Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, moron, the video is about power, and total stupidity.
What you're trying to do is admirable but you have no idea how to do it.
Even George Floyd, who was killed, that man is a professional criminal.
So your nonsense of putting a psychiatrist on patrol duty, pathetic.
How can you tell which area will there be crime and which will not?
Are you a clairvoyant? Or you're even much more idiotic that you don't realize that if you remove police in some areas, those will be the perfect place for criminals to thrive?
We saw the video, we saw the stupidity in it as well.
Why don't you tell that to hypocrites in Hollywood? Why they need so much security? You want to remove security from certain areas for baseless reasons, not sane enough, dummy.
1
-
@dillanrojas6434 How about getting money for those programs and keep the police, dummy?
Yes, he hope police will disappear in the future due to better lifestyle. That's why he's a moron, it will never disappear, because human nature is full of flaws, criminals keep existing, doesn't matter how much nonsense treatment you put into it.
How about stop living behind the screen and get back to real life? Visit a maximum security prison, let's see how you treat those people?
The young man who looted, shoot and kill a police officer last week, your policy of "treatment" failed again and again. Pathetic.
You're allocating resources to all the wrong places, because those resources are needed for the police, dummy.
Why don't you use your own money to fund those fantasy treatment and leave the police alone, because unlike your failed programs of treating criminals like they're naive children, the police force actually works.
The first thing is the claim that "police is the tool of violence and social control".
That is pure stupidity, "police is the tool of law enforcement and social security".
Why don't you go to the victims of criminals, all skin color, and ask them if they feel safer when you remove the police and replace them with psychiatrists?
Because psychiatrists can't defend citizens against criminals, clear? Doesn't matter what reason you commit the crime, people still get harm by those crime.
So before you worry for the criminals, how about you worry for the victims of the criminals?
Because those victims will be hurt a lot more before you can help any criminal, clear?
1
-
@seth_deegan That is just pathetic statistics lie. It's taken out of context severely.
More police doesn't lead to less crime, but it sure makes the crime harder to commit, faster reaction time, more safety. Common sense would know that.
Now, let's see, less police does lead to more crime, dummy. See the last week? Police can't do their job due to the pathetic protesters and people happily went out looting, as well as gang violence, just in Chicago.
Done? Dummy, the world is a stable place because there are super powers, the morons at the UN can't handle the simple fact that certain countries will want to spread terror and dominant over other countries, their concept is pathetic and that's why they don't achieve a damn thing anywhere that matters.
You think that the UN is fighting terrorists?
The terrorism in the Middle East existed for hundreds of years, even before Western intervention, you're going to say that less police there will stop them from killing each other and destroy the region ?
Demilitarization? It's only viable when every side demilitarize, the unfortunate thing is that the world doesn't follow your fantasy. You demilitarize Asia and North Korea shall invade South Korea within a month.
So get back to reality, your "ideas" sounds good in your head, those are not viable options in reality.
1
-
1
-
@lolo_o4309 People don't want to be poor as well, but they can't work or have the willpower to not be poor. Sad life. Why don't you care about the victims instead of the criminals?
Have some sense of moral values.
Addicts before you can help them, they have already harmed dozens of people, care for them, care for the victims, pal. That's a conclusion that you've been avoided.
Career criminal is drug addict who went into prison 5 different times, pulled a gun on a pregnant woman, threatened to kill her and rob her house.
Mr George Floyd, honorable criminal.
That is career criminal.
They have all kind of support and employment for poor people, too much of those support, you're just pathetic.
If he wants to work, get a job, Amazon is hiring, local restaurants, they pay little but that's what you get for having no skill whatsoever, use your free time to gain more skill.
Look pal, society doesn't have the responsibility to take care for you. Ask the real poor people who got out of it.
It's due to you, pal.
Not the system, not the white man, it's you.
Americans are the most privileged morons in the world, and you whine about how the system is against you, no, dummy. You are against you. Your educational system is a joke, I don't understand how it's possible not to be a straight A students in your schools. And because being a straight A is that easy, your college education is as easy as it can get, just don't major in gender study. Compare it to the Koreans, Vietnamese, Chinese.
Wake up.
Unless you're way too lazy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@suprotyv7534
Now you need to take back Crimea with force to show that your belief is correct kid, apparently no Crimean follows you.
It's not a belief, it's a fact that the people in Crimea came heavily from Russia, ask them, kid. Your justification of Israel creating their own territory comes from the same philosophy.
And even more, what Hitler did with the Germans in Sudetes are not bad, it's him killing all those people afterwards are bad.
You're mistaken between full Nazism evil, and a good action committed by Nazism authority.
That's not how argument works, kid.
