Comments by "Mark Armage" (@markarmage3776) on "Bloomberg Technology" channel.

  1.  @williamr9833  I don't think you really understand what intelligence actually means. Intelligence means the ability to learn something quickly, and of course a machine would have that ability, what PhD level people do is not just learning stuff, they're creating stuff for other people to learn, and that entire process is completely different from what the current AI is designed to do, reasoning upward from first principle is still very far fetched. Now you're going to need to dive deeper than an elementary linear assumption of progress, that's not how it works.
    13
  2.  @williamr9833  That's not how it works, homie. Please go study real science, do not confuse real research with wishful thinking, they're 2 completely different things. It's very easy to generate original stuff, especially if they're totally wrong.
    9
  3.  @williamr9833  It's very easy for everyone to create a bunch of things that are absolutely wrong, buddy. They actually need to create stuff that are correct, they're assisting with people who are creating correct stuff, but that's not the same thing. An advance machine is assisting people in manufacturing high technology products but that machine itself can't function without human input. Research hypothesis regarding social science is absolutely meaningless, especially if it's not even backed by a realistic methodology. You're confusing being able to do one tiny part of the whole venture, not even doing it well with being able to do the entire thing, those two are not same thing. Furthermore, that whole exponential argument you is based on nothing, you're guessing using wishful thinking, there's no clear formula or mathematical principle relating relationship between any specific characteristics of any algorithm with the computing hardware with the actual performance. Please go study real science, what's you're doing is making an observed guess on stuff you don't understand whatsoever, like a speculator in the stock market thinking how because a stock is going up, it will never go down. Please be more sophisticated, that's now how science works. Even the people who are researching the thing has no idea what it's going to do next or whether there will be a significant improvement or not, they just take the money given to them to do certain "experiments" and see what's going to hapeen, please distinguish between that, which is actual research, filled with uncertainties and specific details with your version of make belief. HUGE DIFFERENCE.
    1
  4.  @williamr9833  Go study real science, homie. Exactly what do you think AI research is? A bunch of people simply following a clear path of unlimited improvement presented by some God? That's not how it works.
    1
  5. Money going up because money goes in and money goes in because money going up. Infinite Money, to the MOON.
    1