Hollywood hypocrites know what happens without law and order.
6
-
@thecalmbro No, watching too much TV or gambling is an indirect cause.
If gambling can make somebody looses their conscious mind or overdose, it would definitely be illegal.
Your last statement is a baseless assumption. Because the argument of arresting people who do drugs is because society as a whole does not tolerate it is just as valid.
Drugs is illegal almost everywhere in the world, even in countries that don't grow it and have only one kind of race.
So your argument fell apart, kid. Learn real history.
We don't make the drug war because we need to lock up poor people, we make the drug war with the attempt to help poor people, scare them off the drugs and start doing the work. But unfortunately, the reason they can't get out of the drugs is the exact reason why they're poor.
Shocking, isn't it. It's easier to say that they go after the drugs to oppress people then to say that the drug is bad and you're a weak, dumb person who can't live without it.
Get a better sense of dignity, genius. The nonsense of the drug war is made to oppress minorities?
In Phillipines, Malaysia, Vietnam, China, the majority of the drugs criminals are the majority ethnicity. So your argument fell apart.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3