The same logic applies with Cuba, Venezuela, any country with a coup, the people stood up, it's their rights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mike Turner Again, get a real job, maybe something that doesn't make statistical claim from grammar, you're just a total buffoon typing that. And secondly, learn how to argue, typing words in the correct order doesn't make you a smarter person, btw "efficient people", it's called sarcasm, moron. Thirdly, "data scientists", you might want to look up more numbers even though you clearly do not have any idea what those numbers mean, this is not the first "teachers protest", there has been more in the last 9 years, and guess what? Every single time, it's the same, they whine, they whine, they quit, because they don't need them for minimal survival. If they can actually produce "efficient" people, it's due to human instinct that we would have given them the budget, pal, search more statistics, some of them are fully funded and guess what, the products stayed almost the same. Class supplies? Have you ever seen Asian schools, they have class 2 times your size and teachers teach at multiple schools and like win way more intellectual awards for high school students. Don't blame the fund. Finally, learn how to think before typing, typing words in the correct order doesn't make you smarter, it's make you more pathetic paying attention to insignificant details, and who knows, maybe I don't double check my reply because you, a "data scientist", do not worth my time, heck, you should be glad that I even reply to you. With your nonsensical claim and Wikipedia paraphrasing others would have just delete your reply, it's easy.
1
-
@RZakelis My statement is based on facts. Your statement is based on fantasy.
Because you live in a fantasy that the GDP is measured via the dollars, and military capability is measured on also spending on the dollars and you think the only tech in the world is the one coded within software.
That's an adorable fantasy worthy of 3 year old. That's just sad.
The economy is not measured via the dollars, darling. Go learn real economy. America is still among the top economy, but it's nowhere near the best, because it's totally not independent and can't manufacture necessities.
America military is also nowhere near the best, actually you're one of the worst, because you spend 10 times all the countries combined to get the similar, sometimes worse results. Military capability is not measured by airplanes as well, doesn't matter how expensive that plane is. Your countries spent it last 30 years doing nothing significant except bullying poor countries.
Technologically, the core technology of semiconductors and physical manufacturing, your country are way behind. The tech products in Silicon Valley aren't special, they are the dominating one right now not because they're special, it's because they're services companies with the most users. Such users can easily leave if push comes to shove.
You can leave Google or Facebook in preference of Weibo or TikTok, all Chinese. But you can't leave the use of oil in Saudi Arabia or manufacturing of goods in China.
Go learn some math, hombre. You live in a Hollywood movie, and it's bad movie.
1
-
@marigi- National identity doesn't come out of the blue, but they've had centuries to form it and did not form it. Whose fault is that? The British?
If the British had not created Kenya, there would be no Kenya. So I think you owe them a thank you.
Because without colonization, there wouldn't be a country nor a governmental system.
So if it hadn't been for colonization, you would be even more backwards.
So I don't know who you're blaming, the only reason Kenya is a country and not a bunch of tribe crammed together listening to chiefs and warlords is colonization.
So who you're blaming? Now it turns out that only due to colonization do you have a country at all. Before colonization, China is still China, so without colonization, China the country would be in tact.
But without British colonization, Kenya wouldn't even be a country.
So pal, if left alone, Kenya would not be Kenya, it would be tribes of people, not even a country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BrianA-vw2xk
That would be another false assumption of you. If there had been no lack of collaboration, they would have formed a country, pal.
Every kind of society start as conquering other groups of people. That's how the tribe in Africa were formed, that's how kingdoms in China and Europe were formed. You can't keep blaming human basic instinct, pal.
The Kenyans were taking the lands of the Kenyans next to them, by force. Why can't the British take it by force?
The Navajos took the land from the cheyenne , and the Americans took the land from the Navajos, it's a cruel world, pal.
The point here is not whether colonialism is morally justified or not, because everybody was doing it, some were just doing it at a bigger scale. The countries that were colonized, they were the ones invading other smaller communities before the colonization. China for example, That is a fact you can't deny, it happens in every continent, in every stages of history.
So wake up, pal. And to the consequences of colonialism, like I pointed out, other countries got through it easily. It's not the British fault that Kenya were centuries slower than other countries when colonialism happens.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really, people are taking this seriously? The game itself is a bunch of algorithm, and humans can only handle a limited amount of those things. They trick you into believing that anything you do in the game is a result of "creativity". It's not. It's a permutation of algorithms, and sooner or later, the AI's gonna gather enough permutation to defeat any human, not because we're not competent, it's just that what it's design to do. The game isn't actual creativity, it's a hidden form of chess, chess is math, we design computers to handle math that we can't. This is designing a car and race it with a fast runner. Really sad application of AI itself. Try to get better news, Vice News.
1
-
Okay, pal, try to think this, very simple. The game is a game, in can only do what it's programmed to do. The game can't do what isn't allowed, therefore the possibility is limited to the number of possible permutation. And humans, can only handle a number of permutations, and they apply it to compete with each other. Computers can handle all of the the possible permutations, it just takes time. Okay. Isn't that clear enough, they did it in chess, they did it in Go, and they'll do it in games that are disguised but actually are math.
1
-
1
-
1