Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1. You're kidding, right? This is pitiful.
    153
  2.  @mangolassi5273  They just publicly executed 5 opposition leader last week. Yeah, wrong perception. Nice try.
    55
  3. Hey, you moron, this "woman" never went through anything under Kim Jong-un, because she escaped a decade before he came into power. Use your brain, pathetic.
    11
  4. The opposite of that is the Constitution should be interpret however the Democrats want, no basis required. Go back to school, kid.
    9
  5.  @dullyvlog7267  No, we do know the whole story. In the free world, you're not allowed to execute people without a trial, and you're definitely not allowed to execute them publicly. When that soldier from Vietnam execute a combatant who just killed his friends entire family in Saigon, you got "outraged", what happened here?
    1
  6.  @ayanokoji715  Really? So those dead people who were executed are not dead, is that what you're saying?
    1
  7. No, it's about killing of a human being.
    1
  8. Maybe because she married her own brother. Shocking, isn't it.
    1
  9.  @fandomguy8025  Really, it doesn't change so why did he killed a bunch of officers who enact the tactics?
    1
  10.  @fandomguy8025  How about the fact that he also killed the officers rooting for the old leader policies? Have you ever considered the possibility that he wanted his own version of a somewhat civil North Korea and is trying to achieve it? By opening doors to international negotiations and meetings?
    1
  11. In 2016, he predicted that Trump won the popular vote. That couldn't be more wrong. The same was with Bush and Gore. The method he use makes no sense, because that 13 keys he make doesn't account for the severity of each cases, he developed it in 1980s, and till now, there has only been 10 elections. Most of it was a fluke, because out of those 10, he was wrong 2 times, and the other 8 times he went with the polls. The dumbest thing is to say that social unrest lies with the riots, and not with the people afraid of the riots. The subjective judgment of true or false is as cliche as it can get. If there's no methodology to the result you make, it's insane to think that the results are anything but a fluke.
    1