Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "LegalEagle" channel.

Man, if only the US has any standing in lecturing about international laws. Can't wash the blood off of your hands, America.
2
It's just adorable how he ignored the 2014 "protest" was a coup, they literally stormed the Congress building and ousted the President. You can't do that, children. What the hell is this "international community", they recognize coup they like and deny coup that they don't like? Don't confuse international community with US thugs. There are currently 4 super power in the world, and 3 of them are siding with Russia, that's India, China and Russia itself. India and China doesn't voice their support publicly but they throw the US sanctions out the window.
2
No, pal. Originalism is the way law has always been interpreted for over 180 years in the United States and even longer than that in the British Law. Basically since the beginning of modern democratic society itself. The real nonsense is "Living Constitutionalist", which is a manufactured concept within the last 50 years. Go study history, maybe some math.
2
@giglioflex Because that's not how law works, dummy. People who legislate the law write the law. You can't just define the law however you want it to be understood, that's called dictatorship.
2
Actually the people has every right to vote for Court Packing. But if you pack the court this year, we'll pack the court back next year, dummy. It's just math. We dealt with your barbarism for 50 years where there's only 9 justices. Now it's our turn. Show some respect
2
Life is not just about having a heartbeat. It has to be a heartbeat that's reasonably going to develop into a full grown conscious human being. The "potential" here is what set the difference, pal.
1
@caydenl.4878 You Westerners Imperialists sure lives in your own fantasy. It's quite pitiful.
1
@caydenl.4878 You acknowledged only 1/3 of the truth. I know Westerners suck at math but that's still very pathetic.
1
@caydenl.4878 How do I explain this gently. A super-power is a country that you don't dare to mess military wise with. You can't mess with India anymore, they will wrecked anybody. Their economy will bloom like China soon, too many people for it not to take off.
1
She changed it alright, she changed it for the worse. She showcased the biggest loophole in the current state of music contract. And now companies will just fix it outright. As an employee signed to the record, you can't just steal the work you've done for them and create a replica. That's bad business conduct.
1
@thekitkatlizard8661 Little kid, that's not how business works, let me break it down to simpletons like you. There's an implied code of conduct that Miss Swift blatantly ignore because like her fans, she have no manners. Just because something is legal doesn't mean that something is decent.
1
Get over it, homie. They failed to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
1
Such a tragedy. America has joined the rest of the civilized global community where a country constitution doesn't protect the act of killing a baby. Boy, what a day.
1
@quidambrujah Actually this method existed since the beginning of the modern civilization itself. The nonsense of law means whatever you want it to mean is the recently fabricated method. Study real law, pal.
1
@intrinsicallylast5246 Go ahead, you don't have the votes. Any idiots who tried to do that will be voted out of office in Republican states immediately. California has a ton of lunatics but only 2 senators. Go learn some math, darling.
1
@intrinsicallylast5246 Actually it is an extremely popular view in like the other 80% of global population. You brag about getting an abortion in other sane countries, well, it won't end well for you. They disgust it. And of course, you're wrong. The Constitution literally said that it's the Senate job to confirm Presidential apointments. So you know, nice try, darling. Get back to school, study real law.
1
@intrinsicallylast5246 If you want a civil war by ignoring and twisting the rules, go ahead. You'll eat yourself alive There's the word "consent" in the Constitution itself regarding Presidential nominations, darling. Not "usually", always consent. "Shall" means affirmative. Your interpretation is false and is not accepted in any ways, by anyone, in any time The military will follow the judgment of the Court, and of course, they will not follow the appointment process interpretation that nobody accepted in the history of the country. If you want to take make belief English to the military or anybody really, go ahead. The Pentagon is in Washington, and sadly lunatics aren't allowed in it. It will be very amusing watching you dummies struggle, very amusing. This country doesn't follow a simple majority, kid. It's The United States, States United together. Filling enough lunatics at on state doesn't change the nature of the country that has a Constitution when it's formed. So get back to crazy land in California and leave us sane people be. Otherwise, well there's nothing you can do otherwise. Go study some real English, some math as well.
1